PADEPP PROGRAM FOR ASSISTING, DEVELOPING, AND EVALUATING PRINCIPAL PERFORMANCE CHANGES FOR 2015 – 2016 SCHOOL YEAR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 13, 2015.
Advertisements

ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness Toward an Improvement-Focused System of Educator Evaluation Jennifer Hammond OCTE Meeting November 7, 2013.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 4 Component Five – Student Improvement.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Introduction to Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Maine Course Pathways Maine School Superintendents’ Conference June 24 – 25, 2010.
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Office of Federal and State Accountability– State Side Darlene Prevatt, Team Leader
Today’s website:
June 19 th – PLC Day June 19 th – PLC Day Year In Review – Year In Preview District Road Map District Road Map TPEP Early Release Collaboration Early Release.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
October 12, College- and Career-Ready Expectations for All Students 2. State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
MULTIPLE MEASURES What are they… Why are they… What do we do… How will we know… Dr. Scott P. Myers KLFA Wednesday, August 28, 2013.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Division of School Effectiveness Office of Instructional Practices and Evaluations.
KEEP And Student Growth Measures for Building Leaders Lawrence School District, May 14, 2014 Bill Bagshaw, Assistant Director, TLA, KSDE Kayeri Akweks,
Welcome to Third Grade Curriculum Night Our Goal is that by the end of the year all students will be proficient and prepared for fourth grade.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
EVALUATIONS, STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES & KEEP AUG 25, 2014 BILL BAGSHAW, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR.
DRAFT 4.0 PRESENTED TO THE OREGON STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY 17, 2012 Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
Maine Teacher Effectiveness Status.  Maine approved a teacher evaluation law during in the 2012 Legislative sessions.  The rules were determined in.
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 September 2015.
May 29, 2013 Chanute USD 413 And Kansas State Department of Education.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
MODIFIED CURRENT PRACTICE MODEL (SAVING THE BABY!!!) Olde English Consortium Teacher Evaluation Plan – Modified Current Practice Model May 15, 2015.
Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner May 11, 2012.
Summary Rating Responses November 13, 2013 Adobe Connect Webinar Bill Bagshaw, Kayeri Akweks - KSDE.
Educator Effectiveness: State Frameworks and Local Practice(??) CCSSO Annual Conference, June 2012 Juan M. D’Brot Executive Director of Assessment and.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
No Child Left Behind Waivers: Promising Ideas from Second Round Applications By Jeremy Ayers and Isabel Owen with Glenda Partee and Theodora Chang.
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
State Practices for Ensuring Meaningful ELL Participation in State Content Assessments Charlene Rivera and Lynn Shafer Willner GW-CEEE National Conference.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations 1. Outcomes Understand purpose and requirements of Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals Review achievement.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Teacher Effectiveness: All of Your Questions Answered Matt Gill, Tammy Meyer, Robin Curtis 10/15/2015.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
SCDE Expanded ADEPT Advisory Team Meeting April 23, 2015.
South Carolina Succeeds
Identifying and Using Multiple Measures Bill Bagshaw.
Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Kansas Educator Evaluation
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Five Required Elements
KSDE Board Presentation Educator Evaluation Systems Update
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Identifying Multiple Measures and Defining Significance
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
WAVE Presentation on Draft ESSA Plan.
Evaluations & Student Growth Measures
Presentation transcript:

PADEPP PROGRAM FOR ASSISTING, DEVELOPING, AND EVALUATING PRINCIPAL PERFORMANCE CHANGES FOR 2015 – 2016 SCHOOL YEAR

NEW PADEPP GUIDELINES - MARCH 2015 PADEPP Guideline changes approved by SC BOE in March 2015 Ensures ESEA Flexibility Waiver requirements (three year waiver approval June 2015) are met

ESEA FLEXIBILITY REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO PRINCIPAL EVALUATION: Requirement 1: used for continual improvement of instruction. Requirement 2: differentiate performance using at least three performance levels. Requirement 3: use multiple valid measures to determine performance levels, including, as a significant factor, student growth data for all students (including English language learners and students with disabilities), and other measures of professional practice. Requirement 4: evaluate educators on a regular basis. Requirement 5: provide clear, timely, and useful feedback, including feedback that identifies needs and guides professional development. Requirement 6: used to inform personnel decisions.

HOW DOES PADEPP MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS PADEPP now includes a 10 th Standard, Student Growth PADEPP now includes 4 rating categories Principals are evaluated every year on PADEPP, full evaluation every third year, partials in- between years PADEPP includes three conferences PADEPP results are used to inform personnel decisions

GROWTH VS PROFICIENCY

RESPONSE TO ESEA REQUIREMENTS: PADEPP GUIDELINES CHANGES Moved to four rating categories Added Standard 10 – Student/School Academic Growth

FOUR OVERALL SUMMATIVE RATING CATEGORIES Exemplary – Signifies performance at the exemplary level across performance standards. Proficient – Signifies generally at or above the proficient level on most performance standards. Improvement Needed – Signifies performance below expectations. Unsatisfactory – Below all expectations.

DETERMINING OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS Individual ratings applied to standards 1-9 An overall, summative judgement combining standards (1-9) is determined A separate, individual rating is applied to standard 10, Student Growth The overall measures for practice and student growth are combined to determine the overall effectiveness rating using the Decision Matrix found in the PADEPP Implementation Guidelines (pg.6)

DETERMINING OVERALL PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE: StdRating 1E 2P 3IN 4P 5P 6P 7E 8 9P Proficient – Signifies generally at or above the proficient level on most performance standards. Proficient

WHAT EVIDENCE CAN BE USED IN EVALUATING PRINCIPAL PERFORMANCE ON STANDARD 10, SCHOOL GROWTH? School-wide, student academic growth data is the basis for measuring standard 10  Principals are responsible and accountable for the school population in its entirety therefore Standard 10 of a principal’s evaluation is a reflection of School Growth. What data sources?  EVAAS VAM as a school wide growth measure.  local formative and/or state summative assessments.  multiple years of data using multiple sources of data.

MORE ON THE STANDARD 10 EVIDENCE For state assessments you may use… SC READY SCPASS EOCEP ACT WORKKEYS ACT ELL Proficiency assessments Some examples of local formative assessments might include: MAP Benchmarks Objective performance-based assessments Student Learning Objectives

EVAAS/VAM ASSESSMENTS APPROPRIATE FOR USE IN MEASURING STUDENT/SCHOOL GROWTH (STANDARD 10): SCPASS for Grades 4-8

EVAAS/VAM ASSESSMENTS APPROPRIATE FOR USE IN MEASURING STUDENT/SCHOOL GROWTH (STANDARD 10): EOCEP for Grades 9-12

DETERMINING OVERALL STUDENT/SCHOOL GROWTH: In order to determine overall student growth and arrive at a rating for Standard 10: Determine assessment data available Set appropriate growth goals for the assessments you will use Score Standard 10 based on a mutually agreed (principal and evaluator) upon scoring process/rubric Recommendation: Include as a goal in the School Renewal Plan

DETERMINING OVERALL LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS:

PRESUME PROFICIENCY Principal Evaluators are to presume proficiency when scoring Standard 10 for the School Year.

REPORTING TO SCDE The PADEPP Data System (PDS) was de-activated during the SY A new data system is under design but will not be in place for the reporting of this year’s principal evaluations. A spreadsheet will be sent to PADEPP District Administrators during early summer for the reporting of Principal Evaluations. Evaluation results will continue to be due to the PADEPP Coordinator at the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness office by August 15 th.

GOING FORWARD: REAUTHORIZATION OF ESEA The reauthorization of ESEA as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), effective August 1, 2016 Until that time, we stick with current Guidelines (approved by the SC BOE March 2015). Going forward, student growth measures will continue to be an element within the evaluation of educators in South Carolina.

PADEPP TRAINING Provided various times throughout the year Evaluators must be certified through the training Notices of upcoming training will be sent to districts and district PADEPP Administrators Training is one-day, 6.5 hours, normally held at Office of School Leadership in Columbia If needed, training can be conducted at districts

POINT OF CONTACT INFORMATION PADEPP COORDINATOR Office of Educator Effectiveness 1429 Senate Street, Columbia, SC (803)

PADEPP RESOURCES