ENUM Tutorial ENUM Forum June 3, 2003 Steven D. Lind, AT&T GEN0075R0.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AG Projects Miami - June 2005 ENUM Tier 2 Provisioning techniques Linking ENUM with external systems Adrian Georgescu AG Projects.
Advertisements

AG Projects ENUM provisioning - Jan 2006 Telecom Signaling Networks and Service Forum January 18, 2006 Amsterdam.
ENUM Overview – July The ENUM Objective Mapping PSTN addresses into the IP world ENUM allow any IP device to establish whether an E.164 telephone.
Implications of ENUM Geoff Huston Office of the CTO September 2002.
Tekelecs opinion on Change orders NANC 400 and NANC 401 ENUM.
International Telecommunication Union ENUM Issues and Solutions Houlin Zhao Director Telecommunication Standardization Bureau International Telecommunication.
ENUM Technical issues / DNS
2001_03_28 SG A contribution– 1 Dept of State ITAC-T Advisory Committee SG-A Ad Hoc Meeting on ENUM March 28th & 29th, 2001 ENUM CONTRIBUTION TITLE: ENUM.
SG-A Ad Hoc - ENUM Jordyn A. Buchanan Register.com February 12, 2001.
ENUM Call Flow Scenarios
2/12/2001 ENUM Administration Penn Pfautz AT&T
Support and Transparent Process for ENUM Designated Zone implementations for the USA Before the Dept of State ITAC-T Advisory Committee SG-A AdHoc Meeting.
ENUM Administration Issues
U.S. ENUM Implementation ENUM Forum. Scope  Specifications Document  Tier 1 Contracting Entity Options  Tier 1 Structure Alternatives.
Carrier/Infrastructure ENUM Requirements draft-lind-infrastructure-enum-reqs-01.
ENUM Trial Implementation and results ENUM Workshop ETSI HQ Sophia Antipolis, France February 2004.
International Telecommunication Union ITU Perspective on ENUM Robert Shaw ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor ICANN Rio de Janeiro, Brazil March 25,
Numbering for VoIP and other IP Communications draft-stastny-enum-numbering-voip-00 IETF #58 Minneapolis, MN.
ENUM Chris Wong Converging Services Branch International Training Program 7 September 2006.
August 13-14, 2002 Washington, DC Gary Richenaker Chair ENUM Forum
|. Introduction  Quality needs time in education as in science – to teach more about new technologies – to find new services in the IT-landscape – to.
Understanding ENUM & Current Status Network Planning August 21, 2001
ENUM Primer November 4, 2004 Tom McGarry - NeuStar
ENUM ITU-T Status Update An SAIC Company Prepared For: ACA Industry Workshop March, 2003 Telcordia Contact: Gary Richenaker
1 IETF – ENUM US Government Briefing Richard Shockey IETF ENUM Work Group Chair Senior Technical Industry Liaison NeuStar, Inc Vermont Avenue N.W.
Draft-pfautz-lind-enum-carrier- 00.txt IETF 60 4 August 2004 Steven D. Lind.
Document IPW-41 IP and Telecoms Interworking Workshop N umbering, Naming Addressing and Routing IETF EMUM WG Proposal International Telecommunication Union.
© 2008 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. 1 Video Relay Service and Assignment.
December 5, 2003FG3 Report FOCUS GROUP 3 Interoperability Report to NRIC VI Council December 5, 2003 Cliff Naughton (Boeing)
ENUM? “ Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM or Enum, from TElephone NUmber Mapping) is a suite of protocols to unify the telephone numbering system E.164 with.
February 25, Infrastructure-ENUM Secure, Private, Next Generation Addressing Infrastructure Douglas J. Ranalli Founder, Chief Strategy Officer NetNumber,
The Austrian ENUM Trial is closing down 59 th IETF Seoul, South Korea, March 3 rd, 2004 Richard STASTNY ÖFEG, Postbox 147, 1103-Vienna enum:
Naming & Addressing ENUM, EPC, WINC overview JaeYoung Choi
1 NGN Issues - Numbering and Addressing Peter Darling ACIF NGN FOG No. 3.
PSTN – User ENUM – „Infrastructure ENUM“ An ETSI View Richard Stastny IETF60 San Diego.
RIPE64 Enum Working Group DE-CIX NGN Services.
VoIP and ENUM The Austrian Trial IETF #57 Vienna July 2003 Richard STASTNY ÖFEG/TELEKOM AUSTRIA, Postbox 147, 1103-Vienna enum:
ENUM Update for voipeer BOF Richard Shockey ENUM co-chair IETF 63 Paris.
International Telecommunication Union Global ENUM Implementation Robert Shaw ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor International Telecommunication Union.
Industry Canada 1 Bob Leafloor Colman Ho Peter Chau Industry Canada January 2003 (ENUM) T E lephone NU mber M apping.
Japan Registry Service Copyright © 2004 JPRS A Glance at ENUM AP* Retreat Feb. 22, 2004 Hiro HOTTA.
Slide 1 Nicklas Beijar - TRIP, ENUM and Number Portability TRIP, ENUM and Number Portability Nicklas Beijar
©Stephen Kingham SIP Peering SIP Workshop APAN Taipei Taiwan 23rd Aug 2005 By Stephen Kingham
© 2004 AT&T, All Rights Reserved. The world’s networking company SM VoIP, Portability, and the Evolution of Addressing LNPA & Future of Numbering Working.
ENUM- --- S.,L. Chou 1 工業技術研究院 電腦與通訊工業研究所 Industrial Technology Research Institute Computer & Communications Research Laboratories 11/21/00 ENUM --- A.
1 ENUM’s Role in VoIP IP Telephony Conference & Expo Miami February 12, 2004 Sheri Jenkinson VeriSign Communication Services Product Manager - ENUM
International Telecommunication Union ENUM Implementation Robert Shaw ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor International Telecommunication Union ICANN.
IP Network Clearinghouse Solutions ENUM IP-Enabling The Global Telephone Directory Frank Estes Vice President , ext 224
1January 2006Richard Stastny Developments around Infrastucture ENUM and their relevance on NGNs Workshop on NGN Interconnection and Numbering TRIS – TISPAN.
Korean ENUM Trial Updates Contact: Jeonghyun Lee Seung Jai Yi Sungwoo Shin 58 th IETF ENUM Working Group.
The State of VoIP Peering Charles Studt Director of Product Management, VoEX.
International Telecommunication Union ENUM: Convergence of Technology and Organizational Perspectives Swedish Administration Workshop on ENUM Stockholm,
Slide 1 Nicklas Beijar - TRIP, ENUM and Number Portability TRIP, ENUM and Number Portability Nicklas Beijar
International Telecommunication Union ENUM: Convergence of Technology and Interests? ITU Tutorial Workshop on ENUM Geneva, February 8, 2002 Robert Shaw.
Patrik Fältström. ITU Tutorial Workshop on ENUM. Feb 8, 2002, Geneva Explanation of ENUM (RFC 2916) Patrik Fältström Area Director, Applications Area,
12/18/2000 ENUM Administration Penn Pfautz AT&T
Page 1IETF 63 ENUM WG IETF 63 – ENUM WG IANA Registration for an Enumservice Containing Number Portability and PSTN Signaling Information 5 August 2005.
Enumservice VOID draft-stastny-enum-void-00 Richard Stastny Lawrence Conroy IETF60 San Diego.
ENUM The Status of UK Implementation Tony Holmes BTexact Technologies Numbering Addressing & Routeing Chairman UK ENUM Group ITU February 2002.
International Telecommunication Union ITU Perspective on ENUM Robert Shaw ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor ICANN Rio de Janeiro, Brazil March 25,
Update on ITU-T ENUM Activities Steven D. Lind AT&T SG-A ENUM - Ad Hoc February 12, 2001.
International Telecommunication Union ENUM Organizational Perspectives Richard Hill, for Houlin Zhao Director Telecommunication Standardization Bureau.
1 Introduction to ENUM Technical and operational aspects Marco Bernardi NeuStar, Inc
ENF/ERO ENUM Convergence Workshop Tony Holmes Chairman ETSI SPAN11 NAR BTexact Technologies Numbering Addressing & Routeing 9-10 January 2002 Standards.
THIS IS THE WAY ENUM Variants Jim McEachern
KR ENUM Trial Status Update
The Domain Policy DDDS Application
Global ENUM Implementation
Implementation of ENUM on telecommunication networks
ENUM Status of US Implementation
Presentation transcript:

ENUM Tutorial ENUM Forum June 3, 2003 Steven D. Lind, AT&T GEN0075R0

Disclaimer Heavily borrowed from: –Patrik Faltström’s IETF presentation to February 2002 ITU Workshop on ENUM –AT&T/ENUM Forum presentation to December 2002 SG2 meeting Added some telecomm perspective

Assumption Use of standard telephone numbers is not going away –PSTN/analog terminals are going to be around –IP phones use 12- button keypad –Globally unique identifier that has established familiarity with end users

Problem statements How do network elements (gateways, SIP servers etc) find services on the Internet if you only have a telephone (E.164) number? How can subscribers define their preferences for incoming communications?

More Problem Statements How do you address an IP-based voice terminal from the PSTN? For a call that starts out as VoIP, how do you know to keep the call on the IP-plane (as opposed to the PSTN) for a dialed telephone number if the customer is not yours?

Today, Many Addresses tel: tel:

With ENUM, Only One tel: tel: tel: Give this number to friends: ENUM

Solution in short Put domain names derived from telephone numbers in the global domain name system, DNS IETF ENUM Working Group created to solve the problem of using the DNS for: –domain name in – [Numbers re-formatted as domain names] –URI out –[mailto, sip, tel, http or other URI scheme] Solution: NAPTR records Use the URI’s for the communication

ENUM in a nutshell take phone number turn into domain name e164.arpa. return list of URI’s ask the DNS

Step 1 Take an E.164 number and create a fully qualified domain name in a single highly defined and structured domain e164.arpa. The input to the NAPTR algorithm

Step 1 - Explanation Each digit can become a definable and distributed “zone” in DNS terms Delegation can (doesn’t have to) happen at every digit, including at last digit Zones such as country codes, area codes or primary delegated blocks of numbers can be delegated as well as individual numbers DNS defines authoritative name servers for NAPTR/service resource records

Step 2 Lookup NAPTR RR’s in DNS, and apply NAPTR/ENUM algorithm e164.arpa. !^+46(.*)$!ldap://ldap.telco.se/cn=0\1! Use rewrite rules using regular expressions which operate on the E.164 number ( )

Regular Expressions For ENUM, the NAPTR regexp field may yield an (unchanged) URL ! ! ! –“Match on original E.164, and apply rewrite rule ” ^ - Match beginning $ - Match end. - Match any character.* - Match any number of any character () - Grouping, \n in is replaced with group number ‘n’ in

Step 2 in detail $ORIGIN e164.arpa. IN NAPTR ”U” ”mailto+E2U” IN NAPTR ”U” ”ldap+E2U” ”!^+46(.*)$!ldap://ldap.telco.se/cn=0\1” Note that no line break should be in the records

Tier 0 Tier 1 Tier 2 Domain Name System Application Service Provider Registrar Registry ENUM Enabled Applications Provisioning voice fax messaging & presence web pages Authentica tion & Validation Entities

The Public ENUM Infrastructure $ORIGIN e164.arpa IN NS nsnanp.enum.com. 4.4 IN NS sweden_enum.com. … $ORIGIN e164.arpa IN NS e164.att.net IN NS e164.xyz.com. … $ORIGIN e164.arpa. IN NAPTR "u" "sip+E2U" e164.arpa Tier 0 (Country Code Registry) nsnanp.enum.com ( e164.arpa) Tier 1 (Telephone Number Registry) e164.att.net Tier 2 (Application Information) International Implementation worked in IETF and ITU-T National Implementation worked in ENUM Forum (US) sweden_enum.com (4.4.e164.arpa) …

Delegation of Country Code in Tier 0 Draft Recommendation E.A-ENUM in progress Interim Procedures in place between IAB/ISOC and ITU-TSB –Use of e164.arpa pending outcome of Recommendation –Requests must be authenticated by TSB before RIPE- NCC can act –Country Code must be valid and assigned –Position of National Numbering Administrator must be known and must opt-in Similar situation for shared Network codes and codes for Groups of Countries (e.g., ETNS)

Country Code Delegations as of 23 May 2003

National Implementation in the US ENUM Forum organized in August 2001 to address technical specifications “ENUM Forum Specifications for US Implementation of ENUM” (6000_1_0) approved and reviewed with USG in February, 2003 –Requirements for Tier 1 Registry –Specifications and guidelines for Registrar & Tier 2 nameserver Need mechanism for contracting with Tier 1 operators

Requirements Document Reference Architecture Tier 1 Registry Operations, Security, & Admin Tier 1 Performance Specifications Privacy Considerations Provisioning Registrar Requirements Authentication & Authorization Tier 2 Requirements & Guidelines Conflict Resolution Issues Out of Scope

Reference Architecture Tier 1 Registry Tier 0 Root Tier 2 Provider Registrant Registrar

Reference Architecture Registrar Registrant Tier 1 Registry oDoes not address non geographic numbers Tier 2 Service Provider oTier 2 contains the NAPTR records or delegations Interfaces Issue: oOne or More Tier 1 Providers – Delegation at Tier 0 by NPA

Tier 1 Aspects Tier 1 Operations oZone Information (aka zone files) oContactInfo (aka WhoIs) oReporting, backup, escrow & performance requirements Performance Aspects oDNS Performance oEPP Interfaces Tier 1 Security Administrative Aspects oDispute Resolution oData Collection and Privacy

Privacy Considerations Registrant Choice Privacy Analysis Open Disclosure of Registrant Information in DNS Information Handling During Registration and Provisioning Contact Info Fair Information Practices

Provisioning Tier 2 Nameserver Registrar Tier 1 Registry Registrant Application Service Provider Authentication & Validation Entities

Provisioning Aspects Registrar Requirements oRegistrant Validation & Authentication oDispute Resolution oRegistrar Infrastructure Requirements oRecommended Practices & Requirements oVarious Scenarios -Information Flows Tier 2 Some oMostly Guidelines – Some Requirements oTier 2 may be self-provided or from a commercial 3 rd party oInterfaces & Interactions oPerformance Recommendations

Examples DNS-Server Internet PSTN Called party Calling party SIP-Server Gateway

“Call setup” PSTN to VoIP Call via SIP Sip Query e164.arpa.? Dial DNS-Server Sip serverGateway Response

VoIP via SIP to VoIP DNS-Server “ENUM” SIP-Server Gateway

VoIP via PSTN to PSTN DNS-Server “ENUM” SIP-Server Gateway

Future Actions Address implementation issues –Contracting model –Integration/separation of North American countries –Number of Tier 1 operators Address Non-geographic numbers (specifically 8YY Toll Free) –Can’t be cleanly separated by North American country –Has unique provisioning requirements