Goal: Institute an accountability model that… improves student achievement increases graduation rates closes achievement gaps Globally Competitive Students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Overview of STAAR State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness Academic Achievement Distinction Designation Committee (AADDC) April 16, 2012.
Advertisements

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Review of Performance Index Framework and Accountability Ratings RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT To serve and prepare all students for their global.
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
2014 Accountability Commissioner’s Decisions – April 4, 2014.
Curriculum for College and Career Readiness: National Lessons Curriculum for College and Career Readiness Committee May 22, 2006.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
A New School Accountability Model. Draft – March Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://
ESEA Flexibility: College & Career Readiness Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 7 of 8.
College and Career Ready Pre K – 12 Public Schools Florida College System State University System 1.
2013 Texas Accountability System. Features of the System No single indicator can lower a rating Focuses on overall campus/district performance rather.
Parent Meeting February STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness Emphasis on college and career readiness standards Began school.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
1. 2 What tests will students have to take? High School COURSES with EOCs MathEnglishScienceSoc. Studies Algebra I Geometry Algebra II Eng. I-R&W Eng.
Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
STAAR TEST Class of 2015 and beyond. What is STAAR? The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) is the new state assessment for students.
Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
1 Superintendents’ Quarterly Meeting A Next Generation Accountability Model March 25, 2010.
MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 A. Effect Size Can Tell a Lot! B. Future Ready Core NC Accountability.
South Kitsap School District Policy Governance Ends 1 Presentation Ends 1: The South Kitsap School District will enable all students to achieve academic.
1 1 Next Generation School Assessment and Accountability Thursday, November 17, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
FIFTH ANNUAL 50-STATE PROGRESS REPORT on the Alignment of High School Policies with the Demands of College and Careers 2010 Closing the Expectations Gap.
Part I Academic Achievement ACT Participation and Performance Five-Year Trends Racial/Ethnic Groups Minimum Core vs.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
March 2013 Presenter: Nancy Webster Director of Instructional Measurement and Accountability.
Career and Technical Education in America A Progress Report on CTE in the Nation
1 Points of Consensus Choice in Post-Secondary Readiness measures seems supported however there will need to be a careful strategy to minimize gaming {Hearing.
Northwest ISD January 11, 2016 The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Combining Multiple Measures What are the indicators/ components? What are the priority outcomes? What are the performance expectations? How can we evaluate.
The READY Accountability Report: Growth and Performance of North Carolina Public Schools State Board of Education November 7, 2013.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Minnesota’s Proposed Accountability System “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Globalization. Innovation. Graduation.  Transition to Five Achievement Levels  School Performance Grades (A–F)  EVAAS as a Tool NC READY ACCOUNTABILITY.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Operationalizing the General Assembly’s School Performance Grades (Senate Bill 795, Excellent Public Schools Act) October 2012 Superintendents’ Feedback.
Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.
1 1 Assessment and Accountability Tuesday, November 1, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
Index 4/5 ESC Region Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing.
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
American Diploma Project Network
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
A-F Rating and State Accountability System
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Accountability Update
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System
Timeline for STAAR EOC Standard Setting Process
EOCT BACKGROUND SPRING 2012
State and Federal Accountability Overview
Closing the Expectations Gap
Presentation transcript:

Goal: Institute an accountability model that… improves student achievement increases graduation rates closes achievement gaps Globally Competitive Students 1 February

IndicatorsUsesLevels Goal: Institute an accountability model that improves student achievement, increases graduation rates and closes achievement gaps. 2

Review: Emerging Consensus Goal: Institute an accountability model that improves student achievement, increases graduation rates and closes achievement gaps. Post-Secondary Readiness ACT, SAT, other national assessments of preparedness Student Growth Longitudinal growth to replace current growth model Academic Course Rigor Future Ready Core = # and % of students who score proficient on Algebra II EOC 3

Review: Current Recommendations Goal: Institute an accountability model that improves student achievement, increases graduation rates and closes achievement gaps. Student Accountability Change the Gateway Policy for 3,5,8 and EOC assessments to require intervention without retesting Maintain current 25% of final grade policy 4

Today: Goal: Institute an accountability model that improves student achievement, increases graduation rates and closes achievement gaps. Preliminary Weighting and Classification Discussion in Preparation for April 2010 Issues Session 5

Current School Classification System Goal: Institute an accountability model that improves student achievement, increases graduation rates and closes achievement gaps. Performance LevelAcademic Growth Percent of Students’ Scores at or Above Achievement Level III Making Expected or High Growth Making Less than Expected Growth 90% - 100%AYP metHonor School of Excellence No Recognition AYP not met School of Excellence 80% - 89%School of Distinction 60% - 79%School of Progress 50% - 59%Priority School Less than 50%Priority SchoolLow-Performing School 6

Classification Recommendation: Goal: Institute an accountability model that improves student achievement, increases graduation rates and closes achievement gaps. Maintain general categories; if possible, simplify and reduce the number of categories Move to longitudinal growth 7

Current Reward Model Goal: Institute an accountability model that improves student achievement, increases graduation rates and closes achievement gaps. Drop-Out Rate + Improvement on EOCs and EOGs + College Prep/ College Tech Prep Course of Study 8

Weighting Goal: Institute an accountability model that improves student achievement, increases graduation rates and closes achievement gaps. Student Performance Post-Secondary Readiness Student Growth Graduation Rate Weighting The weighting of indicators has implications on how the model might affect outcomes in high school. If Grad Rate is too small, there may be an incentive to allow/encourage students to drop out. For instance… Academic Course Rigor Example

Weighting Goal: Institute an accountability model that improves student achievement, increases graduation rates and closes achievement gaps. Student Performance Post-Secondary Readiness Student Growth Graduation Rate Weighting The weighting of indicators has implications on how the model might affect outcomes in high school. If Grad Rate is too great, there may be an incentive to lower standards to keep students in school. For instance… Academic Course Rigor Example 1 Example

Additional Use Recommendations: Goal: Institute an accountability model that improves student achievement, increases graduation rates and closes achievement gaps. When incorporating a decision rule for possible monetary rewards, use student growth and other improvement measures in determining awards Continue to exclude absolute performance from monetary decision rule. Reward and Sanction 11

Use absolute measures primarily to Goal: Institute an accountability model that improves student achievement, increases graduation rates and closes achievement gaps. Use improvement and growth measures primarily to Target Assistance Reward and Sanction Student Performance Post-Secondary Readiness Academic Course Rigor Graduation Rate Student Growth Change in Post-Secondary Readiness Change Academic Course Rigor over time Change in Graduation Rate 12 Report

Goal: Institute an accountability model that improves student achievement, increases graduation rates and closes achievement gaps. Suggestions for Planning the April Accountability Issues Session How to approach planning that time to encourage getting at the deepest issues? How to be ready to move to the action stage? 13