EIM/EDT Update ColumbiaGrid Planning Meeting June 2, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ColumbiaGrid Reliability Workshop October 1, 2007 Developmental and Staffing Reliability Functional Agreement (DSRFA) Details This program is the cornerstone.
Advertisements

Briefing on California ISO Dynamic Transfers Stakeholder Process For WECC Seams Issues Subcommittee Meeting May 4, 2010 Jim Price, Lead Engineering Specialist.
WECC - Addressing Commercial Practices Ed Beck Chair, Market Interface Committee.
2007 Goals. Introduction Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) will be primarily defined throughout the 2007 year by Electric Reliability.
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator Task Force Report
Class 5 suggestions. Transmission Planning Class 5 supports implementation of a systematic, transparent process for developing and updating bus-level.
WECC - Addressing Commercial Practices Ed Beck Chair, Market Interface Committee.
WECC Operating Committee Report WECC Member Meeting April 20, 2006.
Western Electricity Coordinating Council Market Interface Committee Report to the WECC Board of Directors December 6-7, 2007 Robert D. Schwermann MIC Chair.
Renewable Proposals Made at October Board. Proposal 1 Identify analyses needed to inform policy debates Coordinate WECC-wide info/analysis and coordinate.
Western Electricity Coordinating Council Identify, coordinate, and propose solutions to seams issues Participate, monitor and communicate the development.
1 Bradley Nickell Director of Transmission Planning 10-Year Regional Transmission Plan WECC Overview September 2011.
Order 2000 and PJM: A Natural Match Craig Glazer Manager of Regulatory Affairs PJM Interconnection, LLC.
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC) Task Force Joint Guidance Committee Presentation and Motion to the OC & MIC Standing Committee Meetings March 27-29,
NERC PC Issues Update WECC PCC Meeting John Simpson, RRI Energy Planning Coordination Committee Seattle, WA June , 2010.
Update on CAISO / PacifiCorp Energy Imbalance Market Presentation to WECC Market Interface Committee March 25, 2014 Jim Price, Senior Advisor, Market Development.
1 Utility Wind Integration Group Workshop ACE Diversity Interchange (ADI) Project Sharing Area Control Errors July 2007 Sponsoring Utilities: British Columbia.
EIM DISALLOWANCE CASE: PROGRESS IN THE SOUTHWEST Aka: Continued Assault.
2009 Performance Assessment Member Representatives Committee Meeting October 28, 2008.
Economic Criteria for Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Region Public Utility Law Seminar DeAnn Walker August 3, 2012.
WECC PCC Meeting Salt Lake City, UT March 26, 2014.
1 JULY 2010 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE REPORT – WORK IN PROGRESS Session 4 Discussion of Alternatives and Implementation Activities for Real- Time.
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator
Presentation to WECC Market Interface Committee March 24, 2015
NWPP MC Initiative WECC Update March 25th, 2015 Kathy Anderson
NV Energy Energy Imbalance Market (EIM) Presentation to ISAS
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
RenewElec October 21, 2010 Robert Nordhaus, David Yaffe Van Ness Feldman 1050 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, DC (202) FERC’s.
PacifiCorp Participation in the California ISO. 2 Full participation provides significant benefits beyond those of the Energy Imbalance Market EIM BenefitsFull.
WECC Market Interface Committee Update WSPP Spring 2008 Meeting April 8, 2008 Robert D. Schwermann MIC Chair.
Andy Meyers OC Update ISAS April 2014 Salt Lake City, UT.
Past Studies and Resource Diversity Western Renewable Energy Zones, a joint initiative of the Western Governor’s Association and the U.S. Department.
July 30, 2015 TAC Meeting Update to COPS Michelle Trenary August 12, 2015.
JJ Jamieson MIC Chair MIC Report for ISAS August 2014 Salt Lake City.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update Executive Committee Meeting February 18, 2014.
Overview of WECC and Regulatory Structure
Transmission Planning at the California ISO September 10, 2015.
JJ Jamieson MIC Chair JGC update September 2014 Salt Lake City.
1 Market Evolution Program Long-Term Resource Adequacy Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
Transmission Congestion Management – IDC Granularity Option 3A Larry Kezele and Jeff Norman June 28, 2005 NERC/NAESB TLR Subcommittee.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
Reliability Planning Priorities for 2015 Byron Woertz, Senior Project Manager W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
Update on Energy Imbalance Market Presentation to WECC Market Interface Committee October 15, 2015 Jim Price, Senior Advisor, Market Development & Analysis,
MISO Wisconsin Relationship Public Service Commission Randel Pilo, Assistant Administrator August 7, 2008.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 16, 2005.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting June 20 th, 2008 Austin, TX.
Reliability Standards Development Plan David Taylor Manager Standards Development Standards Committee Meeting June 12-13, 2008.
Transmission Advisory Group NCTPC Process Update Rich Wodyka September 7, 2006.
Energy Imbalance Market (EIM) Dan Dettmer Board Meeting February 16, 2011.
Planning the Networked Grid Transmission Planning J.E.(Jeff) Billinton Manager, Regional Transmission - North Building the Networked Electricity Grid –
4/16/2010 Regional Planning Group Meeting Long-Term Planning Study of the ERCOT Interconnection Warren Lasher Manager, System Assessment.
CREPC/WIRAB Meeting April 27, 2016 Salt Lake City, UT Thomas Carr Western Interstate Energy Board Evolution of Grid Planning in the West.
TEPPC Review Task Force Ian McKay, Chair, TEPPC W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
EIM AWG July 5, Guiding Principles The intent of the group is to work collaboratively to better understand the WECC EIM costs and benefits analyses.
LNBA Subgroup: Avoided Transmission Value
Reliability Assessment Committee Proposal TSS Meeting
Briefing on 2017 CAISO Policy Initiatives Roadmap
Reliability Assessment Committee
Business Practices Subcommittee Update
MAC Board Effectiveness Survey
Kenneth Silver Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
MIC Committee Discussion
Strategic Planning Process
Strategic Planning Process
MAC Board Effectiveness Survey
Update on Energy Imbalance Market
MIC Committee Discussion
MAC Input on Section 4.9 Review
Presentation transcript:

EIM/EDT Update ColumbiaGrid Planning Meeting June 2, 2011

SCED EIM  Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) is: “the operation of generation facilities to produce energy at the lowest cost to reliably serve consumers, recognizing any operational limits of generation and transmission facilities.” ( FERC September 30, 2005)  Energy Imbalance Market (EIM) is: The operation of generation facilities to produce energy, at the lowest cost to reliably serve consumers, to account for the differences (including economic dispatch) between scheduled and actual loads and generation, recognizing operational limits of generation and transmission.  Efficient Dispatch Toolkit (EDT) includes the EIM and an Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC) to redispatch generation to relieve transmission constraints.

Current Process Components  WECC Efficient Dispatch Toolkit Steering Committee (“EDTSC”) - Guidance and Oversight of EDTTRS  WECC EDT Technical Review Subcommittee (“EDTTRS”) - Benefit and Cost Analyses - Risk Assessments  WECC Market Interface Committee (“MIC”) - Guidance and Oversight of SIS  WECC Seams Issues Subcommittee (“SIS”) - Tariff issues and EIM structures white-paper  Crossroads – Western Interstate Energy Board - Coordinating information needed to determine next steps  Vehicle for Designing & Developing EIM beyond Crossroads & EDTSC/EDTTRS is yet to be determined

Timeline  March 7, 8 – Crossroads Stakeholder Workshop  March 16 - Phase 1 Benefits distributed to WECC BOD  March 31 - Cost analysis completed  April 1 - Phase 2 Benefits scope posted for comments  April 7 – Third Stakeholder Workshop, Cost analysis results and Phase 1 Benefits results  April 22 – Finalize Phase 2 Scope  June 22 – Distribute Phase 2 Benefits Results to WECC Board  Post June 22 – Individual BAs to evaluate individual costs/benefits  June and Beyond - Individual BAs to decide whether to proceed with EIM or not

WECC June Board Meeting  Phase 2 Benefits to be Distributed and Discussed  Cost Analysis Results to be Discussed  Risk Assessment Work Plan to be Presented - Risks to WECC of potentially being the Market Operator - Risks to WECC Region of implementing an EIM  WECC Staff not seeking any Board action or approvals regarding WECC Members supporting or rejecting EIM

Benefit Analysis EDTTRS ( - “EDT Results”)  Hour-Ahead Economic Dispatch as Proxy for EIM  Four Cases – 2006 and 2020, Benchmark and EIM Cases  Two Phases – Phase 1 fewer zones, calibrate model; Phase 2 more zones, fine-tune model, more sensitivity analyses  Phase 1 Results EIM $100 Million in dispatch savings EIM $235 Million in dispatch savings - Most of dispatch savings result from coordinated procurement of Reserves (i.e. economic procurement)  Phase 2 Analysis – - Results to be presented at June 22 WECC Board Meeting - Phase 2 benefits expected to be less than Phase 1

Cost Analysis - Results EDTTRS  Capital Costs to Establish a Market Operator - $19 Million to $163 Million  Pre-Operational Costs to Establish a Market Operator – $7 Million to $57 Million  Operational Costs of a Market Operator – $33 Million to $127 Million  Market Operator FTEs – 86 to 316 Total Staff

Cost Analysis – Results EDTTRS (Continued)  Generic BA Individual Costs in Addition to Market Operator Costs (costs are not applicable to specific BA situations) – Capital per BA - $1.2 Million to $3.5 Million Operational Cost per BA - $1.4 Million to $3.9 Million

EIM Process Cycle  Requirements Phase – 1 to 1.5 years  Development Phase – 1.5 to 2 years  Testing & Trials Phase – 1 to 1.5 years  TOTAL – 3.5 to 5 years

NEXT STEPS  Phase II Benefit Results – June 22  Individual BAs determine their own costs/benefits  Individual BAs decide to proceed or not with an EIM  Coalition of willing BAs determine ‘vehicle’ for advancing the development of an EIM