Simona Toscano In the frame of KM3NeT consortium VLV T workshop - Toulon, 22-25 April 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
Advertisements

Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers Monte.
Jan 2009 U. Katz: Astroparticle Physics 1 What is KM3NeT – the Vision  Future cubic-kilometre sized neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea  Exceeds.
Απόστολος Τσιριγώτης Αξιολόγηση Αρχιτεκτονικών και Υποθαλάσσιων Περιοχών Εγκατάστασης για ένα Μεγάλο Μεσογειακό Τηλεσκόπιο Νετρίνων Α. Τσιριγώτης Β. Βεργανελάκης,
Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Design Study the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers construction.
Use of floating surface detector stations for the calibration of a deep-sea neutrino telescope G. Bourlis, N. A. B. Gizani, A. Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis,
Status of the ANTARES Neutrino-Telescope Alexander Kappes Physics Institute University Erlangen-Nuremberg for the ANTARES Collaboration WIN´05, 6.–11.
The presence of the South Pole Air Shower Experiment (SPASE) on the surface provides a set of externally tagged muon bundles that can be measured by AMANDA.
A. BELIAS, NESTOR Institute, Pylos, Greece TeVPA 2009, July 13-17, SLAC1 KM3NeT, a deep sea neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea KM3NeT objectives.
Kay Graf Physics Institute University of Erlangen TeV Particle Astrophysics II Madison, WI, USA August 28 – 31, 2006 Towards Acoustic Detection of UHE.
Status of the KM3NeT Project  What happened so far  The KM3NeT Conceptual Design Report  The Preparatory Phase: Towards Implementation 3rd Workshop.
J.P. Gómez-González. Outline Introduction: The ANTARES neutrino telescope Time calibration Muon track residuals based method: Description and implementation.
KM3NeT detector optimization with HOU simulation and reconstruction software A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 - Paris,
KM3NeT IDM/TeVPA conference 23  28 June 2014, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Maarten de Jong on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration The next generation neutrino.
The ANTARES experiment is currently the largest underwater neutrino telescope and is taking high quality data since Sea water is used as the detection.
Paolo Piattelli - KM3NeTIAPS - Golden, 6-8 may 2008 KM3NeT: a deep-sea neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea Paolo Piattelli - INFN/LNS Catania (Italy)
Search for point sources of cosmic neutrinos with ANTARES J. P. Gómez-González IFIC (CSIC-Universitat de València) The ANTARES.
KM3NeT The Birth of a Giant V. Popa, KM3NeT Collaboration Institute for Space Sciences, Magurele-Bucharest, Romania.
Hanoi, Aug. 6-12, 2006 Pascal Vernin 1 Antares Status report P.Vernin CEA Saclay, Dapnia On behalf of the Antares collaboration P.Vernin
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
Francisco Salesa Greus IFIC (CSIC–Universitat de València, Spain) Representing the KM3NeT Consortium 4 th International Workshop on Very Large Volume Neutrino.
C.DistefanoCRIS 2008 – Salina, September The KM3Net Consortium Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali del Sud Towards a km3-scale.
Apostolos Tsirigotis Simulation Studies of km3 Architectures KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting April 2007, Pylos, Greece The project is co-funded by the.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Marseilles, 29June-3 July.
Status of KM3NeT (Detector Design Optimisations) Christopher Naumann, CEA Saclay – IRFU / SPP for the KM3NeT consortium 44 th Reconcontres de Moriond,
CEA DSM Irfu The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope A status report Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 44 th Rencontres de Moriond February.
Piera Sapienza – VLVNT Workshop, 5-8 october 2003, Amsterdam Introduction and framework Simulation of atmospheric  (HEMAS and MUSIC) Response of a km.
WP2 meeting, Oct 2006, CPPM Claudine Colnard - NIKHEF Claudine Colnard, Ronald Bruijn, Eleonora Presani, Siemen Meester, Paul Kooijman (presented by Maarten.
V.Bertin CPPM / ANTARES Coll. - Moriond ANTARES : A deep-sea 0.1 km² neutrino telescope Vincent Bertin - CPPM-Marseille on behalf of the Antares.
Tools and Methods for simulation and evaluation of Very Large Volume Cherenkov Neutrino detectors: Optimization and Evaluation of proposed KM3NeT designs.
INSTRUMENTATION NEEDS FOR THE CALIBRATION UNIT …AS A WORK DOCUMENT Pascale Keller KM3Net Meeting CPPM, january 2013 Inputs from : Miguel Ardid, Tassos.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Erlangen, May 2009.
Review of Positioning in ANTARES Dr. Lee F. Thompson Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Sheffield Special thanks to Vincent Bertin, CPPM.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
Digital & Analog electronics for an autonomous, deep-sea Gamma Ray Burst Neutrino prototype detector K. Manolopoulos, A. Belias, E. Kappos, C. Markou DEMOKRITOS.
KM3NeT Pylos meeting, April, 2007 Some preliminary studies for the positioning calibration of KM3NeT Miguel Ardid Universitat Politècnica de València.
Acoustic Calibration for the KM3NeT Pre-Production Module Alexander Enzenhöfer on behalf of the KM3NeT consortium VLV T 2011 Erlangen, –
The ANTARES detector: background sources and effects on detector performance S. Escoffier CNRS Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille on behalf.
Antares Slow Control Status 2007 International Conference on Accelerator and Large Experimental Physics Control Systems - Knoxville, Tennessee - October.
The ANTARES Project Sino-French workshop on the Dark Universe Stephanie Escoffier Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille On behalf of the ANTARES.
Time over Threshold electronics for an underwater neutrino telescope G. Bourlis, A.G.Tsirigotis, S.E.Tzamarias Physics Laboratory, School of Science and.
Time calibration system for the KM3NeT deep sea neutrino telescope S. Toscano, IFIC (Instituto de Física Corpuscular)
R. Coniglione, VLVnT08, Toulon April ‘08 KM3NeT: optimization studies for a cubic kilometer neutrino detector R. Coniglione P. Sapienza Istituto.
The single shower calibration accuracy is about 6.7 degrees but the accuracy on the mean value (full data set calibration accuracy) scales down inversely.
PMT measurements in Antares Oleg Kalekin on behalf of Antares collaboration VLVnT 2011 Erlangen
ANTARES Status report  Experiment overview  Status of construction  Status of operation  Status of physics analyses Presentation at ICATPP’07. Oct.
Calibration of Under Water Neutrino Telescope ANTARES Garabed HALLADJIAN October 15 th, 2008 GDR Neutrino, CPPM, Marseille.
C.Distefano KM3NET ‘Physics and Simulation (WP2)’ Oct 24 – 25, 2006 LNS NEMO software Carla Distefano for the NEMO Collaboration KM3NET ‘Physics and Simulation.
VLVNT’08 - ToulonM. Ardid – Positioning System of the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Positioning system of the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Miguel Ardid (IGIC.
Isabella Amore VLV T08, Toulon, France April 2008 International Workshop on a Very Large Volume Neutrino Telescope for the Mediterranean Sea Results.
Status and Perspectives of the BAIKAL-GVD Project Zh.-A. Dzhilkibaev, INR (Moscow), for the Baikal Collaboration for the Baikal Collaboration September.
Umberto Emanuele IFIC (CSIC-UV), Valencia (Spain) Status of Time Calibration System forKM3NeT.
Calibration and Instrumentation: Overview and General Issues Robert Lahmann WPFL meeting Amsterdam 6-July-2010.
Optical calibration from ten to hundreds of meters for the Neutrino Burst Experiment (a poor man’s Km 3 underwater neutrino telescope) NESTOR/NOA Spyridon.
KM3NeT Neutrino conference 2-7 June 2014, Boston, U.S.A. Maarten de Jong on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration The next generation neutrino telescope in.
KM3NeT P.Kooijman Universities of Amsterdam & Utrecht for the consortium.
Optical Modules in the KM3NeT optimization studies in Erlangen
ANTARES Lessons learned from its completion
Sebastian Kuch University Erlangen-Nürnberg
Robert Lahmann VLVnT – Toulon – 24-April-2008
White Rabbit in KM3NeT Mieke Bouwhuis NIKHEF 9th White Rabbit Workshop
The Antares Neutrino Telescope
Acoustic Position Calibration of the KM3NeT Neutrino Telescope
M.Bou-Cabo, J.A. Martínez.-Mora on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration
Calculation of detector characteristics for KM3NeT
ANTARES time calibration
MUPAGE: A fast muon generator
on behalf of the NEMO Collaboration
Nanobeacon: A low cost calibration instrument for KM3NeT
Acoustic Measurements in ANTARES: Status and Aims
Presentation transcript:

Simona Toscano In the frame of KM3NeT consortium VLV T workshop - Toulon, April 2008

2 Dark Room calibration Light sources: LED and Laser Optical Beacon 40 K Optical fibre Absolute timing Timing Calibration Systems What we have learnt from the pilot projects Ideas and studies for Km3NeT Relative Position Calibration Systems Acoustic Method Sea Surface Detector Moon Shadow Absolute Orientation Systems S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/2008 Conclusions

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/ Timing Relative Positioning Absolute OrientationConclusions  Cost?  Needs little labour to implement?  From photocathode up to readout?  Calibration at very low intensity?  Provides self-redundancy? (auto-check)  Provides coincidences (relative timing)?  Works very well with most of the OM designs?  Measures water optical parameters?  Can be used right from the start?  Always reaches desired resolution? F. Salesa’s talk in Parallel Session on Physics on ANTARES time calibration S Koutsoukos’s talk on Calibration from ten to hundreds of meters in an underwater neutrino telescope M. Circella’s talk in this Session on Time Calibration of the NEMO apparatus B. Lubsandorzhiev’s talk in this Session on LED based powerful nanosecond light sources for calibration systems of deep underwater neutrino telescopes For details on timing calibration see:

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/ Timing Relative Positioning Absolute OrientationConclusions ANTARES Dark Room at CPPM: Laser-fibre system, Clock calibration system LEDs in Optical Modules. Cost?  Needs little labour to implement?  From photocathode up to readout? Calibration at very low intensity?  Provides self-redundancy? (auto- check) Provides coincidences (relative timing)? Works very well with most of the OM designs? Measures water optical parameters?  Can be used right from the start? Always reaches desired resolution?

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/ Timing Relative Positioning Absolute OrientationConclusions Cost?  Needs little labour to implement?  From photocathode up to readout? Calibration at very low intensity?  Provides self-redundancy? (auto- check) Provides coincidences (relative timing)? Works very well with most of the OM designs? Measures water optical parameters? Can be used right from the start? Always reaches desired resolution? storey 2 storey 9 storey 15 storey 21 Cost? Needs little labour to implement? From photocathode up to readout? Calibration at very low intensity? Provides self-redundancy? (auto- check) Provides coincidences (relative timing)? Works very well with most of the OM designs? Measures water optical parameters? Can be used right from the start? Always reaches desired resolution? Cost? Needs little labour to implement? From photocathode up to readout? Calibration at very low intensity? Provides self-redundancy? (auto- check) Provides coincidences (relative timing)? Works very well with most of the OM designs? Measures water optical parameters? Can be used right from the start? Always reaches desired resolution? Cost? Needs little labour to implement? From photocathode up to readout? Calibration at very low intensity? Provides self-redundancy? (auto- check) Provides coincidences (relative timing)? Works very well with most of the OM designs? Measures water optical parameters? Can be used right from the start? Always reaches desired resolution? Intra-line calibration Intra-line calibration (may be with just 1 LED per floor?): New uncleaved LED with higher intensity New measurements from ANTARES: 1LED (cleaved) reaches ~150m. Intra-line calibration Intra-line calibration (may be with just 1 LED per floor?): New uncleaved LED with higher intensity New measurements from ANTARES: 1LED (cleaved) reaches ~150m. Collected amplitude times R 2 as a function of the distance R for three LED Beacons located along Line 2. The normalization depends on the LED Beacon intensity which is not the same for the different beacons.

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/ Timing Relative Positioning Absolute OrientationConclusions Cost? Needs little labour to implement? From photocathode up to readout? Calibration at very low intensity? Provides self-redundancy? (auto- check)  Provides coincidences (relative timing)? Works very well with most of the OM designs?  Measures water optical parameters?  Can be used right from the start? Always reaches desired resolution?  Cost? Needs little labour to implement? From photocathode up to readout? Calibration at very low intensity? Provides self-redundancy? (auto- check) Provides coincidences (relative timing)? Works very well with most of the OM designs? Measures water optical parameters? Can be used right from the start? Always reaches desired resolution? e - (  decay) Cherenkov light γ 40 K 40 Ca Always present in sea water Cost? Needs little labour to implement? From photocathode up to readout? Calibration at very low intensity? Provides self-redundancy? (auto- check) Provides coincidences (relative timing)? Works very well with most of the OM designs? Measures water optical parameters? Can be used right from the start? Always reaches desired resolution? coincidences are extremely useful for relative OM calibration. As seen in ANTARES coincidences are extremely useful for relative OM calibration. Coincidences between lines from the same source might be difficult to achieve in some schemes. OM 0 OM 1 OM 2 Taking differences by pairs

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/2008 Multi PMTs in one glass sphere 7 Timing Relative Positioning Absolute OrientationConclusions Cost?  Needs little labour to implement?  From photocathode up to readout? Calibration at very low intensity? Provides self-redundancy? (auto- check)  Provides coincidences (relative timing)? Works very well with most of the OM designs?  Measures water optical parameters?  Can be used right from the start? Always reaches desired resolution? The fibre solution may be too cumbersome if several small PMTs per OM are used For details see M. Circella’s talk on Time Calibration of the NEMO apparatus

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/ Relative timing in Km3NeT Absolute timing in KM3NeT It is required to correlate the events with observations from other instruments (i.e. satellite for GRBs...).Studies indicate that time-stamping at millisecond accuracy is sufficient for this purpose and this is easily achievable with commercially available GPS units. Dark Room 40 KLight Sources Optical fibres Muons Cost?  Needs little labour to implement?  From photocathode up to readout? Calibration at very low intensity?  Provides self-redundancy? (auto- check)   Provides coincidences (relative timing)? Works very well with most of the OM designs?   Measures water optical parameters?  Can be used right from the start?  Always reaches desired resolution?  

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/ Relative Positioning Absolute OrientationConclusions Hydrophones: spatial position accuracy ~ 5 cm Line-shape (based on tilt-meter and compass): accuracy ~ 40 cm. It seems to work well but it should be scaled to KM3NeT Timing Positioning systems used in the pilot projects already reviewed in this session: M. Ardid’s talk on Positioning System of the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope F. Simeone’s talk on The acoustic positioning system for NEMO Phase 2 What we have learnt from pilot projects???  Reduce substantially the number of acoustic emitters (not for all the lines) (  1/5)  Larger distances  lower frequency  Hydrophones: reduce the unit price  Piezos glued to OM:  direct position of the optical module, compasses and tilt-meters probably not needed  more R&D needed (be sure that the optical system does not interfere with the acoustic one and vice-versa), more electronics  Try to reduce the number of tilt-meters and compasses (  50%) + reduction of the unit price

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/ Timing Relative Positioning Absolute OrientationConclusions Two steps: 1.LED Beacons to determine the position of OMs. 2.Acoustic system to determine the position of LOB (with hydrophones mounted on LOB and transponders at the sea bed) Two steps: 1.LED Beacons to determine the position of OMs. 2.Acoustic system to determine the position of LOB (with hydrophones mounted on LOB and transponders at the sea bed) Acoustic-Optical Positioning System: Acoustic-Optical Positioning System: use the LED Beacons in the positioning system. LED Beacon + Acoustic Receiver Autonomous transponder OMs 1 2 ADVANTAGES Reduction of the number of calibration units.DRAWBACKS Interference with the neutrino detector operation Calibration more problematic with light sources. ADVANTAGES Reduction of the number of calibration units.DRAWBACKS Interference with the neutrino detector operation Calibration more problematic with light sources.

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/ To observe celestial objects a precise absolute pointing calibration is needed. Timing Relative Positioning Absolute OrientationConclusions 1.Acoustic Method Measurements of the geographical coordinates (x,y, UMT grid system) give the absolute azimuth of the detector: a surface boat, equipped with an acoustic transducer, determines its own position with a GPS/Galileo receiver and the distance to a given deep-sea transducer by sound transit time. Absolute azimuth accuracy ~ 0.02º Measurements of the depth z give the tilt of the detector: the depth of the acoustic transducer is measured by a pressure sensor located in the anchor of the detection unit and measurements are verified using a ROV equipped with an accurate pressure sensor. A temperature+salinity profile is performed to get the pressure-depth relationship. Absolute tilt angles accuracy ~ 0.01 Absolute pointing accuracy of the telescope better than 0.03º 1.Acoustic Method Measurements of the geographical coordinates (x,y, UMT grid system) give the absolute azimuth of the detector: a surface boat, equipped with an acoustic transducer, determines its own position with a GPS/Galileo receiver and the distance to a given deep-sea transducer by sound transit time. Absolute azimuth accuracy ~ 0.02º Measurements of the depth z give the tilt of the detector: the depth of the acoustic transducer is measured by a pressure sensor located in the anchor of the detection unit and measurements are verified using a ROV equipped with an accurate pressure sensor. A temperature+salinity profile is performed to get the pressure-depth relationship. Absolute tilt angles accuracy ~ 0.01 Absolute pointing accuracy of the telescope better than 0.03º

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/ Timing Relative Positioning Absolute OrientationConclusions 2.Sea Surface Detector 2.Sea Surface Detector [see J-P. Ernenwein’s talk on Study of the calibration potential of HELYCON detectors with ANTARES] The method employs cosmic ray induced showers that contain muons of sufficient energy (E > 2 TeV) to reach the undersea detector. Based on the HELYCON design [ ]. Based on the HELYCON design [ Tsirigotis, A.G. Proceedings of 20th European Cosmic Ray Symposium, Lisbon, Portugal, 5-8 Sep 2006 ]. A Monte Carlo study has been performed to quantify the calibration capabilities of three autonomous detector arrays on floating (4000 m above the telescope) platforms at distances of 150 m from each other. The direction of the shower axis (reconstructed for the surface detector) is compared with the direction of the  (reconstructed for the telescope) Absolute pointing accuracy of the telescope ~ 0.05º in ten days The absolute position can be estimated by measuring the distance between the impact points of the reconstructed  track and the shower axis. The accuracy is better than a meter within a ten day data taking period.

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/ Timing Relative Positioning Absolute OrientationConclusions 3.Looking at the Moon Shadow Since the Moon absorbs cosmic rays, a deficit of atmospheric muons from the direction of the Moon disk (angular radius 0.26º) is expected. Simulations indicate that a 3  effect can be detected in less than 1 year of data-taking with a km 3 detector. 3.Looking at the Moon Shadow Since the Moon absorbs cosmic rays, a deficit of atmospheric muons from the direction of the Moon disk (angular radius 0.26º) is expected. Simulations indicate that a 3  effect can be detected in less than 1 year of data-taking with a km 3 detector. Results from C.Distefano et al., Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A567: , 2006 Moon disk Moon rest frame angular resolution = 0.19º±0.2º

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/ Timing Relative Positioning Absolute OrientationConclusions The angular resolution and the absolute pointing of the detector depends on the timing and position resolutions.  A time accuracy of ~ 2ns and a positioning precision of ~ 40 cm is suitable to achieve the desired angular resolution and pointing accuracy.  The experiences in the pilot projects have been evaluated to implement new ideas and to study the feasibility for KM3NeT.  These ideas have been reviewed: the advantages and drawbacks of each system have been shown.  All these systems are within the guidelines of the KM3NeT Conceptual Design Reports [ ]. The culmination of the current studies on these systems will be a good basis for the design of the calibration systems in the TDR with the final telescope configuration.

15

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/2008 LED Beacons & K40 OM offsets Projection on Y-axis LED beacons K40 Line 1

S.Toscano (IFIC-Valencia) - VLV T08 workshop Toulon, 23/04/2008 LED Beacons & K40 OM offsets LED Beacon 40 K 40 Ca e - (  decay) Cherenkov light  K40 LED beacons K40 LED beacons – K40 Lines 1-5