UNFCCC secretariat, SDM Rocío N. Correia, Associate Programme Officer Efforts undertaken to deliver the expected work Singapore, 28. October 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

CONOR BARRY, Team Lead OSD UNFCCC Secretariat SDM programme Setting expectations of the workshop Bonn, 7- 8 May 2011 Workshop on Programme of Activities.
Presented by: Lex de Jonge Vice-Chair CDM Executive Board Clean Development Mechanism EB perspective on recent developments, with a focus on Registration.
Key provisions and institutional arrangements of the CDM Christine Zumkeller UNFCCC/Cooperative Mechanisms
BASELINE STANDARD UNFCCC secretariat workshop
Durban Decisions on the Clean Development Mechanism DUAN Maosheng Chair of the CDM Executive Board First SDM Joint Coordination Workshop Bonn,
Regional Distribution
Transparency and promotion of the CDM
SDM Strategy SDM Joint Coordination Workshop
JI Governance – review of JI Guidelines
Key recent developments in the CDM and JI Joint Coordination Workshop Bonn, Germany, March 2012 Andrew Howard, UNFCCC secretariat.
UNFCCC secretariat, Sustainable Development Mechanisms Programme Conor BARRY Improving and demonstrating efficiency in CDM processes 7 th Joint Coordination.
UNFCCC secretariat Enhanced Interactions and Direct Communication – Policy matters First SDM Joint Coordination Workshop Bonn, Germany, March 2012.
UNFCCC secretariat, programme Mayuresh Sarang, Team Lead - Accreditation Standards Team Module 2.2 Calibration regarding Accreditation Assessment Requirements.
Presentation title 1st Sustainable Development Mechanisms Joint Coordination Workshop Module 2.4 Materiality Bonn, Germany, 24–25 March 2012 Marsha Cheddi.
. CDM Project Cycle Calibration Melanie Eddis ERM Certification and Verification Services (ERM CVS) CDM Coordination Meeting UNFCCC, Bonn March 2012.
Implementing Decision 10/CMP.7 CCS in the CDM Tim Dixon IEA Greenhouse Gas R & D Programme UNFCCC 1 st SDM Workshop 25 March.
Dhirendra KUMAR UNFCCC Secretariat, Sustainable Development Mechansims Programme New Registration and Issuance Procedures 7 th CDM Joint Coordination Workshop.
UNFCCC secretariat, Sustainable Development Mechanisms Programme Modalities and procedures for direct communication with stakeholders 3/CMP 6, para. 21,
UNFCCC secretariat, programme Fleur Newman, Programme Officer Breakout session 4.2 Procedure on significant deficiencies CMP & EB Mandates and 2012 Process.
UNFCCC secretariat, SDM Olof Bystrom, Programme Officer Module 1.4 JI Project Cycle - Status of Implementation 1st SDM Joint Coordination Workshop Bonn,
1 Validation and registration Verification and issuance Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 20 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
James Grabert Manager, Joint Implementation, UNFCCC secretariat Joint Implementation Overview & Status Kyoto Protocol and Carbon Market.
Presentation title Session 3: The Concept of Programme of Activities (PoA) PoA Registration and CPA inclusion Training-Workshop to support the “Uganda.
SDM programme UNFCCC secretariat Session 2: The CDM project cycle Monitoring, Verification and CER issuance Training-Workshop to support the “Uganda Municipal.
UNFCCC Secretariat Status of negociations on CDM Perumal Arumugam Regional Workshop on CDM and NAMAs for Latin America and the Caribbean,Bogota, (31 –
1:30 – 2:30. TEQSA: A New Regulatory Agency for Australian Higher Education Marian Thakur Regulatory Risk and Information.
Accreditation of Independent entities under JI - Status of JISC work Georg B ø rsting UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation, 9-10 March 2006.
2016 Transitional GEO Work Programme Discussion & CONSOLIDATION Session 10, 2015 GEO Work Plan Symposium Geneva, 7 May 2015 Alan Edwards (IPWG) Giovanni.
Learning from the CDM First UNFCCC workshop on Article 6 projects under the Kyoto Protocol May 2004 Moscow, Russian Federation John Shaibu KILANI.
Staff Structure Support HCCA Special Interest Group New Regulations: A Strategy for Implementation Sharon Schmid Vice President, Compliance and.
Presentation title Session 2: The CDM Project Cycle Post-registration changes Renewal of crediting period Training-Workshop to support the “Uganda Municipal.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The Aarhus & Espoo Conventions Making implementation work for stakeholders.
Lecture #9 Project Quality Management Quality Processes- Quality Assurance and Quality Control Ghazala Amin.
Enhancement of participation of local stakeholders, key to success of CDM projects: Current rules and procedures under the CDM Fatima-Zahra Taibi, UNFCCC.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES FIRST THINGS FIRST Invitation of a mission Information meeting self-assessment.
Module 1.2 – CDM Project Cycle Calibration Calibration through enhanced CDM-AP direct communication with stakeholders (DOEs/ATs) A. Ricardo J. Esparta.
UK Wide Core Skills & Training Framework Findings of 2 nd Stage Consultation and Implications for Development of the Framework.
Second expert group meeting on Draft fiche on delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) Cohesion Policy
Strategic Plan th October Management and Governance “GeSCI’s corporate structures and management arrangements were appropriate for.
Results The final report was presented to NICE and published by NICE and WHO. See
UNFCCC Secretariat Utilizing the existing CDM institutional arrangements for NAMAs Perumal Arumugam Regional Workshop on CDM and NAMAs for Latin America.
GHG inventory submissions and review process under the UNFCCC 8 th Joint UNECE TFEIP & EIONET Meeting Astrid Olsson Reporting, Data and Analysis Programme.
Central Kitsap School District SHARED DECISION MAKING Central Kitsap High School March 2, 2006.
Module Calibration regarding accreditation assessment requirements Calibration through enhanced CDM-AP direct communication with stakeholders (DOEs/ATs)
CDM Project Cycle LGED Bhaban, Dhaka 8 – 9 April 2008 Presented by Khandaker Mainuddin Fellow, BCAS.
1 ACHIEVEMENTS from the Executive Meeting IEC CAB – ILAC - IAF By Pierre de Ruvo Head of the CAB Delegation.
Catalogue of decisions CDM Executive Board EB September 2006.
Public Protection Service 2008/9 Charter Mark and Electronic Data Management System (EDMS) Improve performance and efficiency together with improving customer.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Proposed Framework for Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Negussie Gorfe.
Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections Emission inventory adjustments – an update TFEIP co-chairs: Chris Dore, Martin Adams and Kristina Saarinen.
Introduction of information note Compilation and analysis of available information on the scope, effectiveness and functioning of the flexibility mechanisms.
The Role of Designated Operational Entities in the CDM High-Level Roundtable on CDM Reform World Bank Carbon Finance Business Washington, D.C., October.
Verónica García Malo UNFCCC secretariat SDM / PEA Module 3.2 Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes 1st SDM Joint Coordination Workshop Bonn,
UNFCCC secretariat, Sustainable Development Mechanisms programme Nashib Kafle, Associate Programme Officer Session 3: The Concept of Programme of Activities.
CDM: ISSUES FOR CMP 2 AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS TO LDCS Presentation made to the LDC Negotiators Workshop, Nairobi, 3 November, 2006 Richard Muyungi United.
Current and future work of the Adaptation Committee in the area of adaptation technologies Workshop on technologies for adaptation Bonn, Germany, 4 March.
Update on Methodological Issues Annual Meeting of the Host Country Committee Köln, May 2006.
Твининг пројекат Европске Уније Успостављање механизма за спровођење ММR *** Twinning project Establishment of a mechanism for implementation of MMR Пројекат.
Francisco Arango UNFCCC secretariat JI section Joint Implementation State of Play UNFCCC Technical Workshop on.
1 CDM institutional framework Maria Netto UNFCCC secretariat Addis Ababa 21 October 2003
Clean Development Mechanism
JISC – work accomplished and challenges ahead
Setting Actuarial Standards
Q&A sessions at UNFCCC SB26
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
Conclusions of the seminar
Conclusions of the seminar
Presentation transcript:

UNFCCC secretariat, SDM Rocío N. Correia, Associate Programme Officer Efforts undertaken to deliver the expected work Singapore, 28. October 2010

CDM STATISTICS CDM project pipeline: >4200 of which 2439 are registered. Average of issuance requests published by month: 50 (Jan-Sep) Average of CERs issued by month: 8,490,633 (Jan-Sep) Resubmissions constitute more than 40% of current registration requests and 14% of issuance requests awaiting processing. Secretariat expects resubmissions to decline as DOEs/PPs further improve their adherence to the requirements. Issuance requests are exceeding MAP expectations. UPDATED NUMBERS

New R&I procedures were put in place at EB 54. New review procedures adopted at EB55. Implementation and further work on the DOE performance monitoring framework. Procedural changes Summary of the efforts undertaken R&I electronic workflows were revamped to address the changes in the procedures. Technological changes Implementation of the recruitment plan. Additional work undertaken by external experts and staff from other units. Secretariat SDM Programme restructure. Resources enhancement

Procedural changes Request for registration /issuance Publish request Register / issue Completeness check by secretariat (7 Days) Information & reporting check by secretariat (23 Days) EB Member/Party period to request review (28 Days) Notification to DOE/PP of request for review In case of no request for review Payment of fee; scheduling Commence assessment (cc) Commence assessment (ir) Summary note prepared by secretariat (14 Days) Registration & Issuance Procedures

R&I Review Procedures Request for Review Commence Review Start Objection Period Decision Becomes Final DOE Response (28 Days) Secretariat + RIT Assessm. (14 Days) EB Member Objection Period (20 Days) Objection => Discuss at next EB In Case of Rejection: Ruling objection period (10days) Procedural changes

The aim of the framework is to continuously monitor and improve the performance of DOEs, which will be reflected in better submissions. The implementation of the framework will constitute a tool for identifying areas where guidance, clarifications, new requirements or revision of methodologies are needed. Ensure that DOEs comply with the requirements and meet the standards established by the Board for DOEs. Provide data that would help DOEs to improve their system. DOEs which reach the established thresholds will be requested to conduct a root-cause analysis or a spot-check will be triggered, depending on the outcome of the monitoring. Assist the Board in its decision-making process. Procedural changes DOE performance monitoring

R&I workflows Technological changes The R&I workflows are now in line with the new procedures. The workflows will be continuously adjusted and improved to handle cases faster and more consistently.

Resources enhancement New staff under recruitment in accordance with MAP. Working with external experts (including RIT) to support secretariat assessments. Additional experts under recruitment. Internal staff from other units are also committed to work on the assessment of PAs.

Resources enhancement Restructure of SDM 3 core operational units and 3 units supporting core operations and wider functions of the programme. This structure aligns the work according to functions, instead of topics, to allow SDM teams to focus their technical and process expertise on the respective work areas and increase control and ownership of their specific activities. CDM and JI teams are now merged. Synergy between the work streams and reduction of duplication in expertise and resources. OSD identifies and supports continuous improvements in the operation of CDM and JI and the services provided by the core operational units; supports the development of external stakeholders, in particular DOEs/AIEs, to ensure they understand and comply with the standards established by the regulatory bodies.

Conclusions Based on presents rates of submissions & processing. Assuming a reduction in the number of resubmissions over the next 3 months. Implementing the use of further external resources in assessments of projects. By January, projects upon submission will commence assessment within approximately a month’s time.

Thank You.