An estimation of the effect of gear transmission ratio variations on CO2 emissions from conventional vehicles over WLTP Alessandro Marotta, Giorgos Fontaras,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Further modifications on the gearshift calculation tool
Advertisements

WLTP Number of Tests Different Options And Their Consequences IWG in Stockholm, Christoph Lueginger, BMW WLTP-10-26e.
The ARTEMIS tools for estimating the transport pollutant emissions Artemis project - EC DG Tren COST346 - Heavy duty vehicles emissions M. André, INRETS,
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
WLTP N/v tolerance Simulation results and conclusion BMW,
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
Geneva, June 2011 Effect of ambient temperature (15 °C÷28 °C) on CO2 emissions from LDV over NEDC
1 WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B Issue: Handling of Manual Mode with Automatic Transmission. ACEA Informal Document WLTP-06-17e.
Green Fleets The Mission Through implementation of this Green Fleets policy, all Service Units that own/operate vehicles and fuel-using equipment shall.
NEDC/WLTP correlation process Meeting of TCMV on 17 November 2015
WLTP gtr Annex 9 Determination of Method Equivalency - Progress Report
Joint Research Centre the European Commission's in-house science service JRC Science Hub: ec.europa.eu/jrc 38th UNECE IWG PMP MEETING Exhaust emissions.
1 Comparison of the worldwide weighted WLTP database and EU regional database with WLTC rev3 and further modifications performed by JARI, JRC and HS Heinz.
DG ENTR, 08 September 2011, Brussels, EC Pierre Bonnel Alessandro Marotta Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre (JRC) IES - Institute for Energy and Transport.
Status report about the work of the task force on gearshift issues
WLPT Phase 2 items. COP and ISC.
HD CNG ENGINE PN MEASUREMENT
1st Informal Group on WLTP Palais des Nations, Geneva
CO2MPAS: Dice Workflow Ispra, 24-Nov-2016
Calculation of evaporative emissions with COPERT Giorgos Mellios
SiCo ACEA position RESULT slides proposal.
Fuel consumption measurement in LDVs WLTP 2nd act Working Group
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
Improvement of Family definitions
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
Input on wind tunnel criteria discussions
J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act June 14th, 2017
Weighting Factors impact on WLTP CO2 emissions
CO2 vehicle test Why the test should not be CoP
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Evaluation on Maximum CO2-Delta in 2-Tests-Approach
IVECO Proposal for Revised CoP Procedure
Influence of the Temperature over CO2 Emissions (First Results)
Comments on WLTP documentation
Driving Indices and correction of test cycle flexibilities
European and Economic Social Committee
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
WLTP Informal Working Group
Biagio Ciuffo Georgios Fontaras Alessandro Marotta Stefanos Tsiakmakis
Pilot phase - Learnings
Meeting of the Steering Group for Simulation Issues from the last SGS meeting in LAT model development Munich, 25 July 2014 Biagio Ciuffo Georgios.
COP statistic proposal for UN-WLTP
WLTP Correlation engine modeling
HDV CO2 certification CoP provisions
J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act July 18th, 2017
J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act May 18th, 2017
Real Driving Emissions IWG Recommendations for Data Collection & EU Dataset
Biagio Ciuffo Georgios Fontaras Stefanos Tsiakmakis Alessandro Marotta
Full load curve proposal
Meeting of the Steering Group on Simulation (SGS) Back-translation: implementation and accuracy implications Munich - 24 April 2014
COP statistic proposal for UN-WLTP
WLTP – NEDC Correlation Exercise AVL Cruise Conventional Model Template Munich 25 July 2014
Update on the LAT work for the NEDC-WLTP correlation exercise
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 5/2/2019.
Co2 veHICLE test Feedback on three options for implementation of the test The purpose of the test is to increase the credibility of the simulation based.
J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act March 15th, 2017
WLTP CoP Procedure for CO2/FC
Testing purpose for Phase2 items
PMP INFORMAL GROUP Exhaust particle emissions – progress report
Meeting of the Steering Group on Simulation (SGS) Defining the simulation plan in the Kriging meta-model development Thessaloniki, 07 February 2014.
WLTP CoP Procedure for CO2/FC
WLTP-27-03e gear shift issues
LAT Technology Modeling
COP statistic for UN-WLTP ACEA comments on JRC proposal presented April 8,2019 May 2019.
WLTP CoP Procedure for CO2/FC
Conformity-of-Production
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-10e
WLTP CoP Procedure for CO2/FC
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.
UNECE WLTP COP task-Force Revision on testing Frequency
Presentation transcript:

An estimation of the effect of gear transmission ratio variations on CO2 emissions from conventional vehicles over WLTP Alessandro Marotta, Giorgos Fontaras, Biagio Ciuffo JRC

Objective: estimate the effect of GB differences on CO2 emissions for WLTP TA interpolation method purposes The current TA procedure allows the extension of the TA from one vehicle to another having a different transmission ratios, under given conditions: [from Commission Regulation (EC) 692/2008]

In order to see whether this same extension concept and limit could be applied to the WLTP interpolation method for type approval, JRC has been requested to carry out some simulations. Simulation framework: A generic gasoline vehicle with a baseline GB and 5 alternative, realistic GB (all with 6 gears) A generic diesel vehicle with a baseline GB and 9 alternative, realistic GB (all with 6 gears) Simulations with a JRC model, based on AVL Cruise and Heinz Steven’s Gear Shift Tool (JRC implementation of version 1a)

Gasoline Vehicle: inputs and results (1) gb_finaldrgb_gr1gb_gr2gb_gr3gb_gr4gb_gr5gb_gr a b % b/a98.8%101.9%93.7%93.8%97.4%96.6% c % c/a96.4%92.3%93.9%92.4%93.7%92.1% d % d/a100.9% 96.6%96.9%103.2%104.4% e % e/a96.2%95.8%95.9%96.2%96.7%98.3% f % f/a103.2%103.3%98.9%99.2%105.6%109.6% CO2_WLTP

Gasoline Vehicle: inputs and results (2) gb_finaldrgb_gr1gb_gr2gb_gr3gb_gr4gb_gr5gb_gr CO2_WLTP a b % b/a98.8%101.9%93.7%93.8%97.4%96.6% c % c/a96.4%92.3%93.9%92.4%93.7%92.1% d % d/a100.9% 96.6%96.9%103.2%104.4% e % e/a96.2%95.8%95.9%96.2%96.7%98.3% f % f/a103.2%103.3%98.9%99.2%105.6%109.6%

Diesel Vehicle: inputs and results (1) gb_finaldrgb_gr1gb_gr2gb_gr3gb_gr4gb_gr5gb_gr CO2_WLTP

Diesel Vehicle: inputs and results (2) gb_finaldrgb_gr1gb_gr2gb_gr3gb_gr4gb_gr5gb_gr CO2_WLTP

Conclusion and suggestions Gasoline vehicles appear to be more sensitive to gear transmission variations than diesel vehicles. For transmission variations up to 8% (as defined in Commission Regulation 692/2008) the effects on CO2 emissions from gasoline vehicles can be up to 2%, while for diesel vehicles the variations seem to stay below 0.5%. On the basis of this exercise it does not appear advisable to keep the E≤8% variation limit also for the WLTP interpolation method. Two alternatives (example*): One single limit of E≤4% for all vehicles A limit of E≤4% for gasoline vehicles and E≤8% for diesel vehicles * For a more accurate proposal it might be worth to extend the present study