2015-16 Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends 2015-16 Riverside Community Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Advertisements

PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
NC Read to Achieve 3 rd Grade Parent Night August 29, 2013.
Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.
ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.
PRESENTED BY THE DEMAREST ADMINISTRATIVE TEAM Annual State of the Schools Assessment Report.
Huntington Hills School Provincial Achievement Test Results for Spring 08.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
Shannon Kewin EFD The Basics a. Terra Nova (TN) Test Score Results b. Wilson School Annual Report Card 2. Breakdown of scores (Reading) 3. Breakdown.
Van Hise Elementary School Improvement Plan (SIP) UPDATE October 29, 2013.
“National Standards & Benchmarks for Effective Catholic Elementary and Secondary Schools” Momentum Feb/ Mar
Brad Neuenswander, Interim Commissioner Kansas State Department of Education 2014 Summer Leadership Conference.
Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
WBCSD District Strategic Goals Update August 10, 2015.
Comprehensive School Improvement Plan ITBS/ITED Results for
Benchmark Data. World History Average Score: 56% Alliance: 96%
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Students will demonstrate a strong foundation in academic skills by working toward the Kansas Standards of Excellence in reading,
Berlin Elementary School Spring 2014 Assessments and Initiatives March 26, 2014.
BOE Presentation Assessment Update Trend Data for USD261 SOE.
Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP TEAM MEETING JANUARY 22, 2015 Sedgefield Elementary.
2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient State Performance Targets.
Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.
Merrymount Elementary School PTO Assessment Presentation December 4, 2014.
Iowa Assessment Results and Annual Goals.
Iowa School Report Card (Attendance Center Rankings) December 3, 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE River Edge School District December 16, 2015.
Math Department Data. Algebra II 1 st Period LEVEL I LEVEL II LEVEL III LEVEL IV # of students 1850 % PROFICIENT: 33% % NONPROFICIENT: 67%
Annual Progress Report Data Ankeny Community Schools.
Let’s celebrate the SUPER GPES data from the school year!
An overview for parents and families Butler Avenue School Julie Gillispie--March st Century Community Learning Center.
Low Performing Schools Plan Presentation New Hanover County Schools October 20, 2015.
Kentucky Department of Education, Office of Assessment and Accountability, July 2012 Questions: or
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.
December 2015 STATE OF SCHOOL REVIEW Everett Public Schools Compiled by the Center for Educational Effectiveness.
Sparta High School Continuous School Improvement Plan.
FES State of the Schools. Reading – 85% of FES students will meet or exceed state standards on the MCA-II in reading. We will improve scores on DIBELS.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Next Generation Iowa Assessments.  Overview of the Iowa Assessments ◦ Purpose of Forms E/F and Alignment Considerations ◦ Next Generation Iowa Assessments.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215. Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures.
Millbrae Elementary School District
Legislative Requirement 2013
STRATEGIC OPERATING GOALS
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Administrative Council September 10, 2012
Jackson County ACT Aspire for Grade 10
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
CHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review Plan Year 1/2
SPED SLAM Math/Sci.
School-Wide Achievement Mathematics
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
SPED SLAM Math/Sci.
Hedenkamp Elementary School
College/Career Ready for All
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report
Kearny School District •
Every Student Succeeds Act
SPED SLAM Math/Sci.
West Virginia Parent Report for the SAT School Day
Salem Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Data Riverside Community Schools

Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools

Schoolwide Reading Trends

Schoolwide Math Trends

Schoolwide Science Trends

Schoolwide Social Studies Trends

District Proficiency Levels Riverside Community Schools

Reading Proficiency Levels Grades 2-11 (n=440) In 2016, 24% of 440, or 104 students in 2 nd -11 th grade, were non-proficient in reading. In 2015, 20% of 435, or 87 students in 2 nd -11 th grade, were non-proficient in reading. In 2014, 18% of 438, or 78 students in 2 nd -11 th grade, were non-proficient in reading. In 2013, 24% of 442, or 106 students, in 2 nd -11 th grade, were non-proficient in reading.

Math Proficiency Levels Grades 2-11 (n=440) In 2016, 20% of 440, or 88 student, in 2 nd -11 th grade were non-proficient in math. In 2015, 14% of 435, or 61 students, were non-proficient in math. In 2014, 15% of 438, or 65 students, were non-proficient in math. In 2013, 20% of 442, or 88 students, were non-proficient in math.

Science Proficiency Levels Grades 2-11 (n=440) In 2016, 19% of 440, or 84 students, in 2 nd -11 th grades, were non-proficient in science. In 2015, 18% of 435, or 78 student, were non-proficient in science. In 2014, 17% of 438, or 75 students were non-proficient in science. In 2013, 20% of 442, or 88 students were non-proficient in science.

Social Studies Proficiency Levels Grades 2-11 (n=440) In 2016, 28% of 440, or 123 students in 2 nd -11 th grades, were non-proficient in social studies. In 2015, 21% of 435, or 91 student, were non-proficient in social studies In 2014, 22% of 438, or 96 students were non-proficient in social studies. In 2013, 22% of 442, or 97 students were non-proficient in social studies.

Gradewise Proficiencies Riverside Community Schools

Gradewise Proficiencies – Reading

Gradewise Proficiencies – Math

Gradewise Proficiencies – Science

Gradewise Proficiencies – Social Studies

Class Proficiency Trends Riverside Community Schools

Class of 2026 – 2nd Graders

Class of 2025 – 3rd Graders

Class of 2024 – 4th Graders

Class of 2023 – 5th Graders

Class of 2022 – 6 th Graders

Class of 2021 – 7 th Graders

Class of 2020 – 8 th Graders

Class of 2019 – 9 th Graders

Class of 2018 – 10 th Graders

Class of 2017 – 11 th Graders

Grade Level Proficiency Trends Riverside Community Schools

2 nd Grade Proficiency Trends

3 rd Grade Proficiency Trends

4 th Grade Proficiency Trends

5 th Grade Proficiency Trends

6 th Grade Proficiency Trends

7 th Grade Proficiency Trends

8 th Grade Proficiency Trends

9 th Grade Proficiency Trends

10 th Grade Proficiency Trends

11 th Grade Proficiency Trends

Gaps Riverside Community Schools

SES Gaps Riverside Community Schools

SES - Reading Proficiency Gaps

SES - Math Proficiency Gaps

SES - Science Proficiency Gaps

SES – Social Studies Proficiency Gaps

Gender Gaps Riverside Community Schools

Gender - Reading Proficiency Gaps

Gender – Math Proficiency Gaps

Gender – Science Proficiency Gaps

Gender – Social Studies Proficiency Gaps

IEP Gaps Riverside Community Schools

IEP – Reading Proficiency Gaps

IEP – Math Proficiency Gaps

IEP – Science Proficiency Gaps

IEP – Social Studies Proficiency Gaps

FAY Gaps Riverside Community Schools

District Proficiencies - FAY Gaps Riverside Community Schools

FAY – Reading Proficiency Gap

FAY – Math Proficiency Gap

FAY – Science Proficiency Gap

FAY – Social Studies Proficiency Gap

Gap Trendlines Riverside Community Schools

SES Schoolwide Gap Trends- Reading

SES Schoolwide Gap Trends - Math

SES Schoolwide Gap Trends - Science

IEP Schoolwide Gap Trends - Reading

IEP Schoolwide Gap Trends - Math

IEP Schoolwide Gap Trends - Science

Gender Schoolwide Gap Trends - Reading

Gender Schoolwide Gap Trends - Math

Gender Schoolwide Gap Trends - Science

College Career Readiness – 11 th Graders Riverside Community Schools

College Ready - Reading

College Ready - Math

College Ready - Science

College Ready – Social Studies

Goals Riverside Community Schools

Long-Range Goals Goal 1: All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in reading comprehension, prepared for success beyond high school. Goal 2: All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in mathematics, prepared for success beyond high school. Goal 3: All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in science, prepared for success beyond high school. Goal 4 All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in social studies, prepared for success beyond high school. Goal 5: All K-12 students will use integrated technology as part of their typical experiences in reading, mathematics, and science classes/courses. Goal 6: All students will feel safe at and connected to school. Goal 7: All K-12 students will use integrated 21st century skills as part of their typical experiences in reading, mathematics, and science classes/courses. Goal 8: All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in written expression, prepared for success beyond high school.

Elementary School Annual Goals for Reading Goal: 60% of FAY students (class of 2026) tested proficient on the IA Assessment. FAY students taking the IA Assessments will maintain or show growth in overall proficiency percentage compared to their 15/16 scores. Math Goal: 64% of FAY students (class of 2026) tested proficient on the IA Assessment. FAY students taking the IA Assessments will maintain or show growth in overall proficiency percentage compared to their 15/16 scores. Science Goal: 68% of FAY students (class of 2026) tested proficient on the IA Assessment. FAY students taking the IA Assessments will maintain or show growth in overall proficiency percentage compared to their 15/16 scores. Social Studies Goal: 54% of FAY students (class of 2026) tested proficient on the IA Assessment. FAY students taking the IA Assessments will maintain or show growth in o Written Expression Goal: 68% of FAY students (class of 2026) tested proficient on the IA Assessment. FAY students taking the IA Assessments will maintain or show growth in overall proficiency percentage compared to their 15/16 scores. verall proficiency percentage compared to their 15/16 scores.

Intermediate School Annual Goals for Reading Goal: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2025, 2026, and 2027 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Reading. Math Goal: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2025, 2026, and 2027 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Math. Science Goal: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2025, 2026, and 2027 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Science. Social Studies Goal: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2025, 2026, and 2027 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Social. Written Expression Goal: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2025, 2026, and 2027 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Written Expression.

Jr./Sr. High School Annual Goals for Reading Goal: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Reading. Math Goal: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Math. Science Goal: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Science. Social Studies Goal: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Social Studies. Written Expression Goal: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Written Expression.