Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision TECHNICAL & OPERATIONAL COMPETENCE ATS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Advertisements

Role , Responsibility and achievements of SARI 145 Working Group
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation DQR – Roles and Responsibilities DAL/DQR Workshop Brussels, February 2013 Presented by:
PUBLIC PROTECTION AND ETHICAL GEOSPATIAL DATA DISSEMINATION AN INITIATIVE OF GEOIDE (PROJECT IV-23) Legal aspect related to aeronautical information Pascale.
Ensuring a 'Flexible Use of Airspace'…. Patrick Delmouzée Head of ATM Unit DSS/CM EUROCONTROL Moving towards an Integrated ASM/ATFCM/ATS Approach EUROCONTROL.
Nadia Konzali Project Coordinator, COSCAP-GS
High Level Overview of ICAO Responsibilities
F. Schubert / page 1 Functional Airspace Blocks - Can they inspire the ANS World? Air Transport, Air & Space Law and Regulation International.
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office 1 ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar 9-11 February 2010 Baku, Azerbaijan Theme.
RIS Directive October 11 th 2007 Annick Javor RIS Directive River Information Services.
ICAO Provisions for Safety Management
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar 9-11 February 2010 Baku, Azerbaijan Theme.
1 Reform of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications What it means for Access to Emergency Services Reform of the EU regulatory framework.
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Acceptable Means of Compliance & Alternative Means of Compliance Margit Markus Moossen Legal department 31 January 2013.
International Civil Aviation Organization Features and Evolution of Regional Safety Oversight Organisations (RSOO) Comparative Analysis Mikołaj Ratajczyk.
Regional Cooperation Activity JOINT MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND THE EXECUTIVE BOARD Nicosia 17 Jan 2014.
All information was sourced
ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002  AERODROME MANUAL.
International Civil Aviation Organization and ISO/TC 211 ISO/TC 211 Seminar Berlin, 29 October 2003 ISO/TC 211 Seminar Berlin, 29 October 2003.
1 The Just Culture Initiative Roderick van Dam Head of Legal Service, EUROCONTROL ICAO / McGill Conference 2007 European Organisation for the Safety of.
By Yaw Nyampong International Conference on Air Transport, Air and Space Law and Regulation Abu Dhabi, UAE, April 15-16, 2009.
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.
ICAO Requirements on Certification of Aerodromes Module - 2
08 June 2006 Portland 2006: aircraft certification session Yves Morier The EASA Advance -NPA for UAV systems Certification Presentation by: Y Morier EASA.
Safety Management in Europe European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Dr. Erik Merckx EUROCONTROL Directorate ATM Programmes Head of Business.
16-17 November 2005 COSCAP – NA Project Steering Group Guangzhou, China 1 Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency.
ESARR 5 and language proficiency for ATCOs European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation ICAO – EUROCONTROL EUROPEAN SEMINAR ON LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY.
Existing ICAO SARPs Relating to Aircraft
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 4 : Separation of Functions Responsibilities.
Victor Kourenkov ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 LEGISLATION AND ORGANISATION CONSIDERATIONS.
Requirements - background
European Aviation Safety Agency Head of Aircraft Product Certification
Approximation of legislation to the internal market acquis An EU funded project managed by European Agency for Reconstruction Directive 89/106/EEC on Construction.
Ensuring the Safety of Future Developments
Objective ITY-FMTP - Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) ESSIP Plan 2015 Oscar ALFARO DPS/PEPR
Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such.
Gdansk International Air & Space Law Conference November 2013 Authority and Organisation Requirements “effective management systems for authorities and.
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision CERTIFICATION PROCESS  Peter Stastny,
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 6 : Towards the Implementation of Quality.
WORKSHOP ON COMMON REQUIREMENTS FOR SERVICE PROVISION  Introduction to SESIS Guidance Material  Gerald Amar, SESIS Project Manager European Organisation.
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision LIABILITY AND INSURANCE ISSUES Nathalie.
Authority Requirements Margit Markus Tallinn, 7 May 2009.
1  Copyright 2005 EUROCONTROL Legal Impediments to Just Culture.
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision  Aeronautical Information Services Provider.
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision OVERVIEW OF THE SINGLE EUROPEAN SKY Roderick.
ANSP certification and designation Roles, responsibilities, processes Bogdan BRAGUTA June 2016.
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision SAFETY ASPECTS SAFETY ASPECTS  Juan Vázquez,
Module 02 Essential Requirements for ATCOs. Training Objectives  Appreciate the content of the essential requirements for ATCOs as described within EASA.
EU rules for Third Country operators ??
BEING A PAPER PRESENTED BY ENGR E. N
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
Juan Vázquez Sanz EUROCONTROL SRU
Ensuring the Safety of Future Developments
Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal , 8 February 2001)
4 - 8 November 2013 AIM relevant - Assembly conclusions
Establishment of Space Weather Information Service
Obstacles and lessons learnt by the SRVSOP
COASTAL STATE RESPONSIBILITY (IMO) – HYDROGRAPHY
ICAO AFI Plan African ANSP Presented by: ESAF Regional Office
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
ESARR 5 and language proficiency for ATCOs
ICAO SAFETY INITIATIVES Certification of Aerodromes
USOAP AIG EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION(EI) AAIB MALAYSIAN EXPERIENCE
AERODROME CERTIFICATION COURSE NOTIFICATION OF DIFFERENCES
The ATM Standardisation Coordination Group
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision TECHNICAL & OPERATIONAL COMPETENCE ATS service providers  Juan Vázquez, SRU Safety Expert European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation

CONTENTS  What are the Common Requirements relevant to technical and operational competence of ATS SPs?  Differences from ICAO SARPs  Conditions attached to the certificates  Capability vs. Operation – links with Designation

COMMON REQUIREMENTS Art.6 Service Provision Regulation – CRs shall address:  Technical and operational competence and suitability  Safety Management and Quality Management  Reporting systems  Financial strength  Liability and insurance cover  Human resources  Security  Quality of services  Ownership and organisational structure

COMMON REQUIREMENTS Art.6 Service Provision Regulation – CRs shall address:  Technical and operational competence and suitability  Safety Management and Quality Management  Reporting systems  Financial strength  Liability and insurance cover  Human resources  Security  Quality of services  Ownership and organisational structure  Generic statement about provision of safe, efficient and continuous services efficient and continuous services  Requirements about Working Methods & Operating Procedures Operating Procedures  Generic statement about provision of safe, efficient and continuous services efficient and continuous services  Requirements about Working Methods & Operating Procedures Operating Procedures Reference to relevant ICAO Annex Standards Reference to relevant ICAO Annex Standards

ICAO Standards CRs Annex II, Section 4, Working Methods & Operating Procedures A provider of air traffic services shall be able to demonstrate that its working methods and operating procedures are compliant with the standards in the following annexes to the Convention on International Civil Aviation as far as they are relevant for the provision of air traffic services in the airspace concerned:  Annex 2 on rules of the air (10th edition, July 2005),  Annex 10 on aeronautical telecommunications, Volume 2 on communication procedures (6th edition, October 2001 including all amendments up to No 79),  Annex 11 on air traffic services (13th edition, July 2001 including all amendments up to No 43).

ICAO Standards CRs Annex II, Section 4, Working Methods & Operating Procedures A provider of air traffic services shall be able to demonstrate that its working methods and operating procedures are compliant with the standards in the following annexes to the Convention on International Civil Aviation as far as they are relevant for the provision of air traffic services in the airspace concerned:  Annex 2 on rules of the air (10th edition, July 2005),  Annex 10 on aeronautical telecommunications, Volume 2 on communication procedures (6th edition, October 2001 including all amendments up to No 79),  Annex 11 on air traffic services (13th edition, July 2001 including all amendments up to No 43).

ICAO Standards CRs Annex II, Section 4, Working Methods & Operating Procedures A provider of air traffic services shall be able to demonstrate that its working methods and operating procedures are compliant with the standards in the following annexes to the Convention on International Civil Aviation as far as they are relevant for the provision of air traffic services in the airspace concerned:  Annex 2 on rules of the air (10th edition, July 2005),  Annex 10 on aeronautical telecommunications, Volume 2 on communication procedures (6th edition, October 2001 including all amendments up to No 79),  Annex 11 on air traffic services (13th edition, July 2001 including all amendments up to No 43). DIFFERENCES NOTIFIED TO ICAO Recital 14 […] the Member States and the Commission, acting in close cooperation with Eurocontrol, should work towards minimising the differences notified by Member States in the application of ICAO standards

ICAO Standards The certificate establishes compliance with the ICAO standards… … in the light of the filed differences which exist in the Member State, on the basis of national law. CONDITIONS ATTACHED TO CERTIFICATES THIS SHOULD BE REFLECTED IN

Conditions Attached to Certificates Service Provision Regulation, Annex II Additional conditions attached to certificates may, as appropriate, be related to: (a)non-discriminatory access to services for airspace users and the required level of performance of such services, and the required level of performance of such services, including safety and interoperability levels; including safety and interoperability levels; (b) the operational specifications for the particular services; […] […] (d)the various operating equipment to be used within the particular services; particular services; […] […] This could be a tool to address: ICAO differences, conditions related to operational scenarios, … This could be a tool to address: ICAO differences, conditions related to operational scenarios, … What’s the possible extent of that use? How can this be articulated with the designation?

Links Certification / Designation The current SESIS material has only initiated the work in this area Two schools of thought Focus on the certification Use conditions attached to certificates to  Identify ICAO differences (wherever they exist)  Define operational scenarios  Deal with limitations related to national implementation of some ESARRs (notably ESARR 2 and 5) Give full transparency to the actual certification reference against which verification took place To facilitate the designation Focus on the designation Use the designation to define conditions to deal with:  All sorts of local aspects in terms of local operational scenarios Use the designation as the tool to address the actual implementation Keep certification as close as possible to a declaration of capability

CONCLUSIONS  ICAO Standards are Common Requirements (notably Annex 11 standards in the case of ATS providers)  Working methods and procedures must comply with them  Differences from ICAO standards still remain and should be properly reflected in the certification process properly reflected in the certification process  The conditions attached to the certificate provides a tool to address operational aspects and other residual issues address operational aspects and other residual issues  There is a need to further consider the balance between “Certification” & “Designation” “Capability” & “Actual implementation” “Generic Operational Scenarios” & “Local Operational Conditions” SESIS has raised these issues which are now being discussed at SRC

THANKS A LOT FOR YOUR ATTENTION… TECHNICAL & OPERATIONAL COMPETENCE ATS service providers  Juan Vázquez, SRU Safety Expert