To test the new BROWSE-PEARL model an Italian example scenario has been developed. Hourly weather data have been obtained from a weather station near Bologna.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 9 Normalisation of Field Half-lives
Advertisements

1 Consumer Exposure Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A ccomplishments and Opportunities for Global Collaboration Thomas Brennan.
AREP GAW Section 7 – Chemical Aspects of Air Pollution 1.
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Short introduction to the use of PEARL General properties First tier assessments Higher tier assessments Before looking at first and higher tier assessments,
The MINNI Project Italian Agency for New Technologies Energy and the Environment Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution Convention TFIAM Meeting, Amiens,
A model for the capture of aerially sprayed pesticide by barley S.J.Cox, D.W.Salt, B.E.Lee & M.G.Ford University of Portsmouth, U.K.
ATMOP Partners Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France 7 th framework project selected.
Agricultural modelling and assessments in a changing climate
Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
Using the Crosscutting Concepts As conceptual tools when meeting an unfamiliar problem or phenomenon.
Ammonia emission from standing crops and crop residues TFEIP Agriculture and Nature expert panel meeting Ghent, 2014 Jan Vonk MSc (RIVM) The Netherlands.
Introduction The agricultural practice of field tillage has dramatic effects on surface hydrologic properties, significantly altering the processes of.
Overview of EFSA’s work on opinions and guidance
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
9.Monitoring Plan + 10.Implementation Plan + 4. LAs* 5. WLAs* 6. MOS* 7.Seasonal Variation* 8.Reasonable Assurance + TMDL Process 1 Problem Understanding.
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
CGMS/WOFOST model principles
fluidyn – PANAIR Fluidyn-PANAIR
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
Environmental Systems Analysis National Inventories of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Agriculture in the Netherlands Carolien Kroeze, André van.
(work funded through the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative)
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Egyptian and Italian Cooperation Programme on Environment Best Available Techniques (BAT) Mr. Giorgio Grimaldi Mr. Giorgio de Benedetti 1 Workshop: “Best.
Exposure Assessment by Multi-media modelling. Cause-effect chain for ecosystem and human health as basis for exposure assessment by multi-media modelling.
1 … Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen The grid reference system used for CGMS (MARS-STAT Action) G.Genovese 1st European Workshop.
Air Pollution Dr. R. B. Schultz.
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
Modelling of Acid deposition in South Asia Magnuz Engardt Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI) Introduction to Acid deposition.
Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air Quality Data Summit February 2008.
Acknowledgements This study was performed with financial support of EEA grant EEZ08AP-27 and European Social Fund co-financed project 2009/0218/1DP/ /09/APIA/VIAA/099.
Case study: SEA for land-use plan amendments of Krasna Hora municipality.
Results of the environmental assessments with the CCAT-Tool J.P. Lesschen, J. Kros, W. de Vries and B.S. Elbersen Alterra, Wageningen UR CCAT end-user.
Dutch plan for finalising Hair software package Alterra – Wageningen University and Research Centre Roel Kruijne Working Group Meeting on Pesticide Statistics,
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
Evapotranspiration Partitioning in Land Surface Models By: Ben Livneh.
An air quality information system for cities with complex terrain based on high resolution NWP Viel Ødegaard, r&d department.
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG 3: Overview status report COSMO General Meeting, 19.
Session 5, CMAS 2004 INTRODUCTION: Fine scale modeling for Exposure and risk assessments.
Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19” from left.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
PNWIS Cross-border Air and Waste Solutions The effect of vegetative buffers on wind and dispersion of particulate matter around poultry barns Andreas.
Results Time Study Site Measured data Alfalfa Numerical Analysis of Water and Heat Transport in Vegetated Soils Using HYDRUS-1D Masaru Sakai 1), Jirka.
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
Outcome of the Workshop on PFOA organised by the Commission 4 th of May 2010 Christine Wistuba, DG ENV, D3.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
The FAIRMODE PM modelling guide Laurence ROUIL Bertrand BESSAGNET
5 Project funded by the Euro- Mediterranean Regional Programme for Local Water Management of the European Union DEVELOPMENT OF TOOLS AND GUIDELINES FOR.
Worker exposure to plant protection products (PPPs) in the framework of the BROWSE project Kim Doan Ngoc Pieter Spanoghe Ghent University International.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Why is Coal Ash of Concern and how to assess potential impacts?
Developments in modelling the exposure of operators to agricultural use of PPP as part of the BROWSE project Rianda Gerritsen-Ebben, Henk Goede, Thies.
Advances in Support of the CMAQ Bidirectional Science Option for the Estimation of Ammonia Flux from Agricultural cropland Ellen Cooter U.S. EPA, National.
Development of improved approaches for exposure estimations of operators, workers, bystanders and residents Rianda Gerritsen-Ebben, representing BROWSE.
Worker re-entry exposure within the framework of the BROWSE project Kim Doan Ngoc  Pieter Spanoghe 
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment and Climate Change.
UERRA User Workshop Toulouse, 4 th Feb 2016 Questions to the users.
Exposure Modelling Day 1.
ICHS 2015 – Yokohama, Japan | ID195
Fraunhofer IME InversePELMO - a specific software to perform inverse modelling simulations with FOCUSPELMO Peter Gallien*, Romeo Herr* and Michael Klein**
Modeling of Air Pollutants Dispersion from
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Project Presentation Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr)
NADSS Overview An Application of Geo-Spatial Decision Support to Agriculture Risk Management.
7th AIEAA Conference Evidence-based policies to face new challenges for agri-food systems June 14-15, 2018 – Conegliano (TV), Italy Identification of levers.
(Procter & Gamble, Brussels)
Relevance of GNB for CAP monitoring and evaluation system
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
Progress and problems of POP modelling
Presentation transcript:

To test the new BROWSE-PEARL model an Italian example scenario has been developed. Hourly weather data have been obtained from a weather station near Bologna in Emilia Romagna Region in Italy. Vines were chosen as a representative crop for Italy and crop parameters for testing the BROWSE-PEARL model were taken from FOCUS Piacenza scenario. To test the new BROWSE-PEARL model an Italian example scenario has been developed. Hourly weather data have been obtained from a weather station near Bologna in Emilia Romagna Region in Italy. Vines were chosen as a representative crop for Italy and crop parameters for testing the BROWSE-PEARL model were taken from FOCUS Piacenza scenario ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The output of multiple runs using the coupled BROWSE-PEARL/OPS models will be used in the software tools developed in the BROWSE project for regulators to evaluate the exposure of operators, workers, bystanders and residents after volatilisation of PPPs from treated areas. For the processes competing with volatilisation from plants (photo- transformation, penetration into the plant leaves, wash-off by rainfall), different layers in the plant canopy will be considered in order to deal with different pesticide deposition in each layer. In order to determine vapour concentrations at appropriate locations within a landscape, there is a requirement to couple an emission model such as BROWSE-Pearl to a dispersion model. For this reason BROWSE-Pearl will be coupled to the atmospheric dispersion model OPS (Van Jaarsveld, 2004). OPS (Operational atmospheric transport model of Priority Substances) is a model that simulates the atmospheric process sequence of emission, dispersion, transport, chemical conversion and finally deposition. In order to determine vapour concentrations at appropriate locations within a landscape, there is a requirement to couple an emission model such as BROWSE-Pearl to a dispersion model. For this reason BROWSE-Pearl will be coupled to the atmospheric dispersion model OPS (Van Jaarsveld, 2004). OPS (Operational atmospheric transport model of Priority Substances) is a model that simulates the atmospheric process sequence of emission, dispersion, transport, chemical conversion and finally deposition. The volatilisation of pesticides from plant surfaces can also be described using the concept of transport resistances (van den Berg and Leistra, 2004). As these resistances depend on the prevailing meteorological conditions, hourly meteorological data are needed as input for PEARL. 1 FOCUS (2008). “Pesticides in Air: Considerations for Exposure Assessment”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Pesticides in Air (authors: R. Kubiak, L. Bürkle, I. Cousins, A. Hourdakis, T. Jarvis, B. Jene, W. Koch, J. Kreuger, W-M. Maier, M. Millet, W. Reinert, P. Sweeney, J-C. Tournayre, F. Van den Berg), EC Document Reference SANCO/10553/2006 Rev 2 (June 2008). Leistra, M.,Van der Linden, A.M.A., Boesten, J.J.T.I., and Van den Berg, F. (2001). PEARL model for pesticide behaviour and emissions in soil-plant systems; Descriptions of the processes in FOCUS PEARL v Alterra-rapport 013, RIVM report , Alterra, Wageningen, 107pp. Van den Berg, F. and Leistra M, Improvement of the model concept for volatilization of pesticides from soils and plant surfaces in PEARL. Description and user’s guide for PEARL C1. Beschikbaar op PEARL website: Beschikbaar op PEARL website: FOCUS_AIR_PEARL.pdfFOCUS_AIR_PEARL.pdf Van Jaarsveld, J.A., 2004: The Operational Priority Substances model; Description and validation of OPS-Pro 4.1. RIVM report /2004. RIVM, Bilthoven. FOCUS (2008). “Pesticides in Air: Considerations for Exposure Assessment”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Pesticides in Air (authors: R. Kubiak, L. Bürkle, I. Cousins, A. Hourdakis, T. Jarvis, B. Jene, W. Koch, J. Kreuger, W-M. Maier, M. Millet, W. Reinert, P. Sweeney, J-C. Tournayre, F. Van den Berg), EC Document Reference SANCO/10553/2006 Rev 2 (June 2008). Leistra, M.,Van der Linden, A.M.A., Boesten, J.J.T.I., and Van den Berg, F. (2001). PEARL model for pesticide behaviour and emissions in soil-plant systems; Descriptions of the processes in FOCUS PEARL v Alterra-rapport 013, RIVM report , Alterra, Wageningen, 107pp. Van den Berg, F. and Leistra M, Improvement of the model concept for volatilization of pesticides from soils and plant surfaces in PEARL. Description and user’s guide for PEARL C1. Beschikbaar op PEARL website: Beschikbaar op PEARL website: FOCUS_AIR_PEARL.pdfFOCUS_AIR_PEARL.pdf Van Jaarsveld, J.A., 2004: The Operational Priority Substances model; Description and validation of OPS-Pro 4.1. RIVM report /2004. RIVM, Bilthoven. Internal boundary layer: thickness order of m; r A depends on wind speed, atmospheric stability, temperature Surface air layer: order of mm; r B depends on air temperature Z 0M Z BL Plant r A r B Input data (scenario, application, substance) Output (targets as defined by BROWSE) Photo-transformation Droplet Plant leaf Wash-off by rain Volatilisation Penetration Further improvements in volatilisation description 1.effect of atmospheric stability 2.distinction of two-layer deposit with different exposure conditions (fully exposed vs. reduced exposure) 3.effect of leaf wetness In the short-range exposure scheme, the use of Consensus-PEARL (van den Berg and Leistra, 2004) version is the only model suggested for tier 2 by FOCUS- Air (FOCUS, 2008) as it considers not only volatilisation but also other competing processes occurring on the plant surface, The improved model concepts of Consensus-PEARL have been implemented in the new PEARL model version (the model kernel of FOCUS_PEARL 4.4.4) that has been released recently. This version of the PEARL model has been chosen as an appropriate starting point for further development within the BROWSE project. This BROWSE-PEARL version will be created specifically to address the needs of the regulator in assessing resident and bystander exposure after PPPs volatilisation from treated fields BROWSE-PEARL contains model concepts that describe in a mechanistic way the main factors controlling pesticide volatilisation from soil and plant surfaces (physicochemical properties of the compound, agricultural practices, soil physical properties, meteorological conditions during and after application) and the various competing processes that may reduce the potential amount of pesticide volatilised from the plant surface. Modelling volatilisation of PPPs from treated areas, is necessary to assess their subsequent transport downwind to potential resident and bystander locations. Although mechanistic models of the volatilisation process have been developed in the past, none of these was designed for human exposure assessment. Another possible item for improvement is the interaction between different active ingredients and its effect on the volatilisation behaviour of these ingredients. Further, the moisture condition of the deposit on the rate of volatilisation from the plant leaves has been measured to be significant. Within the BROWSE project, this aspect will be investigated further and will be taken into account in the BROWSE-PEARL model. Further analysis will include the uncertainty in the input values used for the model to describe volatilisation, the relevant competing processes on the plant surface and the uncertainty in the measured volatilisation rates. The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support by the European Commission's 7th Framework Programme, BROWSE (Bystanders, Residents, Operators and WorkerS Exposure models for plant protection products, grant agreement number ). BROWSE is a Specific Targeted Research Project that began on 1st Jan 2011 and will finish on 31st December 2013.