Price support mechanisms in the grain sector History and current situation Michel Ferret FranceAgriMer Paris.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prospects for EU-25 agricultural markets and income Update December 2005.
Advertisements

Prospects for EU-27 agricultural markets and income
Prospects for EU-25 agricultural markets and income
The Common Agricultural Policy Jo Eldridge, Alison Fox, Lizzie Simpson, George Tickell and Chris Wenzinger,
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS Free Trade & Protectionism-Graphical Analysis
AGRICULTURAL MARKET AGENCY :31 Agricultural Market Agency (ARR) as a paying agency.
1 Insights on cross-border ex ante controls – Polish experiences 27th Conference of Directors of EU Paying Agencies Oviedo, April 2010.
1The Republic of TURKEY PADDY RICE January 2006 SCREENING CHAPTER 11 AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENDA ITEM 16g: PADDY RICE.
Understand the role of business in the global economy. 1.
Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER Federal Office for Agriculture FOAG Abolition of Swiss Milk Quotas Jacques Chavaz Deputy.
CHAPTER 7 ANALYSIS OF A TARIFF.
AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (ARDA) Dr. László Rieger Director of Intervention Measures.
Unit Five Trade Relations
1 [Giovanni Anania, IAAE Congress, Durban, August 2003] The Fischler reform of the CAP and the WTO negotiations Giovanni Anania Department of Economics.
Bence Tóth, European Commission The situation of the dairy sector in the EU.
Free Trade and Protectionism (4.2). Free Trade Free trade is the total absence of any from of intrusions, or barrier in the flow of goods and services.
EU farm policy until the Uruguay Round Niek Koning Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy.
Free Trade? Despite policy reforms enacted as a result of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, global dairy markets remain among the most protected.
Chapter 8 Economic Integration.
© CommNet 2013 Education Phase 3 Food production – farm to fork.
International Business Chapter 4. Independent Practice Research the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Department Examine and explain 2 regulations regarding.
EU Common Agricultural Policy 1.Principles and approaches CAP Reform CAP ‘Health Check‘ А) Principles  Free movement of agricultural goods.
2008 Korean Agriculture Overview for Oklahoma Ag Leadership Group February 27, 2008.
Gábor Zsugyelik ISO Council Session Istanbul 23 May April 2006.
EU Milk Policies after End of Quotas Carlos MARTÍN ÓVILO DG Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission Value Chain in Milk Production and Consumption.
Dr. Györgyi Molnár – Péter Földi Hungarian Poultry Product Board 1.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LEARNING OUTCOME 8. THE BENEFITS OF TRADE Absolute Advantage Comparative Advantage Economies of Large Scale When a country can produce.
Logistics Performance in Baltic Sea Area Managing Director Mikko Melasniemi Finnish Association of Purchasing and Logistics LOGY.
Chapter 7.1 Trade Between Nations.
Câmara dos Despachantes Oficiais CONFIAD Paneuropean Network Workshop on Customs Customs Valuation Fernando Carmo CONFIAD Paneuropean Network - President.
International Trade Vocabulary Answers
The Doha Development Agenda, Taking Stock A European Perspective Rolf Moehler former Deputy Director-General for Agriculture of the European Commission.
Screen 1 of 21 Markets Assessment and Analysis Markets and Food Security LEARNING OBJECTIVES Understand basic market concepts and definitions relevant.
The Foreign Economic Activity of Enterprises Of Dadoboeva Farangis.
Unit 7a Economics.
A Basic Primer on Trade Policy A Basic Primer on Trade Policy Dr. Andrew L. H. Parkes “Practical Understanding for use in Business” 卜安吉.
SCREENING CHAPTER 11 AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENDA ITEM 16a: CEREALS The Republic of TURKEY23-26 January CEREALS.
April 17, The Midterm Review of the CAP Issues and options Franz Fischler.
Farm policy reform: the European experience Dan Rotenberg, Counselor - Agriculture Delegation of the European Commission to the U.S. Domestic and trade.
Objective 1.03 Understand business in the global marketplace. 1.
Key Players in EU Policy Making § The COMMISSION ( in principle independent) – Has sole right of proposal § The COUNCIL OF MINISTERS ( the member states.
CRITICAL REVIEW OF CHINA’S CEREAL SUPPLY & DEMAND AND IMPLICATIONS FOR WORLD MARKETS S. 1 Joint Meeting of the 30th Session of the Intergovernmental Group.
Unit AGRI.C4 – Animal Products Kai-Uwe Sprenger Brussels, 1 April 2011 Pigmeat in the Single CMO.
Impact of the CAP Reforms on U.S. – EU Cereal Trade Sachin Chintawar, Lynn Kennedy, John V. Westra.
Agricultural statistical system in Lebanon January 2014 Paris- France Lebanese Republic Ministry of Agriculture Agricultural market (mostly grain)
1 Changes Brought by Implementing Regulations on Purchase / Sales of Cereals and Paddy Rice.
Supply Response in the EU as a Result of CAP Reform What have we learned? ERS Modeling Workshop New Challenges in Modeling EU Agriculture and Agricultural.
Advisory Group Poultry 19 March 2010 Market situation principal feed stuffs.
Federal Association of Farm and Forest Owners in Austria Implementation of Common Agricultural Policy in Austria Vienna Twinning Conference 7 th October.
CONSUMER PROTECTION Slovak Customs Administration UNECE „MARS“ Group meeting 24 – 26 September 2006, Bratislava Bc. Viliam Pružinec, Customs Directorate.
Finnish NGA state-aid scheme Antti Kohtala Ministry of Transport and Communications Finland Digital Agenda Assembly, Brussels, 16th June 2011.
Wheat and Feed Market In Saudi Arabia June 2012 Grain Silos & Flour Mills Organization Kingdom of Saudi Arabia International Grains Council By H.E Eng.
Multi-beneficiary workshop on the reform of the Common Agriculture Policy of the EU (CAP) Common Market Organisation Regulations 1308/2013 and 1370/2013.
Common market organisation for cereals in EU 30th March 2012 in Belgrade Workshop on Market intervention and public warehouses Dr. Peter Bohlen.
Documents and Procedure Steps to Access EU Markets Grant Wilkinson Defra.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 11 – Agriculture and Rural Development.
EU-MED Agpol Annual Meeting Mars Paris
Impact of the CAP Reforms on U.S. – EU Cereal Trade
The EU’s Common Agricultural Policy and Lessons learned for the Future
Education Phase 3 Food production – farm to fork.
Public support to organic certification
The Austrian promotion scheme for green electricity Günter Pauritsch Workshop on renewable energy sources Sofia, 21 December 2011 Austrian Energy Agency.
Instrument of Pre-Accession (IPA) IPA State of Play
CMO introduction and main legal framework
TRAINING SESSION I EU Market Intervention
Chapter 8 Economic Integration.
Milk Market Observatory (MMO)
Key obligations of the MS in CAP
Market support measures
Technical Assistance for Development of a Strategy for Alignment with
Presentation transcript:

Price support mechanisms in the grain sector History and current situation Michel Ferret FranceAgriMer Paris

Overview of the presentation I-Intervention agencies II-Price support mechanisms in the European Union III-Historical background Others

I-Intervention agencies

What is an Intervention agency ? Public body entrusted with the implementation of the intervention scheme in a Member state –Poland : ARR –Germany : BLE –France : FranceAgriMer Generally competent for intervention ( + private storage) in all relevant sectors (grains, milk…) Generally entrusted with other EU – tasks Manages money from the national budget and from the UE (EAGF) Must be « accredited » (= deemed able to manage public money) Conditions for accreditation

II-Price support mechanisms in the EU

How are market prices supported in the European Union ? (1) In the EU all transactions on the internal (= EU-) market concerning grains are free : –No authorization from the State required –No compulsory sale to the State Difference between « producer price » and « market price » –Producer price : price paid to the producer by the cooperative, the merchant or the processor (miller, compounder..) –Market price : price agreed upon by seller and buyer on the wholesale level –Note : the cooperatives are not production cooperatives ; they are storage and marketing entities and belong to the « private sector » ; no obligation to become a member The market price is determined by the interaction of supply and demand

How are market prices supported in the European Union ? (2) In the EU the market prices for cereals are supported by 3 main tools : –The import duty Collected at the EU-border by the national customs authorities Note that nearly all imported quantities enter the EU under a reduced levy –Exports To other EU member states On the world market (since the beginning of the 2000’s without subsidies in the grain sector) –Intervention (for milling wheat and in certain circumstances barley, maize, sorghum, durum wheat and rice) « Public purchases », operated by an Intervention agency On the sellers initiative (coops, merchants)

When does intervention take place ? Reminder : –Only for cereals eligibile –and suitable- (quantity and quality conditions) –Intervention period : Rice : April-July Others : November-May When in a region the (wholesale) market price falls below the intervention (reference) price –Intervention/reference price : see Slide on this matter On the sellers inititiative (holder of the cereals)

III-Historical background -How was the intervention price set in 1962 ? -Evolution of the intervention price -The reforms of the intervention scheme

A-From 1962 to 1967 (6 Member states) CMO for Cereals : First CMO of the Common Agricultural Policy –1962 : « Transition period » (Council Reg 120/67) Gradual creation of the basic mechanisms of the CMO Convergence of the national (6 countries) support prices for grain towards a common intervention price. Objective : a common price in the summer In fact : 1 July 1967 – : discussions in the Council (6 ministers of Agriculture) on the level of the intervention price Germany does not accept to lower its support price (20 % higher than the French price, because of high cereals deficit situation in Germany) December 1964 : agreement on a common price (Intervention price) One intervention price for each cereal (soft wheat, durum wheat, barley, rye)

A-From 1962 to 1967 (2) Entry into force : summer 1967 The level of the common intervention price is very close to the (former) German price –This décision will have far reaching consequences : European grain prices are much higher than the world prices Need for a strong border protection towards imports from third countries Need for high export subventions >>> strained relationships with the competitors (Americans/Canadians)

B-From 1967 to 1992 (1) Yearly modification of the intervention prices (Increases) by the Council During the 1970’s, the intervention prices increase in line with the (high) inflation First corrective measures taken by the Council in the1980’s : insufficient and inadequate Conséquences : –Gradual building-up of large >>> huge intervention stocks, notably in Germany (barley, wheat and rye) –See next slide

Grain intervention stocks in the EU between 1968 and 2007

C-The reforms in the grain sector First reform of the CMO : 1 July 1993 –The intervention prices (I.P) are cut by more than 30 % over 3 years (at the end of 1992/93 the I.P for wheat amounted to 180 € / ton) In the case of wheat, feed wheat is no longer admitted to intervention –The cut is compensated by « area payments » given to the farmers 3 additional reforms in 2000, 2003, 2009 : –the final intervention price is now 101 € / ton From 1 July 2008 : the intervention price becomes the REFERENCE price (Reg 1234/2007, Article 18) –limitation of the number of cereals eligible for intervention –limitation of the volumes eligible for intervention at the price of 101 €/ ton

The result : Gradual dismantling of the intervention scheme Suppression of intervention for rye in 2004 (just before the accession of Poland, the biggest rye producer in the world) From 2006, introduction of intervention quotas for barley, maize, sorghum : –These quotas are gradually reduced to 0, but intervention can be reactivated if market situation critical. From 2009 –Milling wheat : 3 Mt quota at the fixed price (Reference price : 101 €/t) –Intervention tender for the (milling wheat) quantities above 3 Mt –Quota « 0 » for durum wheat, barley, maize, sorghum, rice, but intervention can be reactivated if market situation critical. In this case buying-in by tenders.

IV-Others

Intervention price / Reference price On the occasion of the creation of the Single Common Market Organisation (Reg Council 1234/2007) introduction of the Reference price in the Cereals sector Reminder : in other sectors (milk, meat, sugar), before Reg 1234/2007, there was a difference between the Reference price and the Intervention price. In these sectors the Reference price is a « theoretical » support price ; the price at which level the State « intervenes » (public purchase) is lower. It is the « intervention » price. –For ex. Butter : Intervention price = 90 % of the Reference price Current situation in the cereals sector : –For milling wheat, within the 3 Mt quota : Intervention price = 100 % of the Reference price (101 €/ton) –For the other grains : intervention takes place at the price decided at the tender (max.101 €/ton)

Price reporting procedures The Members states report market prices (wholesale prices) to the Commission for various places every Tuesday In France FranceAgriMer is responsible for this task –Network of informers (brokers, exporters, merchants, coops..) –Cross-check with Futures market in Paris (NYSE-Euronext)

Thank you for your attention Any questions ?