Sources of Topics for a Systematic Review Personal Interest Personal Expertise/Background Professional “Hot Topics” 4.0.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Schoolwide Programs (SWP) NCLB Regional Meetings April 2010.
Advertisements

Protocol Development.
Introduction to The Campbell Collaboration and potential for collaboration with a Cochrane PH Review Group Arild Bjørndal & Julia Littell.
A Proposal for Certification of Librarians as Partners in Systematic Reviews Pamela C. Sieving¹, Kay Dickersin², Roberta Scherer 2, & Ann-Margaret Ervin.
April 2009 Netta Conyers-Haynes, Principal Consultant, Communications Kaiser Permanente National Guideline Program Implications of IOM SR Standards Wiley.
The McCaughey Centre VicHealth Centre for the Promotion of Mental Health and Community Wellbeing Melbourne School of Population Health Planning for a Cochrane.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination An overview of development and progress May 2013 PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews.
Office of Student and School Success “Ensure equality of outcome for Washington State’s 1.1 million students” Our Mission… Andrew E. Kelly Assistant Superintendent.
The material was supported by an educational grant from Ferring How to Write a Scientific Article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
The Campbell Collaborationwww.campbellcollaboration.org Education Panel Session Comments and Points for Discussion Sandra Jo Wilson Vanderbilt University.
Keeping Focus: WSCUC Interim Report Preparation Meiling Tang, Ph.D., Touro University California Diane Waryas, Ph.D., Touro University Nevada.
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
Gallagher, CA (2009) Orientation The Network for Justice Health Orlando, FL Gallagher, CA MAY 6, 2009.
PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews.
Welcome to Mt. Carmel A School-Wide Title 1 School Where all Teachers are Highly Qualified Principal: Martin Gore Assistant Principal: Jocelyn Lakani-Jones.
Unified Support Services Workgroup recommendations August 2012.
Respiratory Effectiveness Group Study Proposal (REG) Insert name of Lead Investigator & key collaborating groups Please direct all questions and correspondence.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
The following slides were presented at a meeting of potential editors and methods advisors for the proposed Cochrane review group in February The.
Systematic Reviews.
Title Name Institute. Background -1 (Main problem)
Session I: Unit 2 Types of Reviews September 26, 2007 NCDDR training course for NIDRR grantees: Developing Evidence-Based Products Using the Systematic.
Company LOGO Professional Development in the Zone Organizational Meeting January 13, 2005.
Systematic reviews to support public policy: An overview Jeff Valentine University of Louisville AfrEA – NONIE – 3ie Cairo.
Title of Scholar Project Month day, year Presenter: Supervisor(s): Critical Care Western.
For Authors Power Point How to Upload Abstracts to the Paper Management System.
Title of the Paper Your Name Critical Care Medicine School of Medicine University of Pittsburgh.
How to write a scientific article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
Gill Gyte and Shirley Manknell. Plain language summary The plain language summary (formerly called the ‘synopsis’) aims to summarize the review in a straightforward.
Cochrane Injuries Group. About the Cochrane Injuries Group What does the CIG do? Who makes up the CIG? What injury prevention research does the CIG do?
January 2009 County Mathematics Leadership Team Meeting Lou Maynus, WVDE Mathematics Coordinator Lynn Baker, RTI Mathematics Contact Alma Simpson, Instructional.
Introduction to Systematic Reviews of Disability and Rehabilitation Interventions 3.0.
Selecting Evidence Based Practices Oregon’s initial attempts to derive a process Implementation Conversations 11/10.
Getting Started: Choosing a Topic. What If I Don’t Have a Topic ?  Professional Organizations  Google.com  Hot Topics in ________  Hot Research Topics.
© ASIC 2012 Parent/Carer Focus Group: Parents/carers as partners in learning Helping young people be MoneySmart.
به نام او که انسان را به زیور « اندیشه » و « تفکر » آراست.
Doing a Systematic Review Jo Hunter Linda Atkinson Oxford University Health Care Libraries 1 March 2006 Workshops in Information Skills and Electronic.
R. Heshmat MD; PhD candidate Systematic Review An Introduction.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2012.
An Introduction to NHS Evidence
External Interface Update 1 External Interface Update May 7, 2007 Daryl Shing.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
The following slides were presented at a meeting of potential editors and methods advisors for the proposed Cochrane review group in February The.
Please complete details below  Tutorial Description (60 words):  Rationale:
Developing a proposal Dónal O’Mathúna, PhD Senior Lecturer in Ethics, Decision-Making & Evidence
Centre for Diet and Activity Research Social inequalities in physical activity: do environmental and policy interventions help reduce the gap? A pilot.
Systematic Reviews of Evidence Introduction & Applications AEA 2014 Claire Morgan Senior Research Associate, WestEd.
 Exemplary Care  Cutting-edge Research  World-class Education  Title of the paper Your name Critical Care Medicine School of Medicine University of.
Test Title Test Content.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting
Teachers Teach Teachers:
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
GRANTS – WORKPLAN AND MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E) INSTRUCTIONS
Date (include day of the week)
Writing Cochrane Protocol Cochrane Thailand Workshop 2017
Translation into Practice
The aim of this study was to …….
FIRST NAME FIRST NAME FIRST NAME FIRST NAME FIRST NAME FIRST NAME
(Title) March 2013 NDPC SD and WVDE
[Presenter’s Name] [Presenter’s Group] [Date]
Northampton Community College Center for Adult Literacy and Basic Workforce Development Bigger and Better Student Outcomes Through Professional Development.
LEVEL 1 PERSONAL & PRESSURE CARE
LEVEL 1 PERSONAL & PRESSURE CARE
[Insert name of the research report here……………………………………..]
30 JANUARY 2019 PRIVATE HEALTH ESTABLISHMENTS
28 NOVEMBER 2018 PRIVATE HEALTH ESTABLISHMENTS
LEVEL 1 PERSONAL & PRESSURE CARE
Registering a systematic review on PROSPERO
Presentation transcript:

Sources of Topics for a Systematic Review Personal Interest Personal Expertise/Background Professional “Hot Topics” 4.0

What’s Hot What’s Not Should Be Hot Should Not Be Hot Adolescent Literacy Comprehension Literacy Coaches Family Literacy Technology Direct Instruction Writing

Personal Interest Personal Expertise/Background Professional “Hot Topics” Educational-Political Timely Topics Published meta-analyses Consumer Needs/Requests Sources of Topics for a Systematic Review

Typical Stages of a Systematic Review Title Registration Protocol Review Update

1) Name and affiliation of primary reviewer: 2) Name(s) and affiliation(s) of co-reviewer(s): 3) Provisional title: 4) Objective: 5) Rationale for review / background: Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group

[w1] Is this what you had in mind?[w1] [w2] Is it types of ‘outcome measures’ (e.g., standardized tests) or ‘measures’ (e.g., sound blending, math computations,e tc)??[w2] [w3] If this is analogous to the Cochrane A-B-C rating we probably need to give an e.g.—this has not been a well discussed process in C2.[w3] Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group 6)Method Types of studies included Types of participants included Types of interventions Types of outcomes Quality appraisal procedures Methods for data extraction Quality assurance procedures

Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group [w1] Is this what you had in mind?[w1] [w2] Is it types of ‘outcome measures’ (e.g., standardized tests) or ‘measures’ (e.g., sound blending, math computations,e tc)??[w2] [w3] If this is analogous to the Cochrane A-B-C rating we probably need to give an e.g.—this has not been a well discussed process in C2.[w3] Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group 7) Roles/responsibilities/expertise of review team Content Systematic review methods Information retrieval Statistical analysis (meta-analysis)

Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group [w1] Is this what you had in mind?[w1] [w2] Is it types of ‘outcome measures’ (e.g., standardized tests) or ‘measures’ (e.g., sound blending, math computations,e tc)??[w2] [w3] If this is analogous to the Cochrane A-B-C rating we probably need to give an e.g.—this has not been a well discussed process in C2.[w3] 8)Support required (any support/guidance required): 9) Contact details of primary reviewer: Name: Title: Affiliation: Address 1: Address 2: City: State, Province or County: Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group

Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group [w1] Is this what you had in mind?[w1] [w2] Is it types of ‘outcome measures’ (e.g., standardized tests) or ‘measures’ (e.g., sound blending, math computations,e tc)??[w2] [w3] If this is analogous to the Cochrane A-B-C rating we probably need to give an e.g.—this has not been a well discussed process in C2.[w3] 10)Approximate date for submission of DRAFT PROTOCOL (please note this should be no longer than 6 months after title approval): 11) Approximate date for submission of DRAFT REVIEW (please note this should be no longer than one year after title approval): Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group