Research group projects in computer science dr licia capra computer science tina fallahi, rasheed wihaib 3 rd year students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment FOR Learning in theory
Advertisements

Self-directed Learners Dr Sara Preston.
Induction: Third Day.  How can we teach to promote learning goals? ◦ Approaches to Teaching  From teacher-focussed to student-centred ◦ Constructive.
Kathryn MacKay Road Safety Project Officer City of York Council Road safety – the future.
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
1 Pair Programming Software Industry Productivity Quality CSci Educ Performance Confidence Pair programming for improved student performance and confidence.
The NFL IMPACT Program Teacher Dinner and Overview.
An Orientation for Parents Fall What is MAP? Measures of Academic Progress Measures of Academic Progress Tests in reading, language, and math Tests.
Technology and the Student Experience WatITis December 6 th, 2011.
The Cooperative Learning Model Students work together to accomplish a task or produce a product in a particular way.
Using Technology In The Classroom Students & Teachers Programmed Notetaking.
201: Week Three Approaching Research. Agenda Readings Your brief research statements Assignments for next few weeks.
Bill Querry EDU 742 Help Students take organized Notes
Using Science Notebooks as tools for teaching. Why Science notebooks? ► Important tools for practicing scientists ► Provide practice writing  Everyday.
The Log provides a framework for recording details of: ● the research programme ● scheduled supervisory meetings ● activities concerning the development.
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
Assessment policy Fundamental principles Assessment for learning Assessment of learning Recording Reporting Reflect what is known to be effective teaching.
Research Methods for Computer Science CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Dr. Pettey CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Dr. Pettey.
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
SOLEDAD A. ULEP UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT Using Assessment to Improve Classroom.
AN INTRODUCTION TO PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR POSTGRADUATES.
 Inquiry-Based Learning Instructional Strategies Link to Video.
The Process of Effective Instruction Includes Planning for Assessment in What and How You Teach.
Texas Tech University NSF-SFS Workshop on Educational Initiatives in Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructure Course Flow Diagrams May 2-3, 2013 Support.
Michael Bodek Associate Professor of English Bergen Community College.
Chemical Engineering curriculum renewal for the twenty first century: a work in progress Peter Holt, Jose Romagnoli and Ali Abbas.
September 26,  Individual jot down  Partner talk  Table discussion  Whole group sharing.
Faculty/Staff QEP Focus Groups Monday, February 18, 2013.
P28.  Educator provides the learners with content.  It is a educator approach  Examples : lectures and demonstrations  Educators must keep the following.
Principal’s Forecast Tangipahoa Parish School System Leadership Focus Strategy June 2015 Gary T. Porter.
Tauber - PACE Reading PACE Reading Overview  Overall goals  Components of program  Themes covered each year  Student expectations  Parent.
Community-based learning in engineering Dr Kate Miller, Centre for Public Engagement University of Bristol.
OVERALL – Overall, I am satisfied with the quality of the course (Q14) Base: 2010 – st Year and nd Year students; 2009 – x 1st Year and x 2nd.
Technology Enhanced Assessment Ian Pirie ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL Learning and Development PROFESSOR OF DESIGN Nora Mogey ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Academic Developer.
High Quality Math Instruction
Parents Overview of Success For All This information booklet will provide you with information on Literacy at Thomas Arnold: FROM SEPTEMBER 2012.
Group work – why do it? Rachel Horn – Civil & Structural Engineering.
Susan Schaeper Klein ISD. What is a PLC? “A Professional Learning Community (PLC) is educators committed to working collaboratively in ongoing processes.
Dr Marcin Ziemski - University of Queensland, Australia 1 Engineering Project Management Doing not teaching Dr Marcin Ziemski University of Queensland,
21 st Century Skills Update Cambrian School District October 4, 2012.
Mentor Teacher Program Collegial Support through Learning-Focused Relationships September 18, 2013.
Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include:  Report student progress toward.
Collaborative Data Teams Growing to Learn & Learning to Grow Eugene Field Elementary Kindergarten-4 th grade Maryville, Missouri.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
AN INTRODUCTION TO PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR UNDERGRADUATES.
 Assessment Match  Match the assessment with the appropriate category  Table talk – how did everyone classify the assessments?
“Process-Outcome” Studies Content vs. Teaching Methods Question-and-Answer or Lecture? High Expectations Carefully structured content followed by review.
Webster Public Schools September 17, MCAS Results  Progress at every grade in every subject  Too slow to keep pace  With NCLB targets 
Teaching for Student Success Cathryn A Manduca SAGE 2YC 7/18/2013.
New Developments with PebblePad at Worcester Libby Symonds Team Leader – Learning and Teaching Technology Unit.
Technologies Derek Middleton, Qualification Development Manager Scottish Qualifications Authority.
Michael Bohannan National University Domain B: ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING.
The Monitoring and Assessment Assignment TS – 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
MEng projects 2013 Introduction Mike Spann Project coordinator
+ Literature Review: Domain B Authors: Nancy Safer & Steve Fleischman Title: How Schools Improve, “Research Matters / How Student Progress Monitoring Improves.
MASTER ADVISOR TRAINING FOR FACULTY ADVISORS KRISTA BURRELL, COUNSELOR DR. GREG CAPITOSTI, CHEMISTRY INSTRUCTOR & FACULTY ADVISOR.
The ABC’s of Assessment: Cycle May 2014: New plans were due to the Center for Teaching and Learning for the cycle July 2014: Plan.
Formative Assessment with A free public service of.
1. Tennessee Standards Reteaching VS. Intervention Reteaching Tier I – Tennessee State Standards  Goal is to reteach standards that students are.
Randi Pellitteri 3 rd grade Informational Writing Science: Georgia.
KLA - ISLN Updates January Introducing the Content Specialists.
Homework Martha Y Pancardo, Silvia Gamez, Mariela Cordoba.
What the Research Says  Use low stakes writing assignments- Incorporate writing into shorter, simple tasks of recording the thinking of the student 
Creating Assessments that Engage Students & Staff Professor Jon Green.
Some quality cycle planning monitoring and sharing examples 1.
Biomedical Sciences 1: Facilitating the transition to higher education Dr Allison Wroe, Dr Phil Larkman Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences Enhancement.
Course goals During the course the students will develop their product development expertise by gaining knowledge on product life cycle impacts, on material.
Research Methods for Computer Science
Writing Across the Content Areas
Students reflecting on assessments and feedback:
Presentation transcript:

research group projects in computer science dr licia capra computer science tina fallahi, rasheed wihaib 3 rd year students

goal

 term 1: research methods – learn research process (in theory) – team formation & project assignment – literature review  term 2: research group projects – learn research process (in practice) – from hypothesis formulation to communication of results key facts

reflections by the academics small group teaching supervisory team

reflections by the students supervisory team cutting edge research

reflections by the academics too much in too little time? linear vs iterative?

reflections by the students continuous feedback on pace anticipate (& assess)

research group projects in CS  what worked well –small group teaching –embedding in research group –forefront research  what we need to change –anticipate hypo & tech skills’ development –close monitoring of pace & progress  food for thought -research process: whole or part? linear or cyclic?  contact: