World Heritage ‘Year of Reflection’ Workshop, Berlin, Nov 2005 Jon Day Director - Conservation, Heritage & Indigenous Partnerships Great Barrier Reef Marine.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Project management.

Advertisements

Results of January 2007 Meeting of Working Group on the Questionnaire and Indicators 24 January 2007.

Developing the governors’ role in school improvement A Lancashire perspective.

Top Tips on Funding Bids Maximizing your organisation’s chances.

Introduction: Towards an Integrated Reporting System for Marine Protected Areas in the Baja to Bering Sea (B2B) Commission for Environmental Cooperation.

Protecting Heritage Places 10 steps to help protect the natural and cultural significance of places.

World Heritage ‘Year of Reflection’ Workshop, UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 2-3 March 2006 Jon Day Director - Conservation, Heritage & Indigenous Partnerships.

AN INTRODUCTION TO SPHERE AND THE EMERGENCY CONTEXT

World Heritage Periodic reporting Latin America and the Caribbean Carolina Castellanos / Mexico.

General Analysis of the (European) Questionnaire Jorun Poettering Consultant WHC.

Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.

Learning Objectives LO5 Document an accounting system to identify key controls and weaknesses in order to assess control risk. LO6 Write key control tests.

IDBM industry project Project Plan. Add text here giving a brief background of the project Project Background.

DRAFT Strategic Planning U.S. Department of Energy Rebuild America Business Partners and Deanna Braunlin GAVIN Consulting, Inc. John Deakin Energy Program.

Results of January 2007 Meeting of Working Group on the Questionnaire and Indicators 24 January 2007.

OpportunitiesChallengesNeeds Already have 217 recognized FLMMA sites. Not ecologically representativeMaps of reef habitats to help optimize design Organizations.

Future Research NeedsWorld Heritage and Climate Change World Heritage and Climate Change - Future Research Needs Bastian Bomhard World Heritage Officer.

1 SOFTWARE PRODUCTION. 2 DEVELOPMENT Product Creation Means: Methods & Heuristics Measure of Success: Quality f(Fitness of Use) MANAGEMENT Efficient &

Date (Arial 16pt) Title of the event – (Arial 28pt bold) Subtitle for event – (Arial 28pt) Internal models Gareth Truran Head of Department, London Markets.

Technical Writing Function. The purpose of having guidelines is to make the document more readable. Standard guidelines govern – Format – page layout,

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year Monitoring Indicators for Cultural World Heritage sites ICOMOS Discussion points.

CR Toolkit Workshop CR Stakeholder Identification Tool ICMM Toolkit# 1 & 2 Trainers: Joe Samara and Merikas Timori Date: 07 th August 2013 Venue: CR Conference.

Practice Educator Briefing Workshop November 2014.

COMPGZ07 Project Management Presentations Graham Collins, UCL

Strategic Planning Process for Affiliates [Insert Chapter or State Council Name Here] © SHRM 2009 Planning Today for Tomorrow’s Challenges Presented by.

Title Slide – Technology Name Presenter’s Information and Title Title of Industry Contacts and University Contacts (as applicable) **IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS:

1 Building Evaluative Capability in Schooling Improvement: The Student View Judy Parr,

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Global Dialogue on Developing a Readiness Preparation Proposal August 13-14, 2009 Structure of the R-PP template Review.

Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)

Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.

December_2009 Partnership maintenance. December_2009 Partnership maintenance $$ $ $

COOP Seminar – Fall 2008 Slide 1 HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM SAIGONTECH SAIGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Software Project Management.

Management Effectiveness and Quality Criteria in European Protected Areas: April 2008 World Heritage Convention and the Assessment of Management Effectiveness.

Measuring and Reporting on Effectiveness – New Zealand Experiences Department of Conservation Te Papa Atawhai Hugh Logan Director General, Department of.

INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.

Project management Topic 7 Controls. What is a control? Decision making activities – Planning – Monitor progress – Compare achievement with plan – Detect.

Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.

UPDATE ON HARMONISATION ACTION PLAN FOR THE SOCIAL PROTECTION SECTOR Coordinating Board for Foreign Assistance in Labour and Social Protection 10 June.

10 Informal Reports.

. Thematic Working Group 4 Possible Elements – Chapter VI: Constraints, gaps and related financial, technical and capacity needs CGE Workshop to exchange.

Proposal for a Donor Sector Mapping Exercise Katarina Kotoglou 31 October 2007.

Project management 1/30/2016ICS 413 – Software Engineering1.

Lead Agency Viability Assessment Consistent with OPPAGA Report 04-65, DCF contracted with FMHI to assist in the design and implementation of a centralized.

John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.

1 Scenario formulation Scenario-based planning is a structured way of thinking about what might happen in the future Scenarios are descriptions of possible.

Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.

HSM 220 MART Teaching Effectively/hsm220mart.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT

UNESCO ‘Year of Reflection’ Workshop, Periodic reporting for World Heritage … Proposed list of ‘Factors affecting World Heritage’

Options for harmonizing national reporting to biodiversity-related agreements Peter Herkenrath UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre.

Rice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras, Philippines Presented by Cristi Marie Nozawa Vice Chair for IUCN WCPA SEA at the Expert Meeting of the World.

Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.

Software Engineering Process - II 7.1 Unit 7: Quality Management Software Engineering Process - II.

Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.

EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,

Computer Security: Principles and Practice First Edition by William Stallings and Lawrie Brown Lecture slides by Lawrie Brown Chapter 17 – IT Security.

Hanson Career Workshop Session 1: Finding Your Career Fit Session 2: Writing Resumes Session 3: Writing Cover Letters/Work Search Strategies Session 4:

Design and modeling 10 step design process

Ten-Stage Design Process

The revised Periodic Reporting Questionnaires: general features Alessandra Borchi Policy and Statutory Meetings Section UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

WORLD HERITAGE - EXPERT MEETING ON BENCHMARKS

Ten-Stage Design Process

How to write a Strategic Plan

Measuring Data Quality and Compilation of Metadata

Involuntary Resettlement 0P 4.12: Planning Instruments

Project Management Process Groups

Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)

Civil Contractors Federation ‘2014 Earth Awards’ Submission Template CATEGORIES 1 and 2 ONLY Company Name (NOTE: if an Alliance then the name of the.

Assessment of quality of standards

Communication Skills and Health Professions Education (Medu)

Managing Self Kamal Nayan Pradhan Sheetal Moktan Managing Self

Presentation transcript:

World Heritage ‘Year of Reflection’ Workshop, Berlin, Nov 2005 Jon Day Director - Conservation, Heritage & Indigenous Partnerships Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Periodic reporting in natural World Heritage Areas …a World Heritage manager’s perspective

Key points that may be useful when considering periodic reporting 1. Relatively simple – 15 pages to address key aspects 2. Focussed just on the five key issues 3. Repeatable – easily updated (completed three times over 4 years 4. Listed key threats & actions to address those threats - including external threats (ie outside WHA) 5. Indicated complexity of the task – many actions required long term solutions; many actions also involved external agencies 6. Useful for me as a manager to monitor progress

Periodic reports – Part II Statement of Significance Criteria for WH listing Statement of Integrity Management arrangements Plans of management Scientific & technical studies Management agency Factors affecting the WH property Monitoring Conclusions Main conclusion re values Responsible implementing/agencies Timeframes

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manage ment actions Monitor ing Priority & scale Lead agency (& others involved ) Due date & comments List the natural &/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values that Describe the key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiven ess of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority & the scale at which issue is operatin g List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manage ment actions Monitor ing Priority & scale Lead agency (& others involved ) Due date & comments List the natural &/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiven ess of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority & the scale at which issue is operatin g List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manage ment actions Monitor ing Priority & scale Lead agency (& others involved ) Due date & comments List the natural &/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiven ess of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority & the scale at which issue is operatin g List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manage ment actions Monitor ing Priority & scale Lead agency (& others involved ) Due date & comments List the natural &/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiven ess of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority & the scale at which issue is operatin g List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manage ment actions Monitor ing Priority & scale Lead agency (& others involved ) Due date & comments List the natural &/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiven ess of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority & the scale at which issue is operatin g List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manage ment actions Monitor ing Priority & scale Lead agency (& others involved ) Due date & comments List the natural &/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiven ess of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority & the scale at which issue is operatin g List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manage ment actions Monitor ing Priority & scale Lead agency (& others involved ) Due date & comments List the natural &/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiven ess of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority & the scale at which issue is operatin g List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manage ment actions Monitor ing Priority & scale Lead agency (& others involved ) Due date & comments List the natural &/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiven ess of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority & the scale at which issue is operatin g List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/WH values Managem ent actions Monitorin g Priority & scale Lead agency (& others involved ) Due date & comments Advantages Retains main components of exiting report, but more effectively shows linkages between above components Highlights significant ‘gaps’ (eg monitoring lacking against important adverse impact) Is a more concise form of periodic reporting Would assist in making better comparisons over successive Periodic Reports Similar information required for other Conventions.

Conclusions (cont) Need to keep reporting simple – managers are flat out managing, and will make little time for filling in forms UNLESS they see it can help them. Consider using pictures, graphs – a picture paints a 1000 words Trends are most useful over time (whether PR, RM or basic monitoring)…recognise that this will only happen if “comparing apples with apples”! Recognise some of the main excuses for ineffective reporting …. ….. Too bureaucratic, lack of consistent approach, concern about ‘what it might show’. Need to change Periodic Reporting do be simpler, more repeatable and less onerous for managers. Problems of databases as a basis for decisions if information is not correct.