Joseph Bell, P.G. Voluntary Cleanup Program – Corrective Action Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2016 Municipal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
John Slavich Guida, Slavich & Flores, P.C. 750 N. St. Paul Street, Suite 200 Dallas, Texas
Advertisements

The Code on SANITATION of the Philippines. Presidential Decree No. 856 Code on Sanitation Dec 23, 1975 – Promulgation of the Code on Sanitation by President.
Intro to Maine Subdivision Law
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Terminal Objective Upon completion of this module, the participant will be knowledgeable about the sections of the Code.
Introduction to Brownfields New Partners for Community Revitalization, Inc. June 29, 2009.
Voluntary Action Program – A Primer Amy Yersavich State and Federal Resources to Redevelop Blighted Properties Lake County November 12, 2010.
Voluntary Action Program – A Primer Martin Smith, Ohio EPA State and Federal Resources to Redevelop Blighted Properties Workshop.
Administrative Foreclosure A RECOMMENDED MECHANISM TO ADDRESS BLIGHTED AND ABANDONED PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH 1.
THE ABCs OF CRAs THE PLAN CHAPTER 163 REQUIREMENTS.
Who’s Monitoring Land Use Controls on Brownfield Sites? Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
WEBINAR SERIES: March 12: General overview of WHP Planning Process March 19: In depth discussion and review of the Data Elements March 26: Requirements.
Unclaimed Property: Reporting and Claims Processes
AirCheckTexas Drive A Clean Machine Page 1. AirCheckTexas Drive A Clean Machine Page 2.
Gary W. Baughman, Division Director 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010.
Carbon Capture and Storage State Legislation Kathy G. Beckett Midwest Ozone Group January 22-23, 2009.
HONR 297 Environmental Models Chapter 2: Ground Water 2.3: Typical Quantitative Issues.
Water and Wastewater Certification 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
EXHIBIT E Eminent Domain Documents Don Stursma Manager Safety & Engineering Iowa Utilities Board.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
Board of County Commissioners Allen County, Ohio Detailed Planning Assessment Hearing Wednesday, May 30 th, 2001 Presented By: Stephen M. Kayatin, Sanitary.
Blasting Regulations Proposed Changes to The Existing Ordinance.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Medical Waste Management Rulemaking Open Participation Meeting Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Waste Permits Division August 18, 2015, Austin.
IRRIGATION LAWS IN MISSOURI Jim Vandike Missouri Department of Natural Resources Geological Survey and Resource Assessment Division.
Presented by: Yolanda Chavez, RN, BSN Policy Rules and Curriculum Development Unit DADS Regulatory Services 1 DADS REGULATORY UPDATE March 2013.
Presentation to the Placer LAFCO Commission September 10, 2014.
The Role of Groundwater Sampling/Monitoring COGCC Proposed Rule 609 University of Colorado Law School Nov 26, 2012.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
1 Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP) Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
Local Powers for Land Use Regulation. Local Land Use Powers Land use regulation is considered a residual power –In most circumstances, that is… –Power.
FOR CLERKS AND RECORDERS  Planning Commission – public meeting and a public hearing  City Council – public hearing  Must contain: - a map of expansion.
Municipal Setting Designations Jennifer Clancey Program Manager.
1. Land Conservation Act (LCA) * Public Agency Webinar Public Acquisition Notification Procedure – A Step by Step Guide * LCA, also known as the Williamson.
December 2015 Detailed Presentation STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS CALIFORNIA Water Boards.
San Antonio Unified Development Code Group 17. Numbering and Referencing The numbering system is consistent with the system used throughout the City's.
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update July 14, 2004 DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Great Lakes Visitors Center.
1 Chapter 10 Annexation of Present-Use Value Land.
Grant County Zoning Ordinance Review Public Comment Forum Todd Kays:Executive Director – 1 st District Association of Local Governments.
S.B Municipality Fees. S.B – Environment Budget Reconciliation Bill Enacted during the 2011 regular legislative session and becomes effective.
Municipal Setting Designations in Texas A Case Study of Tarrant & Dallas Counties CE394K: GIS for Water Resources Professor David Maidment Jeni Webb November.
Surplus City Property – Request for Proposals Administration & Finance Committee February 1, 2012.
ANNEXATION Statutory Overview July 19, 2011 David L. Yearout, AICP, CFM.
An Introduction to the Voluntary Cleanup Program Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair & Conference May 3, 2016 Gene Muller,
Municipal Setting Designations Jennifer Clancey Program Manager.
Who I am Darren Bowling Phone: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Remediation and Redevelopment.
Uniform Environmental Covenants
NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIAL ORIENTATION Florida Property Appraisers Florida Tax Collectors February 7-10, 2017.
Community Improvement Districts County Counselors Association of Kansas Annual Meeting November 15, 2010 Janet S. Garms
Municipal Code Amendment Suspension of Utility Services for Violation of Specified Code Sections of the Pasadena Municipal Code City Council May 15,
A TOUR OF FLORIDA’S BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Dry Cleaning Registration
NAVAJO LAW SEMINAR October 14, 2016
Timothy Veatch, Section Chief
HB4034 – Duplicate Batch Process
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Petroleum Cleanup Program Contamination Notification Training February 2009 Charles T. Williams Environmental.
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
OFFICIAL MASS CANCELLATION
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality Scott Bullock
OFFICIAL MASS CANCELLATION
Confidentiality Frequently Asked Questions
Biltmore C Proposed Water & Sewer Improvement Project
Alexander Hinz & Kasy Stinson Water Supply Division
Institutional Controls At Voluntary Cleanup Sites
Annual Enforcement Report Overview
Prasanthi Bollineni, P. E. VCP-CA Section, Remediation Division
Kasy Stinson Water Supply Division
Presentation transcript:

Joseph Bell, P.G. Voluntary Cleanup Program – Corrective Action Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2016 Municipal Setting Designations (MSDs): Program Overview and Requirements Municipal Setting Designations (MSDs): Program Overview and Requirements

Municipal Setting Designation (MSD) A MSD is based upon a restriction placed/supported by a municipality. MSDs prohibit current and future potable use of the groundwater within the MSD boundary. Potable use includes: drinking, showering, bathing, cooking, or watering crops for human consumption. Groundwater Zone 2 Groundwater Zone 3 Groundwater Zone 1 Soil Contamination MSD Property Designated Groundwater

Eligibility Requirements Proposed MSD must be within corporate limit or extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of municipality. Public water supply must be available to area within MSD boundary and all property within 0.5 mile of the MSD boundary. Municipality ETJ MSD 0.5 mi

Investigation/Assessme nt Remediation Post-Response Action Care When can a MSD be Pursued with the TCEQ? Investigation/AssessmentRemediation Post-Response Action Care A MSD may be pursued at any stage in the investigation and remediation process. Must have documented groundwater contamination within the proposed MSD.

? Who can utilize the provisions of the MSD? = Source Contamination originating from MSD property. MSD relief within MSD boundary MSD relief outside MSD boundary Contamination originating from non-MSD property. No MSD relief within MSD boundary No MSD relief outside MSD boundary MSD Only those persons addressing groundwater contamination within the MSD benefit from the MSD

MSD Considerations MSD ◦ Agents (consultants, lawyers) cost  Application fee  City/RPU dealings  MSD Notification  Miscellaneous Remediation ◦ Agents (consultants, lawyers) cost  Assessment  Remediation  Miscellaneous

Example 5 Mile Water well search

Potential MSD Scenarios Scenario 1: Plume defined and < size of MSD, plume stable/shrinking Scenario 2: Plume defined and < size of MSD, size expanding/unknown Scenario 3: Plume defined and > size of MSD, plume stable/shrinking Scenario 4: Plume defined and > size of MSD, plume expanding/unknown Scenario 5: Plume undefined and unknown in relation to size of MSD, unknown stability All have the same TCEQ MSD application requirements. Plume Defined Plume<MSD Expanding/ Unknown MSD 2 Plume Defined Plume<MSD Stable/Shrinking MSD 1 Plume Defined Plume>MSD Expanding/ Unknown MSD 4 Plume Defined Plume>MSD Stable/Shrinking MSD 3 Plume Undefined Plume><MSD? Expanding/ Unknown MSD 5 All have the same TCEQ MSD application requirements.

Application Requirements Application Form (TCEQ-20149) State Application Fee $1,000 (separate from city requirements) Supporting documentation (discussed later) MSD Certificates are applied to sites that are in a TCEQ Remediation Division Program

Time Frames for Review TCEQ has 90 days from receipt of the MSD Application to: ◦ Issue an MSD Certificate ◦ Deny an MSD Certificate ◦ Request additional information Any responses to requests for additional information received… ◦ TCEQ must respond within 45 days

Data for Last 5 Fiscal Years FY12 ◦ Applications Received= 40 ◦ Certificates issued= 34 ◦ Applications denied/withdrawn= 1 ◦ Applications pending by end of FY= 18 FY13 ◦ Applications Received= 27 ◦ Certificates issued= 28 ◦ Applications denied/withdrawn= 0 ◦ Applications pending by end of FY= 17 FY14 ◦ Applications Received= 25 ◦ Certificates issued= 30 ◦ Applications denied/withdrawn= 0 ◦ Applications pending by end of FY= 12 FY15 ◦ Applications Received= 33 ◦ Certificates issued= 21 ◦ Applications denied/withdrawn= 2 ◦ Applications pending by end of FY= 22 FY16 (thru Feb) ◦ Applications Received= 18 ◦ Certificates issued= 18 ◦ Applications denied/withdrawn= 0 ◦ Applications pending by end of FY= 22 Total ◦ Applications Received= 143 ◦ Certificates issued= 131 ◦ Applications denied/withdrawn= 3 Fiscal Year Applications Received Certificates issued Applications Denied/ Withdrawn Applications Pending by End of Fiscal Year FY FY FY FY FY 16 (thru Feb) Total

MSD Certificates by County 275 MSD Certificates as of 8/31/15 Number of MSD certificates by County Wichita=2 Cooke=1 Denton=3 Collin = 5 Hunt = 1 Tarrant = 49 Dallas = 112 Kaufman = 1 Lubbock = 5 Taylor = 3 Johnson = 1 Ellis = 1 Henderson = 1 Smith = 2 Gregg = 3 Harrison = 1 Ector = 1 Midland = 1 McLennan = 1 Nacogdoches = 2 Angelina = 1 Waller = 1 Harris = 61 Jefferson = 9 Fort Bend = 4 Dimmit = 1 Cameron = 1

Obtaining Required Local MSD Support This slide is a section header to go into the next area of the presentation.

Support Required for MSDs MSD Support ◦ Municipality in which the MSD is proposed ◦ Municipalities within ½ mile of proposed MSD boundary ◦ Municipalities owning or operating a water well within 5 miles of proposed MSD boundary ◦ Retail Public Utilities (RPUs) owning or operating a water well within 5 miles of proposed MSD boundary MSD Support (General Case) Municipality in which the MSD is proposed Municipalities within ½ mile of proposed MSD boundary Municipalities owning or operating a water well within 5 miles of proposed MSD boundary Retail Public Utilities (RPUs) owning or operating a water well within 5 miles of proposed MSD boundary

Format of Support for MSDs An MSD certificate will not be issued unless or until all required support is provided with the application. PASSED BY THE GOVERNING BODY Municipality in which the MSD is proposed PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Ordinance or Restrictive Covenant with Resolution of Support Municipalities within ½ mile of proposed MSD boundary Municipalities owning or operating a water well within 5 miles of proposed MSD boundary Resolution of Support Retail Public Utilities (RPUs) owning or operating a water well within 5 miles of proposed MSD boundary Resolution of Support PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Resolution of Support

Municipalities owning or operating a water well within 5 mi Municipalities within ½ mi RPUs owning or operating a water well within 5 mi Notification must be sent and no opposing resolution issued within 120 days from receipt of notice MSD Support in a Municipality with Two Million People or More Municipalities owning or operating a water well within 5 miles Municipalities within ½ mile RPUs owning or operating a water well within 5 miles Notification must be sent and no opposing resolution issued within 120 days from receipt of notice

Identifying RPUs Resolution of support is required from each RPU that owns or operates a groundwater supply well, as defined Texas Water Code RPUs can be located utilizing the Public Utility Commission (PUC) Water Utility Database:

Size of MSD and Implications MSD smaller than Remediation Site ◦ Only portion issued the MSD can utilize provisions granted by the MSD. ◦ Releases which occurred outside the MSD area have all applicable program rules applied and cannot utilize the MSD provisions. MSD same as Remediation Site ◦ All releases which occurred within the remediation site can utilize provisions granted by the MSD. MSD bigger than Remediation Site ◦ MSD must be contiguous properties ◦ After MSD is issued, newly identified sites within the MSD boundary can be afforded MSD relief. ◦ Assessment reports still needed for sites that were not originally identified at time of MSD issuance MSD smaller than Remediation Site ◦ Only portion issued the MSD can utilize provisions granted by the MSD. ◦ Releases which occurred outside the MSD area have all applicable program rules applied and cannot utilize the MSD provisions. MSD same as Remediation Site ◦ All releases which occurred within the remediation site can utilize provisions granted by the MSD. MSD bigger than Remediation Site ◦ MSD should be comprised of adjacent properties ◦ After MSD is issued, newly identified sites within the MSD boundary can be afforded MSD relief. ◦ Assessment reports still needed for sites that were not originally identified at time of MSD issuance MSD smaller than Remediation Site Only portion issued the MSD is subject to provisions granted by the MSD. Releases outside the MSD area are subject to all applicable program rules applied and person cannot utilize the MSD provisions. MSD same as Remediation Site Within the MSD boundary, persons can utilize provisions granted by the MSD for all releases. MSD bigger than Remediation Site MSD should be comprised of adjacent properties. After MSD is issued, newly identified sites within the MSD boundary can be afforded MSD relief. Assessment reports still needed for sites that were not originally identified at time of MSD issuance.

Notification Procedures

Notice must be provided to Municipality in which proposed MSD is located Municipalities ◦ within ½ mile of proposed MSD boundary, or ◦ owning or operating water wells within a 5 mile radius of proposed MSD boundary RPUs owning/operating a water well within 5 miles of the proposed MSD boundary Each registered private water well owner within 5 miles of the proposed MSD boundary

MSD Notifications (1of 2) Must meet requirements of Texas Health and Safety Code § All persons entitled to notice have 60 days to comment Must provide signed delivery receipts

MSD Notifications (2 of 2) Obtain most recent name and address information from county tax records ahead of time to avoid delays if “returned to sender” (necessitates additional 60 day wait) Proof of adequate delivery includes: ◦ 1 st and 2 nd attempts = signed delivery receipt ◦ 3 rd attempt = signed delivery receipt OR delivery receipt and proof of 2 failed attempts Key map ID numbers to receipts

Notification Process Overview

Excel File for Notifications Formatted for TCEQ mass mail out notifications using Microsoft Word mail merge Should contain: ◦ Current well owner name ◦ Current well owner address ◦ City ◦ State ◦ Zip Remove duplicates and plugged and abandoned wells

THSC Sections – 808 Two-Part Statute MSD Process MSD Received 801 – Definitions 801 – Definitions 802 – Purpose 802 – Purpose 803 – Eligibility 803 – Eligibility 804 – Application 804 – Application 805 – Notice 805 – Notice 806 – Denial 806 – Denial 807 – Certification 807 – Certification 808 – Investigation/ 808 – Investigation/ Response Response

Addressing Section (1 of 2) Applicable before and after MSD certificate issuance Must address all applicable non-potable groundwater use exposure pathways ◦ Does not include soil to groundwater (potable use)

Addressing Section (2 of 2) Potable water wells within MSD or ½ mile of MSD boundary ◦ More than just “registered”  Perform Drinking Water Survey ◦ Determine whether affected or threatened  If affected or threatened, additional assessment may be necessary.  If affected or threatened, address through statutory allowances provided in Section 808.

Example of further exposure pathway assessment warranted RIVER GW PLUME Source MSD Monitoring well Potable use water well

Considerations for Water Wells Within a ½ mile Radius Construction details of water wells which could warrant considering a potable water well threatened ◦ Water wells with unknown screened intervals ◦ Absence of cementation or other measures to prevent screened interval from being affected ◦ Age of the well (old wells typically not cemented to great depths and cementation more likely to fail)

Reference and Guidance Statute: Texas Health and Safety Code Chapter 361 Subchapter W Statute: Texas Health and Safety Code Chapter 361 Subchapter W MSD Guide for Cities TCEQ MSD Webpage

Questions