Guidelines for OLGA 2000 Slugtracking

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Operating Functions.
Advertisements

Operating the Harmonizer
Process Control: Designing Process and Control Systems for Dynamic Performance Chapter 6. Empirical Model Identification Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013.
Nathan N. Lafferty, Martin L. deBertodano,
Choking Due To Friction The theory here predicts that for adiabatic frictional flow in a constant area duct, no matter what the inlet Mach number M1 is,
Liquid Loading Current Status, New Models and Unresolved Questions
REMOTE MEASUREMENT OF STRESS IN FERROMAGNETIC PIPELINES Motivation Ageing global pipeline infrastructure Non-invasive, remote, pipeline integrity assessment.
Experiment 8 : Minor Losses
Two Phase Pipeline Part I
Two-Phase Flow Boiling Heat Transfer P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Selection of Optimal Parameters for Healthy and Safe Furnace.
Two-Phase Flow in Vertical Wells Notes to Accompany Week 5 Lab—Vertical Two-Phase Flow Multi-Phase Flow in Wells (see also PPS Ch. 7, pp 184 onward)
Flow scheme of gas extraction from solids Chapter 3 Supercritical Fluid Extraction from Solids.
Foam Flow Meeting, Jul.9th, New Comprehensive Equation to Predict Liquid Loading Shu Luo The University of Tulsa.
Two Phase Flow Modeling Prepared by: Tan Nguyen Two Phase Flow Modeling – PE 571 Chapter 3: Slug Flow Modeling Dukler and Hubbard – Horizontal Pipes.
Step 1: Set the desired flow rate for each pipe. Step 2: Click on the stream which you wish to size the pipe. Select Sizing from the menu, then select.
1 Numerical Hydraulics W. Kinzelbach with Marc Wolf and Cornel Beffa Lecture 4: Computation of pressure surges continued.
UNICAMP THE HEIGHT OF LIQUID METHOD FOR FREE SURFACE FLOWS Flow simulations of real processes often involve fluids that are separated by a sharp interface.
:By GROUP : Abdul-Majeed et.al
1 Flow Assurance Multiphase Simulations with Wax Deposition FLOWModel R.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering AguaRed.
Stabilization of Desired Flow Regimes in Pipelines
Example of SIMONE Network Manager Integration Plinacro project description.
AccuMax Multi-Point Injection Mechanics
Two Phase Flow Modeling Prepared by: Tan Nguyen Two Phase Flow Modeling – PE 571 Chapter 3: Stratified Flow Modeling For Horizontal and Slightly Inclined.
Fuel Induction Systems for SI Engines
PFR design. Accounting for pressure drop Chemical Reaction Engineering I Aug Dec 2011 Dept. Chem. Engg., IIT-Madras.
Isothermal Reactor Design – Part 2
Valves In Industry (Part 3).
RTD and FLOWs at steady and pulsatile flow in systemic circulation
1 CREL meeting 2004 CFD Simulation of Fisher-Tropsch Synthesis in Slurry Bubble Column By Andrey Troshko Prepared by Peter Spicka Fluent Inc. 10 Cavendish.
Mechanistic Modeling and CFD Simulations of Oil-Water Dispersions in Separation Components Mechanistic Modeling and CFD Simulations of Oil-Water Dispersions.
Lecture 2 Single Phase Flow Concepts
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
In the name of god Flow assurance with OLGA By: Hassan Taziki
MSc and BSc projects for 2005/2006 Supervisor: Rune W. Time These projects are mainly intended for MSc thesis work, but may be simplified to BSc thesis.
Design Steps for Intake & Exhaust Systems
Characteristics of Two-phase Flows in Vertical Pipe
J1879 Robustness Validation Hand Book A Joint SAE, ZVEI, JSAE, AEC Automotive Electronics Robustness Validation Plan The current qualification and verification.
Valves In Industry (Part 3)
HYDRAULICS of steady and pulsatile flow in systemic circulation Motivation Experimental techniques for measurement pressure and flowrate How to calculate.
January 23, Inception of Liquid Loading Foam Flow Ayantayo Ajani The University of Tulsa.
Experimental and numerical studies on the bonfire test of high- pressure hydrogen storage vessels Prof. Jinyang Zheng Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang.
Lecture Objectives -Finish Particle dynamics modeling -See some examples of particle tracking -Eulerian Modeling -Define deposition velocity -Fluid Dynamics.
CUE – Make Any Pump an E-Pump
Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) CSCE 774 – Guest Lecture Dr. Gabriel Terejanu Fall 2015.
NUMERICAL MODEL FOR THE PREDICTION OF FLUID PRODUCTION AND GAS CONSUPTION OF GAS CHAMBER PUMPS PDVSA INTEVEP Fall 2001 ASME/API Gas Lift Workshop Aberdeen.
Transient multiphase flow modelling
Multiple Species Chapter 7. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Objectives The FLOTRAN multiple species capabilities. Dilute mixture option.
Stabilizing control and controllability:
Flow of Compressible Fluids. Definition A compressible flow is a flow in which the fluid density ρ varies significantly within the flowfield. Therefore,
CFD Simulation Investigation of Natural Gas Components through a Drilling Pipe RASEL A SULTAN HOUSSEMEDDINE LEULMI.
Dead Time Compensation (Smith Predictor)
Chapter 10: Flows, Pumps, and Piping Design
CFD Simulation & Consulting Services Hi-Tech CFD | Voice: Optimizing Designs of Industrial Pipes, Ducts and.
Isothermal Reactor Design – Part 2
Multiphase pipe flows Physical phenomena Modelling approaches.
Waldemar Janicki, Adam Adamkowski
Natural Gas Processing I Chapter 2 In-feed System
John Edwards, P&I Design Ltd
Presented by Harry C. Elinsky, Jr. Filtech, Inc.
Modeling and experimental study of coupled porous/channel flow
CHAPTER 6 Viscous Flow in Pipes
J1879 Robustness Validation Hand Book A Joint SAE, ZVEI, JSAE, AEC Automotive Electronics Robustness Validation Plan Robustness Diagram Trends and Challenges.
MEK 4450 Stratified flow models Fundamentals of slug flow
HYDRAULICS of steady and pulsatile flow in systemic circulation
Presented at AIChE Annual Meeting in Indianapolis, USA
Internal Flow: General Considerations
Introduction to the WASP Interface
MEK 4450 Terms & Notation Multiphase flow – Applications Conservation equations
Asst. Prof. Dr. Hayder Mohammad Jaffal
Presentation transcript:

Guidelines for OLGA 2000 Slugtracking

Slug tracking module General Tracking front and tail of each individual slug

Slug tracking module General 4 types of slug initiation mechanisms Hydrodynamic Terrain Level (start-up) Pigging Follows individual slugs through pipeline Calculates the slugs growth or decay Eliminates numerical diffusion of liquid fronts Two-phase or three-phase flow The normal OLGA Scheme is numerically diffusive (all finite difference schemes are that).

Numerical diffusion Real liquid front Standard numerical solution The standard scheme in OLGA is implicit and so in one single time step any liquid with a velocity will be smeared out in the entire pipe (if there is a driving pressure difference of course). This can be illustrated in this way: liquid will be distributed in the entire (numerical) pipe section (averaged). Since the liquid has a velocity it will cross the next boundary and thereby an amount of liquid will appear in the next section and this is also distributed in the entire section - and son on.

Slug tracking module When slug flow is indicated, the module sets up a slug and a slug bubble Slug growth Slug front an tail tracked Slug material balance determines whether slugs grow or decay

Slug tracking module Terrain slugs

Terrain slugging Standard OLGA predicts terrain slugging very well Liquid fronts are sharper with slug tracking than in standard OLGA Slug tracking may give terrain slugging in cases where standard OLGA does not

Slug tracking module Level slugs Setup of level slugs at local liquid concentration jumps over more than one section Level detection in j-1: 1  voidj-1 > BUBBLEVOID (min void in the bubble next to level slug at initiation) 0  voidj < SLUGVOID (max void in level slug at initiation) Level detection in j +1: 0  voidj < SLUGVOID 1  voidj+1 > BUBBLEVOID Startup slug 1 Startup slug 2 Startup slug 3

Start-up slugs (level slugs) Initial gas fraction in a level slug is taken from the sections covering the slug - including the sections where the levels are detected. In order to start level tracking in cases with long sections the use of LEVEL = OFF and HYDRODYNAMIC = MANUAL is an alternative.

Start-up slugs (level slugs) Experiments in 8” loop.

Slug tracking module Correlations Classification of type of tail and front (bubble nose or level/breaking front) Bubble nose velocity Gas entrainment into slug according to standard OLGA correlation for gas fraction in slugs. A NOSE is characterised by a slug bubble which propagates into the liquid slug. A LEVEL is characterised as a breaking front. Note! FRONT is always the RIGHT-hand side boundary of the liquid slug. TAIL is always the LEFT-hand side boundary of the liquid slug. Example: A riser slug in growth phase may have a level/breaking front in both end.

Standard OLGA Hydrodynamic slugs Standard OLGA gives average pressure drop, holdup and flow rates for slug flow Standard OLGA does not show individual slugs or impact of slugging on downstream facilities

Slug tracking module Hydrodynamic slugs Flow regime must be slug flow according to the standard OLGA slug model Minimum initial slug length: 1 DPipe (default) (Initial) gas fraction in the slugs are calculated from the same correlation for gas fraction in slugs that is used in the standard OLGA slug model.

Slug tracking input Hydrodynamic slugs Available input parameters with slug tracking Initial slug length Initial frequency Delay constant Illegal sections

Slug tracking input Hydrodynamic slugs cont. Be aware of intrinsic ILLEGAL SECTIONS: (a section where the slug front “stops” and the slugs that reach this point will eventually vanish ) first and last section in any Branch consequently at MERGE and SPLIT nodes process equipment but not valves Turn on more ILLEGALSECTIONS only if you have problems Use the example of a slug into a separator. It can obviously not maintain its front and when the tail also reaches the separator inlet the slug is ”vanished”

Tuning Hydrodynamic slugs cont. Available field data are limited (Prudhoe Bay, Alaska) One could calculate slug frequency by a method like the Shea correlation One could tune slug tracking to match frequency from measurements or estimated by other methods by adjusting the DELAYCONSTANT Use DELAYCONSTANT to tune model rather than initial frequency

Shea correlation FsL = slug frequency (1/s) (= no of slugs/observation time period) D = pipeline diameter (m) L = pipeline length (m) UsL = superficial liquid velocity (m/s) You may tune DELAYCONST so that resulting slug frequncy is of same order as FsL for hydrodynamic slugging with moderate terrain effects.

Slug lengths Hydrodynamic slugs cont. Hydrodynamic slugging appears to be a statistical phenomenon correlations for slug length distribution predictions are uncertain Rule of thumb: Max. length of hydrodynamic slugs can be in the order of 6 times the average slug length

Performing tracking of hydrodynamic slugs (1) Start with running OLGA without slug tracking until steady state is established If slug flow is predicted, prepare for slug tracking. Pipe sectioning: keep in mind that OLGA Slugtracking requires at least 10 time steps to transport a slug through any pipe section Estimate run-through-time (residence time): T = (L·A)/QT L = Pipeline length A = Pipe cross-sectional area QT = Average total volumetric volume flow

Performing tracking of hydrodynamic slugs (2) Turn on slug tracking in a first (of two) restart simulation (slug tracking can not be turned off in a RESTART) HYDRODYNAMIC = ON Use default values for the other parameters1) Initial slug length - default = 1Dpipe Delay constant - default = 150 Dpipe Illegal sections - default = intrinsic This is the safe way. It is of course fully possible to start with slugtracking immediately. 1) Initial frequency is defined as a minimum number of pipe diameters between slugs. One could use a high number (10000) to avoid any influence from this parameter

Performing tracking of hydrodynamic slugs (3) Model the first slug tracking case with a moderate plotting frequency Plot time trends of QLT1) and ACCLIQ2) at pipe outlet and LIQC3) and NSLUG4) of each branch. Specific slug tracking variables apart from NSLUG are seldom needed 1) total liquid volume flow, 2) accumulated total liquid volume flow, 3) total liquid inventory in a branch, 4) total # of slugs in a branch

Performing tracking of hydrodynamic slugs (4) Run the case At least one run-through-time Until NSLUG is quasi stable Until LIQC (total liquid content in a branch) is quasi stable Quasi stable means quasi stable (i.e a certain pattern in e.g. QLT is repated – watch out for long periods).

Performing tracking of hydrodynamic slugs (5) Make a second restart - from the first slugtracking Reduce the plotting interval sufficiently 1 - 5 (s) Run the case several run-through-times Use the 2nd case to analyze liquid surges out of the pipe use ACCLIQ We emphasize that it is not necessary to plot all sorts of slug variables unless one is concerned with mechanical impact on pipe from slugging.

If OLGA crashes with slug tracking Try one or more of the following: Review the sectioning of geometries. Avoid large differences in lengths of neighbour sections Limit maximum time step (MAXDT in INTEGRATION) Switch off temperature calculation (TEMPERATURE = OFF in OPTIONS)

Papers about slugging Prevention of Severe Slugging in the Dunbar 16” Multiphase Pipeline Paper presented at OTC, Houston 1996 Total Oil Marine, Aberdeen, U.K. Simulation Study and Field Measurement for Mitigation of Slugging Problem in the Hudson Transportation Lines Paper presented in Cannes -97 Amerada Hess & NEL (UK) Scandpower & IFE (Norway)