Local Assistance Plan Schools: Self-Reflection Process and Required Plan May 13, 2016 Presented by Alexandra Pressley Office of Accountability New York.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Advertisements

Schoolwide Programs (SWP) NCLB Regional Meetings April 2010.
PORTFOLIO.
Elementary School Counselor
ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
Campus Improvement Plans
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
Harry Hoag School LOCAL ASSISTANCE PLAN (LAP). PURPOSE In accordance with NYS Commissioner’s Regulations, “…a district in Good Standing that has LAP Schools.
New Specialist Orientation May 2014
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Local Assistance Plan Schools: The Diagnostic Self-Review Document and Report Template August 2013 Presented by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
Skills and Achievement Commencement Credential
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness: Implications for Improving Teacher Preparation Programs Lynn Holdheide, Deputy Director Office of Special Education Program’s.
1 The Diagnostic Self-Review Process for Local Assistance Plan (LAP) Schools September 16 th and 17 th, 2015 Presented by the Long Island RSE-TASC.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
EXPECTATIONS FOR MICHIGAN’S FOCUS SCHOOLS 11/12/20151 FOCUS SCHOOL WEBINAR Office of Education Improvement and Innovation School Support Unit August 27,
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Adapted from guidance presented on August 2013 by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education Improvement Services NYSED Local Assistance Plan Schools:
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
The Every Student Succeeds Act Highlights of Key Changes for States, Districts, and Schools.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Office of School Improvement Contractor Update Division Leadership Support Team Meeting The College of William and Mary March 31, 2014.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Lessons from Virginia: Growing a System of Support for
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Essential Questions What are the ramifications of continued identification under the ESEA Accountability Act? What do we need to do to get our school.
Schoolwide Programs.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Principal’s Meeting: SCEP Planning Part II
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
ESSA accountability & Report Card Proposed regulations
Presentation transcript:

Local Assistance Plan Schools: Self-Reflection Process and Required Plan May 13, 2016 Presented by Alexandra Pressley Office of Accountability New York State Education Department

Background Information New York State’s school and district accountability system has been approved by the United States Department of Education through the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Waiver initiative. The approved waiver is posted on the Office of Accountability website at: The approved waiver requires New York to identify Priority and Focus Districts and schools, as well as support continuous improvement in other Title I schools that are not making progress in improving student achievement and narrowing achievement gaps. The Local Assistance Plan schools are those schools that are not making progress in improving student achievement and narrowing achievement gaps. Pursuant to Commissioner’s Regulations §100.18, the New York State Education Department (NYSED or “the Department”) is required to identify Local Assistance Plan (LAP) Schools annually. 2

Identification A school was identified as LAP for the school year if the school failed to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for an accountability subgroup for the same accountability measure for the , and school year results. 3

The BIG Picture In accordance with Commissioner’s Regulations, a district with LAP Schools will be required to work with the identified schools to conduct a self-reflection, using the Local Assistance Plan Self- Reflection Process Document. The school, in collaboration with the district, is then required to use the results of the Self-Reflection to create an intervention plan for the school year, using the Local Assistance Plan template. Within the plan, the school will be required to clearly identify the supports and interventions that are to be implemented in the in the school, based on the results of the Self-Reflection process. The Self-Reflection Process Document and Local Assistance Plan template are posted on the following webpage: 4

Local Assistance Plan Requirements The Self-Reflection Process and plan will meet the regulatory requirement for LAP Schools by including the following information regarding: –the process by which the plan was developed and how school leadership, staff, parents, and students, if appropriate, were given meaningful opportunities to participate in the development of the plan; –the additional resources and professional development that will be provided to LAP Schools to support implementation of the plan; and –the actions the school and district will take to improve the performance of the subgroup(s) for which the school was identified and the timeline for implementation of the actions. 5

Timeline The Local Assistance Plan, created by the school and district, and based upon the results of the Self-Reflection, must be approved by the local board of education for the district (or Chancellor in New York City) and posted to the district’s website by Friday, July 29,

Diagnostic Tool for School & District Effectiveness (DTSDE) New York State’s lowest achieving schools require targeted and specialized assistance in order to build school and district capacity to support sustainable school change. Necessary supports for effective school change must be based on, as well as be responsive to, the comprehensive needs of the school, driven by an assessment of the optimal conditions for learning as defined by research-based best practices, and delivered in a high quality manner and embedded in school practice. The Rubric articulates the State’s theory of action regarding the optimal conditions for district and school effectiveness. The Rubric has been created to measure how close to or far away a particular school is from the optimal conditions identified. 7

Diagnostic Tool for School & District Effectiveness 8

Rubric Organization 9 DTSDE Tenets Tenet 1 – District Leadership and Capacity Tenet 2 – School Leader Practices and Decisions Tenet 3 – Curriculum Development and Support Tenet 4 – Teacher Practices and Decisions Tenet 5 – Student Social and Emotional Developmental Health Tenet 6 – Family and Community Engagement

Statements of Practice (SOP) Each tenet contains Statements of Practice that are intended to show what effective school practices in that particular tenet look like. Each SOP is described across four stages – within each stage there is descriptive language regarding what the SOP looks like in that stage. The SOPs are comprised of an IMPACT and sub-statements of practice that describe what the practices in each Stage MAY LOOK LIKE. 10

Rubric Organization: Stages  Each column describes a developmental stage in attaining the SOP  Stage 1= Beginning; Stage 4 = Advanced 11

DTSDE: IMPACT statements Each SOP has a corresponding IMPACT STATEMENT 12

Using the Rubric The Rubric outlines the continuum of improvement. The SOPs must be looked at holistically. The rubric is not to be used as a checklist. Always reflect back on the “meaning” of the SOP and why it is essential for school improvement. 13

Step 1: Determining the Reason for Identification If your school has one subgroup identified as a result of performance on state assessments or gaps in performance between the group and the all students group: –Complete the Self-Reflection Process Document. –Use the results of the Self-Reflection to guide creation of the Local Assistance Plan. 14

Step 1: Determining the Reason for Identification If your school has more than one subgroup identified: –Consider all identified subgroups when answering each of the prompts in the Self-Reflection Process Document. For some prompts, the answers may be different for each of the identified subgroups. In those instances, the school should provide a response for each subgroup, which would result in multiple responses for the individual Statement of Practice prompt. For other prompts, the answers may be the same for the different identified subgroups. In those instances, the school can provide one response for the multiple identified subgroups. –Once the Self-Reflection Document is complete, please use the results of the Self-Reflection to guide creation of a Local Assistance Plan to address all identified subgroups. 15

Step 1: Determining the Reason for Identification (cont.) If your school has subgroup(s) that have been solely identified for failing to meet the participation rate requirement, please do one of the following: –Option 1: Proceed with completing the Self-Reflection Process Document and creation of the Local Assistance Plan for the identified group. Provide narrative responses to the questions listed in the “Promoting Participation in State Assessments” section. –Option 2: Complete the Self-Reflection Process Document and create a Local Assistance Plan for a subgroup identified by the school or district as in need of improvement based on internal assessments. The school will need to provide information on the assessments that were used to make the determination. Provide narrative responses to the questions listed in the “Promoting Participation in State Assessments” section. 16

Step 2: Gathering your team. The Local Assistance Plan (LAP) Self- Reflection Process Document provides school- based teams the opportunity to reflect on the practices that exist within the school in preparation for identifying the appropriate next steps on their LAP that will support increased student academic achievement. The school must list the name and title of each individual working on the Self-Reflection team. The expectation is that teams will have representation of parents, teachers, administrators, and other stakeholders. 17

Step 3: Completing the Self- Reflection Process Document Review the Diagnostic Tool for School and District Effectiveness rubric. The DTSDE rubric and more information on how to use the rubric can be found on this website: stic-tool-institute/home.html. stic-tool-institute/home.html In your review of the rubric, be sure to look at the impact statements for each Statement of Practice (SOP). Discuss your interpretation of the rubric and support documents with your team to establish a common understanding of what is stated in the documents. 18

Self-Reflection Process To complete this form, as a group: 1.Review each SOP in the Tenet, and the corresponding Impact Statement. 2.Take time to consider how you would answer the Modified LAP Guiding Question/SOP Prompt. 3.Answer the prompts regarding evidence of impact. 19

Self-Reflection Process Document Components 20

Tips for completing the Modified LAP Guiding Question/ SOP Prompts Avoid providing a list of activities, unless you can provide evidence of how you know they are having an impact and adding value to the school, especially in terms of student achievement and the quality of education. Statements of Practice 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 3.2, 4.2, 5.2, and 6.2 revolve around the leadership at the school. The phrase “The school leaders” has been provided at the start of each of these SOPs to remind schools to frame their answers through the leaders’ decisions and practices. 21

Tips for completing the Modified LAP Guiding Question/ SOP Prompts Within each Modified LAP Guiding Question/SOP Prompt, there is an expected impact, which provides an indication that the practices undertaken are making a difference and adding value to the school. You will find the expected impact for each Guiding Question in bold, green text. When answering “Yes” to any question, be sure that all aspects of the Modified LAP Guiding Question/SOP Prompt have been realized, including the impact portion of the question, which is noted green. Your answers to the Modified LAP Guiding Question/SOP Prompt should range between 10 words (one sentence) and 200 words. 22

Evidence of Impact Prompts Avoid providing a list of activities, unless you can provide evidence of how you know they are having an impact and adding value to the school, especially in terms of student achievement and the quality of education. The prompts look slightly different for each tenet. The main purpose of the prompt is to spur discussion on the evidence that the school has that a particular strategy or activity is working or not working. This information is the most useful in creating the Local Assistance Plan, since it requires the school to determine where changes need to be made in order to achieve the intended impact. 23

Evidence of Impact Prompts 24

Evidence of Impact Prompts 25

Evidence of Impact Prompts 26

Step 3: Complete the Whole School Reflection 27 This section should be completed based upon a holistic review of the information gathered in the Tenet sections. The Whole School Reflection should serve as the starting point for creation of your Local Assistance Plan.

Step 3: Complete the Whole School Reflection 28

Support from the Regional Special Education Technical Assistance Support Centers (RSE- TASC) –A Special Education Improvement Specialist may be available to: –Assist with instructional walkthroughs of the school –Participate as a Self-Review Team member –Provide training on explicit/specially designed instruction and what to look for during classroom observations –Contact information for the RSE-TASC may be found at: asc/locations.htm asc/locations.htm 29

Students with Disabilities Subgroup If your school has been identified as LAP for the SWD subgroup, please make sure to review the following information/practices during your Self-Reflection process: –Data on students with disabilities –See “LAP Self Review School Information Sheet: Additional Considerations for Schools focusing on Students with Disabilities” at m m –School practices relating to special education services –See “Guiding Questions for LAP Self-Reviews – Students with Disabilities Subgroup” at LAPSelfReview.doc. LAPSelfReview.doc –Delivery of explicit and specially designed instruction –See “Explicit and Specially Designed Instruction Walk-Through Tool” at LAPSelfReview.pdfhttp:// LAPSelfReview.pdf 30

Creating a Local Assistance Plan 31

Creating a Local Assistance Plan Part I: Whole School Reflection Identify the date the Local Assistance Plan Self-Reflection Document was completed. Identify the individuals who helped complete the Local Assistance Plan Self-Reflection Document. In thinking about the information gathered using the Local Assistance Plan Self- Reflection Document, and the school as the whole, answer the prompts. 32

Creating a Local Assistance Plan Part II: Plan for Overcoming Barriers and Addressing Needs Complete the following chart to create a plan for overcoming barriers for the identified subgroup and/or addressing any needs that must be met for the identified subgroup. 33

Creating a Local Assistance Plan 34

Creating a Local Assistance Plan Barrier/Need to be addressed – Choose from the barriers or needs identified in Part 1. Strategy to be implemented - Describe the strategy that will be used to address the barrier/need. Resources to be used – Describe what resources (human capital, funding, etc.) will be used to support the strategy. Specialized PD involved – Describe any necessary professional development that must happen to ensure effective implementation of the strategy. 35

Creating a Local Assistance Plan 36

Creating a Local Assistance Plan Mid-year Benchmark Goal – Describe what will have been accomplished by the middle of the school year in terms of staff efforts and student outcomes. End of the Year Quantifiable Goal - Describe what will have been accomplished by the end of the school year in terms of student outcomes. Person(s) responsible –Determine who will be responsible for implementation of the strategy. Time period for implementation – List key dates for the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the strategy. 37

Creating a Local Assistance Plan 38

Collaboration on Development of the Plan The Diagnostic Self-Review is intended to be completed by the school leadership team, in collaboration with district representatives. Schools must describe how the Self-Review Document and Report Template was developed pursuant to Commissioner’s Regulation

LAP and Participation Rate If your school has subgroup(s) that have been solely identified for failing to meet the participation rate requirement, the school must provide narrative responses to the questions in Part III: Promoting Participation in State Assessments. 40

Approval and Posting of the Plan The Local Assistance Plan (LAP) must be approved by the district’s Board of Education (for NYC, it must be approved by the Chancellor).Evidence of Board (or Chancellor) approval must be kept on file at school and district offices. The LAP must be posted, along with evidence of Board (or Chancellor) approval, to the district’s website, no later than July 29, The LAP and the completed Self-Reflection Process document must also be kept on file at both the school and district offices. 41

LAP and 1003(a) School Improvement Grant Funds The Department will make available to districts with Title I LAP Schools, a grant of $20,000 per school to support implementation of LAP plans in the school year. Potential LAP Schools are not eligible for grants. Districts will receive further information in May 2016 regarding these grants. 42

LAP and the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) The Department is required by Commissioner’s Regulations and the state’s approved ESEA Flexibility Waiver to identify LAP Schools for the school year. Although the Every Student Succeeds Act was signed into law on December 10, 2015 by President Obama, states are required to fulfill the terms of their approved ESEA Waivers until a new state accountability plan aligned with ESSA is approved by the United States Department of Education. As the USDE issues guidance to states regarding the development of new state accountability plans, the Department will share that information with the field. 43

Resources To view the technical documentation on the identification of Focus Districts, Focus Schools, Priority Schools, LAP Schools, and Reward Schools, please visit: To learn more about the Diagnostic Tool for School and District Effectiveness, please visit: institute/home.html. institute/home.html For further information on the District Comprehensive Improvement Plan, please view webinars posted at:

Questions? Please contact the Office of Accountability via at 45