 House Bill 2804.  During the 84 th legislative session (2015) HB 2804 was passed.  HB 2804: o Modifies the accountability specifications o Identifies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Advertisements

House Bill 5 Graduation Requirements. HB5 Requirements Begins with students who enter grade 9 in Students entering high school prior to
HB 5 Marty De Leon Escamilla & Poneck, LLC
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
Legislative Update #1 Changes in Assessment and Graduation 83 rd Texas Legislature.
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
House Bill 5 83 rd Legislative Session ESC3 Leadership Services Spring 2014.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/15/2011 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
HOUSE BILL 5 UPDATE. Curriculum Graduation Plans Endorsement Pathways College Readiness requirements Accountability Community and Student Engagement Student.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver Work-ReadinessCertification Industry Credentials August, 2014 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
 Students will identify the Foundation High School Program Graduation Requirements.  Students will identify minimum course requirements at their college.
HOUSE BILL 5 UPDATE Presented by: Education Service Center Region 11 January 23, 2014.
+ HB 5 — School District Evaluation of Performance in Community & Student Engagement.
TMISD District and Campus Improvement Plans and Budget Overview
HB 5 & Community Engagement Building Partnerships.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
House Bill 5 Community and Student Engagement Mathis ISD Presented at Regular Board Meeting, July 22, 2014.
Community and Student Engagemen t Evaluatio n. Community & Parent Involvement  EXEMPLARY Fine Arts  EXEMPLARY Wellness & Physical Education  EXEMPLARY.
NISD Community-Based Accountability System vs. HB5 School District Self- Evaluation in Community and Student Engagement and Compliance.
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
New Graduation Requirements What’s New? End of Course Exams (state testing for high school students: must master exams in English I, English.
Decatur ISD Graduation Requirements For Incoming 9th Graders in the School Year.
November 19 Accountability Webinar Kim Gilson
Grand Prairie ISD Community and Student Engagement Performance Ratings June 2014.
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
Insert campus logo * House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
PARENT NIGHT 2014 Marble Falls High School. HOUSE BILL 5 (HB 5) Changes Testing Requirements Graduation Requirements.
Community and Student Engagement: HB 5 Thursday, February 6, 2014 Dialog and Brainstorming.
Texas Assessment Conference| February 16, 2016 Shannon Housson, Director, Division of Performance Reporting Department of Assessment and Accountability.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
MARCH 2, 2016 ACCOUNTABILITY WEBINAR Kim Gilson, Doni CashRegion 10 ESC 1.
House Bill 5 Graduation Program Update ASADENA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Community and Student Engagement June PEIMS Submission.
NGALC CCRS Measures Mariann Lemke Managing Researcher July 2016 Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.
PEIMS Updates PUG 11 July 13, PEIMS 3 - Summer Duplicate Attendance Reports available for PEIMS 3 first submission PRFAD012 for Edit+ in Turnaround.
PEIMS Reporting Changes. High Quality PK Program/ECDS PEIMS Reporting The Classroom Link Data collection will be expanded to include grades.
Industry Certifications, Licenses & Credentials
PEIMS Summer Reports
HB 2804: A-F Accountability
Texas Accountability system ratings indicators
Accountability System Ratings Indicators HB2804 Domain 5
Accountability System Ratings Indicators HB2804 Domain 4
PEIMS Update
Texas Accountability system ratings indicators
HB 5 HB 5 made sweeping changes:
Accountability Overview 2016
Towards High Performance Schools
House Bill 22 accountability system data revisions
What? Why? How? Learning outcomes What House Bill 5 is
House Bill 22 Overview ESC PEIMS Coordinator Summer Training | August 1, 2017 Texas Education Agency | Academics | Performance Reporting.
TSDS - Texas Student Data System PEIMS
Accountability Update
HB 5 HB 5 made sweeping changes:
G/T: Inclusion, not Exclusion
Reflection and Data Mining
A-F Accountability and Special Education
HB 5 & High School Endorsements
Tom Bean High School Targeted Improvement Plan Summary
Life High School Waxahachie 8th Grade Parent Night– Class of 2021
JESSICA SNYDER CURRICULUM STANDARDS AND STUDENT SUPPORT DIVISION
Texas Education Agency Standards and Engagement Performance Reporting
2019 Accountability Updates
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Texas Accountability system ratings indicators
Presentation transcript:

 House Bill 2804

 During the 84 th legislative session (2015) HB 2804 was passed.  HB 2804: o Modifies the accountability specifications o Identifies criteria in 5 domains

 Accountability ratings specified in HB 2804 begin in the school year.  Data will need to be collected in school year in preparation for school year.

 Measure and evaluate school districts and campuses with respect to: o Improving student preparedness for success in: Subsequent grade levels Entering the workforce o Reducing student academic achievement differentials among students from different racial and ethnic groups and socioeconomic backgrounds o Informing parents/guardians and community regarding campus and district performance

 Comparison to state-established standards disaggregated by: o Race o Ethnicity o Socioeconomic status  School districts and campuses evaluated based on 5 domains

The five Accountability Domains are:  Domain 1 – Includes STAAR and EOC Assessments for all grades  Domain 2 – Includes the percentage of students who met the standards for annual improvement.  Domain 3 – Evaluates academic achievement gaps among students from different racial/ethnic groups and socioeconomic backgrounds  Domain 4 – Evaluates different indicators depending on campus grade levels. Some of the indicators include dropout, percentage of students earning endorsements and student attendance  Domain 5 – Includes three programs related to community and student engagement ratings

 Data for the first, second, and third domains pertain to assessments.  This data already exists or can be calculated from data that already exists, therefore no new information needs to be obtained.

 Requirements o FHSP-COLLEGE-CAREER-INSTRUCTION-INDICATOR- CODE data element created Indicates whether a student in grades seven or eight has received instruction in preparing for high school, college, and a career that includes information regarding the creation of a high school personal graduation plan under TEC , the distinguished level of achievement described by TEC (b-15), each endorsement described by TEC (c- 1), college readiness standards, and potential career choices and the education needed to enter those careers.

 2017 – 2018 Requirements o MILITARY–ENLISTMENT–INDICATOR–CODE Per TEC (c)(4)(a)(ix) – TEA is to collect the percentage of students who enlist in the armed forces of the United States (after graduation). New validations will be created to support the requirement. The MILITARY–ENLISTMENT–INDICATOR–CODE is applicable to all students regardless of graduation plan.

o Performance Acknowledgements for FHSP students AP–IB PERFORMANCE–ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Indicates whether a FHSP student graduate has earned a performance acknowledgement for outstanding performance on a College Board AP test or IB examination. BILINGUALISM–BILITERACY–PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Indicates whether a FHSP student graduate has earned a performance acknowledgement for outstanding performance in bilingualism or biliteracy.

o Performance Acknowledgements for FHSP students CERTIFICATIONS–LICENSURES–POST–SECONDARY– CERTIFICATION–PERFORMANCE–ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Indicates whether a FHSP student graduate has earned a nationally or internationally recognized business or industry certification or license. COLLEGE–READINESS–ASSESSMENTS PERFORMANCE– ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Indicates whether a FHSP student graduate has earned a performance acknowledgement for outstanding performance on the PSAT®, the ACT- Plan®, the SAT®, or the ACT®. DUAL–CREDIT PERFORMANCE–ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Indicates whether a FHSP student graduate has earned a performance acknowledgement for outstanding performance in a dual credit course.

.

 Community and Student Engagement Indicators o Per HB 2804 TEA must collect from all schools their choice of 3 out of the 8 CASE Indicators and ratings criteria that the schools will rate themselves on. The categories are: Fine Arts Wellness and Physical Education Community and Parental Involvement 21 st Century Workforce Development Program Second Language Acquisition Program Digital Learning Environment Drop Out Prevention Strategies Education Programs for Gifted and Talented

o CASE choices will be collected in Sub 3. o JJAEP’s, DAEPS, and Juvenile Detention Center campuses are exempt from this reporting.  CASE Ratings Criteria Link o Per (a)(1)(B) and (a)(1)(c), criteria must be submitted to TEA indicating how the district will evaluate performance and assign ratings. It also states that the information will be made available on the district/campus internet site.

 In order to address this requirement, new elements and a code table have been added for the school year and will be reported in Submission 3: o FIRST–CASE–CHOICE–CODE o SECOND–CASE–CHOICE–CODE o THIRD–CASE–CHOICE–CODE o CASE–RATINGS–CRITERIA–LINK

 Community and Student Engagement Indicators o The CASE indicators selected in the school year, during Submission 3,will be reported to TEA prior to the end of the school year. o These ratings will most likely not be reported in Submission 3 due to timing. Deadline will probably be May 15, 2018.

o Each district and campus will be required to submit their ratings for the 3 CASE indicators they selected in the previous school year. These will be validated with a fatal edit. o The Fifth Domain requirement to rate 3 CASE indicators on an A-F scale does not replace the requirement for districts/campuses to submit ratings for each of the 8 Category Codes currently collected in Submission 3.

o The Performance Rating scale that will be used: An overall or a program or category performance rating of A reflects exemplary performance. An overall or a program or category performance rating of B reflects recognized performance. An overall or a program or category performance rating of C reflects acceptable performance. An overall or a program or category performance rating of D or F reflects unacceptable performance.

 How the 5 Domains contribute to the accountability ratings: o Domains 1, 2, and 3 contribute a max of 55% of the score. o Domain 4 contributes a max of 35% of the score. o Domain 5 contributes a max of 10% of the score