Radionuclides in the ocean Ken Buesseler Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, Massachusetts,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nuclear Accident in Japan: A Summary
Advertisements

David Copplestone CEH Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
The Ocean and Climate Change Institute The Ocean and Climate Change Institute Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
FUKUSHIMA, DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCIDENT AND CONSEQUENCES TO THE ENVIRONMENT Dragoslav Nikezic Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, Serbia
Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Impact and Radiation Effects Resulting from the Nuclear Events in Japan.
TENNYSON BEN-KALIO A CHE 120 PROF. WAN JIN JANHG.
Contamination of food imports into the United States in the early days after the Fukushima accident Robert L. Metzger, Ph.D. Radiation Safety Engineering,
Resource and Energy.
Radioactive Waste: The Story of Chelyabinsk
Nuclear Energy Ryan, Brandon and Brenna Nuclear energy- the energy released during nuclear fission, especially when used to generate electricity.
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
Radiological Monitoring of Air and Drinking Water in British Columbia Following the Fukushima Nuclear Incident Environmental Health Services (EHS) British.
English Presentation Text Nine “Researchers Assess Radioactivity Released to the Ocean from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Facility” Member of group.
Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant
Ch Obtaining Water Quality. Safe Drinking Water the quality of our water is just as important as having a steady supply of water our drinking water.
J.M. Navarrete, G. Espinosa, J.I. Golzarri, G. Müller, M.A. Zúñiga, M. Camacho NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO ID 38: MARINE SEDIMENTS AS A RADIOACTIVE POLLUTION.
Yamauchi et al: Effect of the ionizing radiation on the rain-time atmospheric electric field (PG) 2 week rain Chernobyl PICO 09:36 (EGU ) Fukushima.
Chernobyl disaster The worst man-made disaster in human history.
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill On April 20, 2010, an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon MC252 drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico caused the rig to sink.
Safety of Alaska’s food sources Kristin Ryan Program Director Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Health Anchorage,
AMAP - An international cooperation in far northern conditions Yuri Tsaturov - Roshydromet & Morten Sickel – Norwegian Radiation Protection.
From Chernobyl to Fukushima: introduction Conveners of GI1.4 session M. Yamauchi (Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Sweden) Oleg Voitsekhovych (Ukrainian.
Fukushima Dai-ichi - LinkLink. Boiling Water Reactor – Video LinkVideo Link.
Hot tuna! Fukushima radioactivity and Pacific biota Nicholas Fisher School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences State University of New York at Stony Brook.
What can O 2 tell us about the climate change in the oceans? Taka Ito School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia Institute.
Cowichan Lake Storage Assessment – 2015 Final Results Craig Sutherland, M.Sc., P.Eng. July 27, 2015.
What is Oceanography? Oceanography is an interdisciplinary science because it applies all the sciences and engineering to the study of the oceans. Oceanography.
Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing System SCCOOS me? –You want input from the users? –What products will help EPA with its mission? Relationship.
Conveners of GI1.4 session M. Yamauchi (Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Sweden) Oleg Voitsekhovych (Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute, Ukraine)
1. Progress in Understanding a. Monitoring of sea measurement methods and results Readings of Sea Area Monitoring by Japan 3, Oct., 2011 Masanao NAKANO.
Re-suspension of the radioactive fallout after the Fukushima accident: Risk of internal dose during the first week and the first two months M. Yamauchi,
1. Progress in Understanding c. Calculations of Ocean Circulation Japanese Simulations of Radioactivity Concentrations in the Sea Area 3, Oct., 2011 Masanao.
Infinite is Enhancement of the functions of the Japan Atomic Energy Agency Library’s Fukushima Nuclear Accident Archive using a novel data flagging system.
February 2012 better environment with nuclear energy Nuclear Power: Facts and Fiction Better Environment with Nuclear Energy.
By: Aaron Mashore. Facts  13 percent of the world’s electricity comes from nuclear power plants that emit little to no greenhouse gases.  Nuclear energy.
Tracking the fate of carbon in the ocean using thorium-234 Ken Buesseler Dept. of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
FUKISHIMA Nuclear Reactors Radiological Assessment Air Measurement Surveillance AMS March 22,
Kaijun Su a, Jinzhou Du a, *, Mark Baskaran b and Jing Zhang a State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai.
BY Radiation  Radiation is discover to be harmful to humans  Radiation can damage genetic material and can destroy the environment 
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
HELCOM MORS-PRO Radioactivity in the Baltic Sea Erkki Ilus STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Finland.
Standpoint of the French Institute for Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) on the impact of radioactive releases from the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear.
Nuclear Energy By: Haley Davis, Matthew Williams, Jordan Scott, and Mickey Oriminston.
Daily variation of radiation dose rate after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident poster (EGU ), Friday ( ) 1 M. Yamauchi Swedish.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 2011.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
Grab binders & handouts, begin the Do Now
A LTERNATIVE ENERGY : NUCLEAR Group 4 Bar Shida Keane.
Fukushima Ocean Impact Symposium How do we consider the Fukushima Accident from the Perspective on Ocean Policy November 13 th, 2012 Sanjo Kaikan, The.
Fukushima derived radionuclides in the ocean Ken Buesseler Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, USA Michio Aoyama Meteorological Research Institute, Japan.
(1) On 11 March 2011, Japan had a big earthquake and tsunami, leading to _________ in Fukushima. (nuclear emission)
The Price and Promise of Nuclear Science Nuclear radiation has it’s good points and it’s bad points.
Photo: T. Ishimaru Nov. 13, 2012 Sanjo Conference Hall, University of Tokyo Long-term Sources: To what extent are marine sediments, coastal groundwater,
Starter Complete the #5-7 on page 2 of the sheet entitled, “Standardized Test Prep”. Answer all questions to the best of your ability. You may write on.
What do you know of Japan’s Nuclear crisis? How about any past nuclear issues? Do you feel that nuclear power is safe? Why or why not? Question of the.
Fukushima: the continuing crisis Dr Ian Fairlie Consultant on Radiation in the Environment London, United Kingdom
Dr. Claudia Benitez-Nelson University of South Carolina Radionuclides in Ocean: A General Introduction to Marine Radioactivity.
Nuclear Power.
Chapter 17: Nonrenewable Energy 17-1 Energy Resources and Fossil Fuels
Environmental Issues in Europe
Chapter 24 Section 4 Notes The Birth of Modern Environmentalism
Nuclear power stations
Risk Assessment Fukushima
Nuclear Power.
Tan Yong Jia, Somesh, James
Srinivasa Reddy Mallampati,a* Yoshiharu Mitoma,b Cristian Simionc
Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant
Nuclear Reactor Chernobyl Disaster.
15.Oct Masanao NAKANO Japan Atomic Energy Agency
Radionuclide transport modelling
Presentation transcript:

Radionuclides in the ocean Ken Buesseler Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA Yokohama June 2011

- We live in a sea of radioactivity - Natural sources are larger than man-made sources - Danger is in the dose - one banana = 12 Bq 40 K - need to eat 20 million banana’s go get dose of radiation concern - We can measure less than 1 Bq - In the ocean (and human body) different radionuclides have different fate and toxicity Ken Buesseler WHOI Many sources of radioactivity 1 Bq = 1 Becquerel = one radioactive decay per second 1 PBq = peta-Becquerel = one million billion Bq = 1,000,000,000,000,000 Bq

Various Routes to the Ocean: Boundary Conditions Atmospheric deposition Atmospheric deposition 1 Mid-March ( 5 〜 30 P Bq ) Direct discharge 2 After late-March (3 〜 15 P Bq) small source today Through river runoff 3 Through underground water flow Through underground water flow 4 small and continues small and continues? 80% Fukushima contamination in ocean There are still some uncertainties on “where” and “how much” of different radionuclides were released to the environment. P (peta) = 10 15

One year history of cesium-137 in ocean immediately off Fukushima Levels prior to March 11 At nuclear power plant Ocean Cs levels peak on April 6th - possible reproductive effects and mortality for marine biota Levels of concern for seafood Highest ocean levels post Chernobyl US drinking water limit - Fukushima NPP represents unprecedented release of radionuclides to the ocean - levels decreased rapidly, then leveled off - so reactors are still a source (through Sept.’12) - but levels now safe for marine biota & human exposure - what about seafood? one banana April 1 June 1 Aug 1 Oct 1 Dec 1 Feb Data from TEPCO

JCOPE2 model (Bq/L) Masamoto et al. JAMSTEC

JCOPE2 Tracer-Run (Bq/L) Kuroshio current important for rapid cesium transport May 2011 Aug Nov Mar 2012 Position of >10 Bq m -3

Cesium-137 today off Japan Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant Seawater 15 TBq (TBq = Bq) Seafloor 94 TBq River water <<1 TBq/month River sediment 0.8 TBq/month Power plant >0.3 TBq/month Kanda et al TUMST

Lessons learned Fukushima NPP represents unprecedented release of radionuclides to the ocean off Japan Many reasons for study- Human health- internal/external dose assessments Radioecology- marine biota & fish Modeling/predictions of future accidents Japan is leading studies, but more work is needed than any one lab, or any one country can take on Confirmation by multiple international and independent labs will build public confidence in Japan (and increase scientific insights) Studies of fish are not enough- need long term studies of ocean, seafloor, rivers, etc. Easier to measure Cs than to determine health effects

Sponsors of today’s event Arigatou Gozaimasu!

What about fish off Japan- where are fish most contaminated? - highest off Fukushima Bottom dwelling fish only Data source- Japan Fisheries Buesseler, in review for Science

What types of fish are most contaminated? - bottom fish & freshwater fish - still high after 1 year - variability unpredictable - 18% of fish reported are above limit Data source- Japan Fisheries Buesseler, in review for Science Ken Buesseler WHOI

137 Cs radioactivity at “Unloading dock” inside the plant harbor Data source: TEPCO 137 Cs radioactivity at “Unloading dock” inside the plant harbor Data source: TEPCO 137 Cs radioactivity (Bq/L) Leak from the plant 137 Cs release in summer 2012 Harbor-water: 2.3 x 10 6 m 3 Exchange rate: 0.44 day -1 (6 ~ 19 April 2011) Average 137 Cs at “Unloading dock”: 9.9Bq L -1 (1 April ~ 30 September 2012) 137 Cs release in summer 2012 Harbor-water: 2.3 x 10 6 m 3 Exchange rate: 0.44 day -1 (6 ~ 19 April 2011) Average 137 Cs at “Unloading dock”: 9.9Bq L -1 (1 April ~ 30 September 2012) 10 GBq day TBq month day Bq L -1 Unloading dock Plant harbor

Water volume (m 3 ) Contaminated water underneath the reactor/turbine housings of Reactors 1-4 Calculated by JK based on data released by TEPCO 137 Cs inventory (PBq) Volume 137 Cs “Highly-contaminated” water under the plant Remaining 137 Cs 156 PBq (May 2011) 3 PBq (September 2012) Processed 137 Cs 220 PBq (June 2011 ~ September 2012) Diluted by groundwater inflow Remaining 137 Cs 156 PBq (May 2011) 3 PBq (September 2012) Processed 137 Cs 220 PBq (June 2011 ~ September 2012) Diluted by groundwater inflow Possible groundwater seepage from nearby seafloor??? Possible groundwater seepage from nearby seafloor???

1 Bq = 1 Becquerel = one radioactive decay per second 1 PBq = petaBecquerel = one million billion Bq = 1,000,000,000,000,000 Bq - We live in a sea of radioactivity - Natural sources are larger than man-made sources - Danger is in the dose - one banana = 10 Bq - need to eat 20 million banana’s go get dose of radiation concern - We can measure less than 1 Bq - In the ocean (and human body) different radionuclides have different fate and toxicity Ken Buesseler WHOI Radioactivity in the Oceans Oceanus, June 2012 Cesium-137 Three Mile Island Fukushima 8-45 PBq Chernobyl 85 PBq Global fallout 1960’s 400 PBq

Special Oceanus issue on – Fukushima and the ocean Goal is to bring content of our presentations and discussions to general audiences Hard/web copies early May 2013 In English and Japanese Coincides with 2nd Colloquium in Woods Hole Wed. Nov. 14th 16:00 Ito Hall U. Tokyo Public Event- panel w/ Q&A

Exploring the impacts of the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plants on the Ocean goal: present a scientific review of what we know and don’t know about contaminants released at Fukushima, their fate in the ocean, and their potential to impact marine ecosystems and human health What are the lessons learned? Goal is to inform, not alarm

JCOPE2 Tracer-Run (Bq/L) Kurashio current important for cesium transport

? LNT? ?! ?

Summary of sources and fate of Fukushima Cs in the ocean Direct ocean discharge PBq Atmospheric fallout PBq Rapid offshore transport >99% Cs soluble groundwater ? Rivers vertical mixing sinking marine snow near bottom sediment flow seafloor burial ≈ 0.04 PBq? remineralization FNPP