Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gender Audit. Traditional use of audit relates to accounting: Analysis of gender budget Gender audit still evolving… -now used interchangeably with evaluation.
Advertisements

Introduction to Impact Assessment
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Sabelo Mbokazi Senior Policy Officer HIV/AIDS, TB, Malaria & OID
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
Yoko Watanabe Gender Focal Point GEF Secretariat GENDER EQUALITY ACTION PLAN (GEAP)
Comprehensive M&E Systems
A Human Rights-Based Approach to Monitoring Session 6 (cont.)
1 Designing a Monitoring and Evaluation System for a Rural Travel and Transport Project Michael Bamberger Gender and Development Group The World Bank RTTP.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
At the end of this module, participants should have a better understanding of the following : Elements of Gender Mainstreaming Basics of Gender Analysis.
1 Module 6 Putting It All Together. 2 Learning Objectives At the end of this session participants will understand: The monitoring and evaluation process.
Gender Aware Monitoring and Evaluation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands Presentation overview This presentation is comprised of the following sections:
An initiative of the ACP Group of States funded by the European Union Global Climate Change Alliance: Intra-ACP Programme Training Module Mainstreaming.
The participants should have understood the following basic principles: Integrating gender considerations into project design and implementation Assessing.
Participants should expect to understand: Concept of M&E Importance of gender in M&E Different steps in the M&E process Integrating gender into program/project.
Integrating Gender into Evaluations June Overview Defining concepts Addressing gender considerations in evaluations – Why, when, how – Common challenges.
ZEST Gender issues in Agriculture. ZEST This is the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
PROMOTING GENDER STATISTICS IN EVIDENCE-BASED POLICYMAKING 2 nd Global Forum on Gender Statistics, January 2009 Neda Jafar Statistics Division UN ESCWA.
Measuring Governance with Pro- Poor and Gender Sensitive Indicators: Process flow chart as a tool for promoting gender-responsive governance & identifying.
Gender and the Forest Investment Program Stacy Alboher Linda Mossop-Rousseau FIP Pilot Countries Meeting Cape Town, June 22, 2011.
Indicators Dr Murali Krishna Public Health Foundation of India.
Food For Peace: Title II Programs and Gender 1 FSN Knowledge Sharing Meeting November 15, 2012 Presented by Michelle Gamber, MA, DrPH AAAS Fellow, FFP.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
Developing Indicators
The National Development Plan, Iraq 6 July 2010 “Developing Objectives & Indicators for Strategic Planning” Khaled Ehsan and Helen Olafsdottir UNDP Iraq.
1 Indicators and gender audits Juliet Hunt IWDA Symposium on Gender Indicators 15 June 2006.
Assessments. Assessment in the Project Cycle DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING EVALUATION ASSESSMENT.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH. UNAIDS M&E Senior Adviser 12 th May 2009.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
1 Gender Statistics: What is all about? Angela Me UNECE Statistics Division.
UNDP-GEF Community-Based Adaptation Programme Anne-France WITTMANN CBA-Morocco Programme Manager (UNV) Tools & Tips to foster Gender Mainstreaming & Inclusion.
Update on HTP Module 22 Gender-Responsive Nutrition in Emergencies GNC Annual Meeting 9 th to 11 th July 2013.
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
Monitoring and Evaluation Orientation 17 th May 2011 MCA Namibia.
Independent Evaluation Group World Bank November 11, 2010 Evaluation of Bank Support for Gender and Development.
SUMMARY PROJECT OUTLINE (SPROUT) ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Training Course A : Trade Union Training on ILS & the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles &
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Gender Equality Action Plan (GEAP) GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Colombo, Sri Lanka March 17-19, 2015.
A short introduction to the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reforms.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Gender Analysis and Frameworks Module C. Review of the BIG IDEAS from previous sections.
TRAINING Workshop ‘Integrating Gender in Climate Change Adaptation’, 1-3 July Ha Noi Session 2.4 Gender mainstreaming in CCA programmes and projects: from.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18 th & 19 th March 2010 Indicators.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Steps in development of action plans ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Course A3 – Trade Union Training on Information Management for Trade Union Organization, Research.
Entry points for gender equality & women’s empowerment concepts in REDD+
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
Gender-Responsive NAP Processes
Gender Focal Point Network Training & Orientation
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH
Module 2 The SDG Agenda: No-one left behind
& gender mainstreaming
Evaluation : goals and principles
Gender statistics in Information and Communication Technology for Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality Dorothy Okello, Annual.
GENDER STATISTICS IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION
Module 5 SDG follow-up and review mechanisms
Session 4: SDG follow-up and review mechanisms
Objective of the workshop
Radanar Ayar Association
Integrating Gender M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Presentation transcript:

Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies

Session Outline Recap on why gender sensitive M&E is important What is a gender sensitive indicator? How to develop an effective gender sensitive indicator? Practical examples

Why are gender sensitive Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) frameworks important? Why are gender sensitive Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) frameworks important?

Gender Sensitive M&E Implementing gender sensitive M&E systems will help : 1.Determine gendered dimensions of resource access & use 2.Detail project effects on women and men 3.Help strengthen accountability for implementing national, sub-national and local commitments on gender equality 4.Achieve practical benefits for women & progress toward changes in gender relations 5.Lead to more effective & sustainable REDD+ action

How can gender sensitive M&E be achieved? Sex disaggregated data Gender sensitive indicators Gender sensitive M&E

What has an explicit indicator What gets measured What is more likely to get addressed & implemented

What is a gender sensitive indicator?

There are varying aspects which would help result in an indicator to be gender sensitive: 1)Data disaggregated by sex; 2)Gender specific; 3)Implicitly gendered; and 4)Chosen separately by men & women.

What is a gender sensitive indicator? 1.Data disaggregated by sex Data calculated separately for men and women Allows for comparisons to be made Reveals the differential impact & reach of a intervention on men & women (i.e. in relation to a governance practice or capacity building workshop) EXAMPLE: Ratio of number of workshop participants who are men to that of women

What is a gender sensitive indicator? 2.Gender specific Indicator is specifically targeted at women or men In practice, this type of indicator is used to measure the output or outcomes designed to increase women’s empowerment EXAMPLE: Proportion of seats (%) in National Parliament that are reserved for women (Over the course of a certain time period) what is the proportion of senior level positions, within a certain sector, that are held by women?

What is a gender sensitive indicator? 3.Implicitly Gendered Indicator makes no explicit reference to gender terms of women and men. However, if it is interpreted within a broader context, it is clear that the indicator is of particular relevance to women or men. EXAMPLE: Time saving or time increase in collecting & carrying water, fuel, & forest products as a result of a REDD+ intervention or activity

What is a gender sensitive indicator? 4.Chosen by women Often simply reflect differences in men’s & women’s preferences & priorities regarding different aspects of a sector, policy or action. EXAMPLE: Percentage of women who say that they receive adequate information from the national government or sub-national authorities on REDD+ activities that affect them.

How to develop an effective gender sensitive indicator?

Guidance Steps 1)Identify the action & area to be measured 2)Conduct gender analysis at field level – Can be used to help form baseline data 3)Develop gender-sensitive indicators that are objectively (quantitative) & subjectively (qualitatively) verifiable & that meet the following SMART criteria 4)Access – Determine whether data exists or there is a need to collect data & monitor change 5)Monitor the indicator over time, & make corrections if needed.

SMART Criteria Specific. Indicators should be linked to the goal or objective. One indicator per objective is useful. Measurable. Baseline data is used to measure change. This data is disaggregated by sex, socio- economic grouping, age, & ethnicity, & reveals the situation in the project area before intervention. Achievable. Measurements (costs, etc.) & timelines (e.g. project life) are realistic. Data realistic to obtain. Reliable. The same conclusion is yielded if the measurement is carried out: i) with different tools; ii) by different people; iii) in similar circumstances. Time-bound. Ideally, time frames should develop from the project & not be imposed.

Supportive Frameworks 1)Capacity building to promote the effective collection, retrieval, and analyzation of data on gender equality indicators 2)Indicators & data collection developed in a participatory, consultative process with key stakeholders (promotes ownership) – Both women and men should be involved in the process 3)Adequate financial resources 4)Involve women’s organizations & groups, gender focused NGOs, etc., in monitoring activities

Practical Examples

Forest Use & Knowledge Indicators Ratio in amount of land as accessed by women and men, compared to baseline Ratio between the number of hours women & men apply to the management & conservation of forests, compared to baseline Evidence that sex-disaggregated information on women’s and men’s access to & use of forests applied to REDD+ action planning & implementation Number of research activities that involve women in documenting women’s & men’s local knowledge of resource management & changes in resource availability & use

Forest Use & Knowledge Indicators (cont.) Number & percentage of land or house titles or leases provided in the names of women, men, and joint (both spouses) Percentage change in the number of women & men with secure tenure in pilot province areas

Participation Indicators Number & percentage of women & men, as well as representatives from women and gender focused organizations, who attend REDD+ training, by type of training (e.g., benefit sharing, FPIC, grievance mechanisms, NFMS, etc.) Number of training/workshops sessions designed to account for women’s constraints (e.g. safety issues, childcare, women’s only groups, etc.) Number of gender training & awareness sessions with agencies & other stakeholders involved in REDD+ design & implementation; & number and percentage of women & men attending Number of women & men who actively participate in each training/workshops sessions

Benefit Sharing Indicators Number of REDD+ value-chain improvement activities benefiting women & men Percentage of REDD+ benefits (disaggregated by monetary & non-monetary) that reaches women, men, boy & girls Ratio of REDD+ benefits (disaggregated by monetary & non-monetary) that reaches women & men in relation to the percentage of women & men who participate in forest conservation & sustainable management

Decision-making, Finance & Management Number & percentage of women & men employed in REDD+ agencies & as project & field staff Percentage change in the amount of women in management, technical, & professional positions associated with REDD+ action Evidence that REDD+ finance facilities include gender- sensitive guidelines for all funded activities, & employ women & men in REDD+ fund management Percentage of women staff to be invited to & attend relevant REDD+ and REDD+ financial management trainings Percentage of women who are members of the Independent Monitoring Board

Thank You Elizabeth Eggerts