Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Comparison of images with different perceptual qualities: (a) original image, (b) saliency map of (a), (c) image with blurred pollution in salient area, (d) image with blurred pollution in less salient area, (e) image with noised pollution in salient area, (f) image with noised pollution in less salient area. Figure Legend: From: New strategy for image and video quality assessment J. Electron. Imaging. 2010;19(1): doi: /

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. SMs with the phase correlation algorithm: (a) and (d) adjacent video frames, (b) difference frame between (a) and (d), (e) difference frame between (a) and (d) after phase correlation algorithm, and (c) and (f) SMs with motion information for (b) and (e), respectively. Figure Legend: From: New strategy for image and video quality assessment J. Electron. Imaging. 2010;19(1): doi: /

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Comparison of SMs: (a) reference image, (b) SM resulting from PQFT, (c) square-normalized SMs, and (d) biquadrate-normalized SM. Figure Legend: From: New strategy for image and video quality assessment J. Electron. Imaging. 2010;19(1): doi: /

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Natural images with different attention degrees: (a) to (d) natural images and (e) to (h) SMs of the corresponding natural images. Figure Legend: From: New strategy for image and video quality assessment J. Electron. Imaging. 2010;19(1): doi: /

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Interframe weights of video 1: (a) to (f) the 1st, 11th, 65th, 66th, 90th, and 190th frames of video 1, (g) ea versus frames, (h) eb versus frames, and (i) e versus frames. Figure Legend: From: New strategy for image and video quality assessment J. Electron. Imaging. 2010;19(1): doi: /

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Interframe weights of video 2: (a) to (f) the 1st, 11th, 65th, 66th, 90th, and 190th frames of video 2, (g) ea versus frames, (h) eb versus frames, and (i) e versus frames. Figure Legend: From: New strategy for image and video quality assessment J. Electron. Imaging. 2010;19(1): doi: /

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Framework of SVQA. Figure Legend: From: New strategy for image and video quality assessment J. Electron. Imaging. 2010;19(1): doi: /

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Scatter-point plots for the six objective quality criteria: PSNR, SPSNR, MSSIM, SMSSIM, log (VIF), and log (SVIF). The distortion types are (×) JPEG2000, (+) JPEG, () white noise, (box) Gaussian blur, and (diamond) transmission errors in JPEG2000 stream over the FF Rayleigh channel. Figure Legend: From: New strategy for image and video quality assessment J. Electron. Imaging. 2010;19(1): doi: /

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Scatter-point plots for V-PSNR and V-S-F-PSNR (V-PSNR means using PSNR for each frame, V-S-F-PSNR means using both intra- and interframe weights on PSNR). Figure Legend: From: New strategy for image and video quality assessment J. Electron. Imaging. 2010;19(1): doi: /

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Scatter-point plots for V-MSSIM and V-S-F-MSSIM (V-MSSIM means using MSSIM for each frame; V-S-F-MSSIM means using both intra- and interframe weights on MSSIM). Figure Legend: From: New strategy for image and video quality assessment J. Electron. Imaging. 2010;19(1): doi: /

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Scatter-point plots for V-VIF and V-S-F-VIF (V-VIF means using VIF for each frame; V-S-F-VIF means using both intra- and interframe weights on VIF) Figure Legend: From: New strategy for image and video quality assessment J. Electron. Imaging. 2010;19(1): doi: /