S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February 2004 - 1 Calorimeter Trigger for Super LHC Electrons, Photons,  -jets, Jets, Missing E T Current Algorithms.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Advertisements

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
The CMS Trigger.
Uli Schäfer 1 S-L1Calo upstream links architecture -- interfaces -- technology.
Saclay, 04 / 11 / 2002 E. Perez 1 Simulation of the performances of the upgraded L1Cal  Short reminder  Performances (jets) (see Jovan’s talk for electron.
28 June 2002Santa Cruz LC Retreat M. Breidenbach1 SD – Silicon Detector EM Calorimetry.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
P. Chumney, U. Wisconsin, CHEP, March 2003 CMS Regional Calorimeter Trigger - 1 Level-1 Regional Calorimeter System for CMS P. Chumney, S. Dasu, M. Jaworski,
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
C. Foudas, Imperial CMS Upgrades Workshop FNAL – Trigger Introduction Status of the CMS Trigger Upgrade Activities: –uTCA and Optical Link upgrades.
CMS101 Introduction to the CMS Trigger
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
IEEE NSS & MIC, Norfolk, Virginia, November Triggering on Particle Types: Calorimeter and Muon Based Triggers Sridhara Dasu Department of Physics.
S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin September Regional Calorimeter Trigger Outline: Status of Prototypes Plans for Production Testing Plans for Integration,
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Il Trigger di Alto Livello di CMS N. Amapane – CERN Workshop su Monte Carlo, la Fisica e le simulazioni a LHC Frascati, 25 Ottobre 2006.
CMS101 Introduction to the CMS Trigger Darin Acosta University of Florida.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
7 December SLHC Calo Trigger Simulation Status Report Kevin Flood, Michail Bachtis University of Wisconsin, Madison.
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
01/04/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
W. Smith, U. Wisconsin, CMS SLHC EMU Upgrade Workshop, Jan. 8, 2008Introduction to CMS SLHC Triggers - 1 CMS Trig & DAQ for LHC Overall Trigger & DAQ Architecture:
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
Overview of a Plan for Simulating a Tracking Trigger (Fermilab) Overview of a Plan for Simulating a Tracking Trigger Harry Cheung (Fermilab)
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.
Electron/Photon Related Projects Yuri Gershtein. 2/8/2007Yuri Gershtein FIU CHEPREO Workshop2 Disclaimer / Introduction PRS EGamma split into DPG and.
Ties Behnke: Event Reconstruction 1Arlington LC workshop, Jan 9-11, 2003 Event Reconstruction Event Reconstruction in the BRAHMS simulation framework:
W. Smith, U. Wisconsin, LHC Electronics Conference, October 1, 2003 CMS Calorimeter Regional Trigger - 1 Full Crate Test of the CMS Regional Calorimeter.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire (IN2P3-CNRS) Orsay, France Olivier Callot 4 July 2002 The L0 Calorimeter Trigger Basic principles Overall organization.
CMS Upgrade Workshop - Fermilab Trigger Studies Using Stacked Pixel Layers Mark Pesaresi
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Possible SLHC Modifications to Clock Distribution Chris Tully, Dan Marlow Princeton Madison, Wisconsin February 13, 2003 Current SLB Clock Distribution.
CMS Trigger Upgrades Phase-I (1) Muon Trigger Upgrades: – CSCTF (CSC TrackFinder) – MPC (Muon Port Card) Calorimeter Trigger Upgrades: – HCAL TPG – Calorimeter.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
W. Smith, U. Wisconsin, ATLAS-CMS SLHC Workshop March 21, 2007 CMS SLHC Trigger - 1 CMS SLHC Trigger Wesley H. Smith U. Wisconsin - Madison ATLAS-CMS SLHC.
BEACH 04J. Piedra1 SiSA Tracking Silicon stand alone (SiSA) tracking optimization SiSA validation Matthew Herndon University of Wisconsin Joint Physics.
1 J. Varela, CMS Trigger, RT09, Beijing, May 2009 J. Varela IST/LIP Lisbon CMS Trigger Project Manager 16 th IEEE NPSS Real Time Conference May 10-15,
Sridhara Dasu115 April 2002 L1CaloTrigger Algorithms Sridhara Dasu University of Wisconsin Algorithms: Details, Updates and Simulation - 2 x cm -2.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
R. Croft, Exclusive Diffractive Higgs Signal at L1, Jan 2005 Diffractive Higgs Events in the L1 Trigger ( Work in progress ) Richard Croft, University.
29/05/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
D. Breton, S. Simion February 2012
Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS
L1Calo Upgrade Phase 2 Introduction and timescales
L1Calo upgrade discussion
General DSM layout for E+B
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
CMS Trigger Coordinator
CMS SLHC Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade,
Implementation of the Jet Algorithm ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger
ATLAS-CMS SLHC Workshop This talk is available on:
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
Missing Energy and Tau-Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
The LHCb L0 Calorimeter Trigger
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
U. Marconi, D. Breton, S. Luitz
Presentation transcript:

S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February Calorimeter Trigger for Super LHC Electrons, Photons,  -jets, Jets, Missing E T Current Algorithms What can be improved? Bottom line Must hold the thresholds low to study electro-weak symmetry breaking physics Only option is to further reduce the backgrounds Electrons/photons/  -jets Dominated by tails of jet fragmentation to  0 Use of tracking in level-1 Pixel only or pixel + outer tracker layers? Mandates higher granularity calorimeter trigger output Jets and missing E T These are real - Only minor improvement in resolution likely Topology with vertex identification to reject pileup Pixel tracker provides vertex?

S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February Calorimeter Geometry EB, EE, HB, HE map to 18 RCT crates Provide e/  and jet,  E T triggers

S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February Current Algorithms

S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February Electron/Photon Algorithm Current Algorithm Input: ~5x5 crystal E T sums (trigger tower sums) and a 1 bit characterization of the fine-grain profile Sliding window: Considers nearest neighbor trigger towers only - slides tower-by-tower E T sharpened by adding in nearest neighbor, 2x1 or 1x2 Isolation achieved by cutting on rest of the neighbors in ECAL and all neighbors in HCAL Result: Max E T e/  reported with “crude” position (0.37  x 037  region instead of  x  trigger towers) Rationale EM showers are narrow - R moliere ~ crystal dimension Adding more than 2 trigger towers is not needed Consider small isolation region to avoid accidentally vetoing in presence of multiple crossing pileup

S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February e/  Improvements for SLHC Learn from current High Level Trigger Algorithms Improved isolation Gains realized when pileup is small Veto  0 using careful analysis of shower profile Improved Fine-Grain analysis Use track match Pixel only track match Pixel + Outer layer track match This provides most improvement in S 2 /S+B for electrons Must report calorimeter e/  objects in finer  bins

S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February Improved Fine Grain Info.? Trigger tower size reduction Regroup crystals to reduce tower size in  (but not  due to spread in the B field) Additional fine grain analysis at crystal level Minor gains can probably be achieved using more sophisticated logic - requires change in an ASIC Good improvement requires data exchange between trigger towers Both these changes require changes in on- detector electronics, which is very difficult Access to front-end boards very limited Tied to mechanics, cooling and electrical grounding

S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February Off-detector Electronics Increased isolation region, e.g., 4x4 instead of 3x3 Any additional data exchange can probably be absorbed by serving more channels per board Must keep the cuts high to avoid accidental vetoing due to higher pileup at SLHC Redesign the system for higher data-exchange between cards - is important for photon trigger. Reporting in finer  x  bins One can report position in trigger tower dimension Improved logic to eliminate potential double counting Necessary to provide linking of e/  to a “track” trigger. Again, this uses more data exchange between cards, but is important for electron trigger.

S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February  -jet Algorithm Current Algorithm Marks towers above a certain threshold to use in a pattern search for finding narrow objects in 4x4 trigger towers, using memory lookup and discrete logic Uses wide isolation region (12x12 trigger towers) Uses the full jet energy (12x12) for narrow  -jet Rationale Use minimal additional logic to classify jets as  -jets Use of pattern search is easier than using energy sums Patching on the  -jet finding to jet algorithm simplifies logic - adders and sliding windows are expensive

S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February  -jets Improvements for SLHC Algorithm for  -jets Dedicated narrow jet finding New clustering in 2x2 trigger towers New sliding window on 2x2 sliding by 1x1 Reporting  for  -jets in trigger tower steps Isolation for quark/gluon jets Additional compare circuits Track matching Similar to electron trigger Pixel only or Pixel + outer track layer Allow both 1 prong and 3 prong matches

S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February Electronics for  -jets New sliding windows + energy sum tree Sums 2x2 sliding on 1x1 Can be integrated into the e/  summation tree New isolation region 6x6 trigger tower region Can be part of jet trigger sums Impact Requires additional hardware Conceptually no different from present system for e/  Can merge in primitives (2x1/1x2,2x2,4x4,6x6,…) for all triggers into a new scheme

S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February Jet Trigger Current Algorithm Slides on 4x4 trigger towers Sums 12x12 trigger towers Energy resolution set to 8 bits at input Jets reported at (0.37  x 037  region instead of  x  trigger tower resolution) Potential Improvement Option of 6x6, 8x8, 10x10, 12x12 jets Reduced pileup for low E T jets if necessary Report at fine granularity Slide in 1x1 or 2x2 Impact Increased data sharing and adder trees

S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February Missing E T Current Algorithm E x, E y lookup done using strip sums in bins of  with a granularity  = 0.37 Summed E x, E y used to determine missing ET Potential Improvement E x, E y lookup at  = Improved resolution, 10-bit adders Impact Increased memory lookup Increased data sharing Increased adder count