Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Isolated Photon Cross Section at DØ Ashish Kumar State Univ of New York at Buffalo On behalf of the DØ Collaboration.
Advertisements

Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.
Jake Anderson, on behalf of CMS Fermilab Semi-leptonic VW production at CMS.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
B c mass, lifetime and BR’s at CDF Masato Aoki University of Tsukuba For the CDF Collaboration International Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium BNL.
1 Top Quark Pair Production at Tevatron and LHC Andrea Bangert, Herbstschule fuer Hochenergiephysik, Maria Laach, September 2007.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
KIRTI RANJANDIS, Madison, Wisconsin, April 28, Top Quark Production Cross- Section at the Tevatron Collider On behalf of DØ & CDF Collaboration KIRTI.
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
Recent Open Heavy Flavor Results from ATLAS and CMS Experiment at LHC
Itamar Roth, Ehud Duchovni Group meeting 19/01/15 1.
B Masses and Lifetimes at the Tevatron Satoru Uozumi University of Tsukuba Duke University.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
Properties of B c Meson On behalf of DØ Collaboration Dmitri Tsybychev, SUNY at Stony Brook, PANIC05, Santa Fe, New Mexico B c is ground state of bc system.
1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.
Some recent QCD results at the Tevatron N. B. Skachkov (JINR, Dubna)
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
1 Heavy Flavour Content of the Proton Motivation Experimental Techniques charm and beauty cross sections in DIS for the H1 & ZEUS Collaborations Paul Thompson.
Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Don LincolnExperimental QCD and W/Z+Jet Results 1 Recent Dijet Measurements at DØ Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the DØ Collaboration.
A. Bertolin on behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Charm (and beauty) production in DIS at HERA (Sezione di Padova) Outline: HERA, H1 and ZEUS heavy.
April 7, 2008 DIS UCL1 Tevatron results Heidi Schellman for the D0 and CDF Collaborations.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
Photon and Jet Physics at CDF Jay R. Dittmann Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the CDF Collaboration) 31 st International Conference on High.
Moriond QCD March 24, 2003Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D01 b-production cross-section at the TeVatron Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D0 for the CDF and D0 collaborations.
Run 2 Jets at the Tevatron Iain Bertram Lancaster University/DØ Experiment PIC2003  Inclusive Cross Section  Dijet Mass  Structure.
RHIC-PV, April 27, 2007 M. Rijssenbeek 1 The Measurement of W ’s at the CERN and FNAL hadron colliders W ’s at RHIC ! W ’s at CERN – UA2 W ’s at FNAL -
Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Recent QCD Measurements at the Tevatron Mike Strauss The University of Oklahoma The Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics for the CDF and DØ Collaborations.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
QCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets Mike Strauss The University of Oklahoma The Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics for.
Non-Prompt J/ψ Measurements at STAR Zaochen Ye for the STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago The STAR Collaboration:
Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.
on behalf of the CDF and DØ collaborations
Azimuthal Decorrelations and
Searches for double partons
Energy Dependence of the UE
Tevatron results on Multi-Parton Interactions
Photon Cross Sections at Ecm=2TeV
Implications of First LHC Data: Underlying Event Measurements
QCD at LHC with ATLAS Arthur M. Moraes University of Sheffield, UK
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Inclusive and dijet b productions at CDF
Inclusive Jet Cross Section Measurement at CDF
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Heavy Flavour Content of the Proton
Inclusive Jet Production at the Tevatron
Rick Field - Florida/CDF
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration

♦ Big ideas ♦ Double Parton interactions in  +b/c+dijet and  +3-jet events [very brief] ♦ Double Parton interaction in double J/ψ events ♦ Summary / intepretation 2 Outline

3 Hadron-Hadron collision: simplified

4 Hadron-Hadron collision: traditional Hard radiation

Double Hadron-Hadron Collision: Double parton interactions 5 Signal is not too messy

Historical data #1 Charged particle multiplicity Hard scattering only; +ISR/FSR Multiple Parton Interaction models  n is a cross section to produce a final state with n tracks (Nch). UA5, 540 GeV, ppbar 6 Nch Nch Hadronization based on single hard scattering does not work! Only additional parton interactions can describe the shape.

Historical data #2 Jet pedestal effect UA1 540 GeV  7 With MPI No MPI Jet pT>35 GeV ET density ET density distribution inside and around jet can only be described if MPI contribution is taken into account. ET density and charge particle multiplicities allowed T.Sjostrand and M.van Zijl to build first real, software-implemented MPI model (aka “Tune A”) and describe many “puzzling features” in jet productions in UA1-UA5: PRD36 (1987) 2019

Motivation 8 Most MPI processes are non-perturbative implemented in models of hadron structure and fragmentation. Being phenomenological, experimental input crucial. [mainly minbias] Tevatron (0.63, 1.8, 1.96 TeV; + recent 0.3, 0.9 runs) SPS (0.2, 0.54, 0.9 TeV), Tevatron DY and similar LHC data. MPI can be tested in higher pT regime [e.g. pT(jet) > 15 GeV] In the energy regime of perturbative QCD! MPI events can mimic a signature of a new physics processes Having measured MPI observable and reliably calculable partonic cross section, one can limit MPI phenomenological models.

Double Parton events: Higgs production background  Many Higgs production channels can be mimicked by Double Parton event!  Same is true for many other rare (especially multijet) processes 9 SP Signal DP background p

Double parton and effective cross sections 10  DP - double parton cross section for processes A and B  eff - characterizes size of effective interaction region → information on the spatial distribution of partons. Uniform:  eff is large and  DP is small Compact:  eff is small and  DP is large →  eff is phenomenological parameter => should be measured in experiment ! Effective cross section  eff is directly related with parton spatial density:  is impact parameter where f(b) is the density of partons in transverse space. => Having  eff measured we can estimate f(b)

Double Parton Interactions in  +3 and  +b/c+dijet events:  Extraction of DP events  Measurement of effective cross section 11 Same approach as in 1fb -1 measurement, PRD81, (2010) For two hard scattering events at two separate pp collisions (Double Interaction): For two hard interactions: at one pp collision (Double Parton scattering) Phys.Rev.D89, (2014), arXiv:

△ S distribution : Single Parton vs Double Parton 12 For “  +3-jet” events Single Parton scattering expect  S to peak at  Double Parton interaction  S flat SP model DP model (ideal/Type-1) Double Parton events: pairwise pT balance needs to be preserved, but no correlation between two parton scatterings. Phys.Rev.D89, (2014), arXiv:

Effective cross section ● Having measured number of DP events and corresponding acceptances and efficiencies one can calculate  eff for both final states. ● Measured  eff is in agreement with all Tevatron and LHC measurements, but the new values is more precise. ● No dependence of  eff or double parton fraction on initial quark flavor has been observed. 13 Phys.Rev.D89, (2014), arXiv:  + b/c + dijet  + 3 jet  eff (mb) 14.6 ± ± 1.32 DP Fraction ± ± 0.007

New!!! Double Parton Interactions in double J/  production  Almost fully gluon initial state –Signal: prompt direct J/ψ (S-wave) and (P-waves)  1c and  2c,  1(2)c → J/ψ+  – Background: non-prompt B-hadron decays, non-resonant DY, π/K decays. – Single and Double parton scatterings may contribute => Test of σ eff energy dependence: from high energies to 4-5 GeV, with gg initial state only SP DP Prediction for the Tevatron at p T (J/ψ)>4 GeV, |η|<0.6: expected DP fraction is ~15% J/ψ p p p p J.Phys. G24 (1998) 1105 NRQCD 14 NRQCD

Data selection  L = 8.1 fb -1 statistics  Logical OR of low pT unprescaled di-muon triggers  pT(  )>2 GeV if |  | 4 GeV if GeV, |  |<2. exclude muons having hits just outside of toroid veto cosmic muons by timing cut  muon track segment is matched to the central tracker  track with at least 3 hits  opposite charge   r-DCA ( transverse distance of closest approach of the track to the primary vertex point) < 0.5 cm; z-DCA < 2 cm  Muon pair is in 2.85 < M  < 3.35 GeV Single J  ψ candidates: 7.2 M events selected 902 events in 2.3 < M  < 4.2 GeV 242 events in 2.85 < M  < 3.35 GeV 8.1 fb

Signal and Background Models Non-prompt: b+bbar events simulated with Pythia SP-1: NRQCD implemented in DJpsiFDC generator. It is interfaced to Pythia (Tune A and Perugia UE models) to simulate the parton shower. Contains CS (~90%) and CO (~10%). SP-2: Herwig++, CS only. DP-1: Pythia8 with CS and CO contributions DP-2: two J  ψ candidates randomly selected from two single J  ψ events in data 16 Note: CS = color singlet CO = color octet

Background subtraction Accidental contribution from pi/K decays, DY events Is estimated by fitting data in a wide mass range 2.3 – 4.2 GeV f acc,DY (Single J  ψ) = ± f acc,DY (Double J  ψ) = ± The uncertainty is derived from variation of the fit parameters in the signal and background models

Single J  ψ cross section Acceptance and selection efficiencies are calculated using MC events corrected by data/MC (pT,eta) dependent correction factors (~0.9) Trigger efficiency is calculated using events passed zero-bias and zero- bias+dimuon trigger Measured cross section (with pT and η selections mentioned earlier): 23.9 ± 4.6 (stat) ± 3.7 (syst) nb. Predicted cross section using the “kT factorization”: 23.0 ± 8.6 nb 18

Single Parton and Double Parton contributions – We measure the Double J  ψ production cross section for Double Parton and Single Parton scatterings separately. To discriminate between the two mechanisms, we use △ η( J/ψ, J/ψ ) difference. – Contributions from double non-prompt, prompt+non-prompt and accidental backgrounds are subtracted from data => data should contain just prompt SP and DP events. SP template: DJ events simulated with Herwig++ /DJPsiFDC DP template: Pythia-8 or data-like DP model. f SP = 0.70 ± 0.11, f DP = 0.30 ± 0.10 Systematics: fit and variation between the 2+2 models; prompt+non-prompt origin (either 100% SP- or DP-like). DP double non-prompt is highly suppressed to 0.7– 2 fb. DP dominates at | △ η( J/ψ J/ψ )| >

Double J/ψ SP cross section Measured fiducial cross section (with pT and η cuts):  SP = ± 9.8 (stat) ± 29.8 (syst) fb Predicted cross section using the ”kT factorization”:  kT SP = 55.1 [+28.5, ] (PDF) [+31.0, -17.0] (scale) fb Predicted cross section using NRQCD (LO):  kT SP = 55.1 ± 51.9 fb 20 However, NLO corrections have become recently for LHC: Phys.Rev.Lett.111, (2013). At p T > 4 GeV, the NLO cross section is almost twice larger than LO! To some extent it should be true for the Tevatron.

Double J/ψ DP cross section Measured fiducial cross section (with pT and η cuts):  DP = 56.6 ± 5.8 (stat) ± 23.2 (syst) fb Predicted cross section using the ”kT factorization”:  kT DP = 17.6 ± 13 fb Determining  eff, we use: we get 21  eff = 5.0 ± 0.5 (stat) ± 2.7 (syst) mb

Some discussion The measured  eff in double J  ψ events (5.0 ± 2.8 mb) within 2 σ exp uncertainty agrees with that measured in  +3jet events (12.7±1.3 mb). However, the central value is still noticeably lower. Is it significant? Is there a cause? The initial state in the DP double J/ψ production is very similar to 4-jet production at low pT which is dominated by gluons, while  (W) +jets events are produced in quark interactions,. The measured  eff could indicate a smaller average distance between gluons than between quarks, or between a quark and a gluon, in the transverse space. 22 J/ψ

➢ Studies of MPI events are important  lead to a knowledge of fundamental hadron structure. ➢ Provide a better description of complex final states in hadron-hadron collisions. ➢ Double parton production in  + b/c + dijet and  + 3-jet final states using (L = 8.7 fb -1 ): ➢ We have also studied production of double J/ψ events and found that The size of  eff may indicate a smaller average distance between gluons than between quarks. This result is in qualitative agreement with the pion cloud model predicting a smaller nucleon’s average gluonic transverse size than that for singlet quarks. Summary 23  +b/c +dijet  +3-jet Fraction DP events0.17 ± ± 0.01  eff (mb) 14.6 ± 0.6 (stat) ± 3.2 (syst)12.7 ± 0.2 (stat) ± 1.3 (syst) Double J/  Fraction DP events0.30 ± 0.10  eff (mb) 5.0 ± 0.5 (stat) ± 2.7 (syst)

06/16/14 Ashish Kumar 24  Tracking in magnetic field of 2T:  Silicon microstrip and central fiber tracker  Calorimeter: Liquid argon sampling calorimeter  Central and Endcap, coverage : |η|<4.2  Muon system: Drift chambers and scintillation counters,1.8 T toroid Wide muon system coverage (|η|<2); thick shielding suppresses background. D0 detector 21

06/16/14 Ashish Kumar 25  Important for heavy flavor jet identification  Precise reconstruction of primary interaction vertex and secondary vertices  Accurate determination of impact parameter of tracks D0 detector: Tracker 22

Found DP fractions are pretty sizable: they drop from ~46-48% at 2nd jet pT GeV to ~22-23% at 2nd jet GeV with relative uncertainties ~7-12%. Double Parton fractions and  eff 18 D0 1 fb-1 From Phys.Rev.D81, (2010): “DP in  +3 jet events in ppbar collisions”

Tuning MPI models 19 Phys.Rev.D83, (2011), arXiv: Using azimuthal angle between pT imbalance vector in the 1st parton scattering and 2nd jet, and different 2nd jet pT bins, we can tune MPI models. χ 2 test for MPI models

Models of parton spatial density and  eff -  eff is directly related with parameters of models of parton spatial density 15 D0 1 fb -1 Example: Gaussian spatial density: – Three models have been considered: Solid sphere, Gaussian and Exponential. => From Phys.Rev.D81, (2010): “DP in  +3 jet events in ppbar collisions”

 AFS'86, UA2'91 and CDF'93  4-jet samples, motivated by a large dijet cross section (but low DP fractions)  Use theory predictions for the dijet cross sections.  CDF’97, D0’10  γ+3jets events, data-driven method: use rates of Double Interaction events  (two separate ppbar collisions) and Double Parton (single ppbar collision)  events to extract  eff from their ratio.  => reduces dependence on Monte-Carlo and NLO QCD theory predictions. History of the measurements DP frac 5-8% 53% 22-47% 6-10% 17

Photon Identification ▸ P hotons with pT>26 GeV in ▸ EM fraction > 97% ▸ EM cluster isolation in the calorimeter. ▸ EM cluster isolation in the tracker. ▸ Shower width in EM calorimeter section consistent with EM object ▸ Cut on photon neural network, NN>0.3 (uses calorimeter, preshower and tracking information) ▸ Central photons are required to originate from the primary vertex using hits in preshower ▸ Typical photon efficiency is ~80% Main backgrounds: dijet events 26

06/16/14 Ashish Kumar 31  B and C hadrons have a relatively long lifetime (~1 ps) and travel ~ µm before decay.  Tracks displaced from primary vertex with large impact parameters  Heavy flavor tagging exploits these characteristics of the tracks to create a discriminant used to enrich sample with HF-jets Heavy flavor Jet Identification cut 27 NIM A, 620, 490 (2010)

Cross checks for signal and background models 42 Comparison of pT shapes for J/  events in MC and D0 data Non-prompt data vs MC Prompt data vs MC cτ <0.02 cτ >0.03 Good agreement with the default MC samples. Remaining small defeerences are used to reweight MC and get systematics.

Double Parton gamma jet + gamma HF

Double Parton Interactions in  +3 and  +b/c+dijet events:  Extraction of DP events  Measurement of effective cross section 12 Same approach as in 1fb -1 measurement, PRD81, (2010) For two hard scattering events at two separate pp collisions (Double Interaction): For two hard interactions: at one pp collision (Double Parton scattering) Phys.Rev.D89, (2014), arXiv:

Selection criteria Case 1: No leading jet flavor requirement (Inclusive sampe) 13 Check dependence on initial parton flavor! D0 8.7 fb -1 Case 2: Leading jet Heavy flavor requirement (HF sample) Phys.Rev.D89, (2014), arXiv:

Signal and background event models 14 Phys.Rev.D89, (2014), arXiv:

Photon Identification ▸ P hotons with p T >26 GeV ▸ EM fraction > 97% ▸ EM isolation in the calorimeter & tracker. ▸ Shower width in EM calorimeter section consistent with EM object ▸ Cut on photon neural network, NN>0.3 (uses calorimeter, preshower and tracking information) ▸ Preshower identifies photons from PV ▸ Typical photon efficiency is ~80% Main backgrounds: dijet events 15 Heavy Flavor Identification Phys.Rev.D89, (2014), arXiv:

△ S distribution : Single Parton vs Double Parton 28 For “  +3-jet” events Single Parton scattering expect  S to peak at  Double Parton interaction  S flat SP model DP model (ideal/Type-1) Double Parton events: pairwise pT balance needs to be preserved, but no correlation between two parton scatterings. Phys.Rev.D89, (2014), arXiv:

DP event fraction is found by maximum likelihood fitting Single Parton event model (Sherpa) and Double Parton signal event model (MixDP) to data. 30 Fractions of Double Parton events Inclusive sample Heavy Flavor sample DP fractions Phys.Rev.D89, (2014), arXiv:

Fractions of Double Interaction events, CPF> Charged particle fraction Phys.Rev.D89, (2014), arXiv:

Double interaction: jet – vertex matching 32 Phys.Rev.D89, (2014), arXiv:

Photon fraction: Double Parton vs Double Interaction DP / Photon fractions Phys.Rev.D89, (2014), arXiv: DI /

Effective cross section ● Having measured number of DP events and corresponding acceptances and efficiencies one can calculate  e ff for both final states. ● Measured  eff is in agreement with all Tevatron and LHC measurements, but the new values is more precise. ● No dependence of  eff on initial quark flavor has been observed. 34 Phys.Rev.D89, (2014), arXiv: