ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Improvement Grants Webinar – Tier I and II Schools April 21, 2010.
Advertisements

In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 1 INTRODUCTION STATES LEADING REFORM States and districts have initiated groundbreaking reforms and innovations.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
State and Federal Accountability Directors of Special Education October 10, 2013 Region One Education Service Center Office of School Improvement, Accountability,
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
NEW JERSEY ASSOCIATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATORS SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 ESEA: FLEXIBILITY INSTEAD OF REAUTHORIZATION.
Next Generation of Accountability Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Summer 2012.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
January 19, :00 – 10:00 a.m. ET 1. Changes to Kentucky’s ESEA Waiver Request Required by USDOE Affecting 703 KAR 5:222, Categories for Recognition,
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education SECRETARY OF EDUCATION’S PRIORITIES.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Academic Distress Commissions July 14, Outline Introduction to Academic Distress Commissions (ADCs) Integration of Commissions into Statewide System.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Florida’s Proposal November 14,
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person, regardless of audience, of the following resources found on.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs.
Priority Schools September 25, Support Team Ms. Annette Barnes, Assistant Commissioner for Public School Accountability Mr. Elbert Harvey, Coordinator.
Focus Schools September 25, Support Team Ms. Annette Barnes, Assistant Commissioner for Public School Accountability Mr. Elbert Harvey, Coordinator.
Why are we here? All Title I schools are required to hold an annual meeting for Title I parents* for the purpose of informing you of: our school’s participation.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
WELCOME TO THE TITLE I ANNUAL MEETING FOR PARENTS WESTERLY HILLS ACADEMY.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM September 29, 2011 Carmel Martin, Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
Indiana ESEA Flexibility Waiver. Background -Indiana was a part of cohort 1 -Why cohort 1? -USED Approval February Approval through School.
Priority School District Capacity Review Process and Results Oklahoma State Department of Education March 29, 2012.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Office of Improvement and Innovation Jo Hannah Ward, Director Office of Improvement and Innovation.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
What just happened and what’s next? Presenters: Steve Dibb, MDE Debra Landvik, MDE AYP 2011.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS December 2, 2011 House Education Committee Bob Harmon, Assistant Superintendent
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): Overview and Implications for New Jersey Peter Shulman & Jill Hulnick Deputy Commissioner.
OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS ADVISORY TEAM MEETING WELCOME Brenda B. Blackburn, Superintendent Berkeley County School District November 17, 2015, 5:30 pm.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
NORTH CAROLINA ESEA Flexibility Request Globally Competitive Students (GCS 1) 1Wednesday, February 1, 2012.
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Title I, Part A & Title III, Part A Changes Under ESSA New Jersey Department of Education The Office of Supplemental.
Local Control Accountability Plan Board of Education June 25, 2015 Alvord Unified School District Students | Teachers | Instructional Content.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Welcome to our SCHOOL’S Parents Are Connected (PAC) Meeting
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
WAVE Presentation on Draft ESSA Plan.
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Presentation transcript:

ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015

Today’s Presenters Chris Woolard, Senior Executive Director Center for Accountability and Continuous Improvement Jennifer Vargo, Director Office for Improvement and Innovation Emily Passias, Assistant Director Office of Accountability Elena Sanders, Assistant Director Office of Federal Programs

Today’s Webinar ESEA Update Expected Changes to the ESEA Waiver How to Plan for school year Future Communication

Waiver Overview States can request flexibility from specific requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act in exchange for a rigorous and comprehensive state plan 1

Waiver Overview Flexibility requests must be designed to improve educational outcomes for all students, close achievement gaps, increase equity, and improve the quality of instruction 2

College- and Career- Ready expectations for all students State-developed differentiated recognition, accountability and support Supporting effective instruction and leadership Waivers must address three key principles

Timeline November 2014: Double Testing Waiver August 2014: One-year extension May 2012: Original Waiver March 2015: Three-year renewal Summer 2015: Approval from USDOE

ESEA Waiver Extend the Middle School Double Testing Waiver Integrate career pathways into the school improvement process Clarify the school improvement structure  Update and align school and district labels  Align Differentiated Accountability System

District Support Statuses

Academic Distress Commission and District Interventions Implement the Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) or similar department approved school improvement process in all buildings.  DLT, BLT and TBTs and OIP 5-Step Process  District and building improvement plans Implement School Turnaround Intervention Models in Priority schools

Intensive Districts Interventions Monitor OIP and Turnaround Model implementation 3 times a year ADC and select districts will receive a District Review

Build internal capacity to support OIP implementation Assign internal facilitators Participate in professional development Support and monitor district and school implementation

Moderate D and F District Interventions Implement OIP or similar department approved process in all buildings  DLT, BLT and TBTs and OIP 5-Step Process  District and building improvement plans Focus building improvement plans centered on closing achievement gaps

Moderate D and F District Interventions Build internal capacity to support OIP implementation  Assign internal facilitators  Participate in professional development  Support and monitor district and school implementation Monitor OIP implementation three times a year

Moderate C and Above and Independent District Interventions Moderate C and above:  Provide district support for OIP Implementation in Focus Schools  Develop a plan for Watch schools in the CCIP  Monitor building Independent  No intervention requirements

School Labels

Lowest 5% in overall achievement School is receiving a School Improvement Grant (SIG) <60% graduation Rate Priority School Criteria

New Priority Schools Interventions Implement the Ohio Improvement Process Choose one of five Turnaround Models by May 2016 Implement Turnaround Model in school year

Returning Priority School Interventions Continue to implement School Turnaround Model Implement the Ohio Improvement Process  Develop and implement building level improvement plan  Building Leadership Teams meet 120 minutes per month  Teacher-based Teams meet weekly, minimum of 40 minutes

Returning Priority School Interventions Literacy Strategies for Elementary Schools College and Career Readiness Strategies for Middle and High School Increase monitoring of Turnaround Intervention components:  Recruiting and retaining highly effective teachers and leaders.

Focus School Criteria One of the largest subgroup-to-state gaps for proficiency One of the largest subgroup-to-state gaps for graduation Schools making less progress than the state as a whole

Implement the Ohio Improvement Process Develop and implement building level improvement plan Incorporate strategies for diverse learners in the improvement plan

Implement the Ohio Improvement Process Building Leadership Teams meet 120 minutes per month Teacher-based Teams meet weekly, minimum of 40 minutes

Returning Focus Schools Interventions Revise and implement School Improvement Plan. Receive additional monitoring and support from the district to strengthen Building Leadership Teams and Teacher-based Teams

Watch Schools  Replaces old “Alert” status  Different criteria to get on this list Watch Criteria  Title 1 Schools with a D or F on AMO grade for 2 of 3 most recent years  Schools that receive funding for special student groups (Gifted, SWD, LEP, Economic Disadvantage) and do not show satisfactory achievement and progress with those students

Watch School Interventions Submit an improvement plan to the department outlining its plan for closing subgroup gaps. Use Title I funding for targeted interventions and supports to strengthen school improvement interventions

Supports State Support Team and Transformation Specialists support the academic distress commission, Intensive and Moderate D&F Districts  Priority schools supported Transformation Specialists  Focus school supported by State Support Teams

Supports Universal Supports provided by SST and the department if requested by Moderate C and above and Independent Districts

Funding Title I-A 20% ESEA Set aside Title I School Improvement Sub A Grant School Improvement Grant – SIG

Funding 20% ESEA Set Aside Percent of ESEA District 20% Set Aside Required to be targeted to buildings District Support Status Served Schools Requirements for Set Aside Additional Percent of 20% Contributed to Approved Optional District activities 100% of 20% set aside ADC Priority, Focus, and Watch* Schools Required interventions and Supports outlined in ESEA Waiver Application Table 33 N/A 75% of 20% set aside Intensive Priority, Focus, and Watch* Schools Required interventions and Supports outlined in ESEA Waiver Application Table 33 Up to 25% of 20% set aside 50% of 20% set aside Moderate Focus and Watch* Schools Required interventions and Supports outlined in ESEA Waiver Application Table 33 Up to 50% of 20% set aside No set aside requirement IndependentN/A

Approved Optional Activities  Supplemental instruction to improve pre-K-3 literacy  Supplemental services to improve the building or district lowest report card grade component  Supplemental services to build capacity in middle and high schools to implement drop-out prevention strategies and keep students engaged and enrolled in school

Approved Optional Activities  Services to improve college and career readiness  Expanded learning time  Districtwide professional development to all teachers on the above activities  Other agency-approved activities and initiatives

Funding FY16 Title I SI Sub A Priority Non-SIG Funded Title I Served Schools  119 schools  $80,000 Focus Title I Served Schools  233 schools  $53,000

Funding: School Improvement Grant 1003g (SIG) Competitive 24 Priority Schools are funded in School Year Amount of funding ranges from $350,500 to $509,245

Planning for Academic Distress Commission, Intensive and Moderate D and F  Build DLT, BLT and TBT meeting time into schedule  Assign personnel to serve as internal facilitators  Determine OIP professional development needs and integrate into district and school PD plan  Priority, Focus and Watch plans and strategies are embedded and supported in district improvement plan

Planning for Academic Distress Commission, Intensive and Moderate D and F  Priority buildings incorporate turnaround model components into building improvement plan  Focus buildings incorporate strategies for diverse learners into building improvement plan

Next Steps ESEA Approval ESEA Waiver Renewal Letters to Districts, Local Boards and Schools More information coming your way  FAQ, Fact Sheets and Webinars

Free Professional Development Balanced Assessment Systems and Redesigning Your School Schedule Battelle for Kids in Partnership with the Ohio Department of Education

Free Professional Development Columbus: June 22 Sharonville: June 23 Elyria: June 25

Questions? Submit questions through the chat feature.

(877)