Financial Accounting/OCAS/Auditing Nancy Hughes, Executive Director 2500 North Lincoln Blvd. Room 420 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105 FEDERAL AND STATE COMPLIANCE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Advertisements

LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE.
M AINTENANCE OF E FFORT & C OMPARABILITY R EPORT Teresa Scott Accounting Manager-Grant Management Albuquerque Public Schools NM ASBO.
West Virginia’s Experience. West Virginia Issues  SEA Maintenance of Financial Support (MFS) – USED Waiver  LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) – OSEP Verification.
Maintenance of Effort IV-B Funding LEA Level Special Education Services Kansas Department of Education Special Education Services.
Match and Maintenance of Effort BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R.
ESEA and Private Schools’ Participation Federal Program Directors’ Conference Waterfront Place Hotel, Morgantown March 13, 2013.
IDEA-B and NCLB LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Maintenance of Effort for Special Education April 11, /11/14Office of Special Education1.
CHARTER SCHOOL TRAINING March 3, 2015 Nancy Hughes, Executive Director Financial Accounting / OCAS/Audits (405)
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Excess Cost Presenter Patricia Holcomb-Gray Office of Special Education Programs NJ Department of Education June 3, 2015.
FY 14 Special Education Funding Issues Illinois ASBO Annual Conference May 16, 2013 Illinois State Board of Education Funding and Disbursement Services.
Special Education Funding Education Service Center, Region 20 Sherry Marsh 1.
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability, and Supplement/Supplant PAFPC April 2011.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum 2013 General Initiatives and the Role of Special Education.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
Maintenance of Effort Time and Effort Requirements September 2014.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Maintenance of Effort Danna Sanders Phone:
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Office of Special.
New Charter School Training April 24, 2012 Presented by Iona Martin, Financial Specialist Financial Accounting / OCAS & Auditing.
1 Annual Request for Special Education Funds Application Training Fiscal Year 2010 May 28, 2009 New Hampshire Department of Education Bureau of Special.
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SPED Finance-Grants and Data LEA Academy SPED Finance 1.
SPECIAL EDUCATION MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT (MOE). MOE REQUIREMENT Federal law requires that each local education agency (LEA) receiving federal funds pursuant.
Maintenance of Effort Office of Special Education Fall Forum 1.
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) for Special Education April 7, 2015 April 2015Office of Special Education1.
Federal Grant Training. I. Title I-A Fiscal Requirements  To ensure Title I-A funds are in addition to regular services normally provided, three fiscal.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WEBINAR APRIL 30, 2014 PLEASE DIAL INTO TELECONFERENCE: Toll Free Number/ Participant Code/ COLLEGE ACCESS CHALLENGE.
Special Education Budgets GCASE – SELDA February 2015.
Maintenance of Effort Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I University April 16, 2015 Chris McLaughlin.
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section IDEA Part B Grant Fiscal Monitoring Presented by: Antonia Johnson, IDEA Part B Consultant.
1 Connecticut State Department of Education American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA): Bureau of Special Education Teleconference May 21, 2009.
IDEA EQUITABLE SERVICES: SERVING PARENTALLY PLACED PRIVATE SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein &
Maintenance of Effort Federal Cross-Cutting & Special Education MoE Daniel Lunghofer Supervisor, School District/ESD Accounting.
Consolidated Fiscal (OCFO) Requirements: Special Education and Federal Programs Components Spring Fiscal WorkshopsSpring Fiscal Workshops.
Oklahoma State Department of Education Janet Barresi State Superintendent of Public Instruction Consolidated Schoolwide Funds.
Local Education Agency (LEA) Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Requirements under IDEA.
Federal Programs Network Community Schools Sponsors Fall 2015.
Utilizing Federal IDEA Special Education Funds Permissively to Serve At-Risk Students in General Education The Fiscal Mechanics of RTI and PBS.
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 NCLB: 2009.
COORDINATED EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES CEIS 1.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 IDEA Recovery Funds for Services to Children and Youths with Disabilities.
1 Connecticut State Department of Education American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA): Strategic Planning, Community Consensus Mark K. McQuillan Commissioner.
SES Training on Screens 11, 12, and Part of 8. By Steve Crew September 12, 2007.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Private Nonprofit School Participation.
ESS G RANT M ANAGEMENT IDEA Charter School Expansion Act (CSEA), Basic Entitlement and supplemental grants New Charter Operator Training 2015.
OkASBO/SDE/CCOSA REGIONAL WORKSHOPS ADMINISTRATIVE COST OCAS SUBMISSION TRANSPARENCY ESTIMATE OF NEEDS AUDITS.
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
Fundamentals of Special Education Finance OkASBO Conference FY 2013.
1 RTI, MOE and Other Complex Fiscal IDEA Issues. Agenda - Allowability - Significant Disproportionality, CEIS and RTI - Time and Effort Reporting - Maintenance.
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
THE REAL SUPPLEMENT VERSUS SUPPLANT STORY Maintenance of Effort ( MOE)
Kay Townsend, Fiscal Consultant Title I, IIA, VI, & X Oklahoma State Department of Education (405)
Special Education Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Michael Brooks Division of School Finance Special Education.
IDEA Grants Application: Maintenance of Effort. 2 What is Maintenance of Effort? IDEA regulation (34 CFR § ) which directs districts, for each grant.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Introduction to LEA MOE Tool
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
LEA Maintenance of Effort and Excess Cost Calculation
Understanding Supplement Not Supplant Under ESSA, IDEA, and Perkins
SCHOOL AWARD IN FINANCIAL REPORTING
Maintenance of Effort Virginia Department of Education
IDEA Maintenance of Effort
ESEA Programs | December 2018
Special Education Services Financial Management of Special Education Programs Federal IDEA Part B Funds.
VASBO Spring Conference May 19, 2016 Tracie L. Coleman
Presentation transcript:

Financial Accounting/OCAS/Auditing Nancy Hughes, Executive Director 2500 North Lincoln Blvd. Room 420 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma FEDERAL AND STATE COMPLIANCE CALCULATIONS

Special Education Maintenance of Effort IDEA 613(a)(2)(A)(iii) Funds provided to the LEA under IDEA Part B may not be used to reduce the level of state and/or local funds used to provide special education and related services. Federal requirements mandate that federal grant funds supplement (increase) not supplant (replace) existing funding for special education programs. An LEA may reduce the level of expenditures according to 34 CFR §

Special Education Maintenance of Effort The voluntary departure, by retirement or otherwise, or departure for just cause, of special education or related services personnel. A decrease in the enrollment of a child with disabilities. (SEA already takes this into consideration for districts) The termination of costly expenditures for long-term purchases, such as the acquisition of equipment or the construction of school facilities.

Special Education Maintenance of Effort The termination of the obligation of the agency, consistent with this part, to provide a program of special education to a particular child with a disability that is an exceptionally costly program, as determined by the SEA, because the child- (1) Has left the jurisdiction of the agency; (2) Has reached the age at which the obligation of the agency to provide FAPE to the child has terminated; or (3) No longer needs the program of special education.

Special Education Maintenance of Effort The assumption of cost by the high cost fund operated by the SEA under §

§ Adjustment to Local Fiscal Efforts in Certain Fiscal Years. For any fiscal year for which the allocation received by an LEA under § exceeds the amount the LEA received for the previous fiscal year, the LEA may reduce the level of expenditures otherwise required by § (a) by not more than 50 percent of the amount of that excess. Special Rule. The amount of funds expended by an LEA for early intervening services under § shall count toward the maximum amount of expenditures that the LEA may reduce.

Example of Adjustment In FY 13, Project 621 Allocation was$150, In FY 14, Project 621 Allocation was$100, Difference$ 50, % Rule$ 25, In FY 14, the district can reduce the local and state expenditures for special education by $25,000.00

Example of Adjustment with Early Intervening Services In FY 13, Project 621 Allocation was:$150, In FY 14, Project 621 Allocation was:$100, Difference:$ 50, % Rule:$ 25, Minus Early Intervening Set Aside:$ 10, In FY 14, the district can reduce the local and state expenditures for special education by $15,000.00

FY Districts did not meet Maintenance of Effort for Special Education. State Aid will be reduced for those district who do not have exceptions and those funds will be sent to the U. S. Department of Education.

FY 15 Special Ed. MOE Calculation Funds 11 through 60, Excluding 12 and 41 Project Codes Function Codes 1000 through 3200 Object Codes 100 through 899 Program Code 239

Special Ed. MOE Calculation Old Regulation Compare Previous Years Expenditures to Current Year Expenditures. Expenditures Must Meet or Exceed Previous Years Expenditures by 100%.

FY 2015 New Regulation IDEA section 613 (a)(2)(A)(iii) and 34 CFR § The level of effort a local education agency must meet under section 613 (a)(2)(A)(iii) of IDEA, in the year after it fails to maintain effort is the level of effort that would have been required in the absence of that failure and not the LEA’s reduced level of expenditures. Under this provision, if an LEA failed to maintain effort in , the level of effort that the LEA must maintain in is the level of effort that it would have been required in in the absence of that failure, and not the LEA’s reduced level of expenditures in

FY 2015 New Regulation Example

In FY 13, this District met MOE. In FY 14, the District will have to meet the expenditure level of FY 13.

FY 2015 New Regulation Example In FY 13, this District did not MOE. In FY 14, the District will have to meet the expenditure level of FY 12.

FY 2015 New Regulation Example In FY 13, this District did not MOE. The District filed for an exemption of $37, based on the voluntary departure of special education personnel. In FY 14, the District will have to meet the expenditure level of FY 13.

NCLB MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT Section Maintenance of Effort (a) IN GENERAL- A local educational agency may receive funds under a covered program for any fiscal year only if the State educational agency finds that either the combined fiscal effort per student or the aggregate expenditures of the agency and the State with respect to the provision of free public education by the agency for the preceding fiscal year was not less than 90 percent of the combined fiscal effort or aggregate expenditures for the second preceding fiscal year.

NCLB MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT Section Maintenance of Effort (b) REDUCTION IN CASE OF FAILURE TO MEET- (1) IN GENERAL- The State educational agency shall reduce the amount of the allocation of funds under a covered program in any fiscal year in the exact proportion by which a local educational agency fails to meet the requirement of subsection (a) of this section by falling below 90 percent of both the combined fiscal effort per student and aggregate expenditures (using the measure most favorable to the local agency). (2) SPECIAL RULE- No such lesser amount shall be used for computing the effort required under subsection (a) of this section for subsequent years.

NCLB MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT Section Maintenance of Effort (c) WAIVER- The Secretary of Education may waive the requirements of this section if the Secretary determines that a waiver would be equitable due to — (1) exceptional or uncontrollable circumstances, such as a natural disaster; or (2) a precipitous decline in the financial resources of the local educational agency.

FY Districts did not meet Maintenance of Effort for NCLB.

NCLB MOE Calculation Total Expenditures Funds 11 through 60, Excluding 12 and 41 Function Codes 1000 through 3200 Object Codes 100 through 899 Deductions Adult Education Expenditures Community Services Capital Outlay Payments to LEA’s Federal Funds Student Activities

NCLB MOE Calculation Inputs Teacher Retirement Career Tech Co-op Funds Net Current Expenditures Must be matched by 90% from year to year.

NCLB MOE Calculation Three ways to Calculate Maintenance of Effort. Expenditures Average Daily Attendance Per Student Expenditure October 1 Enrollment Per Student Expenditure

This school met MOE by the expenditures

This school did not meet MOE. Their federal funds will be reduced.68%

This school did not meet MOE but applied for an exemption with the Secretary of the US Dept. of Education and it was granted on the basis of a Natural Disaster.

FEDERAL FUNDS TO BE REDUCED Title I, Part A Title I, School Improvement Program Title I, Part B, Subpart 3, Even Start Title I, Part D, Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At Risk Title II, Part A, Improving Teacher Quality Title II, Part D, Educational Technology Title III, Part A, English Language Acquisition Title IV, Part B, 21st Century Learning Centers Title VI, Part B, Subpart 2, Rural Education Programs Title VII, Indian Education Title X, Part C, McKinney-Vento Education of Homeless Youth

ADMINISTRATIVE COST Title 70, Chapter 1, Section Amount Withheld From Foundation and Salary Incentive Aid. Expenditures cannot exceed more than 5% for any school district with an ADA or more than 1,500 students Expenditures cannot exceed more than 7% for any school district with an ADA or more than 500 to 1,500 students Expenditures cannot exceed more than 8% for any school district with an ADA or fewer than 500 students

ADMINISTRATIVE COST EXPENDITURES D. For purposes of this section, “administrative services” means costs associated with: 1. Staff for the board of education; 2. The secretary/clerk for the board of education; 3. Staff relations; 4. Negotiations staff; 5. Immediate staff of the superintendent; any elementary superintendent or any assistant superintendent; 6. Any superintendent, elementary superintendent, or assistant superintendent; 7. Any employee of a school district employed as a director, coordinator, supervisor, or who has responsibility for administrative functions of a school district; and 8. Any consultant hired by the school district.

ADMINISTRATIVE COST EXPENDITURE CODES 1. Staff for the Board of Education; Functions:2313 (Board Treasurer Services) 2318 (Audit Services) 2319 (Other Board of Education Services) Objects:100 and 200 Series (Salaries and related burdens and benefits) 310 (Official/Administrative Services) 330 Series (Other Professional Services)

ADMINISTRATIVE COST EXPENDITURE CODES 2. The secretary/clerk for the Board of Education; Function:2312 (Board Clerk/Deputy Clerk/Minute Clerk Services) Objects:100 and 200 Series (Salaries and related burdens and benefits) 310 (Official/Administrative Services) 330 Series (Other Professional Services)

ADMINISTRATIVE COST EXPENDITURE CODES 3. Staff relations; Function:2316 (Staff Relations and Negotiations Services) Objects:100 and 200 Series (Salaries and related burdens and benefits) 310 (Official/Administrative Services) 330 Series (Other Professional Services)

ADMINISTRATIVE COST EXPENDITURE CODES 5. Immediate staff of the superintendent; any elementary superintendent or any assistant superintendent; Function:2321 (Office of the Superintendent Services) Objects:100 and 200 Series (Salaries and related burdens and benefits) 310 (Official/Administrative Services) 330 Series (Other Professional Services) Job Classes:615 (Regular or Substitute Secretary/Clerk) 690 (Superintendent’s Secretary)

ADMINISTRATIVE COST EXPENDITURE CODES 7. Any employee of a school district employed as a director, coordinator, supervisor, or who has responsibility for administrative functions of a school district; Function:All Objects:100 and 200 Series (Salaries and related burdens and benefits) Job Classes:101 Administrative/Supervisory/Ancillary Services Officer 107 Executive Assistant 109 Manager 301 Accountant 303 Administrative Intern 332 Network Administrator 513 Supervisor 601 Bookkeeping/Accounting/Auditing Clerk 612 Office Manager

ADMINISTRATIVE COST EXPENDITURE CODES 8. Any consultant hired by the school district; Function:All Objects:100 and 200 Series (Salaries and related burdens and benefits) Job Classes:108 Instructional Program Director/Coordinator /Consultant 110 Non-instructional Program Director/ Coordinator/Consultant 325 Grant Developer

ADMINISTRATIVE COST PENALTY State Aid will be reduced by the amount exceeded. State Aid funds are redistributed to other school districts in the state. There is no waiver for Administrative Cost Penalty.

OCAS MANUAL All of the Federal and State Compliance Calculations are in the Policy and Procedures Guide in the OCAS manual. All but one of the Compliance Reports are available to districts through the Oklahoma Cost Accounting System in the Single Sign on System or the Transparency Website.

SCHOOL DISTRICT TRANSPARENCY ACT Title 70, B. The State Department of Education shall make school district expenditure data available on its website. Data shall be made available in an open-structured data format that may be downloaded by the public and that allows the user to systematically sort, search, and access all data without any fee or charge for access.

SCHOOL DISTRICT TRANSPARENCY ACT Title 70, C. The database shall provide information on school district expenditures of state, federal, and local funds, whether appropriated or non-appropriated, excluding payments of voluntary payroll deductions for employees to receiving parties. The database shall further provide information, including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Identification of the school district; 2. The Oklahoma Cost Accounting System (OCAS) code designation for each expenditure;

SCHOOL DISTRICT TRANSPARENCY ACT 3. The name and principal location of the entity or recipient of the funds, excluding release of information relating to an individual’s place of residence and release of information prohibited by subsection D of Section 24 A.7 of Title 51 of the Oklahoma Statutes or by federal law relating to privacy rights; 4. The amount of funds expended; 5. The type of transaction; 6. A descriptive purpose of the funding action or expenditure;

SCHOOL DISTRICT TRANSPARENCY ACT 7. Copies of all credit card statements, identified by department responsible for each credit card; 8. The budgeted and audited actual expenditure figures for each fiscal year, ensuring each set of figures can be identified as budgeted or audited figures; and 9. The per-pupil spending figure, derived by dividing total expenditures by the total number of students enrolled for each school year. D. The Department shall make the data available on its website within one hundred twenty (120) days of transmission of the expenditures to the Department by the school district.

SCHOOL DISTRICT TRANSPARENCY ACT E. School districts shall provide information requested by the Department to accomplish the purposes of this section. F. If a school district maintains a website, the district shall provide the information required in subsection C of this section in the manner prescribed in subsection B of this section on the district website. G. Nothing in this section shall require the disclosure of information which is required to be kept confidential by state or federal law. H. The disclosure of information required by this section shall create no liability whatsoever, civil or criminal, to the State of Oklahoma, the State Department of Education, school districts, or any employee thereof for disclosure of required information or for any error or omission in the disclosure.

SCHOOL DISTRICT TRANSPARENCY ACT F. If a school district maintains a website, the district shall provide the information required in subsection C of this section in the manner prescribed in subsection B of this section on the district website. Copies of all credit card statements, identified by department responsible for each credit card; The budgeted and audited* actual expenditure figures for each fiscal year, ensuring each set of figures can be identified as budgeted or audited* figures. *Note: State Auditor and Inspector’s website is linked to SDE website for school audits.

Transparency Website Address

QUESTIONS

Financial Accounting/OCAS/Audit Contact Information Nancy Hughes, Executive Director Mykella Clouse, Financial Specialist Katherine Black, Financial Specialist-Auditing Pam Honeysuckle, Financial Specialist Iona Martin, Financial Specialist Amy Morgan, Administrative Assistant