Balancing the Call for Evidence- Based Research Designs With Formative Evaluation to Improve Implementation of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching Ken Wareham.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Advertisements

Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Action Research Opportunity Or Research Based Action.
Materials Support Assessment Professional Development Community/ Administrative Involvement Curriculum Materials Science: It’s Elementary Bringing science.
APS Teacher Evaluation A SMART Process for Student and Teacher Growth.
New York State Education Department Science Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Update Spring 2006.
1 Standards, Curriculum, and Research Mathematically Connected Communities (MC 2 ) Adapted from a PowerPoint by Barbara A. Austin, Ph.D.
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
PISA Partnership to Improve Student Achievement through Real World Learning in Engineering, Science, Mathematics and Technology.
What is program success? Wendy Tackett, Ph.D., Evaluator Valerie L. Mills, Project Director Adele Sobania, STEM Oakland Schools MSP, Michigan.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Data Collection Information 1.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Supporting the CCSS in the Science Classroom through the Science and Engineering Practices of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) John Spiegel.
DMUSD TRANSITION TO COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS. COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS  Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort coordinated.
Let’s Get to the Core Presenter Info: Ron Jetty, Director, PK 16 Initiatives University of Wisconsin System.
AGU FM 2006 Teacher Research Experiences Gail Scowcroft and Chris Knowlton Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island What We Have Learned.
Cindy M. Walker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No
Developing teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching Challenges in the implementation and sustainability of a new MSP Dr. Tara Stevens Department of.
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
Measuring Changes in Teachers’ Mathematics Content Knowledge Dr. Amy Germuth Compass Consulting Group, LLC.
Measuring Changes in Teachers’ Science Content Knowledge Dr. Anne D’Agostino Compass Consulting Group, LLC.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Title II, Part B Mathematics and Science Partnerships Equitable Services to Private Schools: Program Specifics.
DEBBIE FRENCH EDCI 5870 OCTOBER 30,  Title of research project:  “An Investigation of the NITARP/ SSTPTS Astronomy Research Experience for Teachers”
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
RESULTS FOR ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOLS 2013 Statewide Test Data.
1 Standards, Curriculum, and Research Mathematically Connected Communities (MC 2 ) Adapted from a PowerPoint by Barbara A. Austin, Ph.D.
U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships: FY 2005 Summary.
Next-Generation Standards and Accountability Terry Holliday, Ph.D. Kentucky Education Commissioner Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Integrating Success The Transition of All Students From High School to College November 2007 Iowa Educational Research & Evaluation Association Annual.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Improving Teacher Quality Grants, Cycle 5: External Evaluation Report December 8 th, 2008 University of Missouri Evaluation Team.
Math and Science Partnership Program Approaches to State Longitudinal Evaluation March 21, 2011 San Francisco MSP Regional Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Public.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Using SEC Data for Program Evaluation Report on SEC Data Analysis for a State MSP.
Tim Brower Professor & Chair Manufacturing & Mechanical Engr. Oregon Institute of Technology MSP Regional Meeting, San Francisco, February 14 & 15, 2008.
Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director Building a Partnership – Susan Millar District Case Studies – William Clune Targeted Studies.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Teachers for a New Era: Evidence Study at California State University, Northridge Beverly Cabello Evidence Co-Leader, Teachers for a New Era James David.
Challenges and Trade-offs in Measuring the Outcomes of NSF’s Mathematics and Science Partnership Program: Lessons from four years on the learning curve.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
South Jersey Math/Science Partnership at Rowan University Dr. Eric Milou Dr. Jill Perry SJMP.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
1 Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape Melissa Fincher Associate Superintendent for Assessment and Accountability Georgia Department for Education GACIS.
Key Initiatives to Ensure College & Career Readiness for All Students.
Raising the Bar: Common Core State Standards Idaho State Department of Education
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Mathematics and Science Partnership (CaMSP) Grant.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
Understanding the Common Core Standards Adopted by Nevada in 2010 Our State. Our Students. Our Success.
Proficiency-based dual credit Closing the gap between high school and college.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
Broadening Participation through K-12 and Community Partnerships
Cambridge Primary Parent Information Night
“An Impact School Partnership”
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
New Prospect Elementary School
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
Summit Hill Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Balancing the Call for Evidence- Based Research Designs With Formative Evaluation to Improve Implementation of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching Ken Wareham Lewis-Clark State College Catherine Callow-Heusser  ndVision Research & Evaluation, LLC

Math/Science Partnership (MSP) The intent of this program is to encourage institutions of higher education, local school districts, elementary schools, and secondary schools to participate in professional development activities that increase the subject matter knowledge and teaching skills of mathematics and science teachers.

Math/Science Partnership (MSP) Professional development activities must be sustained, intensive, classroom focused, and aligned with state and local standards and mathematics and science curricula.

Math/Science Partnership (MSP) These activities must result in a demonstrable and measurable improvement in student academic achievement in mathematics and science.

State 4 th Grade Math Exams: Percent of student at or above proficient.

State vs NAEP 4 th Grade Math Exams: Percent of student at or above proficient.

Identifying the Need. Data indicates the factor that is putting the district in AYP jail is Language Arts. Research review results in finding the Valle Imperial Project in Science, headed by Supt. Michael Klentschy. A partnership is formed with Klentschy to replicate his program. Teaching for Excellence in Science and Literacy Achievement (TESLA) is awarded spring 2007.

Objectives Increase teacher’s understanding of current research- based best practices related to teaching science using kit-based science modules (e.g. FOSS).

Objectives Increase teachers’ pedagogical skills in science by demonstrating and modeling evidence- based best practices in relation to using kit-based science modules.

Objectives Provide teachers with an in-depth knowledge of scientific concepts through intense study, skill enhancement, application, and demonstration.

Objectives Help teachers understand the interconnectedness of the scientific methods, literacy, and mathematics when learning science and incorporate these connections in the teaching process.

Objectives Provide long-term support to teachers via in-class mentoring and skill development.

20 Evaluation Design Formative evaluation to guide program improvement  Surveys  College faculty observation of classroom implementations with feedback  Student assessment data Summative evaluation  Comparison group design proposed but not feasible  Pre/posttest design based on SAT-9T gains in grade equivalent scores 20

21 Post-Workshop Survey (Fall 2009)

22 Post-Workshop Survey Responses

23 Post-Workshop Survey Responses: Variables

24 Assessment of Teacher Knowledge Pretest-Post: Variables 24 Variables Pretest Posttest

25 Assessment of Teacher Knowledge Pretest-Post: Inquiry 25 Inquiry Pretest Inquiry Posttest

26 Student Outcomes Pretest-Posttest (fall, spring) Stanford Achievement Test version 9 form T (SAT-9T)  Designed to reduce student reliance on memorized factual information and emphasize the unifying concepts and themes in science as outlined in the AAAS publication Science for All Americans (1990)  Subtests for science and language arts 26

27 SAT-9T Outcomes (Spring 2009) Grade Science Grade Equivalent Change Language Arts Grade Equivalent Change 4 th th th

28 Additional SAT-9T Outcomes Participants were 4 th, 5 th, and 6 th grade students Science  41% who were enrolled in participating classrooms for two years were at a 12 th grade equivalent  89% had scores that were at or above grade level Language Arts  45% were at at a 9 th grade or higher grade level equivalent  75% who were enrolled in participating classrooms for two years were above grade level 28

29 Contextual Factors Influencing Project Implementation and Evaluation External evaluator in another state College faculty local to project  Observe classrooms to improve FOSS implementation Varied academic preparation and experience in evaluation, K- 12 teaching, coaching/mentoring Which resulted in limited use of observation data for summative evaluation (due to reliability)  Unmeasured side effect: TESLA built capacity of faculty with regard to inquiry teaching, coaching/mentoring Teachers who volunteered to participate District/school administrators with varying levels of support and involvement 29

30 TESLA Idaho MSP Principal Investigator Kenneth L. Wareham, Ph.D., Associate Professor Lewis-Clark State College Division of Education th Avenue Lewiston, ID (office) (fax) Evaluator Catherine Callow-Heusser, President EndVision Research and Evaluation, LLC 41 E University Blvd #321 Logan, UT (mobile) (office) (fax) 30