Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kentucky Teacher Internship Program: Teacher Performance Assessment (TPA) Career and Technical Education Session November 18, :00 – 6:00 pm.
Advertisements

Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
The Road to Powerful Instructional Practice Through the 5D+™ Teacher Evaluation Rubric Alaska Staff Development Network April 10, 2013 Copyright © 2013.
Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?
LEARNING CENTERED CONFERENCING USING THE CEL FRAMEWORK NICK HEDMAN AND PATTY HOWARD.
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
5D+ Teacher Evaluation Model Professional Learning Phase 1
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
EVIDENCE WITH 5D+ FOR FITNESS/HEALTH, PERFORMING ARTS, CTE AND SPECIAL EDUCATION STACEY KRUMSICK, ICFFS DEBBIE LINDGREN & MARTY NEYMAN-HEALTH & FITNESS.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
CFI: Quality Review Institute Division of Accountability and Achievement Resources Division of School Support August-September 2009 Network Leaders’ Guide.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
Dr. Lorraine Boyle Bemidji State University Bemidji, MN Standards Aligned Curriculum Drive Authentic Tasks Measured through Assessment Processes Presented.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Strategies for Implementing the 5D+ Purpose and Student Engagement Dimensions in the Classroom Hosted by Julie Milder.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
+ The continuum Summative assessment Next steps. Gallery Walk – the Bigger Picture Take one post it of each of the 3 colours. Walk around a look at the.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Peer Observation & Connecting to the Kentucky Framework for Teaching.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
 Sign In and find your assigned table  Enjoy breakfast items  You will NOT need a computer until much later  Be ready to share at 9 a.m. a check for.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Mission The Center for Educational Leadership (CEL) is dedicated to eliminating the achievement gap that continues to divide our nation’s children along.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
KLA - ISLN Updates January Introducing the Content Specialists.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Auburn School District Student Growth Goals June
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
1 Instructional Framework & Teacher Evaluation. 2 Welcome Name School, Assignment, Years in Education One thing you are hoping to get out of today!
CEL5D+ Teacher Panel Tips and tricks for a successful first year. ASD CEL5D+ Training1.
SCRIPTING, CODING, & FINAL EVALUATION. SCRIPTING What is Scripting? Captures what is happening as it unfolds in real time What Does it Look Like When.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Evaluation Updates.
State Board of Education Progress Update
Unfilled Positions FWEA Meeting March 18, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D Day 2

Learning Targets Develop an understanding of how the 5D instructional framework and the 5D+ rubric connect. Develop an understanding of how the Cycle of Inquiry enhances my evaluation.

Success Criteria I can describe key ideas that connect dimensions to indicators within and across the 5D framework and 5D+ rubric. I can describe the Cycle of Inquiry and how it enhances my final evaluation. .

Review of Day 1 CEL 5D Framework CEL 5D + Rubric Performance Indicators Vision Statements & Guiding Questions Guide for lesson planning Reflection Lesson debrief w/administrator CEL 5D + Rubric Dimensions Classroom Environment & Culture Professional Collaboration & Communication Subdimensions Indicators & Indicator Numbers Performance Levels Progressive Performance Language Take out the rubric and the framework card Review: CEL Framework: The performance indicators are…and where they are located on the framework Vision statement and guiding questions purpose of it CEL 5D+ The plus is to add criterions 7&8. (purple) CEL is an instructional framework— 7&8 are outside of the classroom — evidence teacher provides to administrators CEL had to write to meet the state requirements performance language— refer to glossary when possible to ground everyone in the same language/understanding

Cycle of Inquiry Teacher and Administrator roles

Learning Targets Develop an understanding of how the 5D instructional framework and the 5D+ rubric connect. Develop an understanding of how the Cycle of Inquiry enhances my evaluation.

Success Criteria I can describe key ideas that connect dimensions to indicators within and across the 5D framework and 5D+ rubric. I can describe the Cycle of Inquiry and how it enhances my final evaluation.

Cycle of Inquiry SELF-ASSESS: Teacher self-assesses to identify an area of focus. PRE-INQUIRY CONFERENCE: Teacher and principal engage in a pre-inquiry conference. Based on the responses in the self-assessment, what is your area of focus? What kind of evidence will you collect? IMPLEMENTATION & SUPPORT: Teacher and principal engage in study and learning around area of focus. POST-INQUIRY CONFERENCE: Teacher and principal engage in a post-inquiry conference. Based on your inquiry, what did you learn about your practice as it impacts student learning? Here is the overview of the inquiry cycle. You’ll notice that it still has the same four steps, but Step 3 has been re-named to better capture what actually happens in that step. self assessment does not have to be turned in— but admin will mostly like be asking about strengths/challenges/areas for growth— this tool will help focus/guide that conversation

5D+ Inquiry Cycle Same inquiry cycle in graphic form. POST-INQUIRY CONFERENCE: Teacher and principal engage in a post-inquiry conference. Based on your inquiry, what did you learn about your practice as it impacts student learning? SELF-ASSESS: Teacher self-assesses to identify an area of focus. Same inquiry cycle in graphic form. note: that Step 3 is larger and again, name change- this is the heart of the work PRE-INQUIRY CONFERENCE: Teacher and principal engage in a pre-inquiry conference. Based on the responses in the self-assessment, what is your area of focus? What kind of evidence will you collect? IMPLEMENTATION & SUPPPORT: Teacher and principal engage in study and learning around area of focus.

Dimension Groups Group by color Get into various table groups by colors as designated on your stickers. Each table will need Chart paper and Markers Each Color is assigned a dimension Red – Student Engagement Yellow – Curriculum & Pedagogy Green – Assessment Blue – Purpose

Evidences Brainstorm Evidence Walk Collaborate with table group strategies/techniques used in you use that provide evidence for your dimension. Chart 2 or 3 evidences for each indicator. Evidence Walk Need rubric, sticky notes, pen/pencil In your groups you will spend 5 minutes at each dimension chart discussing the evidences posted. Add additional evidences with sticky notes Assign remaining dimensions (Curriculum & Pedagogy, Student Engagement, Purpose, and Assessment) to table groups. Have groups use chart paper to list evidences for indicators. Post Charts Evidence Walk – As table groups, have them visit each dimension. Teachers should read charts, discuss evidences/strategies listed and add evidences/strategies from their classroom with sticky notes.

10 Minute Break

Why Self Assess? Self-Assess State law requires that every teacher complete a self assessment each fall on the criterion they will be evaluated on The self assessment starts a conversation about strengths and the potential areas for professional growth for that year

Self-Assess Highlight Start at basic. Pay attention to frequency words, and, or, teacher, student, commas, etc. Highlight where you think you are in your practice Teachers will need their rubric and their framework. Go through the entire rubric and self-assess where they are in their individual practice. If they need to revisit charts for evidences they do that. Have them highlight where they feel they are in their practice for each indicator.

Pre-Inquiry Goals Student Growth Data Pre-lesson Conversation Video (11 min) Summarize Conversation Nested Goals 8-6-3 sub group = 2+ a subgroup within a whole class that connects to building goals data: pre-assess/2 formatives assess/post assess data tracking: ideas- excel spreadsheet, grade book downloaded to excel

Student Growth Student Growth Data must be relevant to the teacher and subject matter and must be based on multiple measures and shall mean the change in student achievement between two points in time within the current school year, or as agreed upon by the teacher and the evaluator. Assessments used to demonstrate growth should predominately originate at the classroom level and be initiated by the classroom teacher. Assessments used to demonstrate growth must be appropriate, relevant, and may include both formative and summative measures.

Student Growth Goal Setting The teacher and principal will meet to discuss Student Growth Goal Setting prior to a goal being selected. The teacher shall choose a student growth goal for Components SG - 3.1, SG – 6.1, and SG – 8.1 on a Goal Setting form. The goal for SG – 6.1 and SG – 8.1 may be the same goal. Preferably, the goal(s) shall be mutually agreed upon by the teacher and the evaluator.

Implementation & Support Observation Scripting (handout) Coding Noticing/ Wondering Analyzing Feedback Conversation Noticings/ Wonderings Reflecting Student Work Share Collaborative Work Support/ Resources scripting is facts—non judgmental The teacher did… The students did… what’s written and said Wonderings should be answered in feedback conversation

Post Inquiry CEL 5D+ Rubric Conference (December- January) and (March-April) What did you learn about your practice andits impact on student learning? Analyze student growth data CEL 5D+ Rubric Formatively in December – January Review goals – change if needed Summative in March - April

1 Hour

Breakout Sessions Red Dots go to MLC Music Room or AHS Room 201 Student Growth Yellow dots go to MLC Classroom C or AHS Room 203 Comprehensive Evals, Focused Evals & Pivot Green dots go to MLC Classroom D/AHS Room 228 Mid-Year Formative Feedback, Final Evaluation, Scripting & Coding Blue dots go to MLC Classroom E/AHS Business Ed Room Teacher Panel Rotation #1: Red dot (or #1)’s go to Messiah Music Room (or when at AHS room 201) for Student Growth Mini-Session Yellow dots (or #2)’s go to Messiah Classroom C (or when at AHS room 203) for Comprehensive, Focused Evals & Pivot Mini-Session Green dots (or #3)’s  go to Messiah Classroom D (or when at AHS room 228) for MidYear Formative Feedback/Final Evaluation/Scripting & Coding Mini-Session Blue dots (or #4)’s go to Messiah Classroom E (or when at AHS room Business Ed) for Teacher Panel Mini-Session Rotation #2: Blue dots (or #4)’s go to Messiah Music Room (or when at AHS room 201) for Student Growth Mini-Session Red dot (or #1)’s go to Messiah Classroom C (or when at AHS room 203) for Comprehensive, Focused Evals & Pivot Mini-Session Yellow dots (or #2)’s go to Messiah Classroom D (or when at AHS room 228) for MidYear Formative Feedback/Final Evaluation/Scripting & Coding Mini-Session Green dots (or #3)’s  go to Messiah Classroom E (or when at AHS room Business Ed) for Teacher Panel Mini-Session Rotation #3: Green dots (or #3)’s go to Messiah Music Room (or when at AHS room 201) for Student Growth Mini-Session Blue dots (or #4)’s go to Messiah Classroom C (or when at AHS room 203) for Comprehensive, Focused Evals & Pivot Mini-Session Red dot (or #1)’s go to Messiah Classroom D (or when at AHS room 228) for MidYear Formative Feedback/Final Evaluation/Scripting & Coding Mini-Session Yellow dots (or #2)’s go to Messiah Classroom E (or when at AHS room Business Ed) for Teacher Panel Mini-Session Rotation #4: Yellow dots (or #2)’s go to Messiah Music Room (or when at AHS room 201) for Student Growth Mini-Session Green dots (or #3)’s go to Messiah Classroom C (or when at AHS room 203) for Comprehensive, Focused Evals & Pivot Mini-Session Blue dots (or #4)’s go to Messiah Classroom D (or when at AHS room 228) for MidYear Formative Feedback/Final Evaluation/Scripting & Coding Mini-Session Red dot (or #1)’s go to Messiah Classroom E (or when at AHS room Business Ed) for Teacher Panel Mini-Session

10 Minute Break between session 2 and 3

Learning Targets Develop an understanding of how the 5D instructional framework and the 5D+ rubric connect. Develop an understanding of how the Cycle of Inquiry enhances my evaluation.

Success Criteria I can describe key ideas that connect dimensions to indicators within and across the 5D framework and 5D+ rubric. I can describe the Cycle of Inquiry and how it enhances my final evaluation.

What’s Next Evaluation/Clock Hour Forms Booster Sessions

Final Questions