Monitoring Development Projects in a Messy World Guy Sharrock AEA Conference October 28 th, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys MICS3 Regional Training Workshop Data Analysis and Report Writing Workshop Objectives.
Advertisements

H UMANITARIAN R ESPONSE – I NFORMATION M ANAGEMENT.
1. Identify challenges and opportunities using questions that reference the six research for development themes defined in the AAS Program Proposal. This.
FRPA Data Collection, Management and Reporting Defining the Business Requirements RSM Pilot Review Workshop February 2005.
Harnessing the Power of Cross-sectoral Programming to Alleviate HIV/AIDS and Food Insecurity May 30, 2013 Washington, DC Building Savings and Protecting.
Saving lives Real time reporting through SMS INDIA Deepti Pant State Representative - CRS March 30, 2011 ICT4 Development Conference Lusaka, Zambia.
SAFER CITIES MODEL. SAFER CITIES TOOLS SAFER CITIES TRAINING MANUAL AND TOOLKIT Overall development objective is to facilitate effective strategy development.
Improving Program Outcomes: Workshop on Uses of Title II Reporting Requirements Beatrice Lorge Rogers Tufts University TOPS FSN Knowledge Management Workshop.
Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA) FHI Connecticut Ave., NW Washington, DC Tel: Fax:
M&E Issues: RAFIP and REP Kaushik Barua Accra, 12 Dec
Diabetes Prevention Group DPP Curriculum Core Elements: Update July 2005.
Albert Siminyu 1.Design and M&E Manager for World Vision-Sierra Leone (40% of time) Coordinate all design and program development efforts for WVSL. –
Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA) FHI Connecticut Ave., NW Washington, DC Tel: Fax:
Sierra Leone Consortium for Relief and Development (CORAD) CARE Int., AFRICARE, Catholic Relief Services, World Vision Int. Action Plan for Making Monitoring.
Promoting child rights to end child poverty Plan International Typhoon Haiyan Emergency Response Phases November
1 Module 6 Putting It All Together. 2 Learning Objectives At the end of this session participants will understand: The monitoring and evaluation process.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
Food and Nutrition Surveillance and Response in Emergencies Session 14 Data Presentation, Dissemination and Use.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Importance and Uses of Agricultural Statistics Section A 1.
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Food For Peace: Title II Programs and Gender 1 FSN Knowledge Sharing Meeting November 15, 2012 Presented by Michelle Gamber, MA, DrPH AAAS Fellow, FFP.
ActivityInfo Introduction. ActivityInfo? ActivityInfo is an online tool for monitoring humanitarian projects to help humanitarian organizations to: collect.
Overview of UNFPA Mandates and Programme Joint UNHCR/UNFPA Workshop Collaboration on Demographic Data Collection in Emergencies/IDP Situations 7 February.
MARKETS II M&E FRAMEWORK AND CHALLENGES Joseph Obado.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
School of Health Systems and Public Health Monitoring & Evaluation of HIV and AIDS Programs Data Quality Wednesday March 2, 2011 Win Brown USAID/South.
RTQII Indicator Reporting
TANZANIA’S MONITORING SYSTEM: CHALLENGES AND WAY FORWARD BY EKINGO MAGEMBE POVERTY MONITORING OFFICER (MoF-TANZANIA )
21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 1. 21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 2 Family and Community Medicine Department.
Framework and Toolkit for UN Coherence, Effectiveness and Relevance at Country Level: Step 7 – Monitor & Evaluate.
Outcomemapping.ca Complexity and Outcome Harvesting.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
SMART Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transitions.
Breastfeeding rates and practices: Monitoring, evaluation and research gaps.
United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics OG7, Helsinki, Finland October 2012 ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Meta Data 1.
Evaluation of the Center for Irrigation Technology’s Agricultural Pumping Efficiency Program Presentation for the MAESTRO/CALMAC Evaluation Showcase.
Bangladesh Title II Multi Year Assistance Program Program for Strengthening Household Access to Resources (PROSHAR)
Regional Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Centers of Excellence National Coordination Center at the University of Kentucky.
Overview of MBRRR (Market-Based Rapid Response and Recovery) MBRRR Training Session 1.1.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
PRESENTED TO: ENERGY FACILITY CONTRACTORS GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKING GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKSHOP BY: CHRIS CHAVES NSR&D PROGRAM OFFICE OF NUCLEAR.
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Introducing SMILER 1. Why SMILER? Monitoring as the ‘poor relation’ Disconnect between proposal and report contents Projects just not delivering Limited.
Performance Measurement: How Is Data Used in Quality Improvement ? Title I Mental Health Providers Quality Learning Network Quality Learning Network Johanna.
Working to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases Documenting the achievement of elimination as a public health problem GPELF dossier.
1 Module 1 Introduction: The Role of Gender in Monitoring and Evaluation.
Impact Assessment Seminar Phnom Penh, 2-6 December 2013 Ulrike Last, living & working from Nairobi WHY? Share, learn, represent SCS, participate 2 future.
Session 6: Data Flow, Data Management, and Data Quality.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
LESSONS LEARNT FROM THE GFCS ON DISSEMINATING CIS TO SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN MALAWI AND TANZANIA Jeanne Coulibaly ICRAF/CGIAR "The Last Mile" workshop organized.
Module 3: Ensuring Sustainability Session 1. Empowerment of the Community 1 CBDRR Framework Training - Myanmar Red Cross Society.
W. Schiessl, AGRI E.II.4 Programme management and institutions involved in monitoring and evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Plan
Project monitoring and evaluation
Computerized Systems in Clinical Research
UKES Annual Conference
Using Data Effectively
Arif Rashid, FFP M&E Team Lead
FAO South Sudan Juba, November 2017
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
A method for making results data more searchable and usable
RRI Baseline and Endline
Integrating Gender M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa
Mainstreaming Climate Change Adaptation
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring Development Projects in a Messy World Guy Sharrock AEA Conference October 28 th, 2012

Why monitoring? Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5 Lots going on in between ‘deep-dive’ evaluations! BaselineMonitoringImpact

Outline 1. Monitoring approach 2. Project illustration 3. Challenges to monitoring in a complex ecology

SMILER Simple Measurement of Indicators and Learning from Evidence-based Reports

Overview

Process and Products Coaching session Selected participants Draft M&E system M&E Ops Manual Documentation manager ICT4D integration

Malawi: Food Security Project, FY Title II (food assisted) program Nine consortium partners Multi-year and multi-$m Multiple program areas each with multiple interventions Overlap with PEPFAR program

Malawi: Indicators reported to USAID/FFP Data GatheringNumber of ‘Indicator Performance Tracking Table’ indicators Surveys (baseline, endline)22 Annual Survey (collects 15 indicators common to the baseline and endline surveys) ‘Routine’ monitoring18 Total Indicators reported to USAID/FFP40

Malawi: Indicators used by project management Program areasIndicators for internal use only Indicators for FFP (and internal) use Indicators in the PVO indicator tracking table Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition Conservation Agriculture426 Irrigation415 Livestock505 Village Savings and Loans527 Agribusiness628 Disaster Risk Reduction033 Food Distribution213 Other ‘Cross Cutting’347 TOTAL531871

Malawi: overall Upside Routine Monitoring System – Data flow maps – Data gathering forms and report formats (with instructions) Monitoring tools – Data Quality Assessment – Quality Improvement Verification Checklist Assessments and evaluations – Baseline and final survey – Mid-term evaluation – Annual surveys Information and Communication Technology – Excellent database for beneficiary numbers and PVO indicator tracking table indicators – Piloting DataWinners mobile solution for monitoring HH hunger Downside Hard Covers – Missing information – Quality – Inconsistent, though some good work being done Reports – Not always verifiable – Missing information – Timeliness PVO – Filing system – Organization

Monitoring in a complex ecology Project monitoring impacted by… Relationships that support monitoring Relevance of monitoring Responsibilities for monitoring

Final thoughts In a complex operating environment… 1.Good evaluative project monitoring presents an opportunity to learn 2.Even more vital to have a coherent approach to monitoring 3.Setting-up monitoring is more than just ‘technical’ 4.Establish structures and processes to provide continuity and navigate complexity 5.Monitor the monitoring system