Updated Facility Condition Assessment Prince George’s County Public Schools June 17, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FACILITIES BUDGETING / LONG RANGE PLANNING 2012 PASBO Mark A. Czapp George W. Ioannidis Spring Grove Area School District.
Advertisements

1 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Program Request Public Hearing AGENDA 7:00 - 7:15Presentation of Capital Improvement Program Budget Request 7:15.
Public Works Institute April 8, 2014 Bob Hartnett Deputy Director of Public Works Steve Aldridge City Architect.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND Montgomery County Board of Education and Montgomery County Delegation ANNUUAL MEETING November 17,
Capital Improvement Program and Campus Renewal Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board 2004 Facilities Conference February 6, 2004.
PRESENTATION TO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MARCH 7 TH, 2012 FY 2013 School Board Proposed Budget 1.
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS State of Our School Building 1 DRAFT.
Presented by Executive Director of Facilities Management Chuck Scott.
FB STOCKTAKING SYSTEMWIDE PROGRAMS JUNE 25, 2008.
See the Present… Know the Future…. RECAPP ® Markets Telecom Facilities Municipalities Government Transportation.
January – May 2013 Existing Curriculum and Space Needs Summary Facilities staff meets individually with all school principals, as well as Academics and.
Successful Facility Assessments: Savings through Facility Manager and A/E Partnerships May 27, 2014.
Capital Budgeting.
Building for Their Future Dublin Unified School District.
Manage the Facility Condition Index (FCI)
A Plan for Continuous Improvement Presented To: The Springfield Control Board December 21 st 2005 Springfield Public Schools.
Managing the Facilities Asset Portfolio Prepared for the Tuition Policy Advisory Committee by The University of Texas Physical Plant September 10, 2003.
School Facilities Construction Commission Project Overview Facilities Inventory and Classification System (KFICS) Student Achievement through High Performance.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Creating Big Ideas: Long-Term Capital Planning – A.
Office of Facilities Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council March.
Budget Development Time Line September 2011Budget data collection begins December 2011 – March 1, 2012 CSA, BA, & BOE Finance Committee develops budget.
Facilities Condition Audit Summary of Findings Entech is a full-service Architectural/Engineering firm providing design, construction management, facilities.
Jan 31, 2005 Community Update. Jan 31, 2005 Thanks to the voters… Measure R passed with over 63% of the vote $3.87 billion for “the Safe and Healthy Neighborhood.
Financial Skills. Objectives 1.Business strategy 2.Budget strategy 3.Calculations 4.Practice.
Board of Education Workshop Superintendent’s Recommended FY 2015 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Program September 11, 2013.
Department of Public Works Public Buildings Division Joey Duncan, P.E., Director.
June 18, 2009June Regular Board Meeting Tuition Increase Recommendation FY 2010 June 18, June Regular Board Meeting With the assumption that the.
Facilities Condition Assessment Initiated: February 2004 Consultant: ISES Corporation Stone Mountain, GA Scope: Identify the conditions of our facilities,
1 Superintendent’s Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2009 February 11, 2008.
Carroll County Public Schools Board of Education Work Session August 27, 2014 FY 2016 Capital Budget and FY 2017 – FY 2021 Capital Improvement Program.
Office of Acquisition and Property Management Proposed Changes to Attachment G FY 2011 – FY 2015 Five Year Plan.
Anne Arundel County Public Schools Strategic Facilities Utilization Master Plan MGT of America, Inc. September 2, 2015.
ESPLOST Savannah-Chatham County Public Schools July 5, 2006.
ESPLOST Update Savannah-Chatham County Public Schools May 17, 2006.
Capital Improvement Program for September 9, 2014.
The Path to a Sustainable Foundation for Facilities Management in Education Council of Great City Schools Presented by: Doug Christensen, Lander Medlin,
County of Santa Barbara General Services Department Facility Condition Assessment Lessons Learned Greg Chanis, Assistant Director August 13, 2015.
5-year Capital Improvement Plan FY2015 Capital Budget.
Replacement Plant Value (RPV) Dollars in Billions.
Ontario School Boards 72 district school boards in Ontario Approximately 4,900 schools TDSB presently operates 551 active schools Approximately 11.3% of.
DEFERRED CAPITAL PROJECTS REPORT Facilities Sub-Committee June 11, 2013.
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROGRAM UPDATE REPORT Accomplishments and 2016 Planned Events October 1,
South Greenville Recreation Center and Park Master Plan.
Ontario School Boards 72 district school boards in Ontario Approximately 4,900 schools TDSB presently operates 551 active schools Approximately 11.3% of.
Investing in the District of Columbia’s Public School Facilities From Decades of Neglect to Stewardship for our Future Analyzed by 21 st Century School.
SMITHVILLE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT Tradition of Excellence The Power of One … One Community … One Future! November 4, 2014 SMITHVILLE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
Evansville Vanderburgh School Corporation 2014 Budget Presentation August 12,
Grand Rapids Community College Board of Trustees Proposed Budget June 6, 2016.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education Update August 28,
ESPLOST Savannah-Chatham County Public Schools October 31, 2006.
Hamilton County Department of Education
Proposed School Bond Referendum September 26, 2017
Proposed Space Utilization Strategy (DRAFT)
Deferred Maintenance Deferred Maintenance
Forsyth County 2016 Bond Referendum
Analyzed by 21st Century School Fund April 25, 2016
Ohio University Cost Diagnostic
4 November 2013 LEHIGHTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Campus Facilities Conditions Customer View
Space Utilization Advisory Committee November 14, 2017
Grand Rapids Community College Board of Trustees
BARBOUR COUNTY SCHOOLS SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET HEARING October 8th, 2018
Berkshire Hills Regional
Pillager Public School District Community Survey Results
Master Facilities Committee Evaluation and Identification
FIRELANDS Local School District
Roanoke County Public Schools Budget
Bensalem Township School District Feasibility Study
Alpena School District Academic Facilities Partnership Program
Presentation transcript:

Updated Facility Condition Assessment Prince George’s County Public Schools June 17, 2008

2 Introduction  In September 2007, PGCPS hired Parsons 3D/I to perform an updated facilities condition assessment of 184 facilities (15.3M gross square feet)  The purpose of this assessment is to determine the present condition of the facilities and to prepare a capital improvement funding plan required to maintain them

3 Services Provided to PGCPS  Condition Assessment  Data Analysis  10-Year Facilities Plan  Facilities Process Analysis  Software  Training

4 Summary of Findings  Buildings are well kept and clean. However, due to advanced age of facilities:  Mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems are antiquated, inefficient, and in need of major upgrades and/or replacement  Food service equipment is on average in poor condition, and 65% of all food service equipment is beyond normal life expectancy  Most buildings do not comply with ADA accessibility guidelines  Substructures are showing signs of settlement and water infiltration  Exterior building systems are showing signs of aging and deterioration

5 Facility Condition Index (FCI) Measuring Condition: Formula: = FCI Needed Repairs ($) Replacement Value ($) Example:= 50% FCI Needed Repairs of $5M Replacement Value of $10M 5,000,000 10,000,000 Best Practices for FCI FCICondition <40%Good 40% - 75%Fair >75%Poor =

6 FCI Versus Facility Age Average FCI score for PGCPS is 53.94% (Fair) Good – 25 Facilities Fair – 150 Facilities Poor – 9 Facilities

7 FCI Ranking/Condition - Poor FCI Ranking of Schools

8 FCI Ranking/Condition - Fair

9

10 FCI Ranking/Condition - Fair

11 FCI Ranking/Condition - Fair

12 FCI Ranking/Condition - Fair

13 FCI Ranking/Condition - Fair

14 FCI Ranking/Condition – Fair

15 FCI Ranking/Condition - Good

16 FCI Ranking/Condition - New

17 Funding Requirements Needed Current needed repairs $2.12 billion Future needs (capital renewal)$696 million Total capital needs$2.82 billion  Total current backlog of deficiencies  Projected deficiencies over the next 10 years Type # of Buildings Gross Area Sq. Ft. Needed Repairs Replacemen t Value FCI% Capital Renewal Elementary M$898M$1,626M55.22$317M Middle 303.6M$543M$927M58.59$123M High 214.4M$532M$1,159M45.90$222M Other 160.8M$153M$230M66.64$33M Grand Total M$2,126M$3,943M53.94$696M

18 Proposed Capital Funding Plan Capital plan to reduce deferred maintenance backlog (totaling $2.1B) over next 11 years (FY-10 through FY-20) assuming $100 M / year funding  Major Renovation at Nine Schools in Poor Condition ($78,360,703)  Morningside ES, Avalon ES, Henry G. Ferguson ES, Samuel Chase ES, Clinton Grove ES, Thomas Addison Building, Tulip Grove ES, Middleton Valley ES, Annex Building at Suitland HS  Major Repairs at 168 Schools ($1,002,126,529)  Roofing - $24,840,638, Mechanical/Plumbing - $440,658,463, Communication/Alarms - $53,660,579, Kitchen/Food Service Equipment - $26,367,457, Major Repairs - $400,674,954, Special Construction - $54,937,437, Miscellaneous (Structural Engineering Studies) - $987,001  Code Compliance at 93 Schools ($19,512,768)

19 Proposed Capital Funding Plan Due to inflation, reduction of deferred maintenance backlog over next 11 years (FY-10 through FY-20), assuming $100 M / year funding, will be $898M

20 Executive/Board Level Presentation on PGCPS Website Executive/Board Level Presentation of Updated Facility Condition Assessment findings can be found on PGCPS website at and includes:  Slide Presentation to Board of Education  Executive Summary for Priority 1 Facilities  Priority 1 Facility Reports in Alphabetical Order  Executive Summary for Priority 2 Facilities  Priority 2 Facility Reports in Alphabetical Order  Executive Summary for Priority 3 Facilities  Priority 3 Facility Reports in Alphabetical Order

21 Next Steps  Development of Superintendent’s Academic Initiatives and Instructional Requirements  Enrollment and Demographic Projections  Development of a Year Master Facilities Plan of Superintendent’s Vision  Development of the FY-10 to FY-15 CIP

22 Questions and Answers Board Questions