Recognitions and achievements Teacher of the MonthTeacher of the Month Staff Member of the MonthStaff Member of the Month BandBand VolleyballVolleyball.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
Osceola School District’s Classroom Instructor Evaluation The Ins and Outs of Our Classroom Instructor Evaluation
Marzano Causal Model: A Framework for Teaching and Learning
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
Teacher Evaluation Update
 Reading School Committee January 23,
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
Collecting Artifacts: Showcasing Your Best Work!
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Using Data as a Catalyst for Collegial Conversations Changing Instruction and Reflecting on Practice through Peer Observation CCSSO Educational Leaders.
The Webster Groves School District’s Journey to a More Effective Evaluation Process September, 2014.
1 SESSION 1 using The New Performance Standards and New VDOE Requirements
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day
Preparation & Development of Professional Portfolio Workshop: Danielson A Presenter: Mrs. Shirley J. Delgado M. A.
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Welcome – Please sign-in and sit with your Mentor Professional Growth Planning Process.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation Training KICKOFF PRESENTATION March 8, 2013 Presented by: Joy Forrest (FLC) Jennifer Donnelly (PAE) Rich Pepe (FIS)
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Earning Your Best Possible Rating. The observation cycle has been designed to incorporate the elements of the NEAT process into the post-observation.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Improving Our Profession Through Deliberate Practice.
A New Approach to Assessment Based on extensive research that has identified teaching and instructional practices that are most effective in impacting.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
1 Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting April 15, 2009 Leadership for Assessment Literacy From Paper to Practice.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Essential Conditions for Implementation of... Local Professional Development Programming.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
BETTER LEARNING THROUGH PLCS CHOLLA HIGH MAGNET SCHOOL PLC TRAINING P.L.C. AT WORK.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
TLE The Basics…. Who is here today? Corner 1- New to OKCPS Corner 2- New to Teaching Corner 3- New to Oklahoma Corner 4- New to the U. S.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Sample evidences for Teacher Evaluation Robyn White
INSTRUCTIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Recognitions and achievements Teacher of the MonthTeacher of the Month Staff Member of the MonthStaff Member of the Month BandBand VolleyballVolleyball Cross CountryCross Country Senior class recognitionSenior class recognition Overall staff recognition – first quarterOverall staff recognition – first quarter Testing, SIP Goals, Parent communication (customer service), Support of each otherTesting, SIP Goals, Parent communication (customer service), Support of each other

Teacher evaluations Domains 2, 3, and 4

The Goal of teacher evaluation An expectation that all teachers can increase their expertise from year to year, which produces gains in student achievement from year to year with a powerful cumulative effect.An expectation that all teachers can increase their expertise from year to year, which produces gains in student achievement from year to year with a powerful cumulative effect. Deliberate Practice: Make it intentional! Don’t pick something you are already good at.Deliberate Practice: Make it intentional! Don’t pick something you are already good at.

The greatest impact on student achievement. The best teachers are reflective practitioners. Domain One Domain Two Domain Three Domain Four Looking at integrity and positiveness

Summative evaluation components Status Score – This component represents 50% of the teacher’s summative evaluation. It is generated through administrative observation using the classroom or non-classroom observation tools. Domains One (70%), Two (15%), Three (10%), and Four (5%) shall make up this 50%.Status Score – This component represents 50% of the teacher’s summative evaluation. It is generated through administrative observation using the classroom or non-classroom observation tools. Domains One (70%), Two (15%), Three (10%), and Four (5%) shall make up this 50%. Student Performance Measure Score – This component represents 50% of a teacher’s summative evaluation.Student Performance Measure Score – This component represents 50% of a teacher’s summative evaluation. Deliberate Practice Score – This component will be additive and represents additional points that will be added to a teacher’s Status Score prior to it being averaged with the Student Performance Measure score.Deliberate Practice Score – This component will be additive and represents additional points that will be added to a teacher’s Status Score prior to it being averaged with the Student Performance Measure score.

Domains 2-4 Protocol Each of the elements in Domains 2-4 has a separate protocol to help provide feedback to teachers.Each of the elements in Domains 2-4 has a separate protocol to help provide feedback to teachers. Evidence for use of the instructional strategies in Domains 2-4 is typically collected outside of direct instruction time.Evidence for use of the instructional strategies in Domains 2-4 is typically collected outside of direct instruction time. To provide the best feedback to teachers, it is important to be able to see evidences for Domains 2-4 in context of the classroom instruction.To provide the best feedback to teachers, it is important to be able to see evidences for Domains 2-4 in context of the classroom instruction.

Teacher took action w/ no mistakes Specific follow through Must be collaborative. Coaching and sharing is evident

Domain 2 Planning and PreparingPlanning and Preparing Planning is the key to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model Planning is the key to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model There is a direct causal relationship between planning and teachers’ intentional use of instructional strategies. There is a direct causal relationship between planning and teachers’ intentional use of instructional strategies. Intentional Intentional Begin with the end in mind Begin with the end in mind Done with a purpose Done with a purpose Purposeful Purposeful What are you trying to achieve What are you trying to achieve Cohesive Cohesive Can’t stand alone….see the progression of learning Can’t stand alone….see the progression of learning

Sources of evidence for domain 2 Planning conference or similar dialogue with the teacherPlanning conference or similar dialogue with the teacher Pacing Guides, Curriculum MapsPacing Guides, Curriculum Maps Teacher Artifacts (PPT from a lesson, game templates, etc.)Teacher Artifacts (PPT from a lesson, game templates, etc.) Student workStudent work Direct classroom observation (connect lesson plans to the lesson)Direct classroom observation (connect lesson plans to the lesson) Learning ScalesLearning Scales Lesson planning documents including group lesson planningLesson planning documents including group lesson planning Common AssessmentsCommon Assessments

Domain 3 Reflecting on TeachingReflecting on Teaching Ability and willingness to examine one’s own teaching practices in a metacognitive manner.Ability and willingness to examine one’s own teaching practices in a metacognitive manner.

Domain 3 elements

Sources of evidence for domain 3 Self-reflectionSelf-reflection Reflection Conference (Post conference)Reflection Conference (Post conference) Professional Growth Plan (Deliberate Practice)Professional Growth Plan (Deliberate Practice) Documentation of Conferences and Discussions in iObservationDocumentation of Conferences and Discussions in iObservation Data/Assessment AnalysisData/Assessment Analysis Annotated Lesson PlansAnnotated Lesson Plans PLC MinutesPLC Minutes

Domain 4 Collegiality and ProfessionalismCollegiality and Professionalism Collegiality and Professionalism are the context in which the other domains function. Collegiality and Professionalism are the context in which the other domains function. Teachers engage in specific activities that create a professional environment that foster’s teachers’ development. Teachers engage in specific activities that create a professional environment that foster’s teachers’ development. The purpose of this domain is School Improvement The purpose of this domain is School Improvement

Domain 4 elements

Sources of evidence for domain 4 Documentation of Conferences and Discussions in iObservationDocumentation of Conferences and Discussions in iObservation Minutes/agendas from school and district committeesMinutes/agendas from school and district committees Lesson study, book study, or MTSS meeting documentationLesson study, book study, or MTSS meeting documentation Presentations from staff, team, PLC meetingsPresentations from staff, team, PLC meetings Evidence Log for parent phone calls, after school tutoring, mentoring sessions, etc.Evidence Log for parent phone calls, after school tutoring, mentoring sessions, etc. Parent/Teacher conference documentationParent/Teacher conference documentation Documentation of attendance at PTSA meetings, school concerts, sporting events, etc.Documentation of attendance at PTSA meetings, school concerts, sporting events, etc. Documentation of participation in Professional DevelopmentDocumentation of participation in Professional Development

Administrative observations Will include INFORMAL and FORMAL observations, that will be entered into iObservation.Will include INFORMAL and FORMAL observations, that will be entered into iObservation. Teachers will receive at least one unannounced informal observation in each of the first three quarters of the year(variation this year due to timing and implementation). Should an administrator attempt an unannounced, informal observation on a day or class period that the teacher believes will result in a less than Effective rating, the Administrator and teacher will agree to conduct this observation at another time for ONE occasion only!Teachers will receive at least one unannounced informal observation in each of the first three quarters of the year(variation this year due to timing and implementation). Should an administrator attempt an unannounced, informal observation on a day or class period that the teacher believes will result in a less than Effective rating, the Administrator and teacher will agree to conduct this observation at another time for ONE occasion only! Those teachers who have not earned either Effective or Highly Effective ratings on each of their informal observations will receive a formal observation.Those teachers who have not earned either Effective or Highly Effective ratings on each of their informal observations will receive a formal observation.

Status score Should a teacher earn either Effective or Highly Effective ratings on each informal observation, a post conference will be held for the purpose of feedback and growth and this cumulative score will represent the Status Score for the School year.Should a teacher earn either Effective or Highly Effective ratings on each informal observation, a post conference will be held for the purpose of feedback and growth and this cumulative score will represent the Status Score for the School year. For those teachers who are required to have a formal observation, their rating from this formal observation will serve as their Status Score and the informal observations will be used for feedback purposes only (non-evaluative).For those teachers who are required to have a formal observation, their rating from this formal observation will serve as their Status Score and the informal observations will be used for feedback purposes only (non-evaluative). Teachers in their first year of employment in Pasco County or those who have not earned a Status Score of Effective or Highly Effective for the previous school year will receive a formal observation which shall serve as their Status Score.Teachers in their first year of employment in Pasco County or those who have not earned a Status Score of Effective or Highly Effective for the previous school year will receive a formal observation which shall serve as their Status Score.

Informal Observation Cycle

Formal Observation Cycle

Other Information Beginning Friday, November 7 th, weekly lesson plans will be due to your supervising administrator (we will put out an updated list). These are necessary to conduct thoughtful informal observations.Beginning Friday, November 7 th, weekly lesson plans will be due to your supervising administrator (we will put out an updated list). These are necessary to conduct thoughtful informal observations. Domains 2, 3, and 4 will be open and we will collect evidence and add notes throughout the year. This will be shared with you so that you can upload evidence straight to the specific element.Domains 2, 3, and 4 will be open and we will collect evidence and add notes throughout the year. This will be shared with you so that you can upload evidence straight to the specific element. You will be informed when you can begin developing your deliberate practice and informal observations will begin.You will be informed when you can begin developing your deliberate practice and informal observations will begin.

Contacts Robyn WhiteRobyn White Cindy JackCindy Jack Diamela VergneDiamela Vergne

Homework for next month Complete the FSA practice writing test. This assignment can be found on the WRHS PD canvas course.Complete the FSA practice writing test. This assignment can be found on the WRHS PD canvas course. Time yourself. This is a 90-minute testTime yourself. This is a 90-minute test What steps did you take to complete the prompt?What steps did you take to complete the prompt? Provide additional comments about your thoughts of the test and how it will apply to our students.Provide additional comments about your thoughts of the test and how it will apply to our students.