University of Utah Seminar X Systematic Design of Instruction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seminar VI Organizing a Class II Planning a Class! Ron Welch.
Advertisements

Course Design: The Basics Monica A. Devanas, Ph.D. Director, Faculty Development and Assessment Programs Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment.
James Stoll, PhD Linking Learning Objectives to Assessment.
Objectives WRITING WORTHWHILE OBJECTIVES FOR YOUR CLASS.
How to Integrate Students with Diverse Learning Needs in a General Education Classroom By: Tammie McElaney.
ME221Lecture 131 ME 221 Statics Lecture #13 Sections 5.1 – 5.7 Exam #2 Review.
ME221Lecture #381 ME 221 Statics Lecture #38 Final Exam Review.
Identifying Content and Specifying Behaviors
Writing the Syllabus Teaching Skills Purpose of Syllabus Communicates what the course is about Communicates what students need to know in the beginning.
ME221Lecture #371 ME 221 Statics Lecture #37 Final Exam Review.
Communication & Educational Models. Communication n Process of sending and receiving messages n Transmission requires a mutual understanding between communicator.
Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning (Cognitive domain)
Planning for Distance Education Jim Lehman Educational Technology Purdue University.
ME221Lecture 121 ME 221 Statics Lecture #12 Sections 5.6 – 5.7.
ME221Lecture #371 ME 221 Statics Lecture #37 Final Exam Review.
Teaching and Learning If you don’t know anything about learning… You don’t know anything about teaching! Telling is not TEACHING Listening is not LEARNING.
Statics - Review Important Principles of Statics used in Mechanics of Materials External Forces (or Loads) Concentrated Force – applied to a point on a.
Mechanical Engineering Technology Department, SPSU
EDU 550 Assignment 7.
At the end of my physics course, a biology student should be able to…. Michelle Smith University of Maine School of Biology and Ecology Maine Center for.
Review 3 Documents In groups of 2-3, highlight things students must know and be able to do in the 21 st Century Select a speaker to share your items with.
College of Human Sciences UCD Professor Bairbre Redmond Learning Outcomes – Moving from Teaching to Learning.
From Learning Goals to Assessment Plans University of Wisconsin Parkside January 20, 2012 Susan Hatfield Winona State University
Copyright © 2009 On The Edge Software Consulting Advanced Enterprise Java Instructional Plan Presentation Tier Design using an Event Driven Design Methodology.
CE 329 Structural Analysis
College of Engineering CIVE 1150 Fall 2008 Engineering Mechanics: Statics CIVE-1150 Sec. 1 – 6 & 91 Omar Abu-Yasein, PhD., P.E., SECB
Conduct Instructional Analysis Identify Instructional Goal(s) Analyze Learners & Contexts Write Performance Objectives Develop Assessment Instruments Develop.
Instructional Design Aldo Prado. Instructional Design Instructional design is the process of easing the acquisition of knowledge and making it more efficient.
10/08/05Slide 1 Instructional Systems Design in Distance Education Goal: This lesson will discuss Instructional Systems Design as it relates to distance.
Barry Williams1 Analyzing Learners & Context Dick & Carey, Chp. 5.
CHAPTER 2 Designing and Planning Technology-Enhanced Instruction.
1 QIM 501- INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND DELIVERY Dick & Carey Instructional Design Module Prepared by :- Omar Abdullah M. Al-Maktari PQM0025/08 Lecturer :-
CE 329 Structural Analysis Spring Objectives ― General List Course Objectives Describe Topical Coverage for Class Provide the Formula for Computing.
Writing Learning Outcomes David Steer & Stephane Booth Co-Chairs Learning Outcomes Committee.
Dr. Abd Alrazak Aljanabi Kufa university College of education for girls Educational&Behavioral objective Dr. Abd Alrazak Aljanabi PhD(science education)
DAU Curriculum Process: Implementing Bloom’s Taxonomy and Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Evaluation Judith Hall Bayliss, DAU November 2, 2007.
Student Learning Outcomes
Learning Objective A statement in specific and measurable terms that describes what the learner will know or be able to do as a result of engaging in.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Bloom’s Taxonomy USSF Referee Instructor CourseITIP United States Soccer Federation.
ENGINEERING STATICS COURSE INTRODUCTION.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
A Decision-Making Tool.  Goal  Educational Objectives  Student Learning Outcomes  Performance Indicators or Criteria  Learning Activities or Strategies.
Developing Meaningful, Measurable Student Learning Outcomes Tulsa Community College January 2013 Susan Hatfield Professor, Winona State University
Selecting Appropriate Assessment Measures for Student Learning Outcomes October 27, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of Assessment and.
Planning Instructional Units. Planning Vital and basic skill for effective teaching Helps you feel organized and prepared Is only a guide: not carved.
Planning for Instruction Chapter 6 NC Teaching Standard IV.
WELCOME TO BUS 302 The Gateway Experience For more information visit:
Instructional Design Ryan Glidden. Instructional Design The process of planning, creating, and developing instructional or educational resources.
Alignment of 21 st Century Skills, the REVISED 2009 Virginia MATH SOL, Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and Research-based Instructional/Assessment Strategies.
Developing a Culture of Teaching Excellence Systematic Design of Instruction COL Joe Hanus 1.
Instructional Plan Template | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan Cultural Diversity in Health Science Barry L. Rimpsey.
Instructional Plan | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan For Associate’s Degree in Library Skills (Donna Roy)
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
Higher Order Thinking Overview. What to Expect in this Course This course may be different than others by: Incorporating instructional strategies that.
Developing items and assembling a test based on curriculum standards
Classroom Activities to
Systematic Design of Instruction
ADDIE & ASSURE Jasper (Jia) Pan Oct
APPROACH TO INSTRUCTIONAL SYSTEM DESIGN
ARC 108 Assist.Prof.Dr. Mustafa Kutanis
Lecture10 Equilibrium.
Chapter 3: Curriculum © VAN SCHAIK PUBLISHERS Chapter 3: Curriculum.
Instructional Design Models
NACEP Standards and Assessment February 15, 2016
STATICS (ENGINEERING MECHANICS-I)
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان إعداد
Writing Learning Outcomes
Learning Outcomes: Design Aspects
Presentation transcript:

University of Utah Seminar X Systematic Design of Instruction

University of Utah Course Goals Course Goals Instructional Analysis Entry Level Characteristics Course Objectives Criterion- Referenced Tests Instructional Strategy Development and Delivery of Instruction Assessment and Revision Dick & Carey, Ch. 1 Gagne, Briggs & Wager, Ch. 2 Systematic Design of Instruction 2

University of Utah Course Goals Course Goals Systematic Design of Instruction 3

University of Utah Course Goals General statement of what students will be able to do when course is completed Sources of goals: –Institution, department, or program goals –Needs assessment from program review –Industry need –Mandate from the professional organization –New technology 4

University of Utah Statics Course Goals Apply the equations of equilibrium to analyze forces on rigid bodies 5

University of Utah Course Goals Course Goals Instructional Analysis Entry Level Characteristics Systematic Design of Instruction 6

University of Utah Entry Level Characteristics Knowledge and skills students must bring prior to beginning instruction Identify where the knowledge and skills are obtained (prerequisites) Other characteristics of the learners 7

University of Utah Entry Level Requirements Statics Vector Calculus Computer Skill Trig./Geom./Algebra Forces and FBDs Verbal Skills English Calculus Comp. Science High School Physics 8

University of Utah Instructional Analysis Identify the learning required in the course being designed: –Major concepts –Subordinate concepts and skills Diagram depicting these skills and the relationship between them A Map of the Content Domain 9

University of Utah Instructional Analysis Equations of Equilibrium Types of Forces Where Forces Are Applied Types of Structures Solving Forces 2-D Equilibrium 3-D Equilibrium Non-concurrent & Concurrent forces Concentrated Distributed Moments Couples Line of Action Centroids Moment of Inertia Radius of Gyration Trusses Frames Cables Arches Vector math Trigonometry Geometry Free body Diagrams English/SI Units Members Particles Rigid Bodies Two force members Types of Constraints Forces EquilibriumRigid Bodies Newton’s Laws Specific Forces Friction Weight Internal Shear/Moment Diagrams 10

University of Utah How the Course Fits into the Curriculum Statics Calculus Physics Computer Science Prerequisites Strength of Materials Struct. Analysis Soils Adv. Struct Analysis Concrete Design Steel Design Adv. Str. of Materials Follow-on Courses 11

University of Utah Course Goals Course Goals Instructional Analysis Entry Level Characteristics Course Objectives Systematic Design of Instruction 12

University of Utah Write Course Objectives Specific statements of what learners will be able to do Based on instructional analysis and entry level characteristics 13

University of Utah Write Course Objectives Calculate external reactions for rigid bodies in 2D equilibrium Draw free body diagrams for rigid bodies in 2D equilibrium Analyze a truss Calculate internal pin reactions in a frame Calculate internal cable forces for discrete and uniformly loaded systems Solve static dry friction problems Calculate external reactions of rigid bodies in 3D equilibrium Statics Demo Classes 14

University of Utah Course Goals Course Goals Instructional Analysis Entry Level Characteristics Course Objectives Criterion- Referenced Tests Systematic Design of Instruction 15

University of Utah Develop Criterion Referenced Test Items Measure learners’ accomplishment of the course objectives. Use absolute (not relative) standards of achievement. Could include: –Homework Quizzes/Exams –Design problemsFinal Exam –Oral presentationsGroup Exercises –Laboratory exercisesProject Deliverables 16

University of Utah Course Goals Course Goals Instructional Analysis Entry Level Characteristics Course Objectives Criterion- Referenced Tests Instructional Strategy Systematic Design of Instruction 17

University of Utah Develop Instructional Strategy Strategy considers: –Pre-instructional activities –Presentation of information –Practice and feedback –Testing –Follow-up activities Strategy Based on: –Knowledge of learning process – –Content to be taught –Characteristics of learners – 18

University of Utah A Model Instructional Strategy Provide an orientation: –Why is this important? –How does it relate to prior knowledge? Provide learning objectives. Provide information. Stimulate critical thinking about the subject. Provide models. Provide opportunities to apply the knowledge: –In a familiar context. –In new and unfamiliar contexts. Assess the learners’ performance and provide feedback. Provide opportunities for self-assessment. 19

University of Utah Implementing the Model For a block of instruction (2-5 lessons): –Student preparation –Instructor-led lecture and discussion –In-class individual and group problem- solving, with assessment and feedback –Homework, with assessment and feedback –One or more exam problems A transition from: –Instructor leading to students performing –Lower to upper levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy 20

University of Utah Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Knowledge ComprehensionApplicationAnalysisSynthesisEvaluation list, recite explain, paraphrase calculate, solve, determine, apply compare, contrast, classify, categorize, derive, model create, construct, design, improve, produce, propose judge, critique, justify, verify, assess, recommend For the Cognitive Domain 21

University of Utah Course Goals Course Goals Instructional Analysis Entry Level Characteristics Course Objectives Criterion- Referenced Tests Instructional Strategy Development and Delivery of Instruction Systematic Design of Instruction 22

University of Utah Develop and Deliver Instruction Develop instruction –Select textbooks –Supplemental notes –Refine homework and design problems – –Prepare labs –Develop physical models, computer simulations, videos, etc. –Arrange field trips, guest lecturers, etc. –Course syllabus 23

University of Utah Develop and Deliver Instruction Deliver Instruction – –Office hours / Additional Instruction –Administer exams and projects –Grade –Conduct labs 24

University of Utah Course Goals Course Goals Instructional Analysis Entry Level Characteristics Course Objectives Criterion- Referenced Tests Instructional Strategy Development and Delivery of Instruction Assessment and Revision Systematic Design of Instruction 25

University of Utah  Assessment of a Program  Assessment of a Course  Assessment of Teaching  Assessment of Student Learning Types of Assessments 26

University of Utah Assessment and Revision Course Assessment –Student performance with respect to Course Objectives – –Course surveys –Instructor self-assessment –Time surveys –Data comparison with previous years 27

University of Utah Assessment and Revision Program Assessment –Student performance wrt Program Outcomes –Graduate performance wrt Program Objectives –Maps course contributions to Program Outcomes –Aggregates course assessment results at program level 28

University of Utah Course Goals Course Goals Instructional Analysis Entry Level Characteristics Course Objectives Criterion- Referenced Tests Instructional Strategy Development and Delivery of Instruction Assessment and Revision Dick & Carey, Ch. 1 Gagne, Briggs & Wager, Ch. 2 Systematic Design of Instruction 29

University of Utah Seminar X a Questions? Systematic Design of Instruction 30