Transverse kick of HWR and SSR2 Paolo Berrutti, Vyacheslav Yakovlev.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Radio Frequency Quadrupoles
Advertisements

Is the shape below a function? Explain. Find the domain and range.
Heat load due to e-cloud in the HL-LHC triplets G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo 19th HiLumi WP2 Task Leader Meeting - 18 October 2013 Many thanks to: H.Bartosik,
7-4 Evaluating and Graphing Sine and Cosine Objective: To use reference angles, calculators or tables, and special angles to find values of the sine and.
Accelerators 2006 Roger Barlow 1: Wakefields 2: The NS-FFAG.
Part2: Cavities and Structures Modes in resonant cavity From a cavity to an accelerator Examples of structures JUAS 2015 Linacs-JB.Lallement - JUAS
1 PID status MICE Analysis phone conference Rikard Sandström.
Searching for CesrTA guide field nonlinearities in beam position spectra Laurel Hales Mike Billing Mark Palmer.
PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
C.Limborg-Deprey Beam Dynamics for RF gun November 3 rd 2004 Beam Dynamics Justification of RF Gun Modifications.
Chapter 11 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU –Version E2.2 RF cavities for particle accelerators.
Building a Photodetector to Observe the Polarization of Light Kevin J. McElwee Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater MA Mentor: Edward F. Deveney.
KICKER LNF David Alesini LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3 Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
115 December 2011 Holger Witte Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Elliptical Dipole.
FAST KICKER STATUS Fabio Marcellini On behalf of LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In terms of total charge and current  In terms of free charge an current USPAS, Knoxville, TN, January 20-31, 2013 Lecture 2 - Basic.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Muon cooling with Li lenses and high field solenoids V. Balbekov, MAP Winter Meeting 02/28-03/04, 2011 OUTLINE  Introduction: why the combination of Li.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
S. Kahn 5 June 2003NuFact03 Tetra Cooling RingPage 1 Tetra Cooling Ring Steve Kahn For V. Balbekov, R. Fernow, S. Kahn, R. Raja, Z. Usubov.
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
First Demonstration of Optics Measurement and Correction during Acceleration Chuyu Liu Collider Accelerator Department, BNL.
2 July 2002Realistic Fields for a Ring Cooler Magnet System -- S.Kahn Page 1 Realistic Fields for a Ring Cooler Steve Kahn 2 July 2002 NuFact’02 Meeting.
Dipole radiation during collisions LL2 Section 68.
Overview of Ramp Development Giulio Stancari E-835 Collaboration Meeting Torino, May
Principle of Wire Compensation Theory and Simulations Simulations and Experiments The Tevatron operates with 36 proton bunches and 36 anti-proton bunches.
Update on LHC 800MHz Crab Cavity Conceptual Design Liling Xiao, Zenghai Li Advanced Computations Department, SLAC Presented at LARP-CM12, April 9, 2009.
A.Saini, K.Ranjan, N.Solyak, S.Mishra, V.Yakovlev on the behalf of our team Feb. 8, 2011 Study of failure effects of elements in beam transport line &
Warm linac simulations (DTL) and errors analysis M. Comunian F. Grespan.
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
Multipole components in the RCS-BM Hideaki Hotchi Dec. 8, Tokai.
14. Juni 2016 Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Yu. Senichev Spin Decoherence in Multipole Fields.
1 Project X Workshop November 21-22, 2008 Richard York Chris Compton Walter Hartung Xiaoyu Wu Michigan State University.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
Linac Design: Single-Spoke Cavities.
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
CW Linac Lattice August, 29 N.Solyak, B.Shteynas.
Choppers Comparison of three schemes of choppers is made 2.5 MeV and 2.1 MeV beam energies are considered Presented by Boris Shteynas May,
HWR, SSR1 and SSR2 transverse kick summary Paolo Berrutti, Vyacheslav Yakovlev.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
One More RFQ Design Renewal ANL Design. Several MHz RFQ Designs ANL-1LBNL-1LBNL-2ANL-2aANL-2b Vane modulation typeSinusoidal Sinusoidal +
RF-kick in the CLIC accelerating structures
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
General Design of C-ADS Accelerator Physics
Preliminary results for electron lens with beam current of 20 A
Physics design on the main linac
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
DFS Simulations on ILC bunch compressor
FPC Coupler RF Dipole Kick
2.7 Absolute Value Functions
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
Part2: Cavities and Structures
Yuhui Li How to edit the title slide
Outline of the method to find an approximate region of electrons that enter the detector in a quadrupole field after kicked by a point bunch K. Kanazawa.
RF modes for plasma processing
Part2: Cavities and Structures
November 14, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
Thermodynamics of a Type I superconductor
Physics Design on Injector I
11 MeV/u 16O7+ ion acceleration
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Presentation transcript:

Transverse kick of HWR and SSR2 Paolo Berrutti, Vyacheslav Yakovlev

Outline HWR donut: evaluation of the kick and of the quadrupole effect in the whole beta domain: comparison with the previous HWR version Kick dependence on RF phase in the beta domain Modified SSR2 geometry based on HWR experience: SSR2 donut Electric and magnetic components analysis of SSR2 transverse kick (comparison with HWR) SSR2 modified design to have better quadrupole compensation in the whole beta domain Conclusions

HWR donut geometry Old (on the left) and new (right) HWR geometry. The central part of the electrode now is donut shaped.

HWR donut Transverse kick and Q β=0.11HWR Ell_BPHWR Donut Δpx [keV]2.272e e+03 Δpy [keV]2.385e e+03 Q

HWR Electric and Magnetic Q Q due to electric field is represented in figs below. β range covers the whole energy range in which SSR2 cavity is used ( MeV). The electric quadrupole component is reduced by the donut shape, and it is the major part of the total Q of HWR. ElectricMagnetic

HWR Electric kick component Δpc due to electric field is represented in figs below. β range covers the whole energy range in which HWR cavity is used ( MeV ). HWR donut presents more symmetry than HWR elliptical beam pipe. HWR elliptical BP HWR donut

HWR Magnetic kick component Δpc due to magnetic field is represented in figs below. β range covers the whole energy range in which HWR cavity is used ( MeV ). HWR donut and HWR elliptical beam pipe present almost the same magnetic field contribution to transverse kick. HWR elliptical BP HWR donut

HWR kick X and Y component Δpc along X and Y axis is represented in figs below. β range MeV. HWR donut has a better behavior in the whole beta range because of the symmetry of the two main (electric) components, since the magnetic contribution is small. HWR elliptical BPHWR donut

Quadrupole parameter vs RF phase Particle energy= 2.1 MeV, HWR Donut cavity Δpc X and Y components are synchronous in phase, Q parameter does not depend on RF phase.

Quadrupole parameter vs RF phase Particle beta= 0.11, HWR donut cavity Δpc X and Y components are synchronous in phase, Q parameter does not depend on RF phase.

Quadrupole parameter vs RF phase Particle energy= 10.8 MeV, HWR donut cavity Δpc X and Y components are synchronous in phase, Q parameter does not depend on RF phase.

SSR2 donut Transverse kick and Q β=0.47HWR Ell_BPHWR Donut Δpx [keV]5.518e e+02 Δpy [keV]5.512e e+02 Q

SSR2 Electric and Magnetic Q Q due to electric field is represented in figs below. β range covers the whole energy range in which SSR2 cavity is used ( MeV). Donut shape helps reducing the electric contribution, but it makes tha magnetic even worse. ElectricMagnetic

SSR2 Electric kick component Δpc due to electric field is represented in figs below. β range covers the whole energy range in which SSR2 cavity is used ( MeV). SSR2 donut electric kick presents more symmetry than SSR2 racetrack aperture. SSR2 racetrack apSSR2 donut

SSR2 Magnetic kick component Δpc due to magnetic field is represented in figs below. β range covers the whole energy range in which SSR2 cavity is used ( MeV). SSR2 donut and SSR2 racetrack aperture show similar magnetic kick in the whole beta range. The shape of the central part of the spoke affects mostly the electric field. SSR2 racetrack apSSR2 donut

SSR2 kick X and Y component Δpc X and Y components are represented in figs below. β range covers the whole energy range in which SSR2 cavity is used ( MeV). The kick X and Y component are largely affected by magnetic field. As β increases the magnetic effect gets higher and the X component of magnetic field can not be reduced because of the shape of the field lines around the spoke. SSR2 racetrack apSSR2 donut

Electric field SSR2 3D 3D electric field inside the spoke resonator is reported in figures below, X-Y view is on the left, Y-Z on the right. X and Y components of the electric field can be modified by changing the shape of the aperture and beam pipe areas.

Magnetic field SSR2 3D 3D magnetic field inside the spoke resonator is reported in figures below, Y-Z view is on the right, X-Y on the right. It is clear that the magnetic field line are circles around the spoke electrode. The magnetic field X component is bigger than the Y one in the aperture region.

SSR2 new version Since the donut shape is not effective in reducing the quadrupole component the old version has been modified: the aperture is circular instead of racetrack beam pipe profile has changed from circular to elliptical. The figs below show Q vs beta of the new SSR2 design (right) and the comparison with RT aperture and donut (left).

Quadrupole parameter vs RF phase Particle energy= 35 MeV, SSR2 new version Δpc X and Y components are synchronous in phase, Q parameter does not depend on RF phase.

Quadrupole parameter vs RF phase Particle β=0.47, SSR2 new version Δpc X and Y components are synchronous in phase, Q parameter does not depend on RF phase.

Quadrupole parameter vs RF phase Particle energy= 165 MeV, SSR2 new version Δpc X and Y components are synchronous in phase, Q parameter does not depend on RF phase.

Conclusions Donut shape does help to reduce the quadrupole effect in HWR cavity because: The main kick component is due to electric field (low beta) Donut shape symmetrizes X and Y electric component, and so it symmetrizes the transverse kick Magnetic field contribution to Δpc transverse is not affected by the donut but it is very small. SSR2 quadrupole component is not correctable using the donut shape: Donut shape symmetrizes only electric field components and the magnetic ones are almost unmodified Hy is bigger than Hx in the aperture region, this is due to the spoke cavity magnetic field lines The ratio between magnetic and electric contribution to Δpc gets higher as beta gets higher The design of SSR2 showing the best quadrupole component vs beta has elliptical BP and circular aperture. HWR and SSR2 quadrupole effect does not depend on RF phase for any of the betas analyzed in the range of interest.