Green Tax and Budget Reform as a Public Policy Promoting Green Growth – European Experiences Second Policy Forum of the Seoul Initiative Network on Green.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Green Growth, Green Economy and the SEEA 17 th London Group Meeting Stockholm, Sweden September 2011.
Advertisements

Funded by DG Research 6 th Framework Programme Summary of Policy Conclusions and Implications for the EU SDS Simon Dresner, Policy Studies.
Annual Growth Survey What is the AGS? A communication, which sets out the economic and social priorities for the EU in 2013 Launches the next European.
Energy Efficiency Strategy. THE ENERGY WHITE PAPER Energy White Paper sets out four key goals for energy policy to: Cut the UK’s carbon dioxide emission.
1 Antonio Soria Head of Unit Economics of Energy, Climate Change and Transport Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Joint Research Centre European.
ZEW Economic Effects of Co-ordinated and Non-co-ordinated Permit Schemes in an EU-Bubble An Applied General Equilibrium Analysis with the GEM-E3 Model.
1 Overview of carbon related taxation in OECD countries Presentation at the AFDC 2010 Biennial Forum on Fiscal and Financial Policies for Low-carbon Economic.
Environmental Tax Reforms in EU Member States – the current status and future development Stefan Speck envecon 2008: Applied Environmental Economics Conference.
Implementing the Environmental Fiscal Reform – Greening the State Budget in Lithuania Jurate Varneckiene Center for Environmental Policy, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Challenges Competition for resources (including raw materials) increases, scarcities => prices rise => impact on European economy 20th cent.: 12-fold.
Carbon Taxes EU. Germany: Environmental Tax Reform: Carbon German ETR: Five modest steps - first-time inclusion of electricity - road fuel tax increase.
Ort, Datum Autor Tax Relief for energy-intensive business in the framework of the ecological tax reform and the climate change levy Michael Kohlhaas Presented.
Ort, Datum Autor Economic and Environmental Effects of the EU Directive on Energy Tax Harmonization Katja Schumacher Presented at: International Energy.
The UK Climate Change Levy and Ecological Tax Reform Professor Stephen Smith Department of Economics University College London.
EEB’s Environmental Fiscal Reform Campaign Budapest European Environmental Bureau Stefan Scheuer, Policy Director.
Thursday, 16 July 2015 Macroeconomic Rebound Effect from the implementation of Energy Efficiency Policies at global level with E3MG Dr Athanasios Dagoumas.
Climate Change Policies Market failure and possible government failure.
The Ecological Tax Reform in Germany- an environmental policy innovation in international comparison Lutz Mez Environmental Policy Research Unit Free University.
Interrelations between Environmental Fiscal Reform and Emissions Trading schemes : Lessons from Hungary* Pendo Maro European Environmental Bureau (EEB)
1 Brendan Devlin Adviser, Markets and Infrastructure Directorate B, DG ENER European Commission.
EU Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Green Economy Initiative Derek Eaton UNEP UNCEEA, June 2010.
Davis Tax Committee Carbon tax submission May
Experiences and Problems with the climate change levy in the UK from a political point of view Sue Doughty MP Liberal Democrat Shadow Minister for the.
Multilateral and bilateral development financing mechanisms that integrate climate change and key issues in making these programmes more effective Phil.
Hilfs- linien Füllung weiß/ keine Füllung 07/09/ Stefan Speck Implications of EU Environmental Policy for the new EU Member States 7th European Forum.
Danish experiences and recommendations for the implementation of Green Budget reforms and for the use of Green taxes Søren Dyck-Madsen The Danish Ecological.
Electric Vehicles in New Zealand: from Passenger to Driver? Dr. Allan Miller, Scott Lemon.
OECD IMPLEMENTING ENVIRONMENTALLY RELATED TAXES Outstanding issues Jean-Philippe Barde and Nils Axel Braathen OECD, Environment Directorate.
European Environment Agency 1 Distributional and competitiveness implications of environmental tax reforms – revisited Stefan Speck and David Gee 11 th.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 16 Energy Efficiency Module 16: REGULATION AND POLICY OPTIONS TO ENCOURAGE ENERGY EFFICIENCY.
Environmental taxes for the EU? opportunities and risks Dr. Pendo Maro EU Policy Officer, Environmental Policy Integration European Environmental Bureau.
© OECD/IEA 2010 Energy Policies of the Czech Republic 2010 In-depth Review Energy Policies of the Czech Republic 2010 In-depth Review Prague, 7 October.
Federal Planning Bureau Economic analyses and forecasts 1 An assessment of Belgian NRP macroeconomic objectives in a medium term framework Francis Bossier.
Pricing policies for reducing CO 2 emissions from transport Huib van Essen Manager Transport CE Delft.
EU Climate Action EU – Central Asia Working Group on
1 Two points 1.From local to global consumer – the challenge of rising and unsustainable consumption 2.What can we do to reach sustainable consumption.
OECD Environmental Fiscal Reform in OECD Countries Presentation at the conference “The Consolidation of Governance and Entrepreneurship in the Czech Republic.
USE OF ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS FOR PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Veiko Tali, Deputy Secretary General, Ministry of Finance 11th of April 2006 Ministry.
1 Economics of The European 2020 Climate Goals Torben K. Mideksa Center for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslo April 18, 2009 The.
Anni Podimata MEP Member, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 8th Inter-Parliamentary Meeting on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Budapest,
DG Energy and Transport European Commission EU strategy and instruments for promoting for promoting renewable energy sources renewable energy sources by.
European Commission DG TREN / C: Conventional Energy Greenhouse gas mitigation and energy policy, a European perspective Presentation by Cristóbal.
European Environment Agency The ”Porter hypothesis” at 20 - reflections from Europe Prof Mikael Skou Andersen.
Commission’s Climate change and energy package: ETUC’s viewpoint S. Dupressoir, Adviser European Trade Union Confederation, Conference What energy policy.
Lagging Behind or Catching Up? —A Comparison of Chinese and European Environmentally Related Taxes Kris Bachus, University of Leuven, Belgium Jing Cao,
Impact of taxation policy reforms on social systems Péter Pataky MSZOSZ president 01. September 2008.
IFIEC Europe International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers 1 Promotion of Renewable Energies in the EU Member States Consequences on the Price.
January 20, 2006Rod Janssen EC Green Paper on Energy Efficiency Rod Janssen Energy Consultant.
Climate Action Meeting the EU’s Kyoto commitments & Avoiding a gap after 2012 Doha, 27 November 2012 Paolo CARIDI Policy Coordinator DG Climate Action.
Environmental Fiscal Reform (EFR) EFR and development  EFR is an economic instrument. By internalising environmental costs it helps  sustainable development.
20 CHAPTER Social Security PUBLIC SECTOR ECONOMICS: The Role of Government in the American Economy Randall Holcombe.
Dutch presidency agenda on ensuring industrial competitiveness Erik Janssen, Ministry of Economic Affairs The Netherlands.
1 Taxation, Innovation and the Environment Presentation of a new OECD publication at the 11 th Global Conference on Environmental Taxation Bangkok, Thailand.
Economic Challenges of Bulgaria Lecture at the Military Academy of Sofia, July 17, 2003 by Piritta Sorsa, IMF representative in Bulgaria.
UCL ENERGY INSTITUTE Climate Change Working Group Book Launch Professor Paul Ekins (UCL) Presents Carbon-Energy Taxation: Lessons From Europe With a response.
Climate Policy and Green Tax Reform in Denmark Some conclusions from the 2009 report to the Danish Council of Environmental Economics Presentation to the.
Competitiveness effects of environmental tax reform ( COMETR ) Paper read to the seminar: “ Environmental Tax Reform ” Institute of European Affairs M.
Environmental Fiscal Reform (EFR) Sylvain Chevassus European Environmental Bureau Two perceived fears about ETR: competitiveness and income distribution.
FAIR TAX - EUROPE’S WAY TO ECONOMIC GROWTH AND SOCIAL EQUALITY
Definitions and data under the SEEA framework
23nd Meeting of the London Group on Environmental Accounting
Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
SCP in the 7th Environmental Action Programme
Key elements of Finnish Climate change strategy
Determined to reach the target: the EC’s progress
Don Fullerton (Texas) Andrew Leicester (IFS) Stephen Smith (UCL & IFS)
Javier Doz EESC member Workers Group, Spain
Green fiscal policy: Reducing GHG emissions and mobilizing revenue
Presentation transcript:

Green Tax and Budget Reform as a Public Policy Promoting Green Growth – European Experiences Second Policy Forum of the Seoul Initiative Network on Green Growth “Application of Economic Instruments for Green Growth” Stefan Speck UNCC, Bangkok, Thailand September 5-7, 2007

Structure What is understood under ETR/EFR – the European perspective ETRs implemented in Europe – similarities and differences Environmental effectiveness Results of a study analysing the macroeconomic effects of ETRs ETR and employment Results and Lessons Learned

What is understood under ETR/EFR – the European perspective? Environmental tax reform (ETR) is basically a reform of the national tax system where there is a shift of the burden of taxes from conventional taxes, such as labour, to environmentally damaging activities, such as resource use or pollution. Environmental fiscal reform (EFR) is a broader principle, which focuses not only on shifting taxes and tax burdens, but also focuses on reforming subsidies. (European Environment Agency, 2005)

What is understood under ETR/EFR – the European perspective? The first ETR in the Nordic countries – Sweden (1991) and Denmark (1993) – Netherlands, Finland, Germany, UK plus Switzerland and Italy Delors' White Paper on Growth, Competitiveness and Employment – European Commission 1993: If the double challenge of unemployment and pollution is to be addressed, a swap can be envisaged between reducing labour costs through increased pollution charges. ‘Double Dividend Hypothesis’ – a host of academic literature on this subject ( ‘revenue-recycling dividend’)

ETR in EU member states National approaches of ETRs in EU member states differ widely in terms of: Environmental taxes: mainly energy taxes but different energy products and economic sectors are targeted Reduction in other taxes (recycling of revenues generated) :  taxes/charges levied on labour: income taxes, social security contributions, etc;  capital taxes;  granting of subsidies for energy efficiency improvement; Large differences in the approaches adopted mainly in recycling measures between countries!

ETR in EU member states Revenue neutrality – guiding principle in textbooks but not in reality Scope of ETR in terms of revenues shifted; ETRs can also be part of a major tax shifting programme  Sweden 1991 – major fiscal reform process and ETR was part of this reform process: total loss in revenues 71 bill SEK – environmental taxes generate around 18 bill SEK, i.e. partly offsetting the losses in the national budget  Sweden 2001 – 10-year programme of tax shifting programme of around 1.4% of GDP but was abolished after change in government  Germany – about 0.9% of GDP  UK – about 0.13% of GDP

ETR in EU member states Economic sectors affected: industry (large vs. small and medium sized enterprise), transport, households Special tax provisions (tax exemptions/ reductions, tax ceilings) for industry can be found in all countries – fear of possible losses of competitiveness of domestic industries Special earmarking of environmental revenues for specific investment subsidies (for example, Italy) Design of ETRs: rather different between countries reflecting the individual national policy objectives! ONE SIZE WON’T FIT ALL!

The German ETR – tax shift programme ETR – to be implemented during the period First objective: Environmental protection, in particular the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as a means of climate change mitigation. Second objective: reduction of labour costs as a means to increase employment. Instruments to be implemented: energy taxes (increase in existing ones plus new tax on electricity); and reduction of employers’ and employees’ statutory pension contributions  ‘double dividend’ hypothesis!

ETR/EFR – double dividend hypothesis ‘Double dividend’ hypothesis as summarised in a recent OECD publication: ‘… that the results of many models converge, to indicate that a carbon-energy tax combined with cuts in labour taxation, would yield some double employment-environment dividend. However, the employment effect is limited’ (OECD, 2001). ‘ …that an employment dividend is possible when the revenues raised when implementing economic instruments - such as taxes or auctioned tradable permits – are recycled in the form of a reduction in labour costs. The employment increase is likely to be greater when payroll tax reductions are concentrated on unskilled workers’ (OECD, 2004).

Environmental effectiveness of environmental / energy taxes  Germany – reduction in energy consumption ( ): petrol by 14%, slight increase in diesel 2%, and reduction in LFO 23%!  Sweden - CO2 emissions would have been 20% higher if energy/carbon taxes would have remained at 1990 level!  Denmark - landfill tax led to a reduction in the total amount of waste and an increase in the reuse of building and construction materials!  Netherlands – energy consumption 3.5% lower than it would have been had the tax on natural gas and electricity not existed!  Ireland – plastic bag levy: a reduction of around 90 per cent of the consumption of carrier bags after the levy was introduced!  UK – transport: congestion charge in London – reduction in traffic!

The COMETR project – some results Main findings of an EU funded project analysing ETRs in six EU member states (Denmark, Finland, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden and the UK): Results are based on a modelling framework (1990 – 2012)  ETRs lead to a reduction in fuel demand (around 4 percent)  Reduction in CO2 emissions – largest reduction in countries with highest energy/CO2 tax rates  Revenue recycling reduced the costs of ETR and it can be expected to result in an increase in GDP – macroeconomic impacts depend on how revenues are recycled  ETR caused employment to increase by as much as 0.5 percent

COMETR results – effects of ETR on GDP

COMETR result – effects of ETR on employment

ETR and employment A word of caution with regard to the employment effect! Germany: It is estimated that the effective impact of the ETR has been to reduce the pension contribution costs 8% - equivalent to a reduction in average labour costs of around 1.1%. UK: The full-year revenue from the climate change levy (part of the UK ETR) was expected to be around £1,000 million and this was used to fund a 0.3% point reduction in the employers’ national insurance contribution rate (from 12.2% to 11.9%). This represented a reduction in the average cost of labour of around 0.03%.

Summary and Lessons Learned Significance of the design of an ETR  Identification of national policy goals to be achieved with the introduction of an ETR – environmental objective and economic objective!  Which part of the society will be targeted (household/ industry)?  Which environmental taxes to be used?  Which recycling mechanism is used (reduction of other taxes) plus other recycling measures – taking into account the revenue neutrality principle !

Summary and Lessons Learned A further important aspect in the successful implementation of ETR is the role of public information by addressing the potential winners and outcomes of such programmes. Findings of PETRAS - an EU DG Research funded – project: significant impediment to ETR concept is the lack of plausibility in the eyes of general public. to establish trust that the government will honour its promises in terms of using the revenue to reduce labour taxes rather than revenues just disappearing into a black hole.

Summary and Lessons Learned Extensive use of environmental taxes has not shown itself to be detrimental to economies. Public information campaign to generate public support for the shift in taxation from ‘goods’ (labour) to environmental ‘bads’ (environmental pollution). ETRs are primarily focusing on energy taxes – but also other environmental taxes. Revenue generating potential of the latter is rather limited. Broadening the tax base – link to a more general fiscal reform; type of a more consumption-based taxing system.

Conclusion - Perspective/prospect of ETR in Europe More general tax reforms in which an ETR is a component can be found in Europe. The criteria of these reforms are to change the overall tax structure but not explicitly referring to ETR (Austria, Russia). Efforts to reduce subsidies that do not have defendable social, economic or environmental aspects, are expected to continue, and where successful result in budget savings and contribute to reduce the economic tax burden. ETR must address country-specific issues, i.e. the nature and extent of the ETR is relevant to the particular country economic, social and political circumstances.