Educator Micro-credentials

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Advertisements

Avoca and St Arnaud Numeracy Focus. Where we were Relying on text books to drive our Numeracy lessons. Worked independently, planning week by week with.
Your MA Professional Development Plan and Action Research Ready! S.M.A.R.T.! Action! MSLA 2014, Hyannis Connecting, Creating, Caring: The School Library.
Formative Assessment Practices Can Be Used in Educator Evaluation Margaret Heritage Edward Roeber.
Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
DIGITAL BADGES. moveupct.org Overview I. Brief introduction to Move UP! II. What are digital badges ? III. How & why are digital badges being used? IV.
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
We have the goals and the plans. The challenge is… closing the IMPLEMENTATION gap. -Douglas Reeves.
GK Advanced Diploma Pilot COURSE CRITERIA The Course begins Nov Completed by May 2013 Course Contact Hours – Minimum 105hrs Number.
Session Materials  Wiki
Developing a Professional Portfolio Making the connection between craftsman and instructor.
1 Confidential to Shelby County Schools and Memphis City Schools Reflective Practice Theory of Action.
Formative Assessment Project Webinar #1 - May 15, pm Welcome.
A Strategy for Assessment PORTFOLIOS Jones, M., Shelton, M. (2011). Developing Your Portfolio--Enhancing Your Learning and Showing Your Stuff: A Guide.
Teaching and Learning Elementary Math November 27, :30 am – 12:30 pm.
TITLEIIA(3) IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM 1.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation Training KICKOFF PRESENTATION March 8, 2013 Presented by: Joy Forrest (FLC) Jennifer Donnelly (PAE) Rich Pepe (FIS)
Incorporating Video Observations in e-Mentoring SPDG National MeetingWashington, DC October 9, 2014 Alyson Mike, Ed.D., Senior Director, Ed Technology.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Susan Agre-Kippenhan, Portland State University Professor, Art Department Evaluating the Effectiveness of Service Learning.
Early Childhood Education (ZA) Endorsement Program Reviewer Technical Assistance Office of Professional Preparation Services Michigan Department of Education.
Four key design issues CITE Digital Literacies Conference MOOC Scaffolding Activity Feedback Flexibility 01.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
NCDPI Observer Calibration Tool Introduction & Demo.
NCDPI Observation Calibration Training Pilot: Introduction & Demo November 2014.
1 What are the roles of learning targets and success criteria in my classroom? – I can specify plans for engaging my students with learning targets.
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
Professional Certification Professional Certification October 11, 2007 Standard: Effective Teaching Criteria 1(b) Using a variety of assessment strategies.
Teacher Evaluation Wednesday, July 24, :30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Mid-Course Check In, Data Tracking and Preparation for Summative Cycle T-PGES Daviess County Public Schools February 2015.
Formative Assessment  Formative assessment is the monitoring that occurs throughout the process of learning, providing students with feedback on how they.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
EVAL Introduction RIG 2 – Cohort 1 October 29, 2012 Cathey Frederick ESD 189 eVAL Specialist.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Washoe County School District Mike Paul- Director of Professional Growth Systems and TIF3 & TIF4 Grants Yvette Deighton- TIF4 Program Coordinator Jim Grace.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
Standards, Rubric, Commentaries, and Student Work Presenter: Wendy Perry, Ed.D. 1.
 Monday 8:00-9:15 Music (415)  9:30-12:15 Language Arts  Tuesday 9:30-12:15 Language Arts  Wednesday 8:00-9:15 Music (415)  9:30-12:15 Science/S.S.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Badging for Success Michelle Lattke Pasco eSchool.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Human Capital Accountability
ASSESSMENT METHODS – Chapter 10 –.
Using the Snyder Student Rubric Presentation Link:
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Developing a Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan and Report
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Process
What is a micro-credential?
Framing a Problem of Practice…and understanding micro-credentials
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Module 9: Category III: Monitoring Student Progress
Educator Micro-credentials
Empowers Students as Creators Micro-credential Virtual Meet Up
Educator Effectiveness Annual Update
Assessment of Classroom Learning
Why do we have to change? Every student is taught by an effective teacher and every school is led by an effective principal. Fair and equitable statewide.
Micro-Credentials: Competency-Based Skill Recognition for Leaders
Presentation transcript:

Educator Micro-credentials Baltimore County Public Schools http://tinyurl.com/BCPSMicro MC Support Team Amanda Lanza Specialist, Digital Learning alanza@bcps.org Jill Snell Resource Teacher, Organizational Development jsnell@bcps.org Sean McComb Resource Teacher, Organizational Development smccomb@bcps.org

Educator Micro-credentials Initiative Jennifer C. Kabaker Director, Educator Micro-credentials Initiative URL is landing page for MC on website How DP frames MCs Process Professional Learning Journey Lots of information on website to helps folks get started @JenCohKab @DigitalPromise #Love2Learn  Greetings! www.digitalpromise.org/microcredentials

Career-long professional learning: How do we recognize and reward it? Theory of Change Educators are continuous learners Enter the classroom under the assumption that they are full-baked educators We know that that is not true and educators engage in continuous learning New ways that teachers are learning every day, current systems don’t recognize educators for the learning outside formal settings. Focus on seat time rather than what they are doing with that learning MCs address both challenges Allows us to recognize the learning regardless of where it happens Shifts from seat-time to competency Addressing greater conversation around the professionalization of teaching, educators could have evidence/currency that they are experts or masters in their classroom Would have a portfolio regarding everything that they do and who they are as an educator Career-long professional learning: How do we recognize and reward it? FLICKR/ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY

Competency-based System To personalize professional learning Building the system Desired Outcomes – what are the things we wanted educators to know and be able to do based on research (ex. Wait time) Multiple Ways to Learn – to learn the desired outcomes, formal opportunities as well as informal opportunities, agnostic as to where and how an educator choosing to learn DP cares about what they can do = Evidence of Learning Desired Outcomes MOOCs Webinars Multiple Ways to Learn Evidence of Learning Trial and Error Articles Workshops Book Studies

A system of micro-credentials clearly articulates competencies that are important - AND - recognizes educators who demonstrate those competencies DP has embarked upon a journey to develop a system of MCs, that articulate competencies that we know that are important based on research and recognizes educators who can demonstrate those competencies and…

…can be displayed as DIGITAL BADGES. Specific Support interests, goals and immediate needs Transparent Include data about the issuer, the earner, and the evidence. Stackable Can be combined to create greater meaning and coherence Portable and shareable Can be shared by the earner wherever and with whoever they prefer Digital Badge is a piece of currency digital package, that an educator earns and follows them wherever they do Specific – an educator has demonstrated competency in that particular skill Transparent – digital package that shows data about the educator who earned the MC, the offering organization, and the evidence the educator provided Stackable – increases value to educator, demonstrates greater commitment to a particular area Portable and shareable – they own the MC and can take with them, share on social networks, resumes, blog, etc.

Components of a Micro-credential Competency Key Method Method Components Research & Resources Submission Criteria Scoring Rubric Walk through digital and paper copy The DNA of the MCs, developed over the course of a year and half Competency – what we are asking educators to do Key Method – how an educator achieves that competency, some competencies have a single key method (Wait Time), while others may have multiple key methods (Ex. Checking for Understanding) Method Components – Specific, gives educators a clear sense about what that key method looks like in the classroom, what the non-negotiables are, provides suggested implementation strategies, goal is to distill down the key method Research & Resources – Every MC is research backed and research is provided, each MC has resources that are meant to be a starting place for how to learn about the key method Submission Criteria – the meat of MC, what the educator has to submit in order to demonstrate competence, always rooted in research, educator also answers context questions, what does the assessor need to know about the classroom, and provides reflections from teacher and students Scoring Rubric – tells the educator how they will be assessed

Artifacts and Evidence Demonstrating competency Types of Evidence: Videos of teacher and student interaction Lesson, project, and unit plans Student work samples Teacher and student reflections Observations Assessments Peer and self evaluations and reviews What else? DP is constantly learning about this In future could be live evaluations/peer assessments Constantly evolving Will look to our feedback from continuous improvement

Meaningful evaluation and feedback Assessment Process Meaningful evaluation and feedback All MCs are in expert assessment at this time Once past expert assessment, the issuing agency can choose to go into peer assessment, grow the MC community For the pilot, all will be assessed by experts from the issuing organization After an educator submit – feedback loop (after an educator submits a micro-credential application, they receive an email telling them that it is in the process of being assessed. Once the assessment is complete, the educator will receive the assessment form, which includes the completed rubric and scoring guide as well as any feedback from the assessor. Should an educator not receive the micro-credential, he or she can use the feedback from the assessment form to revise and reapply for that micro-credential. ) Expert Assessment First 50 submissions Peer Assessment 3 previous earners Outcomes reconciled by issuers

Platform Demo! www.bloomboard.com/digitalpromise Open a new tab and Sign up – First name, last name, email, zip code, where/what teacher (option) Access to entire submission platform as well ability to explore MCs (we have a created a list of endorsed MCs), can scroll through, but we have created a list for you Click on MC on wiki page, and demo a DP MC (educator should not feel limited to written reflections for students) Download PDF for printing (contains entirety of MC including the submission guidelines and evaluation criteria) After assessed, educator will receive a form from assessor, based on submission guidelines and eval criteria, whether they passed or not, where they fell on rubric and comments/feedback Show application, click Apply button, core is uploading the evidence, demo uploading and adding comment, then hit submit that triggers an email to issuing agency (slides 11-14) Show what it looks like once MC is earned, go to profiles, 3 types of files (MC started, saved, will show MCs applied for but not earned for re-application, MC earned) Demo sharing capabilities (Make note that Share Your Work, evidence and feedback, will be emailed to me once MC is earned), Embed code will allow to post MC to blog or website, share achievement will share only MC Platform Demo! www.bloomboard.com/digitalpromise

2 MCs = 1 CPD As MCs are earned, share work and feedback with Jill Snell Jill will keep a spreadsheet of earned MCs Once an educator as earned 2 MCs, he/she will be emailed the credit report form for completion MCs must be completed by the last day of the BCPS 2015-16 school-year Credit report forms will be submitted for processing the following week

Questions?

Let’s go! Complete the survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BCPS_MCpilot Create an account: www.bloomboard.com/digitalpromise Browse BCPS endorsed MCs at http://tinyurl.com/BCPSMicro Select 2 micro-credentials that you are interested in obtaining Complete the launch survey: http://tinyurl.com/BCPS-MC Register for the Micro-credentialing in the BCPS PD Cycle (CPD Courses) As you obtain your MCs, please share your work with Jill Snell, jsnell@bcps.org Participants will work off ODL MC wiki-page

MC Meet-up for STAT Teachers Continuing Support MC Meet-up for STAT Teachers *April 21st STAT Conference Virtual MC Meet-up *May 23rd, 11am – 1pm MC Support Team

Educator Micro-credentials Baltimore County Public Schools http://tinyurl.com/BCPSMicro As participants enter, direct them to the wiki page. Welcome MC Support Team Amanda Lanza Specialist, Digital Learning alanza@bcps.org Jill Snell Resource Teacher, Organizational Development jsnell@bcps.org Sean McComb Resource Teacher, Organizational Development smccomb@bcps.org