Lifespan February 2009 1 Unanticipated Problems Adverse Events Deviations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

The HRPP FYI Process and the UPIRSO/SAE Review Sheet An IRB Infoshort February 2014.
Susan Burner Bankowski, M.S., J.D. Chair, OHSU IRB
Gerald Treiman, IRB Chair John Stillman, IRB Director Maureen Brinkman, IRB Administrator Ann Johnson, IRB Administrator.
Safety Reporting IN Clinical Trials
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING
What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one? Presented by Office of Human Research Protection.
Protocol Deviations : Identification, Responses and Solutions The Office of Human Subjects Research’s Compliance Monitoring Program Educational Seminars:
Unanticipated Problems Involving Risk to Subjects or Others (UPIRSO) Roy R. Estrada, PhD, PA-C, CIP Associate Director IRB UTHSCSA.
Reporting Unanticipated Problems Involving Risk to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events WFUHS Policy/Procedure Effective Date 6/1/07 Wendy Murray Monitoring.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Update: 21 CFR PART 312 FDA Safety Reporting Requirements for INDs
Capturing and Reporting Adverse Events in Clinical Research
IRB-Investigator/ Research Coordinator Mtg. “CUMC’s New Progressive Policy For Adverse Event Reporting” April 13, 2004 George Gasparis Andrew Wit, Ph.D.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
Human Research Protection Program Training: Post-Approval Event Reporting March 26, 2008 Lisa Voss, MPH, CIP Assistant Director, QIU Human Research Protection.
Renewing An Approved Protocol: IRB Review Process
Vanderbilt Human Research Protections Program
Unlocking the Mystery of General Information Reporting Research Compliance Administration Training Presentation Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Presenter:Heather.
Defining Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRSO)
Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING Elizabeth Dayag IRB Administrator Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.
Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
Using the short form and reporting adverse events Erin Coons, Senior IRB Specialist, COMIRB 1.
Reporting Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events: A Change in Policy Mary A. Banks RN, BS, BSN Director, BUMC IRB Wednesday, November 14, 2007.
Unanticipated Problems Potentially Involving Risks to Subjects or Others Research Protections Office Serving UVM and FAHC Updated April 2012.
New Adverse Event Reporting Policy Effective September 1, 2007.
Office of Research Oversight ORO Reporting Adverse Events in Research to ORO Paula Squire Waterman, MS, CIP Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
EMORY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD VERSION Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations and Non-Compliance.
Common Audit Findings UTHSC Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Adverse Event/Unanticipated Problems Policy and Procedures November 2007.
PATRICIA KERBY, MPA HUMAN SUBJECTIONS PROTECTION COMPLIANCE OFFICER OFFICE OF RESEARCH COMPLIANCE What are the FDA’s expectations in 2010?
Office of Research Oversight 1 VHA Handbook Research Compliance Reporting Requirements Revised May 21, 2010 (Presentation prepared for HRPP 101,
THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH Data and Safety Monitoring Monitoring.
Understanding Unanticipated Problems (UPs) Elizabeth Ness, RN, MS Director, Staff Development Office of the Clinical Director Center for Cancer Research,
EAE Training EAE Reporting and Assessment Overview DAIDS Regional Training Event, Regulatory Compliance Center Kampala, Uganda, September 2009 DAIDS Regional.
1 Unanticipated problems Melody Lin, Ph.D. December,
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Houston, We have a Problem: When and How to Report Problems to the IRB.
Non-compliance with Human Subjects Research Regulations J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP November 2014 Continuing Education for IRB Members.
Stanley Estime, MSCI QA/QI Specialist January 17, 2013 Reportable New Information.
Lifespan 1 Submission Process to the IRB part 2 Revisions to Protocol.
Informed Consent Presented by Marian Serge, RN. Goals Informed consent process and form Title 38 CFR , Common Rule required elements and additional.
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY IRB ADAPTED FROM DHHS GUIDANCE ON UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS Unanticipated Problems.
Main Line Hospitals Institutional Review Board Unanticipated Problems Anne Marie Hobson, BSN, JD, ORA Director Theresa Greaves, ORA Manager.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Bussara Sukpanichnant, Human Subject Protection Office, USAMD-AFRIMS Unanticipated Problems 15 th FERCAP International Conference 24 Nov 15 Nagasaki, Japan.
Instructions for New IRB Continuing Review (Progress) Report
Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRSO)
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Dartmouth Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Data Safety Monitoring and Reporting requirements Brown Bag Series: Noon / First Tuesday of the Month.
Reportable Events Emory IRB 9/11/2014.
IRB reporting updates.
What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one?
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
Adverse Event Reporting: Trials and Tribulations
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
UK Legal Requirement for Notification of Serious Breaches of Good Clinical Practice or The Trial Protocol John Poland, PhD Senior Director, Regulatory.
Navigating Non-Compliance
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING
Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRSO)
Ramy Abdelrahman, MD Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health (DPMH)
Event Reporting in Human Subjects Research
Policy on Prompt Reporting
Presentation transcript:

Lifespan February Unanticipated Problems Adverse Events Deviations

Lifespan February Outline Regulations- OHRP and FDA Reporting Criteria Examples of Reportable Events Timelines for Reporting IRB Review of Reportable Events

Lifespan February OHRP Regulations and Guidance HHS regulations 45 CFR part 46. OHRP considers unanticipated problems, in general, to include any incident, experience, or outcome that meets all of the following criteria: unexpected (in terms of nature, severity, or frequency in relation to the research procedures that are described in the IRB-approved research protocol and informed consent document and the characteristics of the subject population being studied; related or possibly related to participation in the research ( possibly related means there is a reasonable possibility that the incident, experience, or outcome may have been caused by the procedures involved in the research); and suggests that the research places subjects or others at a greater risk of harm (including physical, psychological, economic, or social harm) than was previously known or recognized)

Lifespan February FDA Regulations and Guidance FDA’s recent guidance for Reporting AEs to IRBs in clinical trials of drugs and biological products: “…AE’s observed during the conduct of a study should be considered an unanticipated problem involving risk to human subjects, and reported to the IRB, only if it were unexpected, serious, and would have implications for the conduct of the study (e.g., requiring a significant and usually safety-related, change in the protocol such as revising inclusion/exclusion criteria or including a new monitoring requirement, informed consent, or investigator’s brochure). An individual AE occurrence ordinarily does not meet these criteria because, as an isolated event, its implications for the study cannot be understood.”

Lifespan February FDA Regulations and Guidance FDA’s recent guidance for Reporting AEs to IRBs in clinical trials of devices “The investigational device exemption (IDE) regulations define an unanticipated adverse device effect (UADE) as “any serious adverse effect on health or safety or any life-threatening problem or death caused by, or associated with, a device, if that effect, problem, or death was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in the investigational plan or application…, or any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device that relates to the rights safety, or welfare of subjects” UADEs must be reported by the clinical investigator to the sponsor and the reviewing IRB.”

Lifespan February FDA Regulations and Guidance For device studies investigators are required to submit a report of a UADE to the sponsor and the reviewing IRB as soon as possible, but in no event later than 10 working days after the investigator first learns of the event. Sponsors must immediately conduct an evaluation of a UADE and must report the results of the evaluation to FDA and all reviewing IRBs and participating investigators within 10 working days after the sponsor first receives notice of the effect

Lifespan February FDA and OHRP Both the FDA and OHRP agree that adverse event reports for an isolated incident are meaningless to the IRB unless accompanied by an evaluation as to whether there has been an increase in risk which requires changes in protocol documents, the monitoring process or a corrective action.

Lifespan February What must I report to the IRB? Unanticipated problems which are serious, related to the study and involve increased risk to subjects or others must be reported to the IRB. Most Adverse Events are not reportable as unanticipated problems

Lifespan February What must I report to the IRB? Unanticipated problems which suggest that the research places subjects or others at a greater risk of harm (including physical, psychological, economic, or social harm) than was previously known or recognized.  No events like this have occurred that you’re aware of;  None of the research documents, ICD, protocol, IB, etc., lists this type of event as a probability or possibility  The event is going to require changes to one of the research documents or you will be putting some corrective action in place to monitor the study because of this event, e.g., a change to the consent process, a change in your DSMP, etc.

Lifespan February What is an unanticipated AE? Any Adverse Experience, which is not described (including specificity, severity and frequency) in the current Investigator Brochure (IB), the risk information in the general investigational plan, ICD, or any documents in the current application. For example, under this definition,  Hepatic necrosis would be unexpected (by virtue of greater severity) if the investigator brochure only referred to elevated hepatic enzymes or hepatitis.  cerebral thromboembolism and cerebral vasculitis would be unexpected (by virtue of greater specificity) if the investigator brochure only listed cerebral vascular accidents.

Lifespan February What does RELATED to the research study mean? An event is “possibly related,” if there is a reasonable possibility that the event is more likely than not to have been caused by the research article or procedure. In general, adverse events that are determined to be at least partially caused by the research article or procedure would be considered related to participation in the research. This can sometimes be difficult to assess. Use the examples in the P&P Manual to assist you. If you have questions or concerns call the IRB office.

Lifespan February What Does Serious Mean? The FDA defines serious as: Death, reportable if the patient was on active treatment and the patient's death is suspected as being a direct outcome of the adverse event. Life-Threatening, the patient was at risk of dying at the time of the adverse event or the use or continued use of the product would result in the patient's death.  Examples: Pacemaker failure; gastrointestinal hemorrhage; bone marrow suppression; infusion pump failure which permits uncontrolled free flow resulting in excessive drug dosing. Hospitalization (initial or prolonged)  Examples: Anaphylaxis; pseudo membranous colitis; or bleeding causing or prolonging hospitalization.

Lifespan February What does Serious Mean? Disability, the AE resulted in a significant, persistent, or permanent change, impairment, damage or disruption in the patient's body function/structure, physical activities or quality of life.  Examples: Cerebrovascular accident due to drug-induced hypercoagulability; toxicity; peripheral neuropathy. Congenital Anomaly, there are suspicions that exposure to the research product prior to conception or during pregnancy resulted in an adverse outcome in the child.  Examples: Vaginal cancer in female offspring from diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy; malformation in the offspring caused by thalidomide. Requires Intervention to Prevent Permanent Impairment or Damage,  Examples: Acetaminophen overdose-induced hepatotoxicity requiring treatment to prevent permanent damage; burns from radiation equipment requiring drug therapy; breakage of a screw requiring intervention to prevent malunion.

Lifespan February What is an Unanticipated Problem that is not an AE? Unanticipated Problems related to the study and involving risk to subjects or others must be reported to the IRB Events that were unexpected in nature, related to participation in the research, and resulted in new circumstances that increased the risk of harm to subjects or others must be reported to the IRB. (e.g., lost or stolen laptop/thumbdrive/documents with PHI; or letter containing PHI forwarded to wrong recipient) These events may not have actually caused harm but increased the risk for breach of confidentiality. Another type of example could be wrong dose of drug given to subject that may not have caused actual harm but was unexpected and increased the risk of harm to the participants.

Lifespan February REPORTING AEs TO THE IRB OS/External AEs- only reportable to the IRB if the sponsor indicates that significant and safety related changes to the study documents or monitoring process are required. Local AEs- PIs must report local AEs to the Lifespan IRB which meet the reporting requirements since those have not yet undergone an evaluation in their relevance and significance to the study. ( please refer back to slide 2 and Section 8 in the P&P Manual for reporting requirements )

Lifespan February A subject with seizures enrolls in a randomized, phase 3 clinical trial comparing a new investigational anti-seizure agent to a standard, FDA-approved anti-seizure medication. The subject is randomized to the group receiving the investigational agent. One month after enrollment, the subject is hospitalized with severe fatigue and on further evaluation is noted to have severe anemia (hematocrit decreased from 45% pre-randomization to 20%). Further hematologic evaluation suggests an immune-mediated hemolytic anemia. The known risk profile of the investigational agent does not include anemia, and the IRB-approved protocol and informed consent document for the study do not identify anemia as a risk of the research. The investigators determine that the hemolytic anemia is possibly due to the investigational agent. This is an example of an unanticipated problem that must be reported because the hematologic toxicity was (a) unexpected in nature; (b) possibly related to participation in the research; and (c) serious REPORTABLE AE-REPORT TO IRB

Lifespan February A behavioral researcher conducts a study in college students that involves completion of a detailed survey asking questions about early childhood experiences. The research was judged to involve no more than minimal risk and was approved by the IRB chairperson under an expedited review procedure. During the completion of the survey, one student subject has a transient psychological reaction manifested by intense sadness and depressed mood that resolved without intervention after a few hours. The protocol and informed consent document for the research did not describe any risk of such negative psychological reactions. Upon further evaluation, the investigator determines that the subject’s negative psychological reaction resulted from certain survey questions that triggered repressed memories of physical abuse as a child. The investigator had not expected that such reactions would be triggered by the survey questions. This is an example of an unanticipated problem that must be reported in the context of social and behavioral research because, although not serious, the adverse event was (a) unexpected; (b) related to participation in the research; and (c) suggested that the research places subjects at a greater risk of psychological harm than was previously known or recognized REPORTABLE AE – REPORT TO IRB

Lifespan February How to Decide Whether or not You Should Report an Event to the IRB If an event meets the reporting criteria and warrants consideration of substantive changes in the research protocol or informed consent process/document or other corrective actions such as a change in the consent process or DSMP, in order to protect the safety, welfare, or rights of subjects, then the event must be reported to the IRB. Additional information is included in slide 2 and Section 8 of the P&P Manual

Lifespan February The principal investigator must promptly report unanticipated problems to the IRB that meet the reporting criteria. Examples: An unanticipated event related to the research that exposes individual research participants or others to GREATER risk of physical or psychological harm than was previously known. (Others can include investigators, research assistants, students, the public, etc.). Interim DSMB or Monitoring reports indicating non- compliance or other issues that could increase risk to subjects or others Publications or new information that indicate an increase or change in the risk/benefit ratio Warnings from the FDA or changes in FDA labeling or withdrawal of a marketed drug/device/biologic used in the study

Lifespan February The principal investigator must promptly report unanticipated problems to the IRB that meet the reporting criteria. Suspension of the study or investigator by the sponsor or regulatory agency Certain protocol deviations (see below) Complaints from subjects that indicate a previously unrecognized risk related to the study Incarceration of a participant in a protocol not approved to enroll prisoners who remains actively involved in the research protocol. Breach of Confidentiality (e.g. loss of a laptop containing identifiable research data; transmittal of unencrypted study data) Any other problems/events that impact the risk/benefit ratio of the study

Lifespan February Deviations may be Unanticipated Problems Investigators must promptly report protocol deviations to the Lifespan IRB if the deviation was a major deviation from the protocol that adversely affected the rights and welfare of the subjects, the safety of the subjects, the integrity of the study data and/or the subject’s willingness or ability to continue study participation. Major protocol deviations are: Intentional deviations to eliminate an immediate hazard Enrollment deviations Consent deviations (signing an outdated informed consent that has had revisions since that version was approved; not signing an informed consent). Procedural deviations that may have resulted in an increase risk to the subjects or others (dosing error; missed evaluation being used to assess subject safety or eligibility). Protocol deviation (accidental or unintentional change to the IRB approved protocol without prior IRB approval) that harmed participants or others or that indicates participants or others may be at increased risk of harm.

Lifespan February Local (Internal) Unanticipated problems Unanticipated problems which meet the reporting criteria must be reported to the IRB. Regardless of whether or not the internal adverse event is reportable to the IRB: the investigator must ensure that the adverse event is reported to the sponsor as per the agreement with the sponsor; And, the FDA if applicable (e.g., if you are the holder of the IND or IDE), promptly, within 10 working days of the date the investigator became aware of the event. If the investigator determines that an adverse event is not an unanticipated problem, BUT the monitoring entity subsequently determines that the adverse event does in fact represent an unanticipated problem (e.g., due to an unexpectedly higher frequency of the event, the monitoring entity should report this determination to the investigator and the investigator should promptly report this to the IRB.

Lifespan February What about External AEs? Other Site (OS or External) AEs which meet the reportable criteria and require a significant change to the protocol, (such as revising the Inclusion/Exclusion criteria, monitoring procedures, change in the informed consent or investigator brochure) must be reported to the IRB and must be accompanied by: (1) a clear description of why the AE or series of AE was determined to be an unanticipated problem; and (2) a description of any proposed protocol changes or other corrective actions to be taken by the investigators in response to the unanticipated problem. If all of these criteria are met the report should be forwarded to the IRB within 10 working days of the date the investigator became aware of the event.

Lifespan February How Soon Do I Have To Report the Problem/AE? Only Reportable Unanticipated Problems or Adverse Events have a timeline. Reportable events must be reported to the IRB within 10 working days from the time you became aware of the event.

Lifespan February REPORTING LOCAL FATALITIES ALL Local fatalities, occurring with subjects on Active Treatment whether related or unrelated, must be reported to the IRB within 24 hours of the investigator becoming aware of the event. This 24 hour notification may be via phone, fax, or report form and should be followed by a written report as soon as possible. Any (related) local fatality must be reported to the sponsor and the FDA, if applicable.

Lifespan February Sponsored Required but Otherwise not Reportable If an adverse event does not meet the reportable criteria but the sponsor requires they be reported to the IRB, these reports may be submitted on the “Sponsor Required but Otherwise Not Reportable Event Form (AE3)” Sponsored Required (AE3) reports will be acknowledged as being received by the IRB office. (The report form will be stamp dated received). An acknowledged copy of the report form only (not attachments) will be sent back to the investigator. These reports may be submitted in report form accompanied by a Sponsor Required Form page completed as indicated on the form.

Lifespan February IRB REVIEW OF REPORTABLE EVENTS A report of an unanticipated problem involving risks to participants or others will be immediately forwarded by the research review committee (IRB) Office staff to the IRB Chair or designee if the IRB Office staff believes that immediate intervention may be required to protect participants or others from serious harm. Upon receipt of a report of a possible unanticipated problem from someone other than the investigator or study staff, the IRB manager will notify the PI on the study when appropriate

Lifespan February IRB REVIEW OF REPORTABLE EVENTS Local Reports: If the reviewer considers that either  (1) the problem was foreseen OR  (2) no participants or others were harmed AND participants or others are not at increased risk of harm (e.g. the PI did not indicate changes were to be made to the protocol, ICD, IB, etc.), the reviewer signs the report form and does not check the box requesting further information or review by the full board. The reviewer returns the signed report to the Review Committee office and a copy of the form is forwarded to the investigator. The original signed form is filed in the study file in the Review Committee office.

Lifespan February IRB REVIEW OF REPORTABLE EVENTS If the unanticipated problem was deemed by the chair or designee to put subjects at risk based on the information received from the investigator, the IRB Chair or designee may suspend research to ensure protection of the rights and welfare of participants. Suspension directives made by the IRB Chair or designee must be reported to a meeting of the convened IRB. All reported unanticipated problems where subjects or others were placed at a greater risk than was previously known or recognized will be reviewed at a convened IRB meeting.

Lifespan February IRB REVIEW OF REPORTABLE EVENTS If the IRB finds that the event is an unanticipated problem involving risks to participants or others, according to the definition in the policy, the IRB may recommend any of the following actions: Require modifications to the protocol Reconsider approval and/or revise the continuing review timetable Modify the consent process and/or consent form document Provide additional information to current and/or past participants (e.g. whenever the information may relate to the participant’s willingness to continue participation) Requirement that current participants re-consent to participation Require additional training of the investigator and/or study staff Monitor the research and/or consent process Referral to other organizational entities (e.g., legal counsel, risk management, institutional official) Suspend or Terminate the research Suspend Enrollment (recruitment) in the Research until changes are made to the protocol, consent form or any other documents as applicable Other actions (corrective actions)

Lifespan February The Importance of a Good Data Safety Monitoring (DSM) Plan Plans for Data and Subject Safety Monitoring describe how the researchers will monitor and review unanticipated problems, including AEs. The adequacy of the DSM plan is included in the IRBs assessment of risk to subjects during initial and continuing review. DSM plans should describe the procedures for safety monitoring, reporting of adverse events and/or unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others, descriptions of interim safety reviews and the procedures planned for transmitting the results to the IRB. This description should include information regarding an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), if one exists, or an explanation why an independent data safety monitor is not necessary. See Section 3.75 of the P&P Manual. When the convened IRB reviews a DSM plan and requests modifications to the plan as presented the investigator must comply with the IRBs requests and present the revised plan to the NEXT convened IRB for review and approval. IN OTHER WORDS A STUDY MAY BE DEFERRED BECAUSE THE DSMP WAS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO THE IRB.

Lifespan February ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/GUIDANCE Additional guidance is located in Section 8 of the HRPP Manual, policiesandmanual/lifespanp&pmanual.pdf policiesandmanual/lifespanp&pmanual.pdf FDA’s guidance document pdf pdf OHRP’s guidance document #Q1 #Q1

Lifespan February Contacts for IRB Questions If you have any questions you can contact: Peg McGill, Director ORA Patricia Houser, IRB Manager Jacqui Poore, Sr. Coordinator Adrienne McParlin, TMH IRB Coordinator, Dawn Roux, RIH IRB 1 Coordinator, Alisa Luciano, RIH IRB Panel 2 Coordinator,