NCDOT – “Final Surface Testing” CAPA / NCDOT Asphalt Training Workshop February 21-22, 2012 Raleigh, NC IRI Standard Specification Article 610-13 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minnesota Department of Transportation Mn/DOTs Gradual Shift from Profile Index to IRI.
Advertisements

Mn/DOT Combined Smoothness Specification Operator Certification Training Workshop July 12, 2010.
Why is ride important?. Our customers - the driving public values pavement smoothness very high.
Ride Specification – IRI Update Prepared by Joe Thomas, P.E. 11/1/06 MAAPT 53 rd Annual Asphalt Conference December 6, 2006.
A Connected Vehicle-Based Application to Estimate Road Roughness Transportation agencies devote significant resources towards collection of highly detailed.
ANSI/ASQ E Overview Gary L. Johnson U.S. EPA
Section Cross Slope District 1 Your logo here.
2011 Update on Ride Quality Specifications Frank Palise Advanced Infrastructure Design, Inc. 1 Crossroads Drive, Hamilton, NJ Phone:
Created by: Victor Lund, PEKen Johnson, PE, PTOE St. Louis CountyMnDOT.
IRI Smoothness Testing for Quality Assurance and Warranty Construction Alberta Transportation CUPGA November 15 th, 2009 Moncton, NB.
Proposal Note 555 Surface Smoothness for Bridges and Approaches
LLP HMA Pavements Inertial Profiler Prebid Meeting Solano A0104 Oakland, CA September 14, 2012 Peter Vacura Chief, Office of Asphalt Pavement.
Joe White (608) Wayne Chase (608) WisDOT Materials Management Section 1.
Canadian Truck Size & Weight Harmonization New Brunswick Department of Transportation Subcommittee on Highway Transport Portland, Maine June 6-9, 2010.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 2 Surface Characteristics.
Regional Asphalt Seminars Pavement Wedge Guidelines and Specifications EMMETT R. HELTZEL, P.E. STATE MAINTENANCE ENGINEER.
History Dynatest was founded in 1976 in Denmark by a group of engineers and technicians who combined  science  technology and  business into the development.
International Roughness Index (IRI) for Construction Acceptance Technical Standards Branch Knowledge Presentations to the CEA February 13 th, 2014 Jim.
Alternate Bidding in Missouri Transportation Estimators Association Annual Conference November 2-4, 2005 – Daytona Beach, FL Interstate 44 … South-Central.
LANE CLOSURE CHARTS CHART DEVELOPMENT AND DELAY DAMAGES (District 3) OBJECTIVE To become familiar with the lane closure chart development process.
Pavement Ride Quality Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation.
Data Collection for Determining Pavement Condition
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
Optimal Highway Durability in Cold Regions Jia Yan Washington State University 18 June 2015.
I. Advantages of Smooth Pavements: Longer Life Public Opinion Save Fuel Less Surface Maintenance II. Ways to Ensure Smooth Pavements Subgrade and Subbase.
Update on End Result Specifications Celik Ozyildirim, Ph.D., P.E.
Temporary Traffic Control Standards Update. Why? Came into this position soon after TC details became TTC standards about 1.5 years ago (2/13/2013) As.
Best Practices Related to Research Problem Identification, Scoping, and Programming: A Researcher’s View Martin Pietrucha, Director The Thomas D. Larson.
Performance Specifications T. E. A. M. St. Louis Presentation October 8, 2004.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
Moving to International Roughness Index Measured By Inertial Profilers for Acceptance of New Asphalt Construction in Ontario By John A. Blair, Bituminous.
Footer Text 3D TEXTURE MEASUREMENT Development and Field Evaluation of a Texture Measurement System Based on Continuous Profiles from a 3D Scanning Instrument.
Emmanuel Fernando, Texas A&M Transportation Institute and and Magdy Mikhail, Texas Department of Transportation Texas Department of Transportation Road.
1 Construction Engineering in State Highway Projects Legislative Audit Bureau September 2009.
Plan and TIP Prioritization Process September 2015.
Materials, Pavements & Transportation Operations CONCEPTS FOR ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS Stuart Anderson Gerald Ullman Making.
Working Smart for the Customer’s Benefit Pam Hutton AASHTO SHRP2 Implementation Manager June 11, 2013.
Comparison of Inertial Profiler Measurements with Leveling and 3D Laser Scanning Abby Chin and Michael J. Olsen Oregon State University Road Profile Users.
HBP Warranties – The Cost Benefit Evaluation Begins By: Jay Goldbaum, P.E. Colorado Department of Transportation Pavement Management and Design Program.
ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA PERSPECTIVE Airfield Pavement Roughness Presentation to: ASTM E17 Committee.
Addressing Localized Roughness at the Project Level by Gary Higgins.
Draft 2008 Congestion Management Process (CMP) Technical Report Andrew J. Meese COG/TPB Staff TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Item # 8.
4/25/2017 9:25 AM Inertial Profiler Forum Intro to the Inertial Profiler Implementation September 28, 2015 © 2015 California Department of Transportation.
2003 Warranty Presentations Caltrans WARRANTED HMA PAVEMENTS PAVEMENTS.
Caltrans Test Method METHOD OF TEST FOR OPERATION, CALIBRATION AND OPERATOR CERTIFICATION OF INERTIAL PROFILERS References: AASHTO R 56 – Certification.
MnDOT Pavement Surface Smoothness Specification 23 rd Annual RPUG Meeting September 29, 2011.
A Strategic Plan for Pavement Engineering NCHRP 20-7(223) AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements Dan Dawood, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
By Terry Treutel Ride Quality Consultant Former WisDOT Ride Spec Coordinator.
SAFETEA-LU Section 1201 Real-Time System Management Information 23 CFR Part 511 AASHTO SSOM Task Force on Systems Operations Performance Measures 9 April.
IRI T ESTING IN N ORTH C AROLINA Presented by Christopher Bacchi, PE Vice President, Trimat Materials Testing, Inc. Raleigh, NC.
Office of Highway Safety Sight Distance and Roadway Condition Dan Walsh, P.E.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
Pavement Preservation Program Emily McGraw, PE February 23 and 24, 2015 – NCDOT & CAPA Workshop.
FHWA: Revision of Thirteen Controlling Criteria for Design; Notice for Request and Comment. Comments Due: December 7, 2015 Jeremy Fletcher, P.E., P.S.M.
National Highway Institute 4-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 PROFILE INDICES BLOCK 4.
John Donahue, P.E. Missouri DOT 5 th Annual Building Green with Concrete Workshop June 21, 2012.
April 4, 2011 ITE Technical Conference Lake Buena Vista, Fl Implementation of AASHTO’s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016 Update from the.
CMRA WEBINAR ON NEW SPECIFICATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION JUNE 15 TH, 2010 Recycled Asphalt Shingles in HMA Implementation: A Perspective from Wisconsin.
CAPA 66 th Annual Meeting – April 22, Fiscal Update Staffing Funding Lettings 2.
Specifications Update 2012 CAPA/NCDOT Asphalt Training Workshop David Glover – Barnhill Contracting Ted Naylor – NCDOT Todd Whittington – NCDOT 1.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Asphalt Paving Technical Committee (APT) Proposed revisions to the Asphalt Concrete Sections of the MAG Specifications.
Micro-milling The Economics A Rehabilitative Strategy for Savings Presented By: Sheila Hines Georgia Department of Transportation.
Overview of FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Pilot/Escort Vehicle Operators Training Materials Publications & Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Update John Berg, FHWA American Association of State.
ALDOT Specification Updates
Transitioning to IRI for Pavement Smoothness
Quality Assurance for Emulsified Asphalt Surface Treatments
Prime Factors for Successful Preservation Treatments
Presentation transcript:

NCDOT – “Final Surface Testing” CAPA / NCDOT Asphalt Training Workshop February 21-22, 2012 Raleigh, NC IRI Standard Specification Article Standard Specifications

NCDOT - Ride Quality Background Standard 10 Ft. Non-Mobile Straightedge Article of 2012 Standard Specs. In Standard Specifications forever!

 Smoothness Committee was appointed by the Secretary of Transportation. Charged with researching other methods in addition to the Non-Mobile Straightedge for checking Pavement Smoothness Develop a Project Special Provision for the new method which became the Hearne Straightedge (10’ Rolling Straightedge). NCDOT - Ride Quality Background

National Highway User’s survey in 1996 indicated that nationwide pavement conditions were the No. 1 concern of traveling public Rideability Specification developed for 5 projects let in Nov NCDOT - Ride Quality Background

Full implementation considered for 1997 Pavement Smoothness Task force was established June 2005 – Memo on Rideability (still an issue) Rideability Group was established with Industry Reps. NCDOT - Ride Quality Background

Final Surface Testing SP (2 or more lifts of asphalt, 45 mph, 1000’) Hearne Straightedge – Asphalt Pavement Rainhart Profilograph – Concrete Pavement NCDOT - Ride Quality Background

Hearne Straightedge – Developed in NC by Tom Hearne

Hearne is a 10-ft Rolling Straightedge pushed at 2 mph

Graph produced by Hearne Straightedge

Hearne Straightedge Index Numbers  Straightedge Index (SEI)  Indicates deviations that exceed 0.2 & 0.3” blanking band within a 100 ft. test section  Cumulative Straightedge Index (CSI)  Represents total SEIs for one lot, which consists of not more than 25 consecutive test sections

Hearne Straightedge

Rainhart profilograph for concrete pavements and bridges This is an Asphalt Workshop…moving on!

Issues with Profilographs These “contraptions” are slow (2 mph) Can take multiple runs to complete Traffic control issues (lane closures) Results are subjective (graphs on paper) Not a true profile of roadway

Fast forward to 2011… International Roughness Index IRI! Pavement smoothness measured with Laser Profiler mounted on a vehicle (Deviations Measured in Units = in/mile)

Mounted on Golf carts… Vehicles < 30 mph SUVs, Vans, Pickups… Vehicles up to 70 mph The Benefits?

Laser Profiler Setup NCDOT – Pavement Management Unit has profiler equipment and has been measuring IRI for years on our Interstates PMU has 4 profilers (Single 5-Pt lasers – can go to 7) 2 DynaTest and 2 ICC

Line Laser Technology RoLine and TriODS sensors mounted on lightweight profiler.

NC Turnpike Authority - IRI Special Provision NCTA had an IRI spec on WWF and Monroe projects NCTA used 65 in/mile on asphalt and 75 in/mile on concrete NCTA hired Consultant to perform IRI testing

NCDOT - IRI Development 2008 – NCDOT had pilot project w/ Percent Improvement SP NCDOT developed draft IRI Spec Received Industry input on draft IRI spec Reconvened Rideability group for asphalt 2012 – NCDOT implemented Standard Specification for IRI Intent - Use IRI spec for new location construction (Bypass projects are ideal)

NCDOT – IRI Specification Details For asphalt, still include Hearne as an option (Option # Standard Specifications) Contractor performs smoothness testing or hires a firm In 2010, AASHTO documents on Inertial profilers and systems were updated and finalized Article … 2012 Specifications

NCDOT – IRI Specification Details In August 2003, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Subcommittee on Materials (SOM) adopted Provisional Standards to address these needs, which were further revised between 2007 and 2010 as the following full standards: M Standard Specification for Inertial Profiler R Standard Practice for Accepting Pavement Ride Quality when Measured Using Inertial Profiling Systems R Standard Practice for Certification of Inertial Profiling Systems R Standard Practice for Operating Inertial Profiling System

NCDOT – IRI Specification Details For asphalt, still include Hearne as an option (Option # Standard Specifications) Contractor performs smoothness testing or hires a firm In 2010, AASHTO documents on Inertial profilers and systems were updated and finalized Article … 2012 Specifications

NCDOT – IRI Specification Details Need calibrated profiler and trained, competent personnel using the system Use low-speed or high-speed profiler Run profiler on both wheel paths at same time Will allow separate runs…one per each wheel path Article … 2012 Specifications

NCDOT Specifications require use of Line Laser technology

Line Laser Technology PaveMetrics LCMS with Accelorometer to collect IRI values

NCDOT – More details on IRI Specification Data provided to RE after each run on approved media (CD, DVD, flash drive) DOT will analyze raw data on FHWA ProVAL software DOT can do QA to verify data with PMU profilers

Contractor provides results report - 10 days after completion of smoothness testing IRI numbers for 0.10-mile sections (MRI is average of IRI numbers from both wheel paths) NCDOT – Same numbers for both pavement types w/ acceptance range from Pay Incentives / Adjustment “continuous” formulas NCDOT – More details on IRI Specification

NCDOT – Pay Adjustment Chart Price adjusted based on MRI numbers per lane –45.0 or underPA = $200 per 0.10 mile –45.1 to 55.0PA = 600 – (10*MRI) –55.1 to 70.0Acceptable (No PA) –70.1 to 90.0PA = 650 – (10*MRI) –Over 90.1Corrective Action Required Corrective action must be approved by RE Areas of Localized roughness (>125.0 in 25’)

Project Criteria Implementation on projects in 2012 Criteria when Final Surface Testing applies: –1) Facility is 45 mph or greater –2) Length is 1 mile or greater –3) Must have 2 lifts of asphalt pavement

Option 1Option 2 Extinct soon?? 2012 “Final Surface Testing” Standard Specification Review

Questions / Comments? CAPA / NCDOT Asphalt Training Workshop February 21-22, 2012 Raleigh, NC