KeV Harmonics from Solid Targets - The Relatvisitic Limit and Attosecond pulses Matt Zepf Queens University Belfast B.Dromey et al. Queen’s University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vulcan Front End OPCPA System
Advertisements

Femtosecond lasers István Robel
Ultrafast Experiments Hao Hu The University of Tennessee Department of Physics and Astronomy, Knoxville Course: Advanced Solid State Physics II (Spring.
The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
C. McGuffey a, W. Schumaker a, S. Kneip b, F. Dollar a, A. Maksimchuk a, A. G. R. Thomas a, and K. Krushelnick a (a) University of Michigan, Center for.
0 Relativistic induced transparency and laser propagation in an overdense plasma Su-Ming Weng Theoretical Quantum Electronics (TQE), Technische Universität.
SENIGALLIA-COULOMB09 1 Protons Acceleration with Laser: influence of pulse duration M. Carrié and E. Lefebvre CEA, DAM, DIF, Arpajon, France A. Flacco.
KAPITZA-DIRAC EFFECT Eric Weaver Phys 4P62. General Outline  Theorized in 1933 by Kapitza and Dirac  Reflection of electrons from standing light waves.
High-order Harmonic Generation (HHG) in gases by Benoît MAHIEU 1.
Basic Principles of X-ray Source Detection Or Who Stole All Our Photons?.....
05/03/2004 Measurement of Bunch Length Using Spectral Analysis of Incoherent Fluctuations Vadim Sajaev Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory.
kHz-driven high-harmonic generation from overdense plasmas
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Pravesh Patel 10th Intl. Workshop on Fast Ignition of Fusion Targets June 9-13, 2008, Hersonissos, Crete Experimental.
Ultrafast XUV Coherent Diffractive Imaging Xunyou GE, CEA Saclay Director : Hamed Merdji.
Sub femtosecond K-shell excitation using Carrier Envelop Phase Stabilized 2-Cycles IR (2.1  m) Radiation Source. Gilad Marcus The Department of Applied.
KeV HHG and Sub femtosecond K-shell excitation. ( using IR (2.1  m) Radiation Source ) Gilad Marcus The Department of Applied Physics, The Hebrew University,
Hard X-ray FELs (Overview) Zhirong Huang March 6, 2012 FLS2012 Workshop, Jefferson Lab.
2. High-order harmonic generation in gases Attosecond pulse generation 1. Introduction to nonlinear optics.
1 A Grating Spectrograph for the LCLS Philip Heimann Advanced Light Source Observe the spontaneous radiation spectrum of the individual undulators Observe.
Update on LLNL FI activities on the Titan Laser A.J.Mackinnon Feb 28, 2007 Fusion Science Center Meeting Chicago.
KeV Harmonics from Solid Targets - The Relatvisitic Limit and Attosecond pulses Matt Zepf Queens University Belfast B.Dromey et al. Queen’s University.
Hot Electron Behaviors Relevant to Fast Ignition K. A. Tanaka 1,2, H. Habara 1,2, R. Kodama 1,2, K. Kondo 1,2, G.R. Kumar 1,2,3, A.L. Lei 1,2, K. Mima.
Laser plasma researches in Hungary related to the physics of fast ignitors István B Földes, Ervin Rácz KFKI-Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear.
John Arthur Mirror June 23, Effects of LCLS X-Ray Mirrors John Arthur Presenting work by Peter Stefan and Mike.
R. M. Bionta SLAC November 14, 2005 UCRL-PRES-XXXXXX LCLS Beam-Based Undulator K Measurements Workshop Use of FEL Off-Axis Zone Plate.
Random phase noise effect on the contrast of an ultra-high intensity laser Y.Mashiba 1, 2, H.Sasao 3, H.Kiriyama 1, M.R.Asakawa 2, K.Kondo 1, and P. R.
Bremsstrahlung Temperature Scaling in Ultra-Intense Laser- Plasma Interactions C. Zulick, B. Hou, J. Nees, A. Maksimchuk, A. Thomas, K. Krushelnick Center.
Lund University From Rydberg to Atto physic Is matter a wave ?
Discussion of measurement methods for femtosecond and attosecond pulses.
R & D for particle accelerators in the CLF Peter A Norreys Central Laser Facility STFC Fellow Visiting Professor, Imperial College London.
Rainer Hörlein 9/12/ ICUIL 2010 Watkins Glen Femtosecond Probing of Solid Density Plasmas with Coherent High Harmonic Radiation Rainer Hörlein.
COST Meeting Krakow May 2010 Temperature and K  -Yield radial distributions of laser-produced solid-density plasmas Ulf Zastrau X-ray Optics Group - IOQ.
DMP Product Portfolio Femtosecond Lasers Trestles Ti:Sapphire lasers …… fs; nm, mW Mavericks Cr:Forsterite lasers
High Harmonic Generation in Gases Muhammed Sayrac Texas A&M University.
Ultrafast particle and photon sources driven by intense laser ‐ plasma interaction Jyhpyng Wang Institute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, Academia Sinica.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
The Particlelike Properties of Electromagnetics Radiation Wei-Li Chen 10/27/2014.
CLEO2004 K. L. Ishikawa No. 0 Enhancement in photoemission from He + by simultaneous irradiation of laser and soft x-ray pulses Kenichi L. Ishikawa Department.
Efficient scaling of output pulse energy in static hollow fiber compressors X. Chen, A. Malvache, A. Ricci, A. Jullien, R. Lopez-Martens ICUIL 2010, Watkins.
Yen-Yu Chang, Li-Chung Ha, Yen-Mu Chen Chih-Hao Pai Investigator Jypyng Wang, Szu-yuan Chen, Jiunn-Yuan Lin Contributing Students Institute of Atomic and.
Imperial College London Imperial College XUV Attosecond Beamline: progress and results to date Charles Haworth Laser Consortium Imperial College London.
Free Electron Lasers (I)
Institute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taiwan National Taiwan University, Taiwan National Central University, Taiwan National Chung.
Nonlinear Optics in Plasmas. What is relativistic self-guiding? Ponderomotive self-channeling resulting from expulsion of electrons on axis Relativistic.
About the possibility to build a 10-PW femtosecond laser for ELI-NP till 2015 Razvan Dabu National Institute for Lasers, Plasma and Radiation Physics Bucharest.
Relativistically oscillating plasma surfaces : High harmonic generation and ultrafast plasma dynamics Brendan Dromey ICUIL 26 Sept – 1 Oct Watkins Glen.
Fast Electron Temperature Scaling and Conversion Efficiency Measurements using a Bremsstrahlung Spectrometer Brad Westover US-Japan Workshop San Diego,
Femtosecond Laser Spectroscopy of C 60 Nieuwegein, The Netherlands August 21, 2001 Eleanor Campbell, Göteborg University & Chalmers, Sweden R.D. Levine,
Mitigation of fast particles from laser- produced Sn plasma for an extreme ultraviolet lithography source Y.Tao and M.S.Tillack University.
1.Stable radiation source 2.Wavelength selector 3.Transparent sample holder: cells/curvettes made of suitable material (Table 7- 2) 4.Radiation detector.
Enhancing the Macroscopic Yield of Narrow-Band High-Order Harmonic Generation by Fano Resonances Muhammed Sayrac Phys-689 Texas A&M University 4/30/2015.
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
X-RAY LIGHT SOURCE BY INVERSE COMPTON SCATTERING OF CSR FLS Mar. 6 Miho Shimada High Energy Research Accelerator Organization, KEK.
Field enhancement coefficient  determination methods: dark current and Schottky enabled photo-emissions Wei Gai ANL CERN RF Breakdown Meeting May 6, 2010.
TOWARD GENERATION OF HIGH POWER ULTRAFAST WHITE LIGHT LASER USING FEMTOSECOND TERAWATT LASER IN A GAS-FILLED HOLLOW-CORE FIBER Walid Tawfik Physics and.
Attosecond Optical Science V R. The key idea; F=ma Classically an atom’s own electron, driven by a strong electric field can interact with its parent.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Probing nuclear dynamics in molecules on an attosecond timescale 7 th December 2005 J. Robinson, S. Gundry, C. A. Haworth,
HHG and attosecond pulses in the relativistic regime Talk by T. Baeva University of Düsseldorf, Germany Based on the work by T. Baeva, S. Gordienko, A.
Free Electron Laser Studies
Seeding in the presence of microbunching
High Harmonic Generation from overdense plasma
Using a digital micromirror device for high-precision laser-based manufacturing on the microscale Please use the dd month yyyy format for the date for.
Topic report Laser beam quality
Studies of the energy transfer
High Harmonics from Overdense Plasma Surfaces
Reduction of emittance from metals to less than thermal
All-Optical Injection
Peking University: Jinqing Yu, Ronghao Hu, Haiyang Lu & Xueqing Yan
Optics John Arthur, SLAC & William W. Craig, LLNL April 24, 2002
High energy 6.2 fs pulses Shambhu Ghimire, Bing Shan, and Zenghu Chang
Presentation transcript:

keV Harmonics from Solid Targets - The Relatvisitic Limit and Attosecond pulses Matt Zepf Queens University Belfast B.Dromey et al. Queen’s University Belfast K. Krushelnick et al, Imperial College P. Norreys et al, RAL

Outline High Harmonic Generation from Solid Targets  Harmonics from solid targets – Background  Experimental results The relativistic limit – high conversion efficiencies keV harmonics – coherent fs radiation Angular distribution- beamed keV radiation  Potential for very bright attosecond pulse generation

Ultra High Harmonic Generation - the principle High power pulse tightly focused onto a solid target Critical surface oscillates with v approaching c  Relativistically oscillating mirror  = (1+(a0) 2 /2) 1/2 Reflected waveform is modified from sine to ~sawtooth Incident Pulse Reflected Pulse Process intrinsically phased locked for all harmonics! Zeptosecond pulses possible at keV  Harmonic efficiency is FT of reflected waveform  Train of as pulses (analogous to mode-locking)

Typical spectra – Conversion efficiency follows power law scaling Conversion efficiency scales  q ~n -p With p=5.5…3.3 for I= …10 19 Wcm -2 (a 0 = ) Very high orders become rapidly more efficient at high intensities e.g. 100 th harmonic~I 3 From Norreys, Zepf et al., PRL, 1832 (1996) What happens for much higher intensities >10 20 Wcm -2. (a 0 >10)? Is there a cut-off or can we generate arbitrarily high harmonics?

PIC predicts asymptotic limit of p REL ~2.5-3 Orders > 1000, keV harmonics! Exact value of p is pulseshape dependent Gordienko et al. PRL 93, , 2004

The cut-off question. Until recently no firm theoretical basis for a cut-off Should one expect a cut-off? Harmonic spectrum is simply FT of reflected waveform  no cut-off  infinitely fast risetime components (unphysical)  Recently: Rollover for n> 4  2 (Gordienko et al (PRL,93, , 2004)  Revised theory predicts rollover for n>8 1/2  3 (T. Baeva et al, PRE and talk after break) Very different predictions for reaching 10,000 harmonics: 4  2 : a0=508 1/2  3 : a0=22

Attosecond pulses by spectral filtering  Removing optical harmonics + fundamental changes wave from from saw-tooth to individual as-pulses from (G. D. Tsakiris et al.,New J. Phys. 8, 19(2006)

nFnF Duration of attosecond pulses  n=(2 1/p -1)n F Few as pulses possible <1keV >1keV nFnF Extremely short pulses are possible Harmonic efficiency slope as n -p

Conversion efficiency into attosecond pulses Conv eff at filter peak:  f| ~(n f ) -p Bandwidth:  n~(2 1/p -1)n F Pulse efficiency:  pulse ~(2 1/p -1)n F -(p-1) ~n -3/2 ~n -3/2

Realistic experimental configuration Filters (~0.1µm thick) have negligible dispersion (G. D. Tsakiris et al.,New J. Phys. 8, 19(2006)

Consequences from the oscillating mirror model Oscillating Mirror Flat, sharply defined critical density surface Flatness results in specular reflection of the harmonics Well defined mirror surface gives high conversion efficiency Phase locked harmonics – as pulses possible Surface denting/bowing in response to laser can change collimation. Surface roughness important for Ångstrom radiation. Harmonic efficiency depends strongly on plasma scale length, L L/  Short, high contrast pulses appear ideal. Single cycle pulses to generate atto pulses

Experimental Setup: CCD or image plate detectors Grating spectrometer or von Hamos crystal spectrometer Target position Double plasma Mirror Setup Incident laser pulse: f 3 cone

The issue of pulse contrast ASE contrast ns timescale Prepulses ns timescale Recompression errors ps timescale Plasma formation threshold If the contrast is not excellent (<10 10 a plasma will form early and no steep gradient (mirror) will form.

Plasma Mirror - an ultra-fast optical switch A low reflectivity surface (i.e. a piece of glass with AR coating can operate as ~100fs rise time optical switch: - Illuminate with I max > plasma formation threshold - prepulse sees R cold < main pulse sees R plasma ~60-80% - contrast enhancement: R plasma /R cold ~ 100 Disadvantages: Energy loss, new PM required every shot. Plasma Mirror

Experimental paramters Pulse Energy (No Plasma Mirror):up to 500J Pulse energy with PM: up to 150 J Pulse duration: fs Contrast (no PM)>10 7 :1 Contrast with PMs:>10 11 :1 Spot size:~7  m Peak intensity (with PM) Wcm -2

Experimental data from Vulcan PW shows p=2.5 .2 for a=10 HIGH EFFICIENCY 10 eV (17nm) 10 (4nm) Extremely high photon numbers and brightness:  1 photons  1 ph s -1 mrad -2 (0.1%BW) Relativistic scaling p REL =2.5 Published : B. Dromey et al, Nature Physics, 2006

Pulse duration reduces with n:  ~n -1 Diffraction limited focus: w 0 ~n -2 Intensity increases: Theoretical max. intensity increases with harmonic order! (for p<3)

Laser contrast is the key to high efficiency Harmonic Spectrum (arb.) Reference Spectrum (arb.) Pixel number 9x10 3 1x x x x10 4 ~ 200 ~ No plasma mirror Contrast ~10 -8 Source Broadening increases linewidth in no PM case Signal (arb) b) ~ ~ 8x Shot 1: Contrast (2 plasma mirrors) Strong harmonic signal. Shot 2: Contrast 10 7 (No plasma mirrors) Weak C-line emission Harmonics >100x brighter than thermal source in water window

Intensity/ /arb. units Normalised at 1200 th order Order, n .5x10 20 Wcm .5x10 20 Wcm -2 Harmonic efficiency  n  Relativistic limit  ~n ±.2 Photon Energy 1.414KeV 3.767KeV Intensity dependent roll-over keV harmonics + the efficiency roll-over First coherent, femtosecond, sub-nm source I t FWHM 1’ ~ 500fs

Roll over scaling confirmed as ~  3  8  3 44 22 Roll-over measurements Vulcan 1996 highest observed ( Wcm -2  m 2 ) Roll over ~  3  10 keV a0~30 (10 21 Wcm -2  m 2 )

x10 19 Wcm x10 20 Wcm -2 Intensity/ arb. units Wavelength /Å kT~1.5keV kT~3keV Standard contrast (~10 -7 ) – Bright thermal emitters. Planckian Spectrum observed for standard contrast Signal brightness ~2x HHG signal  Plasma mirrors are essential  Absorption much higher for low contrast pulses.

Beamed keV harmonic radiation - demonstrates coherent keV radiation X-ray emission above 1keV and 3  is beamed into ~f/3 cone (laser also f/3) for nm rms roughness targets. No beaming observed for -shots with micron rms targets -shots without plasma mirrors Angle from target normal/deg (Specular reflection 45º, incident -45º) X-ray Signal > 1 keV 4º FWHM Gaussian fit to beamed HHG signal specular

What determines the angular distribution? 2)Why do keV harmonics beam at all? Surface roughness should prevent beaming (Wavelength<< initial surface roughness for keV harmonics)  what reduces the surface roughness a) smoothing in the expansion phase? b) Relativistic length contraction (highest harmonics are only generatedat max. surface  ) 1)What determines the angular distribution? Diffraction limited peformance would suggest  harmonic ~  Laser /n   harmonic ~10 -4 rad for keV harmonics.

Surface denting Ponderomotive pressure can deform surface. (under the current conditions some deformation is unavoidable Denting required to explain our results:~ 0.1  m  This would lead to the same divergence for all harmonics in agreement with results.  Solution: use shorter pulses to prevent surface deformation Laser

Surface roughness Surface roughness would impact on the highest orders only -Unlikely to be a major factor in this experiment Solution: highly polished targets Laser

Imprinted phase aberration Phase errors in fundamental beam are passed on to harmonics  n ~n  Laser Divergence of harmonics can be strongly affected (cf doubling of high power laser beams)

High Efficiency Spectral range Number of photons Pulse duration eV (Al filter) ~7 * as eV (Zr filter) ~2* as eV (Cu filter) ~2* as Assuming 1J,5fs (projected ELI front end) Extremely powerful attosecond source Ultrahigh brightness may be possible with DL performance For full ELI (4.5 kJ) 14 mJ in 1% 10 keV

Harmonics from solids are efficient way of producing as pulses up to keV photon energies. Ideal for converting ultra high power pulses (100’s of TW) HHG in the relativistic limit has been demonstrated. Simple geometry for as-pulse production (surface harmonics, phase locked with flat phase, dispersion free system) Two possible schemes: polarisation switching or single cycle pulses Angular divergence limit remains a question mark: Beam quality at high harmonics remains an issue. Contrast requirements (>10 10 ) are a challenge for fs lasers Summary