Ronda Davis, Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group APS Math Specialist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Selecting and Assigning Accessibility Features and Accommodated Test Forms in PearsonAccess 1 Accessibility Features and Accommodations.
Advertisements

COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS (CCSS) PARENT WORKSHOP.
PARCC in Illinois Presented by: Dan Frederking Principal Consultant Illinois State Board of Education Illinois State.
Secondary PARCC Practice Tests Instructional Implications.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Maria J. Ortiz, Principal January 21, 2015 PARCC Parent Meeting.
SBA Usability, Accessibility, & Accommodations
Accessibility and Accommodations. Introduction Positive and productive assessment experience Results that are fair and accurate.
Accessibility and Accommodations. Introduction Positive and productive assessment experience Results that are fair and accurate.
Universal Design Arkansas Department of Education January 2014.
Parent Information Spring EBR Office of Professional Development and Instruction
0 Accessibility Features and Accommodations Ensuring Access for All Students.
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking October, 2013.
Reading the Mathematics Evidence Tables 1. Master Claim: On-Track for college and career readiness. The degree to which a student is college and career.
Kristy Green Debbie Wilson Joan Mattson. Higher Expectations 3 ELA/Literacy Read sufficiently complex texts independently Write effectively to sources.
Ronda Davis Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group Math Coach at Highland High School,
Accessibility and Accommodations. Introduction Positive and productive assessment experience Results that are fair and accurate.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers PARCC 1.
Secondary PARCC Tests Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Sub-claim A: Students solve problems involving the major content for their grade level with connections to practices Sub-Claim B: Students solve problems.
Ronda Davis Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group Math Coach at Highland High School,
Spring 2014 PARCC Field Test: Accessibility and Accommodations.
PARCC Assessment Math Shifts Becky Justus Math Teacher Greene County Tech Junior High PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member.
Reading the Mathematics Evidence Tables 1. Master Claim: On-Track for college and career readiness. The degree to which a student is college and career.
PARCC WORKSHOP Preparing Students for the Call to be College and Career Ready.
Understanding the Evidence Statement Tables for the PARCC Summative Assessments in Mathematics Welcome to the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for.
PARCC: Accessibility Features & Accommodations
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision of Assessment: Texts Worth Reading, Problems Worth Solving, Tests Worth Taking Overview Presented by:
Assessment Accommodations Andrew R Hinkle. Is There Anything I Need to Know About Testing Accommodations for Online Assessments?
PARCC Update June 6, PARCC Update Today’s Presentation:  PARCC Field Test  Lessons Learned from the Field Test  PARCC Resources 2.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
ECD is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the validity of the assessments, increase the comparability.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
MPs: Math Practice Standards grades 6-8 (CCSS) Welcome…
Achievethecore.org 1 Implementing Standards and Incorporating Mathematical Practices Sandra M. Alberti AMTNJ October 24, 2013.
Brandon Graham Putting The Practices Into Action March 20th.
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CCSS FOR MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS PRESENTED BY: BEATRIZ ALDAY.
Common Core and the Community College May 20, 2014.
Welcome to Common Core High School Mathematics Leadership
Ronda Davis Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group Math Coach/Teacher at Highland High.
Common Core State Standards The New National Initiative West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Meeting March 19, 2013.
Common Core High School Mathematics: Transforming Instructional Practice for a New Era 1.1.
Integrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice with the Standards for Mathematical Content Part One – K-5 Math Oct. 23,
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
Online Assessment Supports State Assessment Beth Schiltz, SD DOE – Sped Office September, 2015.
PARCC - Access for All Katherine Glorioso Brennan Supervisor of District Testing.
New Mexico PARCC Tests: What do families need to know? November 2015.
Ronda Davis Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group Math Coach at Highland High School,
PARCC Accessibility Features and Accommodations Manual Training for Parents Presented on November 20, 2014 Presented by the: Office of Special Education.
Accessibility and Accommodations. Introduction Positive and productive assessment experience Results that are fair and accurate.
ASSESSMENT UPDATE Literacy Specialists September 10, 2014.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision of Assessment: Texts Worth Reading, Problems Worth Solving, Tests Worth Taking Overview Presented by:
Mater Gardens Middle School MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT WHERE LEARNING HAS NO FINISH LINE ! 1.
Ronda Davis, Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group APS Math Specialist.
Ronda Davis Math Specialist, Assessment Dept PARCC MOWG NM Representative February 2016.
 The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) will be assessed in the spring of 2014 for Grades 3 through 5:
Illinois State Board of Education A Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking.
Irvington Public Schools: PARCC INFORMATION
Accessibility Features and Accommodations
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 4
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
Milwee Middle School Math Night
Analyzing PARCC Results to Inform Instruction
Claim 2: Problem Solving
Presentation transcript:

Ronda Davis, Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group APS Math Specialist for Assessment PARCC Mathematics PARCC: Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Career What’s New in SY & Review of Important Facts

Which One Doesn’t Belong

Mathematical Flexibility

2016 Testing Window - ONE window 4

New Math Design Testing Times 5

Test Design Changes – Fewer Test Units With the changes, students in all grades will participate in fewer test units. The redesigned ELA/L tests are composed of 3 units. The math tests are composed of 3 or 4 units.

Windows New Single Window Grades 3-5/6-8 Short Items Reasoning Items Modeling Items Total Points Units Total Time 56 pts 14 pts 12 pts 82 pts varies 5 hrs. 40 pts 14 pts 12 pts 66 pts min 4 hrs. Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II Short Items Reasoning Items Modeling Items Total Points Units Total Time 65 pts 14 pts 18 pts 97/107 pts varies 5.3 – 5.5 hrs. 49 pts 14 pts 18 pts 81 pts 90 min. 4.5 hrs. Comparison of 2015 and New Math Design 7

specifications-documentswww.parcconline.org/assessments/test-design/mathematics/math-test- specifications-documents

Focus (Math): where the Standards focus, more time to master concepts at a deeper level (CCSS,MCF, ES Tables) Problems Worth Doing (Math): multi- step problems, conceptual questions, applications, and substantial procedures PARCC’s Core Commitment to Assessment Quality test-documents

Students Test By Content – Not Necessarily Grade Level Grades 3 – 8: Take the Test Based on their Enrolled Grade Grades 8 – 11: Take the Test Based on their Enrolled Class Algebra 1 Geometry Algebra 2 NOTE: Per NMPED, Students enrolled in Alg or Geom BELOW grade 8 will take their grade level test

PARCC Accessibility Policies Features for All Students Accessibility Features Identified in advance Accommodations Built into the test Available to All Students Example: magnification, highlighting, eliminate answer choices, line reader Available to All Students Must be turned on in Advance Example: answer masking, text-to-speech for mathematics, background/font color Available with IEP/504 Must be identified in Advance Example: Word to word dictionary, small group testing, extended time

Features Built Into The Test Bookmark Eliminate Answer Choices Highlighter Tool Line Reader Tool Magnifier (Tool or Keyboard Shortcut) Notepad Pop-up Glossary Spell Check Redirect Student

Accessibility Features Identified in Advance (ALL students) – Complete PNP Answer Masking AND/OR General Masking Background/Font Color (Color Contrast) Text-to-Speech Headphone will be needed NOTE: Headphones can be used as noise buffers Human Reader Small group testing Frequent breaks Time of day Separate or alternate location Specified area or seating

Accommodations for Special Ed Calculators on Noncalc Section Math Manipulatives Extended Time Accomodations for ELL Word to Word Dictionary Extended Time Spanish & English Version of Test (CBT or PBT) Human Reader in Spanish (or other lang) Text to Speech in Spanish Human Scribe Additionally... Students with IEP’s or ELL Students

Which accessibility features and/or accommodations would benefit students during instruction and assessments?

Grades 3 – 5 – No Calculators Grades 6 – 7: Four Function with Sq Rt & % Grade 8: Scientific Calculator  Middle School ~ 75% of exam w calc Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2: Graphing Calculator (~85% of exam w calc) Calculator Use PARCC Calculator Policy

Grade (s)Unit 1Unit 2Unit 3Unit 4 3 – 5 Non-calculator (60 min) Non- calculator (60 min) Non-calculator (60 min) Non- calculator (60 min) 6 Non-calculator (80 min) Calculator (80 min) Calculator (80 min) N/A 7 Non-calculator section and Calculator section (e.g., split) (80 min) Calculator (80 min) Calculator (80 min) N/A 8 Non-calculator (80 min) Calculator (80 min) Calculator (80 min) N/A High School Non-calculator section and Calculator section (e.g., split) (90 min) Calculator (90 min) Calculator (90 min) N/A Calculator Placement on Each Unit

Math Tools On-Line Grades 3 - 8: Rulers available as on-line tools Grade 3: ¼ inch Grades 4 – 8: 1/8 inch On-Line Grades 4 – 7: Protractors as shown to the right 8 th Grade, Geometry & Integrated Math: Not Provided as On-Line Tools, but...  Schools or Students May Provide: tracing paper, reflection tools, straight edge and compass – think Transformational Geometry Tools Math Tool Policy

Scratch Paper Test Administrators Must Provide:  Scratch paper – Blank, Lined &/or Graph (At Least 1 sheet)  Scratch paper is NOT limited GRAPH PAPER – Practice using this as scratch paper all year

Think about how to incorporate these into your instruction Will be provided as a dropdown  Hard copies may be provided by schools Reference Sheets Grades Reference SheetHigh School Reference

Alg 1 S-ID. Int.1 6. SP. Evidence Tables Have Useful Clarifications (unpack the standards)

ALG 2 Securely Held Knowledge

Based on Reasoning and Modeling  Connecting CCSS to applications and modeling  For example: C & D Claims are NOT explicitly found in the CCSSM document Alg 1

Securely Held Knowledge in D Claims Geo

Brain Research on Math, Jo Boaler Video may be found at :

Turn to your neighbor... How does what you just heard impact instructional decisions?

Some final thoughts… Assessments should be worthy of instructional imitation Released items and sample tasks are a nice starting place PARCC’S view: –Content, practices, and balance –Cognitive complexity (1/3 high + 1/3 medium + 1/3 low) –PLDs Parcc.pearson.com Practice Tests – Mimic the Actual Test

Sub-Claim D: Highlighted Practice MP.4 with Connections to Content (modeling/application) The student solves real-world problems with a degree of difficulty appropriate to the grade/course by applying knowledge and skills articulated in the standards for the current grade/course (or for more complex problems, knowledge and skills articulated in the standards for previous grades/courses), engaging particularly in the Modeling practice, and where helpful making sense of problems and persevering to solve them (MP. 1),reasoning abstractly and quantitatively (MP. 2), using appropriate tools strategically (MP.5), looking for and making use of structure (MP.7), and/or looking for and expressing regularity in repeated reasoning (MP.8).

Claim 1.Identifying variables in the situation and selecting well; 2.Formulating a model by creating and selecting representations that describe relationships between the variables 3.Analyzing and performing operations to draw conclusions 4.Interpreting results in terms of original situation 5.Validating conclusions – improve model if necessary 6.Reporting conclusions Modeling Claim

Algebra 1 Released Practice Item for Modeling

Reasoning Reflection Reflect... How can you structure instruction to ensure that students know/can do what is being asked of them in light of this item, but in a classroom setting? What are some implications and adjustments we might want to consider to our curriculum, instruction and assessment?