RECOVER Role/Science Guidance during Design, Construction and Implementation Phases RECOVER Science Meeting March 1, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Concepts based upon March 5, 2004 paper prepared by the Action Committee and presented by Corinne Brooks.
Advertisements

County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 1 Provide Policy Direction on Scope of ASR EIR Item 16 March 21, 2005 Regular Meeting Staff Contact: Henrietta.
Watershed Approaches and Community Based Planning
US Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division Northwestern Division 1 System Flood Control Review: Regional Agency Review Briefing Lonnie Mettler Northwestern.
Bureau of Land Management Regulations Washington State Association of Counties Cooperating Agency & Coordination Training November 22, 2013 – Vancouver,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Vertical Team Roles & Responsibilities Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
The decision box represents key management decisions and serve as the GATES which delineate phases. The decision can be to proceed, exit, or recycle. More.
CERP Guidance Memorandum
AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
IS&T Project Management: Project Management 101 June, 2006.
Transportation Management Plan Overview. TMP Overview2 Is that the impression people have?
© 2008 Prentice Hall11-1 Introduction to Project Management Chapter 11 Managing Project Execution Information Systems Project Management: A Process and.
Project Execution.
US Army Corps of Engineers PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG ® Project Planning with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Presenter Name Presenter Title.
Software Evolution Planning CIS 376 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board on Status of the FCSA July 12, 2013 Central Valley Integrated Flood Management Study.
Project Management Process Overview
PMP® Exam Preparation Course
Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Regional Technical Forum End-use Load Shape Business Case Project Project Initiation Meeting Portland, OR March 5, 2012.
1 CERP – PDT WORKSHOP COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN April 2002 Project Implementation Reports.
Acme Basin B Discharge Public Workshop May 22, 2002 COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
Unit 8:COOP Plan and Procedures  Explain purpose of a COOP plan  Propose an outline for a COOP plan  Identify procedures that can effectively support.
Centro de Estudos e Sistemas Avançados do Recife PMBOK - Chapter 4 Project Integration Management.
Defining Everglades Restoration Success* *i.e., “millions of crayfish” COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN John C. Ogden, Chief Scientist, Everglades.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Transportation Management Plan Overview. TMP Overview2 Is that the impression people have?
EXPLORING RECREATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AT THE PICAYUNE WOOD TREATING SITE Michele Mahoney, EPA TIFSD.
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 1 Confirm Scope of Work and Description for MPWMD ASR Project Item 13 April 18, 2005 Regular Meeting Staff.
Lecture 11 Managing Project Execution. Project Execution The phase of a project in which work towards direct achievement of the project’s objectives and.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
NCHRP Study (30) Performance Measures for Context Sensitive Solutions – A Guidebook for State DOTs As presented by Sally Oldham at the 2005 Midwest.
Programmatic Regulations PDT Workshop COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN April 18, 2002.
US Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation US Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division One Corps.
Welcome to Session 3 – Project Management Process Overview
Subcommittee on Design New Strategies for Cost Estimating Research on Cost Estimating and Management NCHRP Project 8-49 Annual Meeting Orlando, Florida.
Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan Web evergladesplan.org.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
DOE Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Conference Knoxville, TN August 24-27, 2009 Colette Broussard, DOE-HQ Office of Quality Assurance Policy.
S&I Standards Organization Engagement & Communication Plan DRAFT Standards Support Team 1 September 2011.
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Key Steps to Delivering Project 1.Lead agency submits final project scope, budget and schedule to MTC 2.MTC.
Erv Gasser Natural Resource Specialist nps Baer Field Manager National Interagency BAER Team Leader - North team National Park Service, Seattle, Wa BAER.
WMO WMO INTEGRATED GLOBAL OBSERVING SYSTEM (WIGOS) STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION (Dr S. Barrell, Chair, ICG-WIGOS) WMO; OBS.
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Company: Cincinnati Insurance Company Position: IT Governance Risk & Compliance Service Manager Location: Fairfield, OH About the Company : The Cincinnati.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
US Army Corps of Engineers Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan Master Recreation Plan.
US Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento DistrictIntroductionIntroduction Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Phase II Supplemental Authorization –
Date Planning for Compliance with the Final 316(b) Phase II Regulations For APPA – March 8, 2004 David E. Bailey EPRIsolutions.
The Central Everglades Planning Process DOI Team Briefing November 14, 2011 November 14, National Research Council CISRERP Update 5 th Biennial.
Report Performance Monitor & Control Risk Administer Procurement MONITORING & CONTROLLING PROCESS.
Team-Based Development ISYS321 Managing the Information Systems Project.
RECOVER PDT Workshop COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN April 18, 2002.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
Using indicators for program management and program assessment Draft framework with examples Donna Podger (916)
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
Determinations / verifications under JI – Experience to date UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, February 13 th, 2007 For the benefit.
Agenda Item #10 Revised Process for State Expenditure Plan and Approval of Next Steps Doug Robison, PWS Gulf Consortium Meeting April 21, 2016 Hillsborough.
Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Information Presentation to YBFEPT July.
ISO Session 3 Environmental Management and Ethics in Management.
STUDY TITLE Presenter Name Presenter Title Duty Location
COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN
Presentation transcript:

RECOVER Role/Science Guidance during Design, Construction and Implementation Phases RECOVER Science Meeting March 1, 2016

BUILDING STRONG ® 2 Presentation Outline  Purpose  RECOVER’s Mission and Goals  RECOVER Role During Project Implementation  CERP Monitoring  RECOVER Task  Draft RECOVER/Project Implementation Process

BUILDING STRONG ® 3 REstoration, COordination and VERification (RECOVER)  Provides the science behind the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP)  Determines if the goals and objectives of CERP are being met  Identifies unanticipated results and potential remedies for consideration  Coordinates the results of evaluations and assessments  Communicates scientific information to support decision-making  Three Major Components Planning - integrating RECOVER with planning and operation of the system Evaluation - forecasting project performance through predictive modeling and performance measures Assessment - measuring performance of projects through research and monitoring

RECOVER/PDT Interactions - Formulation 4 Identify TSP Plan Formulation and Evaluation Develop Base Conditions and Models Prepare PMP PIR Kick-Off Initial Alternative Plans Final Array Alternative Plans Draft PIR IPR FSM PAL AFB Develop existing and without project conditions Develop project performance measures Design Selected Plan Develop Monitoring Plan Develop Operating Plan Issues & Recomm. IPR Draft CAR Pre-Application Conference RECOVER PMP Input 1 RECOVER Overview Presentation 2 RECOVER Regional Evaluation Presentation RECOVER Monitoring Plan Presentation 7 6 System-wide Modeling Assumptions 3 RECOVER Performance Measures Presentation 4 RECOVER Performance Measures Consistency Review 5 RECOVER Review of Monitoring Plan RECOVER Input to Draft Operating Manual RECOVER Evaluation of Alternative Plans RECOVER Assist in System-wide Benefits Analysis 9 8 RECOVER/PDT Interactions - Formulation RECOVER Always Provides Key – Input Established in Plan Formulation : RECOVER Provides if requested by the PDT

BUILDING STRONG ® 5 RECOVER’s Role During Implementation  Little guidance on how RECOVER provides assistance to projects during implementation  Project-level monitoring plans relied heavily on the RECOVER MAP to cover the required project-level monitoring  Changes to the MAP and other agency monitoring programs since the beginning of CERP  With additional information, assumptions of the project- level monitoring plans have changed  Adaptive Management Plans are now required for projects

BUILDING STRONG ® 6 CERP Monitoring Monitoring and Assessment Plan (MAP)  Assess the status of the Everglades ecosystem  ~35 monitoring components Ecological, biological, water quality Within and cross-regional monitoring Leverages monitoring from other agencies  Refined through the CERP Adaptive Management (AM) Program  Provide a method of summarizing of ecosystem changes as they relate to CERP goals and objectives Identify major unanticipated findings Project-level Monitoring  Project-specific, smaller scale

BUILDING STRONG ® 7 RECOVER Task – Work in Progress  Part of the RECOVER 5-Year Plan  Develop a process for the interaction between the project teams and RECOVER for the implementation phase of the project  Identify the value-added for each interaction  This will include the monitoring, data analysis, data storage and reporting  Look at existing guidance and develop a new process that will be vetted by RECOVER, the project team and upper management  Develop a CERP Guidance memorandum

Interim Operating Manual Project-level Monitoring (over the life of the project) BCOE ReviewDesign Scoping Water Quality Certification Site Survey Final Project Operating Manual Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) Value Engineering (VE) Study Ecological Proposed – For Discussion Purposes RECOVER’s Role in CERP Project Implementation 8 Incorporation of project monitoring into RECOVER Assessments and Reporting RECOVER review of analysis for ecological monitoring of operational testing phase, if applicable Construction Monitoring Water Quality Hydro- meteorological Adaptive Management OMRR&R RECOVER coordination with the project Project Author ization DRAFT March 2016 Required RECOVER Input RECOVER – REstoration, COordination and VERification MAP – Monitoring and Assessment Plan BCOE - Biddability, Constructability, Operability, and Environmental Review OMRR&R – Operation and Maintenance, Repair, Replacement and Rehabilitation Adaptive Management over the life of the project Project/ RECOVER Communi- cation Begins (varies depending on project) Optional RECOVER Input or Situational Awareness Crosswalk with MAP/Review Monitoring Plan 3 1 RECOVER involvement in PED and/or VE Study 2 4 Ecological Project Manager communicates with RECOVER as needed Transfer to Sponsor Key Acronyms

Congressional Authorization is the trigger point for REstoration, COordination and VERification (RECOVER) to begin coordination with the project team during project implementation that includes design, construction, and Operation and Maintenance, Repair, Replacement and Rehabilitation (OMRR&R) phases. Project and RECOVER communication begins – RECOVER will provide a point of contact to assist the technical team as the project features are refined during design. RECOVER involvement in Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) and/or the Value Engineering (VE) Study – RECOVER will provide information on location of construction features and lessons learned from prior project implementation or Monitoring and Assessment Plan (MAP) monitoring that may be applicable to design. RECOVER point of contact will be involved in the VE Study to ensure optimum project benefits in response to new information and adaptive management options. Crosswalk of the Project-level monitoring plans with the MAP to ensure coordination of project-level and system-wide monitoring to ensure project monitoring needs are covered, restoration success identified, RECOVER monitoring can be leveraged as baseline monitoring prior to project implementation (project design and construction schedule), and adaptive management (AM) plan can be implemented. Interim Operating Manual - RECOVER review of analysis of ecological monitoring of operational testing phase, if applicable (i.e., Modified Waters Delivery incremental testing). Construction Monitoring – Ecological Project Manager (Picayune Strand example) communicates with RECOVER to ensure construction ecological/ecosystem performance issues are addressed. Project-level Monitoring – Incorporation of project monitoring into RECOVER assessments and reporting RECOVER input on Project Adaptive Management Plan Implementation – Key Uncertainties, Management Option Matrices, etc. Evaluate project performance to maximize restoration results through AM of operations and when/how to move forward with phases of project construction Close communication with the project biologist to be aware of anything unexpected or changes that could be addressed through AM RECOVER to coordinate with project when drafting the System Status Report (SSR) to incorporate project-level monitoring RECOVER to check in with the project two times a year to look at adaptive management actions Data Management and Reporting – Quality Assurance and Oversight Team (QAOT) to coordinate data management Projects report in the South Florida Environmental Report (SFER) RECOVER reports in the SSR Communication between RECOVER and the project teams Consistency review Final Project Operating Manual – RECOVER coordination with the project and input with results of monitoring and assessments OMRR&R –Adaptive management of the system over the life of the project – how is this done? DRAFT RECOVER’s Role in CERP Project Implementation Required RECOVER Input Optional RECOVER Input or Situational Awareness

BUILDING STRONG ® 10 Next Steps  Receive input from RECOVER and project team members  Receive input from management  Develop a CERP Guidance memorandum

BUILDING STRONG ® 11 Questions?