Logo area 11 T Review: Safety and Codes Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer With contributions by -Frédéric Savary, Hervé Prin, TE-MSC -Carlos Arregui,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standardisation, regulation, worldwide strategies 1 Modules of conformity assessment.
Advertisements

Safety and Health Management Program
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
12/04/2005M.Castoldi CERN-SC International HEP Safety Forum Stanford Linear Accelerator Center ESTABLISHMENT OF A QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN THE CERN.
Safety Management of the LIU Project A. Funken Anne Funken, LIU PT 21/05/15.
Safety & Safety Documentation 2 3 Safety in three Questions Why ? Providing a safe workplace is a legal and moral obligation on every undertaking, and.
1 CHCOHS312A Follow safety procedures for direct care work.
Manfred Kochsiek Wilfried Schulz Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig und Berlin Modernisation of Legal Metrology in Germany.
U D T Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Warsaw June 2004 INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC SYSTEM OF ENSURING.
Certificate in Pipeline Construction, Welding & Inspection LECA LEXTON ENERGY CORPORATE ACADEMY Copyright 2013 Lexton Energy Incorporated PCWI delivered.
André Henriques DGS/SEE LIU-PSB OOSTER. HSE S AFETY C ORRESPONDENT 13 TH S EPTEMBER 2012 September 2012.
REPUBLIC OF CROATIA STATE OFFICE FOR METROLOGY Conformity Assessment Procedures of the „New Approach“ of EU illustrated by the Measuring Instruments Directive.
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
Adverse Event Management from the HSE perspective E. Cennini / DGS-SEE EDMS Id Adverse events Workshop Creating a common understanding.
Overview of the EU Food Safety Requirements
Phare SL Implementation of Technical Regulations on Company Level Top Management Seminar Expert: Willem Wolf Chamber of Commerce and Industry,
© 2015 BELGORAIL 27/04/2015 – BEWAG « Staff (human) in the ECM regulation 445/20111/EU» Staff (human) in the ECM regulation.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Assemblies Intentions and enforcement. Intentions Free movement  CE marking for vessels, accessories and assemblies Well-defined responsibilities  Manufacturer,
Prime Responsibility for Radiation Safety
1 REPUBLIC OF TURKEY PRIME MINISTRY UNDERSECRETARIAT OF FOREIGN TRADE General Directorate of Standardization for Foreign Trade Presented by Selin ÖZŞAHİN.
ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE GENERAL European Commission 1 ATEX Directive 94/9/EC UNECE WP.6 Break-out session on equipment for explosive atmospheres.
1 EARLY SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF PROJECTS AND EXPERIMENTS HSE UNIT PH DSO EDMS No
Approximation of legislation to the internal market acquis An EU funded project managed by European Agency for Reconstruction Directive 89/106/EEC on Construction.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
LS2 Safety Thomas Otto, LS2 Safety Coordinator.
Approximation of legislation to the internal market acquis An EU funded project managed by European Agency for Reconstruction Directive 89/106/EEC on Construction.
19/11/2015 PSB and PS&TT2 Facilities YETS L. Kobzeva.
Last but not least : LS2 General Safety 1 Thomas Otto, LS2 Safety Coordinator for LHC Ana-Paula Bernardes, LS2 Safety Coordinator for Injectors.
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
Safety Documentation Formerly an exotic unknown, today part of the work!
Standards for Technical Educators Occupational Safety & Health.
28 th January LHC Performance Workshop Session 8: (E)YETS and Long Shutdown 2 Strategy and Preparation. General.
Being TSO at CERN Safety at CERN2 Being TSO at CERN – Safety at CERN Safety – what is it ? Safety Policy Safety responsibilities Organisational structure.
C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Technical.
ESS Cryomodule Status Meeting – Elements of Safety | | Christine Darve Elements of Safety Applicable to the ESS 2013 January, 9 th Christine.
Workshop on Accreditation of Bodies Certifying Medical Devices Kiev, November 2014.
CLAUDIA PANAIT TAIEX Expert – European Commission Legal Adviser Ministry of Health, ROMANIA.
Dipl.-Ing. Ogün Uykun TAIEX WORKSHOP - ANKARA
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
Process Safety Management Soft Skills Programme Nexus Alliance Ltd.
Logo area MQXF Review: Safety Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer With contributions by -Paolo Ferrcin and Ezio Todesco, TE-MSC -Francesca Viggiano,
Introduction to the CPR. Transition from CPD to CPR, key dates TAIEX Workshop INT MARKET CPR and CE marking, Baku, 23 and 24 February 2015.
Logo area Compliance with CERN Safety Rules – Role of CERN Health, Safety & Environment protection (HSE) Unit C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE) International.
Workshop on conformity assessment procedures and certification of medical devices INT MARKT Kyiv, November 2011 Conformity assessment of medical.
Logo area MQXF Review: Safety Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer International Review of the Inner Triplet Quadrupoles (MQXF) for HL-LHC.
LS2 Safety Preparation Thomas Otto, LS2 Safety Support Officer for LHC
Cryogenic safety organisation at CERN
Crab Cavity Technical Coordination meeting:
Being TSO at CERN Safety at CERN Being TSO at CERN Safety at CERN.
Strategy for conformity of non-standard cryogenic equipment
Safety in Construction and Upgrade Phases
HSE rules & regulations
EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING
EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING
Third Party Activities for FH1 Project
EP Experiments safety validation process Safety Permits
Thomas Otto, TE Department, CERN
HL-LHC Safety Assessment Process
EU legislation on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
OHS Staff Introduction Training
Assemblies Intentions and enforcement
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson 9th SRF ESS
Mattias Skafar Head of Quality Division
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson 9th SRF ESS
2.1. Monitoring of products placed on the market To verify the products comply with applicable directives EC declaration of conformity and technical.
INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson ESS Accelerator Collaboration Board Meeting Trieste
National Legislation in the Pressure Sector and the PED
Presentation transcript:

logo area 11 T Review: Safety and Codes Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer With contributions by -Frédéric Savary, Hervé Prin, TE-MSC -Carlos Arregui, HSE-SEE -Francesca Viggiano, TE-HDO 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area Contents  CERN Safety Policy  HL-LHC Safety Organisation  HL-LHC Safety Process  Launch Safety Agreement  Pressure Equipment Directive  Next Steps Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area CERN Safety Policy Excellence in matters of Safety Objectives:  to ensure the best possible protection in health and safety matters of all persons participating in the Organization’s activities as well as of the population living in the vicinity;  to limit the impact of the Organization’s activities on the environment, and  to guarantee the use of best practice in matters of Safety. Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area Implementation principles  Organic units are responsible for implementing the Safety policy  HSE unit has the role of providing assistance and independent control  Specialised units have specific tasks (Medical Service, Fire Brigade …)  Establishment of a Safety Management System CERN Safety Policy Excellence in matters of Safety Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area CERN Safety Rules 1.Grant a high level of Safety (European practice in occupational Safety) 2.Take account of the intergovernemental status of the Organization. 3.CERN Safety rules are based on regulations, directives and standards of the European Union, if they exist and are deemed applicable to CERN. 4.For cases not covered by CERN Safety Rules, the regulation applicable in the competent Host State is used. Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area Who is in Charge of Safety ? Means Hierarchical Line Consulting Rules / Advice/ Control Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area Two aspects of Safety ConformityPreventive Workplace Safety EquipmentProcess Standards (ISO, EN, Eur. Dir….)Safety Rules, best practice InspectionHazard identification, risk assessment Report on non-conformitiesSafety Report, action list Make conformApply rules and best practice Conformity marking User manualProcedure manual Training in use of equipmentTraining the process Safety Training Personal Protective Equipment 7 Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area Conformity Issues  Conformity: an item meets the essential requirements of a given (safety) standard  “Equipment X is conform to Standard EN 1234”  Have all relevant items inspected  HSE unit inspection service  Make conform, where necessary  Technical measures  Technical documentation and manuals  Train workers 8 Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area Preventive Workplace Safety  Workplace Safety ascertains that a worker uses a conform equipment in a safe way  Risk Assessment of relevant processes  Technical experts  Safety (support) officers  HSE unit experts  Put into place recommended actions  Establish process manuals  Train workers 9 Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area HL-LHC Safety Process Equipment Conformity  Hazard Identification of operation of the finished item  Launch Safety Agreement, fixing Safety requirements  Design, production, testing  Collect documents for a “Safety File”  Safety Clearance by HSE unit  Install and operate Workplace Safety  Hazard Identification of the production process  Laboratories, Workshops  Production facilities  Test facilities  Workplace Risk Assessment with Action List for Supervisors  Act on recommendations  Produce, test, repair items Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area Resulting Safety Documents Launch Safety AgreementWorkplace Safety Assessment Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area LSA: Applicable Rules and Standards  CERN Safety Rule on Mechanical Equipment SR-M  CERN Safety instruction on Cryogenic Equipment GSI-M4  European Directive 97/23/EC on pressure equipment - Pressure Equipment Directive (PED)97/23/EC  Cryogenic safety assessment before the start of the corresponding cryogenic activities  Assessment contains  a summary of the safety requirements  the documents that are required to demonstrate compliance with these requirements and which complement the safety file. Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area LSA: Documents to Produce  Design & Engineering file:  Risk assessment  Result of design calculations  Design drawings and diagrams of components, circuits  Description and explanations necessary to understand the drawings and diagrams  Cryogenic conformity assessment  Construction / Manufacturing file:  Manufacturing drawings  Material certificates for base materials and welding consumables  Welders certificate and welding procedure approval certificate  Non-destructive testing (NDT) personnel certificate  Records of welding inspections  Pressure report test  Commissioning file:  EC declaration of conformity  EC certification of conformity of pressure relief devices  Instruction manual which shall include information (operation & maintenance instructions)  HSE initial inspection report Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review, This is due a.s.a.p.

logo area 11 T Dipole as seen from a Regulator Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review, Directive 97/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of On the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning pressure equipment

logo area Pressure Equipment Directive  Goal: to assure end-user protection on free European market, applicable also to self-use of equipment.  Essential Safety Requirements  Classification  Conformity Assessment Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area Hazards from Pressure Vessels  Explosive energy: 1000 bar L = 10 5 J ≈250 g TNT  European legislator aims to protect consumers and users from faulty pressure equipment  Involvement of “notified bodies” to verify design, construction and to witness pressure tests. Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area 11 T Cold Mass Classification Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review, PS = 20 bar V = 183 L 50 bar L < PS V < 10 4 bar L → Annex II Table 2 PS V = 3630 bar L > 3000 bar L → Category IV If PS V < 3000 bar L, then Cat III possible Is it possible ? Is it worthwhile ? 17

logo area Conformity Assessment Category IIICategory IV B1 + DB + D B1 + FB + F B + C1G HH1 Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review, Required Conformity Assessment Modules ModuleContent BEC type examination, performed by notified body B1EC design examination, performed by notified body C1Conformity by type DProduction QA, assessed by notified body FProduct Verification, performed by notified body GEC unit Verification, performed by notified body HFull QA, assessed by notified body H1Full QA, design examination and special surveillance of final assessment (notified body)

logo area Next Steps Equipment Conformity  Compile the Design and Engineering File  Agree, with HSE, on exact conditions and modalities of the conformity assessment  Note that a pressure vessel with lHe is not an ordinary one (two phases, complex thermodynamics) Workplace Safety Assessment of Buildings:  Bld 103 (cable production)  Bld 180 (LMF)  SMI 2 (cryostating)  SM-18 (test facility)  not started in progress terminated Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area Thank you for your Attention Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,

logo area Proof (Pressure) Test  Normally, hydraulic p[oof tets are performed at 1.43 times the design pressure  Not possible for cryogenic pressure vessels  Manufacturer has to propse and justify alternative method.  CERN HSE:  pneumatic proof test at 1.25 times the design pressure is appropriate. Thomas Otto, HL-LHC Project Safety Officer, 11 T Magnet Review,