Under attack: Where do theists go now? Abandon the argument Reject theism Base theism on Something else Personal faith Revealed theology Different theistic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent versions of the Design Argument So far we have considered the classical arguments of Aquinas and Paley. However, the design argument has attracted.
Advertisements

The Design Argument for the Existence of God
By Nicole and Kirsty. About; The Teleological Argument is also known as The Design Argument. It comes from the Greek telos which means “the study of final.
Chapter 12: Is There a God?.
a) AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding Explain in detail Use technical terms (and explain them) Include quotations Link back to the question Make sure your.
The Design or Teleological Argument for the Existence of God
Understand the anthropic principle. Have knowledge of the replies.
How do the following products show design?
Pragmatism developed in the U.S. after the Civil War (ca. 1865) no longer content merely to reflect European philosophy a new approach for a new and vigorous.
Taylor - argument for God from contingency & necessity ~ slide 1 Richard Taylor’s argument for God from contingency & necessity 1. Basic datum - the very.
Swinburne’s argument from design
Design/Teleological Argument
The Cosmological Proof Metaphysical Principles and Definitions Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR): For every positive fact, whatsoever, there is a sufficient.
The Cosmological Argument. Also known as ‘The First Cause Argument’ Unlike the Ontological Argument, it derives the conclusion from a posteriori premise.
Victoria Popoola. Natural Theology is a branch of theology based on reason and ordinary experience that explains God’s rational as a part of the physical.
The Teleological Argument The idea that there is evidence of design in the universe which suggests a designer.
L ECTURE 17: T HE T ELEOLOGICAL A RGUMENT AND C AUSALITY.
A Questions AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding – one side. Explain in lots of detail 20 mins Approx 2 sides Link back to the question Make links between.
The Teleological Argument October 7 th The Teleological Argument Learning Objective: To analyse the argument from Design, considering its strengths.
The Teleological Argument also known as “ the argument from design ”
Christian Philosophy and Applied Ethics. Is something boring because of it or because of you?
Christian Philosophy and Applied Ethics
The answer really annoys me for 3 reasons: 1.I think the statement is arrogant. It doesn’t take into account any definitions of God but solely focuses.
The Design Argument In his book, Natural Theology, William Paley presents the classic expression of the Design Argument. Comparison of a watch and human.
Knowing God Through Creation Chapter 1 Lesson 1. Read Daniel 3:52 When did you first realize that God exists? How do you know that God exists?
Recent versions of the Design Argument. Describe the teleological argument for the existence of God. 4KU An argument for the existence of God or a creator.
Faith & Reason Arguments for God’s Existence. The Two Ways of ‘Knowing’ God  Pure Reason: Many philosophers have created proofs using logic to prove.
It is reasonable to infer the existence of God from the fact that the world is as it is; just like the cosmological argument. We are going to consider.
The Argument from Religious Experience Does a claimed experience of something divine prove God’s existence?
Teleological Argument Also Known As The Argument From Design.
Epistemology Revision Another criticism of indirect realism:  Problems arising from the view that mind-dependent objects represent mind-independent objects.
1.The argument makes it likely that there are lots of worldmakers. Strength: Man made things often require many creators. For example a house needs many.
Chapter 4 The God Who Reveals Religion
By Arunav, Aran, Humza.
The Cosmological Argument What is it about? Many religions in today’s society make claims, such as: Many religions in today’s society make claims, such.
Recent versions of the Design Argument. Outline the Design Argument.
Darwinian evolution MORE THAN JUST A THEORY?. DO YOU AGREE?
Darwin’s View on the Teleological Argument Versions of the Teleological Argument.
The Design or Teleological Argument for the Existence of God.
HUME ON THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (Part 1 of 2) Text source: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, parts 2-5.
The Cosmological Argument Science can offer us explanations of things that are within the universe, but does the universe as a whole have an explanation?
Science and Religion The origins of the world and universe Religious stories of creation The big bang Darwin’s theory of evolution Fundamentalist views.
GREEK PHILOSOPHERS I can explain the importance of the Greek philosophers; Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of Descartes’ Trademark Argument? StrengthsWeaknesses p , You have 3 minutes to read through the chart you.
Inductive Argument Premise = The world appears to have order and purpose. The world is complex, which is evidence that it has been designed. If the world.
The Design or Teleological Argument for the Existence of God.
Modern Versions of the Teleological Argument Today you will be learning two types of modern design arguments and their supporting philosophers.
The Design or Teleological Argument for the Existence of God.
L/O: To explore Hume’s criticisms of the Design Argument.
Chapter 1: The cosmological argument AQA Religious Studies: Philosophy of Religion AS Level © Nelson Thornes Ltd 2008 Revision.
By Jagrav and Rahul.  Theist - A person who believes in God  Atheist - A person who believes there is no God  Agnostic - A person who believes we cannot.
The Design or Teleological Argument for the Existence of God.
Key Words Key Quotations
Responses to the Design argument
c) Strengths and weaknesses of Cosmological Arguments:
The Teleological Argument
Does the argument have value? Strengths
Evaluation Questions Whether inductive arguments for God’s existence are persuasive. The extent to which the Kalam cosmological argument is convincing.
Explaining the universe
Anthropic and Aesthetic Quiz
Cosmological Argument: Philosophical Criticisms
Recap: William Paley Qua Regularity Socrates Classical Philosophy
The Anthropic Principle
Scientific Method Vocabulary.
Explore different ideas about the Anthropic Principle in the design argument for the existence of God. (8 marks) Intro – order and purpse What the Anthropic.
The Teleological Argument
What is the difference between a cabbage and a machine?
Problems with the 4 causes & Prime Mover
What conclusions could we draw from each of these photos
The Teleological Argument
Presentation transcript:

Under attack: Where do theists go now? Abandon the argument Reject theism Base theism on Something else Personal faith Revealed theology Different theistic arguments Re-state the argument Reject / reply to Hume & Darwinian criticisms Reformulate the argument on a different basis Beauty Anthropic principle Argue for non-classical theology

F.R. Tennant and the anthropic principle Cambridge academic and clergyman “Nature is meaningless and valueless without God behind it and Man in front.” (Philosophical Theology, 1930) Tennant is arguing that humanity is at the forefront of creation, because the circumstances of the universe uniquely and surprisingly enable human life to emerge. Tennant was the first theist philosopher to use the fundamental characteristics of the universe as life- nurturing to offer a new form of teleological argument; many have since followed this path.

Anthropic reasoning From the Greek ‘anthropos’ (human/man); anthropic reasoning argues from the human perspective. Write down a list of the factors necessary for your existence. Reflect: are humans fortunate in having the conditions of life met? Is it surprising that the world is set up for life?

Weak and strong principles ‘Weak anthropic principle’ The circumstances in our universe are such that the emergence of life is possible. This could fit in with theism (God has enabled life), but does not so clearly suggest the idea of creation. ‘Strong anthropic principle’ The circumstances in our universe are such that the emergence of life is inevitable Theists could use this to argue teleologically, that God has intended a human life producing universe.

Anthropic teleological argument 1.The emergence of human life in our universe depends on numerous factors: planetary conditions, fundamental laws of physics, etc. 2.Human life has emerged in our universe. 3.A life-friendly universe such as ours is highly improbable; almost any other set of circumstances we can think of would have been life-hostile. 4.A designer or intelligent Creator would make sense of our improbable universe. CONCLUSION: God exists Rate my argument Convincing Unconvincing

A new design argument? Keith Ward “The argument in its seventeenth-century form … may have been superseded by Darwin. But the design argument still lives, as an argument that the precise structure of laws and constants that seem uniquely fitted to produce life by a process of evolution is highly improbable. The existence of a designer or creator God makes this much less improbable. That is the new Design Argument, and it is very effective.” But can you criticise Ward’s ‘new’ argument? Your criticisms:

Richard Swinburne One of the most eminent modern philosophers of religion is Richard Swinburne, Professor of Philosophy at Oxford (retired). Swinburne is the chief exponent of what Ward calls the “new design argument” – an argument which takes a different path from the pre- Darwinian argument of Paley. His argument is set out in The Existence of God. Swinburne begins by distinguishing between spatial and temporal order. ‘Spatial order’ is the subject of Paley’s argument – how parts are fitted together in an orderly way by a designer. Swinburne regards this argument as defeated by Darwinism.

Swinburne continued I pass on to consider a form of teleological argument which seems to me a much stronger one-the teleological argument from the temporal order of the world. The temporal order of the universe is, to the man who bothers to give it a moment's thought, an overwhelmingly striking fact about it. Regularities of succession are all pervasive. For simple laws govern almost all successions of events. In books of physics, chemistry, and biology we can learn how almost everything in the world behaves. The laws of their behaviour can be set out by relatively simple formulae which men can understand and by means of which they can successfully predict the future. The orderliness of the universe to which I draw attention here is its conformity to formula, to simple, formutable, scientific laws. The orderliness of the universe in this respect is a very striking fact about it. The universe might so naturally have been chaotic, but it is not-it is very orderly.

The God conclusion Given the striking pervasiveness of orderly laws of nature, Swinburne asks, how are we to explain the universe as we find it? Swinburne claims that scientists are able to define laws, say how they work, and discover new ones. However, what scientists may never do is find a basis for the most fundamental laws in the first place. In other words, the scientific method cannot explain why there is deep and fundamental order in the first place. If there is no possible scientific explanation for this, then we are required to look for another simple and elegant explanation – the most likely answer, he claims, is God.

Objections to modern design arguments Multiverse theory – there may be and may have been many universes, most of which are chaotic and do not sustain life. If there are many universes, the chance of an orderly universe emerging are not remote. Humans over-state their importance – famously put forward by the American poet Mark Twain. The world was not created as an amazing habitat for man; man exists because of the world, not the other way around. Rate Swinburne’s argument Convincing Unconvincing

Theological objections to design Finally, it may surprise you to know that some theists have objected to design arguments on theological grounds; they see these arguments as misrepresenting or diminishing the divine. A classic example of this is the great artist, poet, and mystic William Blake ( ). He wrote a work tellingly titled There is No Natural Religion (1788), which attacks the idea of the human senses encompassing the idea of the divine. Blake argues that “none could have other than natural or organic thoughts” if reliant upon sensory perception alone. This removes the revelation of a transcendent God from the heart of religion, which Blake did not accept.

Isaac Newton, by William Blake (1795) Blake’s opposition to natural religion is typified in his famous painting of Isaac Newton. Here, Newton is unflatteringly depicted at the bottom of the sea, fixed upon his mathematical drawings. Blake, a visionary, opposed the idea of religion being discovered materially and naturally, through science. The possibility of different types of perception of the divine are important for Blake: man “perceives more than sense can discover”.

Assessment (a)Explain how the teleological argument attempts to prove the existence of God. (25) (b)“Evolution leaves no room for a designer of the universe”. Discuss. (10)