Improved Erosion Control BMPs for Road Construction Projects in the North Carolina Mountains Results To determine whether if practical, alternative Best.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the Johnson County Stormwater Management Program Casey J. Lee U.S.
Dewatering & Coastal Issues H 2 0 & Erosion Control Workshop UCF Stormwater Management Academy March 15-16, 2007 Jim Smoot, PhD, PE Molly Wood, PE U.S.
Storm Water Blue Ribbon Panel Recommendations to the California State Water Resources Control Board The Feasibility of Numeric Effluent Limits Applicable.
Joongdae Choi, Chulhee Won and Dongkoun Yun Kangwon National University, Korea Rural Research Institute, Korea ICID 2012, Adelaide, Australia.
NC STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT of SOIL SCIENCE Alternative Check Dams for Polyacrylamide Dosing Melanie M. McCaleb, CPESC North Carolina State University,
1 Effluent Guidelines for Construction Greg Davis USEPA
A State’s Perspective of the EPA’s Effluent Limitations Guidelines 40 CFR Part 450 Jeffrey B. Shaver, PE, CPESC AASHTO Subcommittee On Design July 27,
Module 4: Temporary Sediment Controls. Learning Objectives n Identify locations for sediment control BMPs n Identify applications for different types.
Future of the Construction and Post Construction Water Quality Program
Turbidity or Not Turbidity? That Is The Question!!!!
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
SWPPP: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Creating/Implementing a Plan for Compliance.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
Construction Storm Water Controls CET-3320 Hydrology & Hydraulics.
Introduction To The Highway Runoff Manual This introduction focus on: An overview of the Highway Runoff Manual. The definition of Minimum Requirements.
Assessment of gravel transport characteristics of the upper Santa Ana River Scott Wright and Toby Minear USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento,
Iron Mountain Mine California Acid Mine Drainage Discharge Stuart Gaunt Guy Laurie.
Evaluation of Street Sweeping as a Water Quality Management Tool in Three Residential Basins in Madison, WI Bill Selbig USGS – WRD Middleton, WI Bill Selbig.
Ch  Know what design frequency means  Know how to delineate a drainage area on a topographic map 2.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Urbanization ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Chapter 6.2 The Work of Streams.
Part 1: Biotic Indicators Fresh Water Studies: Water Quality & Living Organisms.
 NEW PRODUCT –The Dual Polymer System  Why Treat?  EPA’s (ELG)  Active Treatment  Semi-Active Treatment  Passive Treatment.
Erosion Control on Construction Sites David Athey, PE Deputy Public Works Director, Engineering City of Atascadero.
Office of Sustainability Presented by Sofia Habity EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL.
Senior Associate Florida Successes of Polymer Enhanced Best Management Practices (PEBMPs) Steven R. Iwinski Environmental Scientist March 16 th, 2007.
1 Mixing engineering and biology. Where Fish Passage is required Connectivity is required across the landscape wherever there are fish. Fish and fish.
Factors affecting erosion and deposition Velocity Gradient – rise over run Channel shape Channel roughness Discharge – amount of water flow per unit.
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
Steve Harrison, Environmental Manager Bureau of Entomology and Pest Control -Mosquito Control Section.
Conservation Strategies for Growing Communities. The Growth of Urban Conservation.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Materials Transport & NSCD Material Classes Velocity to Transport Relationships York NSCD Restoration PSY CCREP.
Oregon Case Studies Ryan Johnson. Studies  The response of impounded sediment to a culvert replacement project on Sutter Creek, a tributary of Honey.
Basic Hydrology Water Quality: Sediment production and transport.
Key Questions for Understanding Surface Water Section 9.1.
Stormwater Control & Design
Basic Hydraulics: Solids Transport. What is sediment? Matter that settles to the bottom of a liquid Matter transported by water or wind May be particles.
Bedload-transport measurements with geophones
Filtration Observations in the Carver County WMO West Metro Water Alliance May 25, 2011 (Thanks to Kristen Larson, Carver County)
Created by The North Carolina School of Science and Math.The North Carolina School of Science and Math Copyright North Carolina Department of Public.
MDOT Storm Water Management Plan Module 2: Best Management Practices
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Natural vs. Accelerated Soil Erosion Natural geologic erosion has occurred at a relatively slow rate since the earth was formed. Natural erosion produces.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Bee Lake Water Quality Monitor Data Summary Period of record: to 2/19/07.
Sediment Delivery to the Watonwan River
Erosion and Sedimentation Erosion – Detachment, movement and deposition of soil by water, wind, ice or gravity. Sediment – Particles derived from inorganic.
Christie Beeman and Jeff Haltiner Philip Williams & Associates Hydrograph Modification: An Introduction and.
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601
Basic Hydraulics: Storm Water Management concepts
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCE DEPT. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (DERM) “THE PERMITTING PROCESS TO DISPOSE OF STORMWATER.
SWPPP: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Creating/Implementing a Plan for Compliance.
Watersheds The area of land that is drained by a river is called a watershed or drainage basin.
TWS/SELC Road Condition Study Two Duke University Nicholas School of the Environment, Masters Candidates and one Duke University, Undergraduate.
Works of Streams Steams doing work. Erosion  Erosion is transportation of minerals and materials by use of mobile agent  Usually water, wind or ice.
Construction Land Disturbance Pollution Control
Presentation - Streams
Continuous Surrogate Monitoring for Pollutant Load Estimation in Urban Water Systems Anthony A. Melcher, USU Civil and Environmental.
Basic Hydraulics: Solids Transport
This photo was taken in August What has changed since then?
Section 1: Surface Water Movement
Stream Erosion.
Freshwater Systems = <1 % of Earth’s total water!
6.1 Configuration of sedimentation tank
Hydrologic Control Structure
Pearce Creek DMCF Baseline Exterior Monitoring Spring 2017 Results
Or… Why did that bucket of water I spilled disappear into the ground.
Setback area relative to drainage area Runoff volume, mean of 4 events
Presentation transcript:

Improved Erosion Control BMPs for Road Construction Projects in the North Carolina Mountains Results To determine whether if practical, alternative Best Management Practices for roadway projects are able to reduce the turbidity of water runoff as compared to the standard NC DOT practices currently used. Curley Maple Rd Site: Turbidity (NTU)StandardFiber check dams+PAM Fiber check dams only Average4,198 a 30 b 187 c Median Value1, Table 1. Runoff turbidity results (NTU) for the three treatment type sections at the Steeltown Rd site. Funding provided by: The North Carolina Department of Transportation NC DOT Standard BMPs These BMPs primarily consisted of periodic rock check dams and sediment basins, though at Steeltown the entire ditch channel was also lined with erosion control matting. The results suggest there is a significant advantage in the use of the new BMP types, particularly those with PAM 705 added. At the first site the average turbidity values (in NTU) for the stormwater runoff for were 4,198 for the standard DOT BMPs, 30 for the fiber check dams with PAM 705, and 187 for the fiber check dams alone. The second site showed similar results with average turbidity values of 64 for the fiber check dams with PAM 705, as compared to 852 for the standard DOT BMPs. However, only the fiber check dams with PAM 705 had an average turbidity that came close to achieving the sensitive habitat runoff turbidity limit of 10 NTU, though they did meet that threshold for eight storms at Steeltown Rd and two storms at Curley Maple. Summary Materials and MethodsIntroduction Project Objective Erosion Control BMPs: Definition and Function Erosion control Best Management Practices (BMPs) for construction sites are designed to reduce the amount of sediment leaving the project in water runoff. For roadway projects in the mountains they typically include small sediment basins and rock check dams, both of which are designed to detain or slow water runoff, allowing suspended sediment more time to settle out. Why Study Erosion Control? Sediment is the most common pollutant affecting North Carolina’s waterways, impacting a range of aquatic organisms, reducing reservoir capacity, and hurting their aesthetic and economic value. Construction activity, including roadway projects, is a significant contributor of state-wide sediment loading. The NC DOT program of widening and paving rural roads in the mountain region provided an opportunity to evaluate new types of roadside erosion control BMPs. Current regulations have established maximum allowable discharge turbidities for sensitive waters (to include trout streams) at 10 NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Unit). However, this low threshold has proven quite difficult to meet and new structures and practices are needed to achieve this requirement. What is PAM? PAM is an acronym for polyacrylamide, a water soluble, synthetic polymer commonly used in a variety of water treatment processes. PAM exists in a variety of neutral or charged forms but each is intended to increase the rate of flocculation, or particle binding, that occurs in water, significantly increasing the rate of sedimentation. The anionic PAM 705 was used in this study and has been approved for stormwater treatment by the NC Dept. of Water Quality. Figure 3. A 120° weir used at the Steeltown site to capture runoff samples and to determine overall runoff flow volume. Each experimental section had a separate weir located above a culvert to capture runoff from only that section. Turbidity (NTU)StandardFiber check dams+PAM Average852 a 64 b Median Value30540 Steeltown Rd Site: Table 2. Runoff turbidity results (NTU) for the two treatment type sections at the Curley Maple Rd site. Figure 2. An ISCO brand water sampler used to sample runoff from the project sites. Solar panel and battery are in the foreground. Fiber check dams – Coir Logs The larger and stiffer of the two experimental types, the coir logs are made of woven coir fibers made from coconut husks. The rolls used were 10’ long and 12” diameter, costing around $55 each. Approximately 5 of these logs were placed per experimental section. Fiber check dams – Straw Wattles The smaller, lighter, and more malleable of the two experimental types, the straw wattles simply consist of straw packed into a plastic mesh casing. The rolls used were 10’ long and 9” in diameter, costing around $20 each. Approximately 15 of these wattles were placed per experimental section. Project Description The study was conducted on two roadway paving projects located in the North Carolina mountains. The first, Steeltown Rd is located north of Lenoir, NC in Caldwell County, while the second, Curley Maple Rd is located just north of Boone, NC in Watauga County. The Steeltown site consisted of three separate treatment type sections: DOT standard BMPs – a 137 m long section at 5% slope Fiber check dams plus PAM 705 – a 203 m long section at 7% slope with approximately 9.1 m spacing between BMPs Fiber check dams alone – a 141 m long section at 6% slope with approximately 7.6 m spacing between BMPs The Curley Maple site consisted of two separate treatment types: DOT standard BMPs – a 154 m long section at 3% slope Fiber check dams plus PAM 705 – a 149 m long section at 3% slope with approximately 8.5 m spacing between BMPs. Sampling Methods Runoff was collected by Teledyne ISCO brand 6712 portable water samplers programmed to collect samples after a set water volume had passed. At Steeltown, they collected the samples from the front side of constructed weirs located at the entrance of a culvert. At Curley Maple, they collected samples from the interior of the culverts themselves. Figure 4. A photo of the comparative average runoff turbidity results (in NTU) for the three treatment type sections at the Steeltown Rd site. Figure 5. A photo of the comparative average runoff turbidity results (in NTU) for the two treatment type sections at the Curley Maple Rd site. Figure 1. Photos of the PAM 705 used in the study. Approximately 100 g of granulated PAM (as shown on left) was sprinkled on each wattle or log after each significant storm event, though PAM may come in many different solid and liquid forms (as shown on right). Sediment Loading (kg) StandardFiber check dams+PAM Fiber check dams only Overall Total9, Average per Storm428 a 0.8 b 2.1 b Sediment Loading (kg) StandardFiber check dams+PAM Overall Total657 Average per Storm3.4 a 0.8 b Table 3. Sediment loading rates (kg) for the three treatment type sections at the Steeltown Rd site. Table 4. Sediment loading rates (kg) for the two treatment type sections at the Curley Maple Rd site. S.E. King, R.A. McLaughlin, and M.B. Shaffer *p < 0.05 for statistical comparisons There were 32 total storm events captured for the Steeltown Rd site with rainfalls ranging from 4 to 54 mm, with an average of 25 mm. There were 19 total storm events captured for the Curley Maple Rd site, with rainfalls ranging from 6 to 78 mm, with an average of 21 mm.