HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ 20061 The extent of use and preference of a suitable HRQoL instrument for routine clinical use in head & neck cancer patients.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Evaluation: What is it?
Advertisements

An Introduction to Test Construction
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12
CHILD HEALTH NURSING.
Subjects eligible for this study were post treatment, disease free head and neck cancer patients undergoing routine follow-up visits for surveillance.
RESEARCH PROPOSAL. WHAT IS IT? A plan of action that describes in detail how you plan to carry out a research & request permission to proceed with the.
Quality Patient Care Is Frequently Measured The Communication Systems Prevalent in Nursing Units. Through Analysis of.
Improving health outcomes across England by providing improvement and change expertise How to Measure Patient Activation Measuring Patient Activation In.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.
Swallowing Outcomes in Head & Neck Cancer
Evaluation is a professional and ethical responsibility and is a core part of PHN professional practice Commitment to evaluation helps build the PHN intelligence.
Business research methods: data sources
Research problem, Purpose, question
Measuring Learning Outcomes Evaluation
CORRELATIO NAL RESEARCH METHOD. The researcher wanted to determine if there is a significant relationship between the nursing personnel characteristics.
CTU survey Dr Oluseun Adeogun NIHR Research Methods Fellow in Health Informatics University Of Liverpool / North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research.
WRITING A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
…patient reported outcome (PRO) measure for your clinical study Dr Keith Meadows, DHP Research & Consultancy Ltd.
How to Assess Student Learning in Arts Partnerships Part II: Survey Research Revised April 2, 2012 Mary Campbell-Zopf, Ohio Arts Council
Project Purpose The purpose of the project is to develop a preliminary “patient care map” for head and neck cancer patients for eventual use at the Vancouver.
Referral for information & support as part of routine cancer management D Hill, P Livingston, V White, D Akkerman.
Decision Support as a Clinical Skill Module III: Decision aids designed for specific decisions Last update: September 2008.
MAST: the organisational aspects Lise Kvistgaard Odense University Hospital Denmark Berlin, May 2010.
Designing Survey Instrument to Evaluate Implementation of Complex Health Interventions: Lessons Learned Eunice Chong Adrienne Alayli-Goebbels Lori Webel-Edgar.
Developing Business Practice –302LON Introduction to Business and Management Research Unit: 6 Knowledgecast: 2.
Therapeutic Education: Cancer Patients on chemotherapy: Shamim Akhter QURESHI MBBS,MPH, Ingénieur d’étude(EHESP) 2 nd June 2012 June 2010.
The PAN-Care Project Development and testing of a comprehensive care planning service to enable patients with end stage pancreatic cancer die at home Department.
National Obesity Observatory The Standard Evaluation Framework National Obesity Observatory The Standard Evaluation Framework Kath Roberts
FDA Approach to Review of Outcome Measures for Drug Approval and Labeling: Content Validity Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in.
BACKGROUND Health Care Attitudes and Trends among the Pediatric Prescribing Community Mahesh Narayan 1 MB, MSE, Dimple Patel 1 MS, Peter C. Adamson 1,2,3.
Systematic Reviews.
March 2001Management of Thyroid CancerInformation Projects Team THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH THYROID CANCER Cathy Bennett Information Projects Manager.
Successful Concepts Study Rationale Literature Review Study Design Rationale for Intervention Eligibility Criteria Endpoint Measurement Tools.
May 2001 Management of Thyroid Cancer Information Projects Team THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH THYROID CANCER Cathy Bennett Information Projects Manager.
Cancer Centers In Clinical Trials Sandrine Marreaud Head of Medical Department.
Looking at our School—LAOS School Development Planning Initiative.
QUALITY of LIFE Head & Neck Cancer and Chemotherapy Lisa Licitra Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit Istituto Nazionale Tumori Milano.
(Date of presentation) (Name of presenter) UK IBD audit Biological therapies audit 2014 Comparison of (Your site name) results against the national results.
Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.
Workshop 18 th May 2010, Brussels Applying the Value+ model on patient involvement in HTA processes.
Assessment Ice breaker. Ice breaker. My most favorite part of the course was …. My most favorite part of the course was …. Introduction Introduction How.
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
Regional Dental Consultants’ Meeting Presented by Emerson Robinson, DDS, MPH Region II and V Dental Consultant.
Evaluation of Psychosocial Support Services for Adolescent and Young Adult Patients at Roswell Park Cancer Institute Allison Polakiewicz, MPA Project Proposal.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Publishing Educational Research Articles Dr. David Kaufman Faculty of Education Simon Fraser University Presented at Universitas Terbuka March 4, 2011.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
Research into Practice Audiology Chemotherapy Ototoxicity Project.
Psychosocial difficulties in head and neck cancer; the development of an evidence based measurement instrument Lucy Ziegler Rob Newell.
© Dr Sue Pavitt 2014 Clinical Trials and the Benefits of Patient Public Involvement Professor Sue Pavitt Professor in Translational and Applied Health.
Michael Celestin, MA,CHES,CTTS 3/6/2013 R2R MENTORSHIP EXPERIENCE.
Performing a Successful Supportive Care Clinical Trial Jennifer Temel, MD.
A Survey of Consultants and Specialists in Restorative Dentistry on their use of HRQOL Questionnaires. QOL in Head & Neck Cancer – 5 th International Workshop.
Development of a Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI): a way of improving out-patient consultation & patient empowerment.
Dr. Sania Arya (JR) Dr. Jagdeepak Singh (Professor) Dr. Dinesh Kumar Sharma(AP) Dr. Ravinder Singh(SR) Department of ENT, Government Medical College Amritsar.
The Impact of Swallowing Function Pre- and Post Head & Neck Cancer Treatment Jo Patterson Research Associate / Macmillan SALT University of Newcastle /
OCRCC’s experiences in collecting HQoL data & preliminary findings
Disclosure of HIV status to children living with HIV in Malawi: needs assessment and formative evaluation of an intervention to help with the disclosure.
Incorporating Evaluation into a Clinical Project
DATA COLLECTION METHODS IN NURSING RESEARCH
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
Development of the Patient Concerns Inventory
Development of an electronic personal assessment questionnaire to capture the impact of living with a vascular condition: ePAQ-VAS Patrick Phillips, Elizabeth.
Controlling Measuring Quality of Patient Care
IB Environmental Systems and Societies
School of Dentistry Education Research Fund (SDERF)
STEPS Site Report.
Patient reported outcome measures for facial skin cancer: a systematic review and evaluation of the quality of their measurement properties Tom Dobbs,
Presentation transcript:

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ The extent of use and preference of a suitable HRQoL instrument for routine clinical use in head & neck cancer patients - The Malaysian Experience Dr. Jennifer G Doss¹ Professor W Murray Thomson² Associate Professor Raja Latifah Raja Jallaluddin¹ ¹Dental Faculty, University of Malaya, Malaysia ²School of Dentistry, University of Otago, NZ

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Introduction Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important end-point in oncology patients. Incorporating HRQoL measurement routinely in head and neck patient management would enable specialists to better assess impact of disease and treatment The active involvement and contributions of specialists managing head and neck patients are essential in the process of adapting and validating an existing HRQoL instrument for routine use

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ In Malaysia Use of HRQoL instruments currently confined to research purposes only None of the H&N cancer HRQOL instruments have been cross-culturally adapted and validated for routine use in a clinical setting There are only sporadic efforts by specialists to obtain HRQoL data routinely in clinics

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Aims of Study To explore the extent of use of HRQoL instruments among specialists on head & neck cancer patients To ascertain specialists’ preference for a HRQoL instrument for routine use in a clinical setting

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Method A one-day workshop was conducted Target Participants Specialists based in 5 government and 3 university hospitals throughout 6 main states in Malaysia Multi-disciplinary team of oncologists, ENT surgeons, OMF surgeons, oral pathologists, nursing staff and counselors

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ 20066

7 Method Workshop Questionnaires Focus group Discussions (FGD)

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Questionnaires 1. Socio-demographic details of participants 2. Extent of use of HRQoL instruments (Kanatas,2004) 3. Score in terms of importance 5 suitable criteria required of a HRQoL instrument in a clinical setting* 4. Evaluate quantitatively 3 most commonly used HRQoL instruments based on these 5 suitable criteria i) EORTC-H&N ii) FACT-H&N (v 4.0) iii) UWQOL (v 4.0)

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Focus Group Discussions Qualitative evaluation of i) EORTC-H&N ii) FACT-H&N (v 4.0) iii) UWQOL (V 4.0) In terms of identifying Suggestions for adapting an existing questionnaire for head and neck cancer patients in Malaysia

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Criteria AcceptabilityFeasibilityPracticality Interpretability of Scores Applicability Suitable Criteria for a HRQoL instrument in a clinical setting Based on a review of literature (Hyland,2003; Higginson and Carr,2001; Thornicroft and Slade, 2000)

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Suitable Criteria for a HRQoL tool for routine use in a clinical setting Applicability of the HRQOL instrument in terms of relevance and completeness in coverage of items and domains to a head & neck cancer patient Score (1-10) Feasibility for routine use in a clinical setting-length of HRQOL instrument in terms of respondent and interview burden Acceptable format of suitable wording of items and response format for patients that is clear & easy to understand Interpretability of scores – the ease of interpreting scores in a clinically meaningful way to improve clinical decision making Practicality of using the instrument in terms of training staff and infrastructure to support collection of data

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Results 1) Profile of Patients 2) Extent of Use of HRQoL instruments 3) Suitable Criteria for a routine HRQoL instrument 4) Evaluation of 3 HRQOL instruments a) Quantitative results b) Qualitative results

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Profile of Participants A total of 18 participants (72%) Government (50%) and university (50 % ) hospitals Equal gender distribution 30-40yr old (50%), 41-50yr old (38.9% ), 51-60yr old (11.1% ) Working experience mostly > 10years (77.8%); 6-10 yrs (16.7% ) ; 1-5yrs (5.6%) Oncology related working experience mostly > 10years (50% ) ; 6-10yrs (27.8% ) ; 1-5yrs ( 22.2% )

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Specialties 55.6% 16.7% 11.1% 5.6%

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Extent of Use of HRQoL Instruments Slightly less than half (47.1%) had used UWQOL (50%) ; EORTC (25%) ; other simplified questionnaires (25%) Pre- and post-treatment (62.5%) Used mostly on Oral and NPC patients undergoing surgery (62.5% ) Distributed either by research clerks /nurses (62.5%) and clinical nurses (37.5%) mainly in clinics (87.5%)

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Benefits of use - Qualitative responses  Provides useful feedback on patient’s condition and side-effects during treatment and follow-up  Provides info on how patients cope at home with family and friends  Gives info on general outcomes of treatment  Allows appreciation of patient’s point of view  Helps to plan for better management and support for patients

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Problems identified during use - Qualitative responses  Time-consuming; patients get annoyed  Patients’ interpretation of questions is different  Requires translation into different language for non-English-speaking patients  Manpower shortage  Difficult to do on busy clinic days

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Reasons for not using HRQoL instruments - Qualitative responses  No knowledge of such questionnaires  Have not considered going into specific QoL assessment  None developed or validated for Malaysian use with appropriate language translation  Not part of patient management protocol  Not easy to use on daily basis because of workload  Not so easy to decide which one to use

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Criteria for a suitable routine HRQoL instrument Partici- pant no FeasibilityAcceptabilityApplicabilityInterpretation of Scores PracticalitySum of Scores Raw scores (1-10) Partici- pant no FeasibilityAcceptabilityApplicabilityInterpretation of ScoresPracticality (10/46) (8/46) (8/46) (10/46) (10/46) 2 Sum of weighted scores e.g. weighted scores

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ ) Criteria for a suitable HRQoL instrument Ranking of importance based on sum of weighted score Results Rank of Importance Suitable Criteria Of HRQoL tool Sum of weighted score 1 Acceptability Feasibility Practicality Interpretability of HRQoL scores Applicability 3.271

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Evaluation of EORTC,FACT-H&N & UWQOL against the 5 criteria a) Quantitative aspects Scores (raw & weighted) for 5 criteria b) Qualitative aspects Specialists’ suggestions for adapting one of these questionnaires for Malaysian head & neck patients

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Evaluation of EORTC, FACT-H&N & UWQOL against each criterion Applicability (raw score min-max : 1-10) Participant no 123 EORTC-H&N1057 FACT-H&N998 UWQOL768 Sum of raw scores Applicability (calculation of weighted score w) Participant no 12 Sum of w1-w18 scores EORTC- H&N 0.385O.25 x FACT-H&N Y UWQOL z Table A Table B

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Results – Quantitative 4a) Summary of weighted scores of 5 criteria in EORTC, FACT-H&N & UWQOL AcceptabilityFeasibilityPracticalityInterpretaion of scores Applicability EORTC- H&N (x) FACT- H&N (Y) UWQOL5.641 (z)

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Evaluation Matrix AcceptabilityFeasibilityPracticalityInterpretation of scores Applicability EORTC- H&N *** *** FACT- H&N *** * UWQOL*****

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Suggestions from qualitative responses Add ‘betel quid chewing habit’ Add in ‘spiritual aspect’ Add ‘shoulder function’ Add ‘I worry about how my family will cope after I pass away’ Item GE5 ‘I worry about dying’ is insensitive & could be replaced with item GE6 ‘I worry that my condition will get worse’

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ The meaning of ‘partners’ needs to be clarified or changed to ‘spouse’ Item H&N7-’swallowing’ needs to be specified as ‘swallowing liquids or solids’ Shorten response options Needs comprehensive guide & training for interviewers Suggestions from qualitative responses

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Conclusion There is a general lack of use of HRQoL instruments among specialists managing head and neck cancer patients in Malaysia Specialists who had previously used these instruments noted definite benefits in the management of their patients However, some problems were identified during the use of these instruments especially during busy clinic days.

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Conclusion Specialists’ preferences for criteria suitable for a HRQoL for routine use in a clinical setting (in order of importance) are: (1) Acceptability (2) Feasibility (3) Practicality (4) Interpretability of scores (5) Applicability FACT-H&N was the preferred HRQoL instrument, meeting 4 out of these 5 criteria for routine clinical use. However, some suggestions were made to adapt this questionnaire for use in Malaysia.

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/ Acknowledgements Appreciation to the Oncologists, ENT surgeons, Oral Maxillofacial Surgeons, Oral Pathologist, Nursing Staff and Counsellor who participated in the workshop, and to the Oral Cancer Research and Coordinating Centre and Pharmaniaga Sdn Bhd for funding this workshop

HRQoL workshop/Liverpool/