Fault Tree Analysis for the BLEDP Student meeting 30.09.2013 Vegard Joa Moseng.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ways to Improve the Hazard Management Process
Advertisements

Integra Consult A/S Safety Assessment. Integra Consult A/S SAFETY ASSESSMENT Objective Objective –Demonstrate that an acceptable level of safety will.
99/11/12. When to use it Fig. 1. Fault Tree Analysis in problem solving.
1 Fault-Tolerant Computing Systems #6 Network Reliability Pattara Leelaprute Computer Engineering Department Kasetsart University
Frequencies Estimation Ricki M Mulia, ST. MSc. Unsafe Act Unsafe Condition HAZARD EXPOSURE Penyakit Akibat kerja RISK Kecelakaan kerja Higiene Industri.
Design Concepts and Principles
Reliable System Design 2011 by: Amir M. Rahmani
Reliability Block Diagrams A reliability block diagram is a success-oriented network describing the function of the system. If the system has more than.
Reliability Risk Assessment
1 Software Testing and Quality Assurance Lecture 39 – Software Quality Assurance.
Testing an individual module
CSC 402, Fall Requirements Analysis for Special Properties Systems Engineering (def?) –why? increasing complexity –ICBM’s (then TMI, Therac, Challenger...)
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO RISK IDENTIFICATION 2.
1 Software Testing and Quality Assurance Lecture 35 – Software Quality Assurance.
Safety Assessment (Fault Trees) ITV Model-based Analysis and Design of Embedded Software Techniques and methods for Critical Software Anders P. Ravn Aalborg.
Summary and Safety Assessment mMIC-SFT November 2003 Anders P. Ravn Aalborg University.
Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.
CIS 376 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn
Vegard Joa Moseng BI - BL Student meeting Reliability analysis summary for the BLEDP.
What is Fault Tree Analysis?
Fault Tree Analysis Applied to a tiny ― Computer Startup ― (2-3 people)
Basics of Fault Tree and Event Tree Analysis Supplement to Fire Hazard Assessment for Nuclear Engineering Professionals Icove and Ruggles (2011) Funded.
1 Avionics Workshop Ottawa, Ontario Nov.2003 Installation Approval of Non-required Avionics Equipment ISSUE TCCA Regional aircraft certification engineers.
Leen Vooijs Implementing risk based maintenance concepts.
Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.
EML 4550: Engineering Design Methods
Quality in Product and Process Design Pertemuan 13-14
Quality Risk Management Methodology Anthony Cumberlege SAPRAA meeting - Randpark golf club, 20 March 2009.
Relex Reliability Software “the intuitive solution
Risk Assessment and Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Mario. H. Fontana PhD.,PE Research Professor Arthur E. Ruggles PhD Professor The University of.
Slide 1 Using Models Introduced in ISA-d Standard: Security of Industrial Automation and Control Systems (IACS) Rahul Bhojani ISA SP99 WG4 Meeting.
WHAT IS SYSTEM SAFETY? The field of safety analysis in which systems are evaluated using a number of different techniques to improve safety. There are.
ERT 312 SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION IN BIOPROCESS RISK ASSESSMENT Prepared by: Miss Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim.
ERT 322 SAFETY AND LOSS PREVENTION RISK ASSESSMENT
Risk & Liability in Engineering. Source: On September 11, 2001, terrorists attacked the Twin Towers by flying two hijacked 727’s into them.
FAULT TREE ANALYSIS (FTA). QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS Some of the commonly used quantitative risk assessment methods are; 1.Fault tree analysis (FTA)
Vegard Joa Moseng – Student meeting. A LITTLE BIT ABOUT SYSTEM RELIABILITY:  Reliability: The ability of an item to perform a required function, under.
QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT RASHID MAHMOOD MSc. Analytical Chemistry MS in Total Quality Management Senior Manager Quality Assurance Nabiqasim Group of Industries.
GE 116 Lecture 1 ENGR. MARVIN JAY T. SERRANO Lecturer.
B. Todd et al. 25 th August 2009 Observations Since v1.
Software Testing and Quality Assurance Software Quality Assurance 1.
11th International Symposium Loss Prevention 2004 Prague Ľudovít JELEMENSKÝ Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, STU BRATISLAVA, SLOVAKIA.
Safety-Critical Systems 7 Summary T V - Lifecycle model System Acceptance System Integration & Test Module Integration & Test Requirements Analysis.
TUGAS K3 DALAM INDUSTRI KIMIA
Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Mathew Samuel NASA/GSFC/MEI (301)
Vegard Joa Moseng BI - BL Student meeting Reliability analysis of the Input Monitor in the BLEDP.
RLV Reliability Analysis Guidelines Terry Hardy AST-300/Systems Engineering and Training Division October 26, 2004.
WHAT IF ANALYSIS USED TO IDENTIFY HAZARDS HAZARDOUS EVENTS
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making System Analysis Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, Country XX - XX Month,
1 Software Testing and Quality Assurance Lecture 38 – Software Quality Assurance.
Prof. Enrico Zio Fault tree analysis Prof. Enrico Zio Politecnico di Milano Dipartimento di Energia.
Fault Tree Analysis for Fatality Prevention Dr. Steven A. Lapp President - Design Sciences, Inc.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
Beam Interlock System Dependability Study RSWG – 31 st January 2005.
SAFETY AND HEALTH IN PROCESS INDUSTRIES(MKKK1653) 2015/2016 ASSIGNMENT Failure mode, effect and critical analysis (FMECA) By Yahya Gambo (MKK152006) SUBMITTED.
ON “SOFTWARE ENGINEERING” SUBJECT TOPIC “RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT” MASTER OF COMPUTER APPLICATION (5th Semester) Presented by: ANOOP GANGWAR SRMSCET,
October 22, 2005 Parvaiz Ahmed Khand An Overview of Software Safety.
LOGO Combining Fault Trees and Event Trees Seung Ki, Shin.
Detailed Analyses Chapter 14.
Fault Trees.
Fault Tree Analysis Using Binary Decision Diagrams
Guide for the application of CSM design targets (CSM DT)
FMEA PROCESS FLOW Causes/ failure mechanisms Product definition
Safety and Risk.
Quality Risk Management
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
CUT SET TRANSFORMATION
BHOPAL Industrial Disaster Management Cycle: OECD 2004.
Project Risk Management Jiwei Ma
Review and comparison of the modeling approaches and risk analysis methods for complex ship system. Author: Sunil Basnet.
Presentation transcript:

Fault Tree Analysis for the BLEDP Student meeting Vegard Joa Moseng

About the Fault Tree Analysis Fault tree analysis (FTA) is a top-down approach to failure analysis, starting with a potentially undesirable event called a TOP-event, and then you determine all the ways it can happen. The analysis proceeds by determining how the TOP event can be caused by individual or combined lower level failures or events. Causes are connected through logic gates, typically AND & OR gates. FTA is the most commonly used technique for a casual analysis in risk and reliability studies.

Main steps in a FTA Define the TOP event (potential accident) and boundary conditions. Construction of the fault tree. Identifications of the minimal cut sets. Qualitative analysis of the fault tree. Quantitative analysis of the fault tree. Report results.

Preparation for FTA Starting point is often an existing Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and a system block diagram. The FMECA is an essential first step in understanding the system. The design, operation and environment of the system must be evaluated. Cause and effects of the events leading up to the TOP event must be identified and understood.

Components in FTA building

Boundary conditions Normal boundary conditions are: 1.The physical boundaries of the system (what is included?) 2.The initial conditions (what is the operational state of the system when the TOP event is occurring?) 3.What types of external stresses should be included? 4.The level of resolution.

Boundaries for the BLEDP Physical boundaries are limited to the card itself and the immediate connections (fiber optic cables) with causation being random failures (including failure due to human error in maintenance) and normal degradations over time. Operational state of the system is normal beam permit. There are three TOP events that have been discovered: 1.Maintenance – Non critical failures that can be fixed later 2.False dumps – Failures who are incompatible with safe operation. Dumps the beam to protect the system. 3.Blind failures – Failures which should cause false dumps but are undetectable. No external stresses are included. Resolution is set to minimal cut set.

A cut set is a set of basic events whose occurrence ensures that the TOP event occurs (single failure with no redundancy and several simultaneous with redundancy). It is considered a minimal cut set if the set can’t be reduced more without losing its status as a cut set. Qualitative assessments are done on the cut sets. Qualitative assessments

Quantitative assessments