Lessons Learned from Real Data Xin Qian BNL 1. Outline Space Charge effect for LArTPCs on surface Field Response Calibration How to deal with noises and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALICE TOF FESTIVAL Offline tools and GRID scenario for the ALICE TOF detector A. De Caro (University of Salerno and INFN) CERN – Bdg.29, October 20 th.
Advertisements

General Characteristics of Gas Detectors
A New Approach to Cluster Finding and Hit Reconstruction in Cathode Pad Chambers and its Development for the Forward Muon Spectrometer of ALICE A.Zinchenko,
Simulation of the RPC Response José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting University Hassan II Casablanca, Morocco September.
TRACK DICTIONARY (UPDATE) RESOLUTION, EFFICIENCY AND L – R AMBIGUITY SOLUTION Claudio Chiri MEG meeting, 21 Jan 2004.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Ties Behnke, Vasiliy Morgunov 1SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Pflow in SNARK: the next steps Ties Behnke, SLAC and DESY; Vassilly Morgunov, DESY and.
D. Peterson, “TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction”, LC-TPC-LBL, 18-Oct For example: TPC: 2.0 m O.R., 0.5 m I.R., 150  m spatial.
Chapter 7 – Poisson’s and Laplace Equations
D. Peterson, “TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction”, SLAC, 07-Jan For example: TPC: 2.0 m O.R., 0.5 m I.R., 150  m spatial.
D. Peterson, “TPC Digitization and Reconstruction: Noise ”, LCWS07, DESY, 30-May TPC digitization and track reconstruction: efficiency dependence.
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams Michele Faucci Giannelli.
General Physics II, Lec 7, By/ T.A. Eleyan 1 Additional Questions ( The Electric Potential )
STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nantes, July2002 SVT Analysis/Status Update Jun Takahashi – University of Sao Paulo.
KM3NeT detector optimization with HOU simulation and reconstruction software A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 - Paris,
LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LArIAT and LBNE Jim Stewart LArIAT EPAG Chair BNL LBNE LARIAT-EPAG J. Stewart BNL T. Junk.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
I have made the second half of the poster, first half which is made by tarak will have neutrino information. A patch between the two, telling why we do.
1 Tracking Reconstruction Norman A. Graf SLAC July 19, 2006.
Linear Collider TPC R&D in Canada Bob Carnegie, Madhu Dixit, Dean Karlen, Steve Kennedy, Jean-Pierre Martin, Hans Mes, Ernie Neuheimer, Alasdair Rankin,
IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Metrology 1.Perspective distortion. 2.Depth is lost.
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
PHENIX Drift Chamber operation principles Modified by Victor Riabov Focus meeting 01/06/04 Original by Sergey Butsyk Focus meeting 01/14/03.
Summary of PHOS Internal Notes (part I) Rafael Diaz Valdes 10/25/20151.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Erlangen, May 2009.
Measuring the Position Resolution of a COMPASS Drift Chamber Prototype Rojae Wright 1, Ihnjea Choi 2, Caroline Riedl 2, Matthias Grosse Perdekamp 2 (1)
The Pattern Recognition issue for the Mu2e experiment Giovanni F. Tassielli - G. Marconi University.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration Zhengyou Zhang Sung Huh CSPS 643 Individual Presentation 1 February 25,
TPC ExB distortion at LHC-ALICE experiment Yasuto Hori for the ALICE-TPC collaboration Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo 1.
G. BrunoOffline week - February Comparison between test- beam data and the SPD simulations in Aliroot G. Bruno, R. Santoro Outline:  strategy of.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
Preliminary Slice Test Track Fitting S. Durkin Sept. 8, 2005 Analyze RunNum1007Evs0to49999.bin using /AnalysisUtilities look for tracks in two separate.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
November 4, 2004Carl Bromberg, FNAL LAr Exp. Workshop Nov. 4-6, Liquid argon as an active medium Carl Bromberg Michigan State University & Fermilab.
Preliminary results on Copper filters, with FLIC test chamber F. Pietropaolo, A. Zani, M. Meli CENF General Meeting – 22/10/2015.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.
A. De Caro for the ALICE TOF Offline Group (University of Salerno and INFN)
1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
Ions in LAPD Can we Observe Them in Long Bo ? 3/6/2016 Ions in LAPD Sarah Lockwitz and Hans Jostlein, Fermilab 1 Sarah Lockwitz and Hans Jostlein Fermilab.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
18 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey 1 DECAL: Motivation Hence, number of charged particles is an intrinsically better measure than the energy deposited Clearest with.
10/25/2007Nick Sinev, ALCPG07, FNAL, October Simulation of charge collection in chronopixel device Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
MICE Tracker Software A. Dobbs CM32 9 th Feb 2012.
Laser Calibration of a Liquid Argon TPC G. Sinnis J. Danielson W. Sondheim.
View of TPC Optimization from Reconstruction Working Group Xin Qian and Tingjun Yang 1.
Outline Description of the experimental setup Aim of this work TDC spectra analysis Tracking method steps Autocalibration Single tube resolution Summary.
Recent Progress on Wire-Cell Xin Qian and Chao Zhang BNL 1.
Thoughts on TPC Optimization Xin Qian BNL 1. Outline Detector Parameters – TPC angle – Wire pitch – Wire angle – Wire pattern – Wire plane gap Basic reconstruction.
Comparison of reconstruction strategies in IceCube Lake Geneva, April 2007.
Low-energy Sim/Reco Capability Xin Qian (BNL) Tingjun Yang (FNAL) 1.
Daniel H. Gutiérrez Velázquez Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory PPD – Neutrino MicroBooNE.
1 straw tube signal simulation A. Rotondi PANDA meeting, Stockolm 15 June 2010.
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
High Energy Physics experiments.
Activities on straw tube simulation
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
HARPO Analysis.
HLT & Calibration.
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Hellenic Open University
Presentation transcript:

Lessons Learned from Real Data Xin Qian BNL 1

Outline Space Charge effect for LArTPCs on surface Field Response Calibration How to deal with noises and dead channels 2

Space Charge It is possible that the electric field in LArTPC is distorted – One possible source is the ion space charge – Ion’s velocity is about five orders of magnitude slower than the ionization electron – Ions take several minutes to move from APA to CPA For LArTPCs on surface, cosmic muons leads to significant amount of space charge inside the TPC active volume  distort electric field – Magnitude: (Drift distance) 3 and (E-field)

4 Simulation: M. Mooney

Impact of Space Charge 5 Clear effect of space charge with the laser data

Impact of Space Charge (I) Space charge leads to a distortion of electric field – According to Maxwell equation, electric field line can not cross each other – Due to the high density of LAr, ionization electron basically drift along the electric field line With the distortion of the electric field line, the unique feature of LArTPC (the foundation of wire- cell) stays the same – Same amount of charge are observed by all three planes for point charge arrived at anode plane 6

Impact of Space Charge (II) With the standard position reconstruction (assuming no space charge effect), a distorted 3D image will be reconstructed The correction of space charge must be 3D point (x,y,z) rec to 3D point (x,y,z) corr, once the space charge effect is calibrated Wire-Cell imaging step, producing (x,y,z) rec directly, fits well with space charge correction – Can be done before the pattern recognition 7

Notes The Space Charge Distortion in MicroBooNE qualitatively agrees with expectation – Need quantitative evaluations The space charge leads to curved tracks, which effectively reduce the number of long cosmic muons travelling parallel to the wire planes – For some MC events, Wire-Cell has memory issues due to this kind of long parallel tracks – For real Data, memory is more relaxed (also due to dead channel) 8

Outline Space Charge effect for LArTPCs on surface Field Response Calibration How to deal with dead channels 9

Strategy Comparison (Xin’s View) Traditional 2D Reconstruction Start with 2D (time + wire) 2D pattern recognition – Particle track information Matching 2D patterns into 3D objects – Time information (start/end of clusters) – Some charge information to remove ambiguities in matching – 3D track-like objects for both tracks and showers MC truth are needed to evaluate efficiency Wire-Cell 3D Tomography Start with 2D (at fixed time) 2D image reconstruction – Explicit Time + Charge information – Some connectivity information can be used 3D image reconstruction – Straight forward 3D Pattern recognition – Tracks – Showers Imaging vs. recognized pattern can be used to evaluate efficiency 10

Discussion Wire-Cell explicitly uses the match of time and charge information from all three planes – Very high requirement to the deconvoluted signal from all three planes – Performance are thus sensitive to the quality of the deconvoluted signal We can use this feature to calibrate the overall response function 11

Tiling Wire: wire +- pitch/2 Cell: overlap of three wires (each in U, V, and W) Tiling: form cells from wires 12 Mike Mooney CellMaker W: measured charge in a wire C: expected charge in a cell G: a matrix containing geometry information connecting wire and cell

Discussion Cells are made from the fired wires at the same time slice If there are time offsets among signals from fired wires, the number of cells created should be reduced Therefore, we can use this metric (number of cells created) to calibrate the time offset 13

Solving C: charge in each (merged) cell G: Geometry matrix connecting cells and wires W: charge in each single wire B: Geometry matrix connecting merged wires and single wires V BW : Covariance matrix describing uncertainty in wire charge 14

Discussion For each merged wire, after fit we have two values: – Measured charge – Expected charge from the sum of merged cells The expected charge is calculated based on the unique feature of TPC – Same amount of charge is observed by every wire plane by point charge arriving at the APA 15

Outline Space Charge effect for LArTPCs on surface Field Response Calibration How to deal with noises and dead channels 16

About 10% unusable channels 17

Impact to Wire-Cell Naively, with 10% unusable channels, the volume efficiency with all three wire planes can be estimated as – 0.9 * 0.9 *0.9 ~ 73% One can increase the efficiency by requiring only two out of three planes However, there are a lot of ghosts produced in the process 18

Two planes 19

Three planes 20

Strategy Comparison (Xin’s View) Traditional 2D Reconstruction Start with 2D (time + wire) 2D pattern recognition – Particle track information Matching 2D patterns into 3D objects – Time information (start/end of clusters) – Some charge information to remove ambiguities in matching – 3D track-like objects for both tracks and showers MC truth are needed to evaluate efficiency Wire-Cell 3D Tomography Start with 2D (at fixed time) 2D image reconstruction – Explicit Time + Charge information – Some connectivity information can be used 3D image reconstruction – Straight forward 3D Pattern recognition – Tracks – Showers Imaging vs. recognized pattern can be used to evaluate efficiency 21

Discussion How to deal with unusable channels is a challenge to all reconstructions methods I believe that Wire-Cell suffers more – Wire-Cell has high requirement on charge/time matching among three planes – While two-plane tiling has high efficiency, it also introduces lots of ghosts A disambiguity algorithm was introduced However, this disambiguity algorithm also kills good signal Probably need two-pass reconstruction (one to remove cosmics, one to deal with neutrinos) 22

Summary Wire-Cell tomographic reconstruction fits well with the position correction due to distorted field – Space charge by positive ions Wire-Cell has stringent requirement on the time/charge match among different planes – This can be used to calibrate the overall response function Wire-Cell suffers more from the unusable channels – Challenges to be resolved 23