1 Error study of non-scaling FFAG 10 to 20 GeV muon ring Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 July, 2006 ffag/machida_20060726.ppt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of Resonance Crossing in FFAG Masamitsu Aiba (KEK) Contents 1.Introduction 2.Crossing experiment at PoP FFAG 3.Crossing experiment at HIMAC synchrotron.
Advertisements

1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Main Linac Simulation - Main Linac Alignment Tolerances - From single bunch effect ILC-MDIR Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO References: TESLA TDR ILC-TRC-2.
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
1 Dejan Trbojevic EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, Virginia May 19, 2008 Dejan Trbojevic e-RHIC with non-scaling FFAG’s.
FFAG Workshop 2005 Dejan Trbojevic April 3, 2005 Electron model lattice with added edge focusing  Introduction:  Rick Baartman : “Spiral focusing slides”
Resonance crossing and error tolerances Shinji Machida KEK FFAG05 at Fermilab, April 3-7, 2005.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
FFAG Workshopfermilab April 2005 f Summary: FFAG WORKSHOP nonscaling electron model muon FFAGs C. Johnstone Fermilab.
1 Tracking code development for FFAGs S. Machida ASTeC/RAL 21 October, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
FFAG-ERIT R&D 06/11/06 Kota Okabe (Kyoto Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
1 Muon Acceleration and FFAG II Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC NuFact06 Summer School August 20-21, 2006.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
Scaling VFFAG eRHIC Design Progress Report 4 July 15, 2013Stephen Brooks, eRHIC FFAG meeting1.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
1 Muon acceleration - amplitude effects in non-scaling FFAG - Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 April, ffag/machida_ ppt.
1 Dynamic aperture of non-scaling FFAG with sextupole Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 21 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
An ultra-low emittance lattices for Iranian Light Source Facility storage ring Esmaeil Ahmadi On behalf of beam dynamics group Iranian Light Source Facility.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
ML (BC) Studies update Nikolay Solyak Arun Saini.
ERHIC Orbit Correction Studies (Minor Update) Using Oct’14 lattice and dispersion diagnostic January 5, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC FFAG meeting1.
“2:1” Scaled eRHIC FFAG Design Featuring ≤30T/m quadrupoles August 18, 2014Stephen Brooks, eRHIC FFAG meeting1.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Suzie Sheehy DPhil Candidate, John Adams Institute 3/9/08 PAMELA lattice studies Dynamics of the Machida lattice.
Analysis of Garren’s 27-Jul-2011 Hybrid Synchrotron Lattice J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting February 2,
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
FFAG 4-Bend Injection Line into EMMA C. Johnstone, Fermilab EMMA phone conference July 24, 2007.
Dejan Trbojevic, September 21, 2009International Workshop on FFAG09 - Fermilab 1 Dejan Trbojevic Crossing Resonances In a Non-scaling FFAG.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Alex.
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
Nonscaling FFAG design and EMMA experiment
Zgoubi tracking study of the decay ring
eRHIC FFAG Lattice Design
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Preservation and Control of Ion Polarization in MEIC
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Muon Acceleration in a Neutrino Factory
The new 7BA design of BAPS
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
JLEIC Weekly R&D Meeting
First results of proton spin tracking in a figure-8 ring
Status of Proton & Deuteron Spin Tracking in Racetrack Booster
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Presentation transcript:

1 Error study of non-scaling FFAG 10 to 20 GeV muon ring Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 July, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf

2 Definition of errors Alignment error –Horizontal and vertical directions. No longitudinal or tilt. –Assume each QD and QF are on a single support table. QD and QF are aligned (or misaligned) together. –Alignment errors produce additional dipole kicks. Gradient error –Random errors of quadrupole strength. –Gradient errors produce additional quadrupole kicks. Distribution of both errors is Gaussian and there is a cut at 2 sigma. Use 40 seeds to see statistics.

3 Tracking conditions Constant energy gain (independent of RF phase) per turn is assumed to avoid time of flight variation due to transverse amplitude. 10 to 20 GeV acceleration is finished in 17 turns. 30 pi mm emittance in horizontal and vertical (ellipsoidal in 4-D). Distribution of 500 macro particles is Waterbag. Nominal initial dp/p and phase spread are assumed.

4 Initial matching Assume the distortion of beta functions are small. Particle distribution is matched unperturbed lattice function. To make sure the above assumption is reasonable, choose the initial tune away from half-integer resonance. Initial momentum is [GeV/c] in the present study.

5 Note on initial matching Results presented at EPAC06 assumed initial momentum at either 9.9 or 10 [GeV/c]. Tunes of both momentum is very close to an integer and initial matching was bad. With proper matching (present study), effects of errors are reduced. Result presented at EPAC06 when only alignment error exists. Those are improved with proper matching.

6 Loss criterion At every cell, calculate amplitude (single particle emittance) of each macro particle. If the amplitude is more than 45 pi mm (1.5 times of the initial emittance), the particle is regarded as lost. The “phase space collimation” concept was introduced by Meot.

7 Tracking results (1) only alignment error No beam loss at 20  m (rms) or below. 50  m (rms) may be tolerable.

8 Tracking results (2) only gradient error No beam loss at dG/G=2 x (rms) or below. dG/G= 5 x (rms) may be tolerable.

9 Tracking results (3) gradient error with some alignment error Two kinds of errors seem to be added, not multiplied. 20  m (rms) 0  m (rms) 50  m (rms) 10  m (rms)

10 Summary In 10 to 20 GeV/c muon ring, –Alignment error should be 20 to 50  m (rms). –Gradient error should be dG/G= 2 to 5 x (rms) Requirement of gradient error may be a bit hard.