Interpreting the Data for Webster County Elementary/Middle School A presentation for Faculty and Staff Pre-Planning, 2011-2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Advertisements

Metrics for Physical Science The Easy Way: The Easy Way: Learning Learning the Metric System and Conversions the Metric System and Conversions Utilizing.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
C Domain Teaching for Student Learning. The focus in the C Domain is on the act of teaching and its overall goal of helping students connect with the.
Elementary School Standards-Based Classroom.
8 th Grade Technology Literacy NCLB guidelines. Technology Literacy The portion of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act known as 'Enhancing Education Through.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
STaR Chart Summary for Bryan ISD By Jenna Springfield.
Whole site approach to improvement Leading the Learning Workshop 3 - for leadership teams in secondary sites Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit.
BY: JESSICA WILLIAMS Technology in Education. What is Technology? SMART Board Clickers Projector Computer Flash Drive I-Pad Zune Document Camera Flip.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Creating Effective Inquiry-Based Learning Activities that Increase Student Achievement.
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
 Rubric – Appendix pg. 26  Four components ◦ Planning – will look at tomorrow ◦ Classroom management ◦ Instruction ◦ Professional Notebook.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Evaluating Educational Technology and Integration Strategies By: Dakota Tucker, Derrick Haney, Demi Ford, and Kent Elmore Chapter 7.
Collaboration I nstruction Assessment 1st AnalysisReflection Intervention Assessment 2nd COMING FULL CIRCLE Mallard Creek and UNCC PDS Work Plan Outcomes.
Instructional Design Gayle Henry. Instructional Design Instructional Design is creating experiences for the learner where how they learn is achieved in.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
WHAT THE LIBRARY CAN DO FOR YOU! “Help us Help you”
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
1 NEEDS BASED TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Aland Russell Director of Technology Escuela Campo Alegre Documents available upon.
Using Technology in the Classroom. State of Education Low test scores Funding issues Poverty Lack of support Standardized testing.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
Created By: Ms. Leah Wendt.  1. Teachers know the subjects they are teaching. The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures.
Setting Your Students Free How to create a student-centered versus a teacher- centered learning environment in your classroom Presentation By Kelly Miller.
Presenting History Using Photostory January 2010 History Connected Teaching American History Grant Connections to Standards: Massachusetts History and.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015.
By: Megan Becker. o Smart boards are interactive white boards that enhance the learning and collaboration of it’s users through various hands on tasks.
Interpreting the Data for Webster County Elementary/Middle School A presentation for Faculty and Staff Pre-Planning, Presented by: Marcia Roberts,
Intel ® Teach Program Thinking with Technology Course Pn. Idawati Che Mat Jabatan Teknologi Pendidikan
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
CMS TEC Grant Final Activities April 16, Grant Goals Increase teachers’ effective integration of digital resources into the curriculum Professional.
Classroom Technology Plan By Saundra Tyson-Dawson E7801 Instructional Technology Planning and Management Dr. Regina Merrwether.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Big6 Overview Big6™ Trainers Program McDowell County Schools.
TECHNOLOGY PROPOSAL Chile, Arizona, and Tucson Unified School District Sara Gibbs EDTC 645 Country Proposal Summer 2013 Dr. Blesh.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Educational Computing David Goldschmidt, Ph.D. Computer Science The College of Saint Rose Curriculum and Technology.
Programming the New Syllabuses (incorporating the Australian Curriculum)
Literacy Centers In-Service January 3, 2007 Facilitator: Amy Lack, Reading Coach.
Company LOGO MCPS District Technology Teaching Plan Department of Instructional Technology Presented by Jennifer Martin July 16, 2012
Instruction and Technology December 10, What’s up? Preview of learning gains and Excel “how-to” Final touches in bringing your unit together – Bulletin.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Leveraging the Internet for Learning Josh Baron Josh Baron Associate Director for Instructional Technology Center for Improved Engineering.
Put Your Classroom On A 21 st Century DI-IT Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated Classroom Environments Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated.
Sharp Elementary and the 21 st Century Classroom A Vision of Our Today.
Math Math Communication January 21, 2010 ESU#3 Facilitated by: Pam Krambeck and Debbie Schraeder.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
Supervising the Use of Technology in the Classroom Developed for SSU Supervisors by Regina Royer & Ernest Bond.
NETS.S for Students Victoria Wilson IT Standard 1 Creativity and Innovation Students demonstrate creative thinking, construct knowledge, and develop.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting Campbell Elementary School September 15, 2015.
Helping 21 st Century Teachers Transform their Practice – But How? PLP Presentation May 24, 2010 PLP Presentation May 24, 2010.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Standards and Instruction Putting it All Together Linda Dressel November 29, 2014 St. Leo University.
Technology and Special Needs Students By Dennis Waller.
*Solution Fluency *Information Fluency *Collaboration Fluency *Creativity Fluency *Media Fluency *Digital Citizen By Tricia Cherek EDT 652.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
Community Event Twanna Bradford Professor Williams Final Project June 5, 2016.
Issues in Teaching EDU Session 1 The Conceptual Understanding of What You are Teaching.
Patsy Kraj Spring 2011 University of West Georgia.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Technology and 21st Century Skills Assessment Rubric
Assessments TAP 1- Strand 5.
Instructional Tools The Eagle Group.
Presentation transcript:

Interpreting the Data for Webster County Elementary/Middle School A presentation for Faculty and Staff Pre-Planning,

How are we doing? Georgia vs. Webster

Comparison of CRCT State to Webster County Percent of Students Scoring in Does Not Meet the Standard/Performance Level 1 in Science Graph A

Comparison of CRCT State to Webster County Percent of Students Scoring in Does Not Meet the Standard/Performance Level 1 in Social Studies Graph B

So…we have a problem or two! But wait, there’s more….. Science Social Studies

Operations/ Concepts Responsible Use Productivity Tool Communicate Information Information Search Data Utilization Grade 643%41%43%32%34%35% Grade 742%33%30%33%41%28% Grade 892%98%85%96%87%95% OAS Technology Literacy Results Table1 Percent achieving mastery/competency in each domain Why aren’t our students performing better on this assessment?

What can we do?

If we expect different results in the future, we have to make some changes in what we are doing today. So….

Our goals: To increase the number of 6th, 7th, and 8th grade students who meet or exceed the CRCT performance standards in science by a minimum of 3% by To increase the number of 6th, 7th, and 8th grade students who meet or exceed the CRCT performance standards in social studies by a minimum of 3% by To increase the number of 6th, 7th, and 8th grade students achieving mastery/competency on the OAS Technology Literacy Test by 3% by 2013.

How can we achieve these goals? All classrooms now have 21 st Century technology tools for teacher and STUDENT use!

Technology is the Key

Professional Development will be Provided Mandatory attendance at professional development workshops (to be offered monthly) You will learn to use your new technology tools so that you will be able to teach your students to utilize the technology to bring science and social studies to life in completing their assignments.

A GREAT place to start is Georgia Standards.org Why? They’ve already done the work for YOU! Georgia Standards.org

SMART BOARD USE EXAMPLE

SMART Document use example ?video_id=35994&title=60_Sec_Tech_Episode _22_Smart_Document_Camera_and_Science& ref=Mrobert6

Clicker activity

Lesson using IPODs

Lesson with digital cameras

How will we know if the plan is working?

NoviceImprovingProficientExpert Planning and Designing The online activities have not been previewed by the teacher. The activities require only lower-level thinking. The teacher uses only basic skills. The online activities have been previewed by the teacher. The activities generally require only lower-level thinking. The teacher uses basic and advanced skills. The technology usage enhances concept development. The online activities have been previewed by the teacher. The activities include some higher-order critical thinking. The teacher customizes the lesson for some students. The technology usage enhances and extends concept development. The online activities have been previewed and there is a back-up plan. The activities require higher-order critical thinking. The teacher customizes the lesson for all students. Webster County Schools Technology Integration Rubric (Teacher)

Teaching and Management The lesson focus is on technology use. No rules for computer use have been established. The students are unaware of acceptable use rules and safety guidelines. The teacher seldom monitors learning. Many students are off-task. Technology is often used as a reward or time-filler. Students do not have equitable access to technology. The lesson focus is on technology use. Basic rules for technology use have been established. The students are unsure of acceptable use rules and safety guidelines. The teacher occasionally monitors learning. Some students are on- task. Technology is sometimes used as a reward or time- filler. Most students have equitable access to technology. The lesson focus is on subject area content. There are established rules and routines for computer use, getting help, and group work. The students understand the acceptable use rules and safety guidelines. The teacher often monitors learning. Most students are on- task. Technology is used as a tool for specific learning objectives. Most students have equal and appropriate access to technology. The lesson focus is on subject area content and students use multiple tools and information sources. There are well-established rules and routines for computer use, getting help, group work, and peer coaching. The students demonstrate a thorough understanding of acceptable use rules and safety guidelines. The teacher actively monitors learning and checks for understanding. All students are on-task. In the classroom students use technology tools as needed without teacher direction. All students have equal and appropriate access to technology.

Assessment and Evaluation All students create the same product. Students allowed to make some assignment choices. Students create products that meet objectives. Students create products that demonstrate original thinking and creativity. Students create products that clearly meet objectives. Adapted from rubric of Kennesaw State University Educational Technology Center. (2010). Retrieved from edtech.kennesaw.edu/admin/ED51100/Performance%20Rubric.doc

References Kennesaw State University. (2010). Retrieved from edtech.kennesaw.edu/admin/ED51100/Performance%20Rubric.doc board.jpghttp:// board.jpg whiteboard image  HBgkIBwgKCgkLDRYPDQwMDRsUFRAWIB0iIiAdHx8kKDQsJCYxJx8fLT0t MTU3Ojo6Iys IPOD Image