Dial-in: 1-888-447-7153 Passcode: 899594 SPDG Directors’ Webinar: Exploration Stage Presenters: Ron Dughman, Mountain Plains Regional Resource Center,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SISEP Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai
Advertisements

Barbara Sims Dean Fixsen Karen Blase Caryn Ward National SISEP Center National Implementation Research Network FPG Child Development Center University.
A Quick Look at Implementation Science Mary Louise Peters Technical Assistance Specialist National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center
Building Implementation Capacity to Improve Youth Outcomes Allison Metz, Ph.D. Associate Director National Implementation Research Network University of.
Getting Ready for Phase II of the SSIP
The Process of VTPBiS Implementation Getting From Here to There! Vermont.
Planning for Success: Using Implementation Data to Action Plan for Full and Sustained Implementation Barbara Sims Caryn Ward National SISEP Center National.
SWIFT School Wide Integrated Framework for Transformation
Professional Development and Technical Assistance: The National Blueprint for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.
Theory to Practice: How One SEA Uses Implementation Science Minnesota Department of Education presentation for the CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Improving Student Outcomes: Using Technical Assistance.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Allison Metz, Ph.D., Karen Blase, Ph.D., Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Rob Horner, Ph.D., George Sugai, Ph.D. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Anne Lucas, WRRC/ECTA Ron Dughman, MPRRC Janey Henkel, MPRRC 2013 WRRC Leadership Forum October.
Barbara Sims, Co-Director National SISEP Center FPG Child Development Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Greensboro.NC March 20, 2013 Implementation.
Building Capacity with Implementation Drivers
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs and Services that Promote the Social-Emotional Development of Young Children Part I Karen Blase, Barbara.
Implementation Science 101 Vestena Robbins, PhD Kentucky Dept for Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities.
Implementation Science Vision 21: Linking Systems of Care June 2015 Lyman Legters.
SectionVideo/PresentSlidesTotal Time Overview + Useable Intervention8:30 min Stages7:19 min Teams PDSA Terri present Drivers8:50 min Lessons Learned +
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Intro – SPDG Program Area Meeting Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. OSEP Project Officer & SPDG Program Lead 1.
Improving Outcomes for All Students: Bringing Evidence-Based Practices to Scale March 25, 2009 MN RtI Center Conference Cammy Lehr, Ph.D. EBP & Implementation.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Barbara Sims Brenda Melcher Dean Fixsen Karen Blase Michelle Duda Washington, D.C. July 2013 Keep Dancing After the Music Stops OSEP Project Directors’
Putting it all together: How Facilitative Administrations can use Performance Assessment and a Comprehensive Assessment System to support Staff Competency.
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
Systemic Improvement:
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Barbara Sims Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Integrated System for Student Achievement SISEP in Illinois.
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
: The National Center at EDC
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Six Years of SPPs: Lessons Learning for Designing, Implementing.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. &
Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon.
Barbara Sims Debbie Egan Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda Using Implementation Frameworks to Identify Evidence Based Practices 2011 PBIS.
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
Dial-in: Passcode: SPDG Directors’ Webinar Implementation Stage Series Kick-Off Presenter: Audrey Desjarlais, Coordinator, Signetwork.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
Vermont Integrated Instruction Model (ViiM) Highlights August 2012.
Michelle A. Duda Barbara Sims Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase October 2, 2012 Making It Happen With Active Implementation Frameworks: Implementation Drivers.
ND State Personnel Development Grant North Dakota Scaling- up and Implementation Science Framework (ND-SISF )
Min.cenmi.org Michigan Implementation Network Providing Support through District Leadership and Implementation Team April 29, 2010 Michigan Implementation.
Dial-in: Passcode: SPDG Directors’ Webinar SPDG Program Measure 3: Presenters: Patricia Hershfeldt, EdD, Maryland PBIS, Cyndi Boezio,
Sandra F. Naoom, MSPH National Implementation Research Network Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill.
Dial-in: Pass code: SPDG Directors’ Webinar Implementation Driver Series: Organizational – Data Decision Support Systems Facilitators.
An Introduction to Implementation Tools to Help Build Implementation Capacity SPDG Evaluators May 2012 Michelle A. Duda, Dean L. Fixsen,
NC State Improvement Project
SPDG Directors’ Webinar Implementation Stage Series Kick-Off
Welcome to the SPDG Webinar
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
The Process of VTPBiS Implementation
State and District Role in
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
The Hexagon An EBP Exploration Tool
RtI Coordination: Supporting Training
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Welcome to SPDG Evaluators’ Online Session:
Installation Stage and Implementation Analysis
Welcome to SPDG Evaluators’ Community Session:
SPDG Implementation Conversations - Discussion
Presentation transcript:

Dial-in: Passcode: SPDG Directors’ Webinar: Exploration Stage Presenters: Ron Dughman, Mountain Plains Regional Resource Center, Marick Tedesco, PhD, State Transformation Specialist, State of Oregon

2 Webinar Ground Rules Roll Call  Enter Name, State, and role in chat pod Mute your phones:  To Mute or Un-Mute Press *6  Please do not put your phones on ‘Hold’ Q & A Process (audio/chat):  Ask questions in two ways – 1) via phone or 2) type in chat pod Archive Recording, PPT, & Materials:

3 General Updates 2013 SPDG Continuation Reporting  REPORT Due: May 3, 2013  Link to Recorded presentation by Jennifer Coffey  Q&A Session: February 19, 3:00-4:00pm Eastern to address questions grantees may have after viewing the recording SPDG National Meeting - Deadlines  Registration and reserve lodging – February 11  Submit Market Place and Poster Session Proposals: February 11

4 General Updates OSEP Project Directors Meeting  SAVE THE DATE: July 15-17, 2013  Hosted by AIR  SPDG Program Area Meeting - 4:00-6:00 pm Day 1  No meals or snacks provided -  You must register for the conference before reserving lodging. Please click here to register now.Please click here to register now  A block of rooms has been reserved at the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel,

Feb-Mar Mar-Apr Apr-June June-Aug months Follow-up Peer to Peer Check-ins Discussion Imp Stage-based Tool Implementation & Scale Up Conversations PLC Feb 14 Mar 6 (f2f mtg) Apr 11 Jun 13 One week prep Directors’ Webinars Feb 7 Mar 6 (f2f mtg) Apr 4 Jun Units #1 Exploration: February #2 Installation: March #3 Initial Implementation: April #4 Full Implementation: June Presentation Impl-Stage & related tools Parsed by RRC Regions

Agenda for today 6  Overview of the Exploration Stage  Guiding Implementation Questions Overview  Hexagon Tool Overview and Use  Hexagon Tool and Correlation to Guiding Implementation Questions  Overview of the ImpleMAP  One State’s Experience with ImpleMap

Introductions 7

Karen A. Blase Barbara Sims Michelle A. Duda Dean L. Fixsen Jonathan Green Ron Dughman, RRCP Jeanna Mullins, RRCP Chapel Hill NC October 2012 Building Implementation Capacity RRCP Implementation Core Team Institute

Purposeful matching of critical implementation activities to the appropriate stage of the process Stages of Implementation Stages

Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability and improvement at the organization and systems level Help guide leaders to use the right leadership strategies for the situation Implementation Drivers Drivers

New Approaches Need New Ways of Work Transparent, protocol-driven feedback loops and processes Aligned policies, funding, guidance to support new ways of work There are no administrative decisions, they are all education quality decisions. Improvement Cycles Cycles

Implementation Teams ARE NOT Committees Advisory Groups Implementation Teams DO Know the innovation – the WHAT Know and use implementation science and best practices – the HOW Use Plan, Do, Study, Act Cycles to “get started” and “get better” Stay on “mission” Engage in the right work at the right level at the right time. Implementation Teams Teams

IMPLEMENTATION STAGES Purposeful matching of critical implementation activities to the stage of the process

Active Implementation Frameworks Successful implementation on a useful scale requires... Purposeful matching of critical implementation activities to the stage of the process – “STAGES OF IMPLEMENTATION” Active use of implementation core components “best practices” – “IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS” A focus on continuous, purposeful improvement – “IMPROVEMENT CYCLES” Organized, expert assistance – “IMPLEMENTATION TEAMS”

Our Current Context Improved Outcomes for ALL Students GOAL EBPs/EIIs

Stages AND Drivers Implementation Takes Time: 2 – 4 Years EXPLORATION INSTALLATION INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION FULL IMPLEMENTATION Drivers “DRIVERS”

Stages of Implementation EXPLORATION Competency Drivers Organization Drivers Leadership Drivers Integrated & Compensatory —Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005 “Pay now or Pay later”

Exploration Goals Create readiness for change Changing hearts and minds Examine degree to which the proposed strategies and practices meet the needs of our State and our students Determine whether the strategies, practices, and implementation are desirable and feasible Implementation Stages

Exploration Stage What happens during Exploration Stage? Determine Need and Identify Options Assess “Fit” and Feasibility Structural and functional changes identified Promote “Buy in” for the innovation and for implementation supports Make recommendations (go/no go) Implementation “Team” identified Implementation Stages

GUIDING IMPLEMENTATION QUESTIONS EXPLORATION STAGE Formalize Structures 1. Who will be accountable on a day-to-day basis for ensuring this work is done? • 2. How will State leadership be a part of this process to ensure that successes are operationalized and barriers are removed?

GUIDING IMPLEMENTATION QUESTIONS EXPLORATION STAGE Determine Need and Options 1. What do your current data suggest is the most critical or pivotal need? 2. What is the supporting research or evidence of the strategies you are considering?

GUIDING IMPLEMENTATION QUESTIONS EXPLORATION STAGE Assess Fit and Feasibility 1. What are the priorities of your State? 2. What is your theory of change (i.e., logic model, blueprint, outcome map etc.)? 3. How will you measure progress toward that goal at t the LEA? 4. Who will do what differently at the SEA to impact that outcome? At the LEA?

GUIDING IMPLEMENTATION QUESTIONS EXPLORATION STAGE Promote “Buy-in” and “Ownership” 1. How will readiness be created at the SEA? At the LEA?

GUIDING IMPLEMENTATION QUESTIONS EXPLORATION STAGE Reassess and Decide 1. What has emerged during Exploration that impacts your decision?

The Hexagon An EBP Exploration Tool NEED FIT RESOURCES EVIDENCE CAPACITY READINESS Fit with current Initiatives School, district, state priorities Organizational structures Community values Need in school, district, state Academic & socially significant Issues Parent & community perceptions of need Data indicating need Resources and supports for: Curricula & Classroom Technology supports (IT dept.) Staffing Training Data Systems Coaching & Supervision Administration & system Evidence Outcomes – Is it worth it? Fidelity data Cost – effectiveness data Number of studies Population similarities Diverse cultural groups Efficacy or Effectiveness Capacity to Implement Staff meet minimum qualifications Able to sustain Imp Drivers Financially Structurally Buy-in process operationalized Practitioners Families Readiness for Replication Qualified purveyor Expert or TA available Mature sites to observe Several replications How well is it operationalized? Are Imp Drivers operationalized? The “Hexagon” can be used as a planning tool to evaluate evidence- based programs and practices during the Exploration Stage of Implementation. Download available at: EBP: 5 Point Rating Scale: High = 5; Medium = 3; Low = 1. Midpoints can be used and scored as a 2 or 4. HighMedLow Need Fit Resource Availability Evidence Readiness for Replication Capacity to Implement Total Score © National Implementation Research Network Adapted from work by Laurel J. Kiser, Michelle Zabel, Albert A. Zachik, and Joan Smith at the University of Maryland

Exploration: ImpleMap Purpose:  To assess and understand “the implementation landscape”  A data collection tool to assess Implementation drivers and implementation best practices Pre-Requisites  Interviewer needs to have expertise in Implementation Science  Site has a history of successful (or not) use of evidence-based or evidence informed practices

ImpleMap Administration INTERVENTION WHATHOWWHO Enter the name of each intervention provided by the respondent. You may know the intervention by another name, but record the name used in this provider organization. Ask questions to get information about the vetting process. Ask about the “core intervention components” as they are described by the respondent. Core intervention components are the critical functions that define an intervention. Ask about the Implementation Drivers. Implementation Drivers are components related to: ►developing staff competency (selection, training, coaching, performance assessments); ►organization supports (decision support data systems, facilitative administration, systems interventions); and ►leadership supports (technical and adaptive). Ask about the person accountable for providing each Implementation Driver. Record the name, position, and physical location of each person.

Reflection Creating Readiness What role can you play in developing readiness for the EBP/EII you have in mind? What are 2 things your team could to tomorrow to asses your current infrastructure? The Hexagon Tool (Analysis of Evidence- based Programs or Practices) Modification of the Hexagon Tool for a new initiative Implementation Mapping (ImpleMap) Supporting New Ways of Work

What’s Next 29  Thursday 2/14, Implementation and Scale Up Conversations PLC: Break-out discussions focused on Exploration Tools  Friday 2/8: Agenda with guiding questions disseminated via the PLC Outlook reminder message  Friday 2/8: Peer Partners to be notified

Peer Partners 30  Friday 2/8: Peer Partners to be notified ??, Louisiana, 2011 Adria David, Idaho, Director, 2012 Allison Layland, Maryland, Coordinator, 2012 Annette Young, Montana, Coordinator, 2010 Brenda Oas, North Dakota, Director, 2012 Debrajean Scheibel, Maine, 2011 Denise Andreski, Florida, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Evaluator, 2012 Jane Splean, Nevada, Coordinator and Lori Schwank, Nevada, Coordinator, 2007 Jennifer Huisken LaPointe, Arkansas, Evaluator 2009 Kerry Haag, Kansas, Director, 2012 Kimberly Harper, Wyoming, Director, 2011 Kristan Sievers-Coffer, Indiana, Director 2009 Lorraine Jensen/Larson, Minnesota, Director 2010 Lowell K. Oswald, Utah, Director 2012 Mary Steady, New Hampshire, Director 2012 Pat Mueller, Alabama, Delaware, New Hampshire, Mississippi, Vermont, Evaluator & Co- Director 2012 (4), 2010 (1) Paula Crawford, North Carolina, Director 2010 Sarah Drinkwater, Oregon, Director 2011 Shatarupa Podder, Pennsylvania, Director 2012 Susan Williamson, Alabama, Director 2012