ABET ACCRIDITATION (IS Program) STATUS AND TASKS AHEAD ACADEMIC YEAR 2015 - 16 By Dr. Abdul Azeem Team Lead ABET (IS) 15 th September 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment: A Mirror with 2 Faces Accountability Reflective Practice.
Advertisements

THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
ABET-ASAC Accreditation Workshop ABET Criteria and Outcomes Assessment
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
ABET Accreditation for Surveying/Geomatics Programs in the US.
© Copyright CSAB 2013 Future Directions for the Computing Accreditation Criteria Report from CAC and CSAB Joint Criteria Committee Gayle Yaverbaum Barbara.
Dr. Barbara M. Wheeling Associate Professor College of Business Director of Accreditation and Assessment MSUB Coordinator of Institutional Assessment.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
College Strategic Plan by
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
University of Peshawar 13 th QEC Meeting August 18-19,2009, Karachi.
JIC ABET ACCREDITATION PROJECT
وحدة الاعتماد الأكاديمي 8/16/2015. ACCREDITATION Dr. ABD EL-SLAM HEMAID BADR A.A.U. DIRECTOR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING JAZAN UNIVERSITY 8/16/2015.
QEC initiates SA through the dean one semester prior to the assessment Department forms the PT that will be responsible for preparing SAR QEC reviews.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL, THE MOST BENEFICENT.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL, THE MOST BENEFICENT.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday March 28,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.2 Guidelines on: IMapping of PEOs to Mission Statement IIMapping of SOs to PEOs.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
SELF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1.Program Mission Objectives and Outcomes 2.Curriculum Design and Organization 3.Laboratories and Computing Facilities 4.Student.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday Sep 26,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.7 How to write the Self-Study Report ? Presented by: JIC ABET COMMITTEE.
Draft TIP for E-rate. What is E-rate? The E-rate provides discounts to assist schools and libraries in the United States to obtain affordable telecommunications.
Some examples of quality standards and their use for self assessment and planning CINDA Workshop for TEIs Ramallah, May 2007.
Standard Five - Library and Information Resources Committee Members Chris Brown, College of Education, Co-Chair Scott Smith, University Libraries, Co-Chair.
Members of the NSAC Placement Testing Specialist Transfer Credit Evaluation Team AP credits Dual credits Academic Advisors First year of study at Benedictine.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
Total Cost of Ownership for Technology Resources at Mission College Description and Recommendations.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
1 TERMS OF REFERENCE Assoc.Prof.Dr. Osman YILMAZ April 20, 2004 University Curriculum Committee.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
ABET ACCRIDITATION STATUS AND TASKS AHEAD By Dr. Abdul Azeem.
ABET ACCREDITATION – BS [CS] PROGRAM STATUS REPORT & FUTURE PLANS AY 2015 – 2016 (FIRST SEMESTER) QUALITY ASSURANCE UNIT COLLEGE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE &
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
1 Michigan State University Preparation for EC 2000 Thomas F. Wolff, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies College of Engineering Michigan.
Organizational Process The activities conducted by an educational institution or school is called organizational process Which consist of series of steps.
Assessing the Operations at Your Institution: Purposes + Planning + Processes = Performance Arizona Assessment Conference Yavapai College, Prescott, Arizona.
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
Program Curriculum, T-L and Other Processes; Highly Doable and Highly Useful N J Rao and K Rajanikanth
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Administration, Finances, and Resources
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Accreditation of study program at the Faculty of Information Technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Maine is IT! at SMCC Grant Playbook for
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Presentation transcript:

ABET ACCRIDITATION (IS Program) STATUS AND TASKS AHEAD ACADEMIC YEAR By Dr. Abdul Azeem Team Lead ABET (IS) 15 th September 2015

ABET IS TEAM MEMBERS S. No. Name GroupsCriteria/Tasks 1. Mr. Gayasudeen Hashmi Team – A PEO and SO Finalization, Develop Assessment and Evaluation Procedures of SO. Mapping of PEO/SO, Development of Indicators 2. Mr. Agha Salman Haider Team – A 3. Mr. Haseeb ur Rahman Team – B Facilities Curriculum. Table Mr. QamruddinTeam – B 5. Mr. Asif Aftab Team – C Students and Faculty Policies and Procedures Collection, Table 6.1, 6.2, Table D-1, D-2 6. Mr. Shiraz Maniyar Team – C 7. Mr. Nadim Rana Team – D Development and coordination of Course Descriptions and Rubrics 8.Dr. WaliullahTeam - D 9.Mr. Mohammed Sarfaraz Departmental Information collation and with regards to ABET criteria

WHAT ABET WANTS FROM US

WHAT ABET LOOK S IN PROGRAM ? ABET PRIMARILY LOOKS FOR THE FOLLOWING  Procedures  Student intake, Faculty Intake and Retention, Effective Teaching, Assessment, Evaluation and Support  Curriculum  Satisfying ABET program criteria, PEOs and Stu. Outcomes  Courses  Syllabi meeting requirements of Performance Indices for Student Outcomes  People  Program Managers, Faculty, Students and Support Staff  Facilities.  Offices, Classes, Labs, Library, Student Activity centers

Primary Activities to Achieve ABET. OUTER LOOP- PEOs INNER LOOP STUDENT OUTCOMES

I. Academic  (2) Program Educational Objectives (PEOs approved by Constituents)  (3) Student Outcomes (Attain Student Characteristics)  (5) Curriculum (Alignment, Pre-req. Structure, Support SO( Course mapping), Syllabus, Coop. Training)  (4) Continuous Improvement (Improvements in SO achievement) II. Administrative (To Support Academic Criteria Compliance)  (1) Students - (Admit, Advise, Evaluate and Monitor)  (6) Faculty - (Qualification, Size, Workload, Authority, Responsibility.)  (7) Facilities - (Class rooms, Labs, Offices, Library, Activity Rooms.)  (8) Institutional Support - (Leadership, Faculty Devlopment, Evaluation Award/Reward, Recruitment, Retention, Leaves)  (4) Continuous Improvement - (Improvements in Administrative Criteria Compliance) To Achieve Required Quality ABET Demands us to Comply With Following Criteria

Activities Last Academic Year Pre-SSR prepared and evaluated with Consultant. Received training and Clarifications from consultant. Program Edu. Objectives revised as per consultant’s advise. Students Outcomes finalized as per consultants advised (earlier we have broken down SOs but as per advise we retained original) Assessment Strategy drafted. Course descriptions finalized as per ABET standards with CLOs and SO mapping PEO vs SO and SO vs Courses mapped. Rubric brain storming undertaken for IS faculty and could develop few course rubrics. Curriculum Aligned with ABET and mapped with SO Pre-SSR Version – 2 ground work mostly completed.

Input and approval from constituencies on our IS program PEO’s, SO’s and Curriculum. Improvements in ABET based course descriptions for the all courses with measurable Learning Outcomes. Development of Rubrics for All courses to test the Students outcomes and PEOs. Exit Surveys from outgoing students and Alumni. One cycle of SO assessment and evaluation. Policies and procedures for Administrative criterion. Activities for Academic Year

WHERE ARE WE NOW ? CRITERIA WISE STATUS REPORT

CRITERION 1. STUDENTS – (Admit, Advise, Evaluate and Monitor) Sub CriteriaDescription/ Requirement Task CompletedTask PendingStatus Student Admissions Summarize the requirements and process for accepting new students into the program. 1 General Admission requirement 2.University Admission requirement 3.Registration Procedure 4.Withdrawal Procedure 1.Number of Admission for Last Four Years. Partially Completed Evaluating Student Performance Summarize the process by which student performance is evaluated and student progress is monitored 1. JU and CCSIS General rules for Evaluating Student Performance 2. Attendance Rules in CCSIS Completed / To be Reviewed Transfer Students and Transfer Courses Summarize the requirements and process for accepting transfer students and transfer credit. 1.Transfer student and Transfer Courses 1.Number of student transfer from other university. 2.Number of student Transfer within the University/ College/Program. To be taken up Advising and Career Guidance Summarize the process for advising and providing career guidance to students. 1.Academic Advising 2.IS Advising Process 3. Student Advising at College Level 4. Student Advising at Department Level. To be Collected Work in Lieu of Courses Summarize the requirements and process for awarding credit for work in lieu of courses To be Taken up Graduation Requirement s Summarize the graduation requirements for the program and the process for ensuring and documenting that each graduate completes all graduation requirements for the program. 1. Graduation Requirement. Completed / To be Reviewed

CRITERION 2. PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES Sub CriteriaDescription/ Requirement Task CompletedTask Pending Status Mission Statement Provide the institutional mission statement 1.Mission statement development 2.Review and approval of mission statement form authority 3.Alignment of mission statement with college and university mission Completed / To be Reviewed Program Educational Objectives List the program educational objectives and state where these can be found by the general public. 1.Development of PEOs 2.Review and approval of PEOs form authority 3.Online publishing of PEOs for public display Completed / To be Reviewed and Published Consistency of the Program Educational Objectives with the Mission of the Institution Describe how the program educational objectives are consistent with the mission of the institution. 1.Mapping of PEOs with College of Computer Science Mission 2.Mapping of PEOs with Information Systems Mission Completed / To be Reviewed Program Constituencies List the program constituencies. Describe how the program educational objectives meet the needs of these constituencies. 1.Listing of program constituencies 2.Program Meets needs of constituesncies To be Taken up Process for Review of the Program Educational Objectives Describe the process that periodically reviews the program educational objectives including how the program’s various constituencies are involved in this process. 1. Development of SOP for PEOs review

CRITERION 3. STUDENT OUTCOMES Sub CriteriaDescription/ RequirementTask CompletedStatus Student Outcomes List the student outcomes for the program and indicate where the student outcomes are documented. List of Student OutcomesCompleted Relationship of Student Outcomes to Program Educational Objectives Describe how the student outcomes prepare graduates to attain the program educational objectives. 1.Relationship of Student Outcome with Program Educational Objectives. 2.Mapping of SO’s with Curriculum Courses. 3.Mapping of SO’s with CLO’s. Completed Process for the Establishment and Revision of the Student Outcomes Describe the process used for reviewing and revising student outcomes. Steps to review the revision of Student Outcomes. Completed Enabled Student Characteristics show how they enable students to attain by the time of graduation, characteristics (a) through (i) as listed in Criterion 3 To be developed from the assessments obtained from the Rubrics of courses Not Completed

CRITERION 4. CONTINEOUS IMPROVEMENT Sub CriteriaDescription/ Requirement Task Comple ted Task Pending Status Student Outcomes A. Description of the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each student outcome is based B. Frequency with which these assessment processes. C. Expected level of attainment of SO D. Summaries of the results of the evaluation process and SO attainment. E. Documentation of results. 1.Rubric development (as a sample basis 5 rubrics have been dev.) 2. Semester wise data collection 3.Development of procedures for SO attainment To be Taken Up Continuous Improvement A. How the results of evaluation processes for the student outcomes used for Program continuous improvement. 1. Development of procedures for evaluation To be Taken Up Additional Information Minutes from meetings where the assessment results were evaluated and where recommendations for action were made MoM on Strategy changes and evaluation To be Taken Up

Sub CriteriaDescription/ RequirementTask CompletedTask PendingStatus Table 5-1 Describes the plan of study for students in this program Completed during the previous semester To be updated for the current semester Completed /Updated Curriculum Alignment with PEOs Describe how the curriculum aligns with the program educational objectives ma Mapping of curriculum with PEOs NILCompleted Curriculum Support for SO Attainment Describe how the curriculum and its associated prerequisite structure support the attainment of the student outcomes Mapping of curriculum with SOs NILCompleted Program Prerequisite Structure Attach a flowchart or worksheet that illustrates the prerequisite structure of the program’s required courses. Course roadmap and its flowchart illustrating required and pre requisites linkage NILCompleted Hour and Depth wise requirement of Program areas Describe how your program meets the specific requirements for this program area in terms of hours and depth of study. Mapping of curriculum with ABET knowledge areas and illustrate how the current curriculum and credit hour fulfill the ABET requirements NILCompleted Cooperative Education If your program allows cooperative education describe the academic component of this experience and how it is evaluated by the faculty NIL There is no Cooperative Education being conducted till last academic year. Not completed Course Syllabi Appendix A, include a syllabus for each course used to satisfy ABET requirements Course description has been Developed as per the ABET format with CLOs and SO Mapping. New Syllabi from new curriculum has to be updated Completed Teaching Material Describe the materials (course syllabi, textbooks, sample student work, etc.),that will be available for review. Collected as per the curriculum followed during the last academic year To be collected as per the revised curriculum from this academic year Not Completed CRITERION 5. CURRICULUM

CRITERION 6. FACULTY Sub Criteria Description/ RequirementStatus Faculty QualificationsTable 6.1Partially Completed Faculty Adequacy How they are adequate to cover all the curricular areas of the program To be Taken Up Faculty ResumeInclude faculty resumes as in Appendix B.Partially Completed Faculty Workload Table 6-2, Faculty Workload Summary and describe this information in terms of workload expectations or requirements Partially Completed Faculty Size How the faculty in the program are of sufficient number to maintain continuity, stability, oversight, student interaction, and advising for the program To be Taken Up Professional Development Provide detailed descriptions of professional development activities for each faculty member. To be Taken Up/ Management Support Required Authority and Responsibility of Faculty Role played by the faculty with respect to course creation, modification, and evaluation, Role in the definition and revision of PEO and SO and their attainment. Administrative roles of HOD, Dean. To be taken up.

CRITERION 7. FACILITIES Sub CriteriaDescription/ RequirementTask CompletedTask PendingStatus Offices, Classrooms Summarize each of the program’s facilities in terms of their ability to support the attainment of SO 1. Details of class and Offices (of old staff members) updated 1.Offices Locations of newly joined Faculty members to be updated Partially Completed. LaboratoriesHow they are adequate to cover all the curricular areas of the program. Appendix-C containing a listing of the major pieces of equipment used by the program All the laboratories details along with the availability of software updated. Completed Computing Resources Describe computing resources (workstations, servers, storage, networks including software) other than labs which are used by the students in the program. Accessibility of university-wide computing resources available to all students and their adequacy. All the details regarding workstations is updated. Details of Servers and Networks to be taken up Partially Completed GuidanceDescribe how students in the program are provided appropriate guidance regarding the use of resources in college/university To be Taken Up Maintenance & Upgrading of Facilities Describe the policies and procedures for maintaining and upgrading the tools, equipment, computing resources, and laboratories To be Taken Up/ Library Services A. Evaluate the capability of the library to serve the program, B. Adequacy of Technical collection C. Adequacy of Process for faculty to request new books. Details of the books in the college library is updated Assessment /evaluation to be done SOP for request of new books to be developed Partially Completed, To be taken up

Sub CriteriaDescription/ RequirementStatus Leadership Describe the leadership of the program and discuss its adequacy. How the leadership is involved in decisions that affect the program. Completed Program Budget and Financial Support Process used to establish the program’s budget. How teaching is supported by the institution in terms of graders, teaching assistants, teaching workshops, etc. How resources are provided and their adequacy to acquire, maintain, and upgrade the facilities, and equipment. To be Taken Up/ Management Support Required Staffing Describe the adequacy of the staff (administrative, instructional, and technical) Completed Faculty HiringDescribe the process for hiring of new faculty.Completed Faculty RetentionDescribe strategies used to retain current qualified faculty Faculty evaluation, Award and Reward to be developed Support of Faculty Professional Development Describe Adequacy of support for faculty professional development. How such activities such as sabbaticals, travel, workshops, seminars, etc., are planned and supported. Policies and procedures to be developed and implemented. CRITERION 8. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT