Knowledge-Building and Instructional Practice in Georgia Reading First.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
Advertisements

Benchmark Assessments in Literacy
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Carolyn Ward. Reading Club Funded by state grant Supplement work in classroom Provide support in listening skills, reading comprehension, reading fluency.
Clark County School District
Deb Drescher Warren County Public Schools. Warren County Public Schools’ Title III (ELL) program is now in school improvement status and has identified.
Benchmark Assessments in Literacy Jefferson County Schools Susan Roberts K-12 Literacy.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Supplemental Reading and Math Instruction Grades K-6.
Keystone State Reading Conference October 29, 2012 Dr. Deb Carr, King’s College.
Program Effectiveness in GARF: Where Have We Been and Where Do You Need to Go?
1 Promoting Third Grade Reading Proficiency National Governor’s Association Policy Institute May, 2012 Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph.D. Professor of Education.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
How did student do in Year 1 of GARF? Summarizing DIBELS data.
The Idaho State Department of Education Presents: “ELLA” Early Learning Literacy Activities This program is designed to support the most important early.
Reading First Site Visits Jane Granger Meadows, M.S. Lisa A. Slover, M.S. Mary Raiford Mickey McKinnes 2006 Just Read, Florida! Leadership Conference.
Reading Recovery® Orchard Hill Elementary School Montgomery Township Schools September, 2005 Presented by Kathleen Scotti & Kathy Grover.
Direct Instruction Kadetta Miller
Welcome to Title I Reading Night! September 24, 2012.
Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtII) East Penn School District.
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
How will classrooms be changing?.  Public Act 12-50: An Act Concerning Requirements for Early Childhood Educators  SB-382: An Act concerning teacher.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION North Carolina Reading First Dr. June S. Atkinson, Director.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Literacy achievement of the C olumbus H earing I mpaired P rogram (CHIP) for The Ohio 8 Summit May 5, 2005 Presenter: Terri Gampp, M.A. R esource E ducator.
PTO Presentation on Harcourt Reading Series Erin Monn Literacy Coach.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Professional Development Modules Ideas for Targeting Teacher Growth Georgia Reading First.
◦ Demographics  Grades K and 1  130 Kindergarten students  166 First Grade students  51% Economically Disadvantaged  29% Title 1  15%
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Applying Research to Reading Instruction: What’s Next? Timothy Shanahan University of Illinois at Chicago
Summer School Reading Initiative: My Reading Coach.
Does Reading First Work? Feng-Yi Hung, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Program Evaluation Clover Park School District.
Student Achievement Manager Intervention Plans. Creating a Student Intervention Plan Intervention Plans: Encompass all components of an intervention –
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Aligning Literacy Curriculum Instruction Across the District Summit for Urban Education May 5, 2005 David Bible Helena Dameron Maya Marlowe.
THE BIG PICTURE “Teaching Reading Sourcebook, 2 nd Edition” Jana L. Jones June 3, 2009.
Reading First Reading First M.W. Cuyler Elementary School September 17, 2004.
Best Start Kindergarten Assessment
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Day 1. Literacy development Why are we here? Historical trends in beginning reading. Language and reading development.
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
Supported by: Federally Funded Title I / Reading Recovery Programs This presentation created by Rhonda Reedy and Shelly Paxson.
Curriculum NCCS
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *using a researched-based.
Projects #9, 17, 29, and 32 Mentor: Helga Bernard, Ph. D. Clark County School District School Improvement and Research.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research Reading Coaches Conference Orlando, Florida August, 2004.
Interpreting data for program evaluation and planning.
Data-based Decisions: A year in review Sharon Walpole University of Delaware.
From curriculum to instruction: Designing and implementing sound instructional diets.
Title I Planning Meeting One November 18, How are Title I funds being used? The majority of the funding was spent on personnel personnel. Title.
Where Do You Stand? Using Data to Size Up Your School’s Progress Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia.
 Students in grades Kindergarten through twelfth  Classroom teacher, reading specialist, interventionist  Can be administered individually, some assessments.
The State of the School Fall Goals What do we want children to know and be able to do with text in this school? We want our children to know how.
Referral Made Like any other disability determination under IDEA, can’t be based on any single criterion – meaning a single test, assessment, observation,
The State of the School’s Reading First Program Fall, 2005.
MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Title 1 Program Overview
What does this mean for my child?
Literacy Development Plan
LITERACY-BASED DISTRICT-WIDE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Annual Title I Parent Meeting October 24, 2016
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
the Science of Learning: Pre-K and Early Literacy
Indicators of Early Literacy Skills: Dibels
Presentation transcript:

Knowledge-Building and Instructional Practice in Georgia Reading First

Evaluation Questions 1.To what extent is RF being implemented in our funded sites? 2.Are children in RF schools making progress in reading achievement? 3.Are RF schools doing better than non-RF schools?

Evaluation Methodology Collect data from all stakeholders (LEAs, principals, coaches, teachers, parents, children) Surveys Interviews Observations Assessments

In terms of knowledge of the 5 RF components and assessment strategies for each, how do you think your teachers are doing?

Here’s what they said... Almost all (90-100%) teachers, literacy coaches, and principals report that they understand the five essential components Almost all (90-100%) teachers report that they understand how to assess the five essential components

Phonemic Awareness K and 1 teachers report that they are prepared to teach phonemic awareness Observations in K and 1 indicate that teachers were providing phonemic awareness instruction

Minutes of PA instruction across 1-hour observations

What are the strengths and weaknesses in phonemic awareness instruction in your building?

Phonics Almost all (90-100%) K teachers report that they are prepared to teach phonics Most (50-89%) 1-3 teachers report that they are prepared to teach phonics Observations indicated that teachers are teaching phonics in all grade levels, with emphasis gradually decreasing across the grades

Minutes of phonics instruction across 1-hour observations

What are the strengths and weaknesses in phonics instruction in your building?

Fluency Almost all (90-100%) K,2,3 teachers report that they are prepared to teach fluency Most (50-89%) 1 teachers report that they are prepared to teach fluency Observations indicated that teachers are teaching fluency in all grade levels, with emphasis gradually decreasing across the grades

Minutes of fluency instruction across 1-hour observations

What are the strengths and weaknesses in fluency instruction in your building?

Vocabulary Almost all (90-100%) 1 teachers report that they are prepared to teach vocabulary Most (50-89%) K,2,3 teachers report that they are prepared to teach fluency Observations indicated that teachers are teaching vocabulary in all grade levels, with emphasis gradually increasing across the grades

Minutes of fluency instruction across 1-hour observations

What are the strengths and weaknesses in vocabulary instruction in your building?

Reading Comprehension Most (50-89%) teachers report that they are prepared to teach comprehension Observations indicated that teachers are teaching vocabulary in all grade levels, with emphasis gradually increasing across the grades

Minutes of comprehension instruction across 1-hour observations

What are the strengths and weaknesses in comprehension instruction in your building?

Kindergarten Instruction

Compare the values in the two charts. Where are the differences? To what extent do you consider these differences important? How are these instructional emphases represented in your classrooms?

First Grade Instruction

Compare the values in the two charts. Where are the differences? To what extent do you consider these differences important? How are these instructional emphases represented in your classrooms?

Second Grade Instruction

Compare the values in the two charts. Where are the differences? To what extent do you consider these differences important? How are these instructional emphases represented in your classrooms?

Third Grade Instruction

Compare the values in the two charts. Where are the differences? To what extent do you consider these differences important? How are these instructional emphases represented in your classrooms?

What can each of you do to increase knowledge in Year 2? What can each of you do to improve instruction in Year 2? LEA Representative PrincipalCoach